Why would a new[] expression ever invoke a destructor?About constructors/destructors and new/delete operators...
PTIJ: Haman's bad computer
How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?
Do the primes contain an infinite almost arithmetic progression?
Why Shazam when there is already Superman?
Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?
Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience
Why can Carol Danvers change her suit colours in the first place?
How to cover method return statement in Apex Class?
Why would a new[] expression ever invoke a destructor?
What if you are holding an Iron Flask with a demon inside and walk into Antimagic Field?
Temporarily disable WLAN internet access for children, but allow it for adults
What are the balance implications behind making invisible things auto-hide?
User Story breakdown - Technical Task + User Feature
Angel of Condemnation - Exile creature with second ability
Why is this estimator biased?
Calculate sum of polynomial roots
Yosemite Fire Rings - What to Expect?
When were female captains banned from Starfleet?
Why is the "ls" command showing permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?
Fear of getting stuck on one programming language / technology that is not used in my country
Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank
Quasinilpotent , non-compact operators
Why is short-wave infrared portion of electromagnetic spectrum so sensitive to fire?
Probability that THHT occurs in a sequence of 10 coin tosses
Why would a new[] expression ever invoke a destructor?
About constructors/destructors and new/delete operators in C++ for custom objectsDoes delete call the destructor?Overloading operator delete in a base classWhen is %destructor invoked in BISON?Why should C++ programmers minimize use of 'new'?Why is ::operator new[] necessary when ::operator new is enough?Why am I permitted to declare an object with a deleted destructor?Does delete[] deallocate memory in one shot after invoking destructors?Why are non-placement `new` and `delete` built into the language and not just regular functions?Why deallocation function is not called when object constructor throw in a new expression?
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
add a comment |
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
add a comment |
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
From the C++17 standard (draft here), [expr.new]:
If the new-expression creates an object or an array of objects of class type, access and ambiguity control are done for the allocation function, the deallocation function, and the constructor. If the new-expression creates an array of objects of class type, the destructor is potentially invoked.
Why would new[] invoke a destructor? It's new, after all. It isn't delete.
c++ c++17 new-operator
c++ c++17 new-operator
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
edited 1 hour ago
Cody Gray♦
195k35382470
195k35382470
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
asked 1 hour ago
thbthb
8,66932355
8,66932355
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55307381%2fwhy-would-a-new-expression-ever-invoke-a-destructor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
add a comment |
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
add a comment |
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
If construction of any object in the buffer throws an exception, the previously constructed objects must be destructed. That requires an available destructor.
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
edited 1 hour ago
Sombrero Chicken
24.4k33281
24.4k33281
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
answered 1 hour ago
StoryTellerStoryTeller
103k12215280
103k12215280
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55307381%2fwhy-would-a-new-expression-ever-invoke-a-destructor%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
