Mrthfx

It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)

When was drinking water recognized as crucial in marathon running?

Borrowing Characters

Sometimes a banana is just a banana

Can we carry rice to Japan?

Did Amazon pay $0 in taxes last year?

Six real numbers so that product of any five is the sixth one

How to lift/raise/repair a segment of concrete slab?

What is this waxed root vegetable?

What are all the squawk codes?

How do you say "powers of ten"?

Inverse of the covariance matrix of a multivariate normal distribution

Plagiarism of code by other PhD student

When an experienced monk meditates how much does their mind wander?

School performs periodic password audits. Is my password compromised?

Roots of chords on the guitar for different inversions/voicings

lead or lag function to get several values, not just the nth

What Does the Heart In Gyms Mean?

Is the withholding of funding notice allowed?

Real life puzzle: Unknown alphabet or shorthand

Citing contemporaneous (interlaced?) preprints

Is it possible to make a clamp function shorter than a ternary in JS?

Why doesn't Object.keys return a keyof type in TypeScript?

Are small insurances worth it

Is there a legal poaching?

There she is, there he is, there you are, and there it isIs there a friendly calling for uncle?Meaning of 'unreserved' for a legal judgementWhat we can use “there” or “over there”Is it correct to say “I have the economic and financial legal capacity”?What is 'pay their way through legal battles'The precise meaning of “legal vortex”Drugs: legal vs illegalmeaning of the phrase “legal no man's land” in contextDifference between 'can we go there' and 'can we go over there'?

3

I heard the illegal poaching being uttered so many times in a TV show, about animals, that my ear of a non-native speaker, made me questioning the validity of the term.

I have made some Ngram research here and looked up _poaching on Wikipedia, but that results haven't given me a satisfactory answer. As a result, I'm still puzzled.

According to Wikipedia, poaching is defined as:

the illegal hunting or capturing of wild animals.

Hence my question: can there be a legal and an illegal poaching?

Please let me know your thoughts on this.

PS: I am familiar with the word poaching since I first watched the movie Robin Hood, starring Kevin Costner, Elizabeth Mastrantonio, Morgan Freeman, etc., almost two decades ago.

meaning-in-context phrase-meaning vocabulary

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

J.R.♦

99.1k8127245

asked 3 hours ago

Lucian SavaLucian Sava

9,063113073

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  There are many pleonasms in daily use: temper tantrum, future prospects, foreign imports. It's best not to get too worked up about idioms; like other free gifts from the past, the English language is not absolutely perfect.
  
  – choster
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

I heard the illegal poaching being uttered so many times in a TV show, about animals, that my ear of a non-native speaker, made me questioning the validity of the term.

I have made some Ngram research here and looked up _poaching on Wikipedia, but that results haven't given me a satisfactory answer. As a result, I'm still puzzled.

According to Wikipedia, poaching is defined as:

the illegal hunting or capturing of wild animals.

Hence my question: can there be a legal and an illegal poaching?

Please let me know your thoughts on this.

PS: I am familiar with the word poaching since I first watched the movie Robin Hood, starring Kevin Costner, Elizabeth Mastrantonio, Morgan Freeman, etc., almost two decades ago.

meaning-in-context phrase-meaning vocabulary

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

J.R.♦

99.1k8127245

asked 3 hours ago

Lucian SavaLucian Sava

9,063113073

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  There are many pleonasms in daily use: temper tantrum, future prospects, foreign imports. It's best not to get too worked up about idioms; like other free gifts from the past, the English language is not absolutely perfect.
  
  – choster
  3 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I heard the illegal poaching being uttered so many times in a TV show, about animals, that my ear of a non-native speaker, made me questioning the validity of the term.

I have made some Ngram research here and looked up _poaching on Wikipedia, but that results haven't given me a satisfactory answer. As a result, I'm still puzzled.

According to Wikipedia, poaching is defined as:

the illegal hunting or capturing of wild animals.

Hence my question: can there be a legal and an illegal poaching?

Please let me know your thoughts on this.

PS: I am familiar with the word poaching since I first watched the movie Robin Hood, starring Kevin Costner, Elizabeth Mastrantonio, Morgan Freeman, etc., almost two decades ago.

meaning-in-context phrase-meaning vocabulary

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

J.R.♦

99.1k8127245

asked 3 hours ago

Lucian SavaLucian Sava

9,063113073

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

J.R.♦

99.1k8127245

asked 3 hours ago

Lucian SavaLucian Sava

9,063113073

share|improve this question

edited 2 hours ago

J.R.♦

99.1k8127245

asked 3 hours ago

Lucian SavaLucian Sava

9,063113073

edited 2 hours ago

J.R.♦

99.1k8127245

edited 2 hours ago

J.R.♦

99.1k8127245

asked 3 hours ago

Lucian SavaLucian Sava

9,063113073

asked 3 hours ago

Lucian SavaLucian Sava

9,063113073

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

3

Poaching is always illegal, so the adjective "illegal" is redundant. There is a (rare) word to describe this kind of redundancy: "Pleonastic". It means using more words than needed.

Many style guides recommend reducing redundancy in your writing: You should say "tuna" not "tuna fish". You should not say "the two twins" (since twins implies two) you do not need to say "new innovations" (since innovations are always new).

But pleonastic expressions are not ungrammatical, and some are very common and natural, especially in speech or less formal writing. Sometimes a writer will use a redundant word to emphasise a point.

There are three types of hunting: Legal trophy hunting, illegal poaching and subsistence hunting for food.

The author wants to emphasise and contrast trophy hunting, which is legal, with poaching, which is illegal.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

James KJames K

37.3k13891

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Hares are classed as wild animals but still hunted for food not as a trophy...
  
  – Solar Mike
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  What is your point? Lots of animals are hunted for food.
  
  – James K
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

1

The very definition of poaching contains the word "illegal", so it is a bit repetitive to say illegal poaching.

the illegal practice of trespassing on another's property to hunt or steal game without the landowner's permission.

Such repetitive constructions are used to add emphasis, but are not technically needed.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

JPhi1618JPhi1618

1113

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199258%2fis-there-a-legal-poaching%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

Poaching is always illegal, so the adjective "illegal" is redundant. There is a (rare) word to describe this kind of redundancy: "Pleonastic". It means using more words than needed.

Many style guides recommend reducing redundancy in your writing: You should say "tuna" not "tuna fish". You should not say "the two twins" (since twins implies two) you do not need to say "new innovations" (since innovations are always new).

But pleonastic expressions are not ungrammatical, and some are very common and natural, especially in speech or less formal writing. Sometimes a writer will use a redundant word to emphasise a point.

There are three types of hunting: Legal trophy hunting, illegal poaching and subsistence hunting for food.

The author wants to emphasise and contrast trophy hunting, which is legal, with poaching, which is illegal.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

James KJames K

37.3k13891

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Hares are classed as wild animals but still hunted for food not as a trophy...
  
  – Solar Mike
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  What is your point? Lots of animals are hunted for food.
  
  – James K
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

Poaching is always illegal, so the adjective "illegal" is redundant. There is a (rare) word to describe this kind of redundancy: "Pleonastic". It means using more words than needed.

Many style guides recommend reducing redundancy in your writing: You should say "tuna" not "tuna fish". You should not say "the two twins" (since twins implies two) you do not need to say "new innovations" (since innovations are always new).

But pleonastic expressions are not ungrammatical, and some are very common and natural, especially in speech or less formal writing. Sometimes a writer will use a redundant word to emphasise a point.

There are three types of hunting: Legal trophy hunting, illegal poaching and subsistence hunting for food.

The author wants to emphasise and contrast trophy hunting, which is legal, with poaching, which is illegal.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

James KJames K

37.3k13891

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Hares are classed as wild animals but still hunted for food not as a trophy...
  
  – Solar Mike
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  What is your point? Lots of animals are hunted for food.
  
  – James K
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Poaching is always illegal, so the adjective "illegal" is redundant. There is a (rare) word to describe this kind of redundancy: "Pleonastic". It means using more words than needed.

Many style guides recommend reducing redundancy in your writing: You should say "tuna" not "tuna fish". You should not say "the two twins" (since twins implies two) you do not need to say "new innovations" (since innovations are always new).

But pleonastic expressions are not ungrammatical, and some are very common and natural, especially in speech or less formal writing. Sometimes a writer will use a redundant word to emphasise a point.

There are three types of hunting: Legal trophy hunting, illegal poaching and subsistence hunting for food.

The author wants to emphasise and contrast trophy hunting, which is legal, with poaching, which is illegal.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

James KJames K

37.3k13891

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

James KJames K

37.3k13891

answered 3 hours ago

James KJames K

37.3k13891

answered 3 hours ago

James KJames K

37.3k13891

1

The very definition of poaching contains the word "illegal", so it is a bit repetitive to say illegal poaching.

the illegal practice of trespassing on another's property to hunt or steal game without the landowner's permission.

Such repetitive constructions are used to add emphasis, but are not technically needed.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

JPhi1618JPhi1618

1113

add a comment | 

1

The very definition of poaching contains the word "illegal", so it is a bit repetitive to say illegal poaching.

the illegal practice of trespassing on another's property to hunt or steal game without the landowner's permission.

Such repetitive constructions are used to add emphasis, but are not technically needed.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

JPhi1618JPhi1618

1113

add a comment | 

The very definition of poaching contains the word "illegal", so it is a bit repetitive to say illegal poaching.

the illegal practice of trespassing on another's property to hunt or steal game without the landowner's permission.

Such repetitive constructions are used to add emphasis, but are not technically needed.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

JPhi1618JPhi1618

1113

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

JPhi1618JPhi1618

1113

answered 3 hours ago

JPhi1618JPhi1618

1113

answered 3 hours ago

JPhi1618JPhi1618

1113