Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?

In Linux what happens if 1000 files in a directory are moved to another location while another 300 files were added to the source directory?

What's a good word to describe a public place that looks like it wouldn't be rough?

Replacement expressions

My cat mixes up floors. How can I help him?

Cat is tipping over bed-side lamps during the night

Graph with overlapping labels

What would the chemical name be for C13H8Cl3NO

Positioning node within rectangle Tikz

It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)

How can animals be objects of ethics without being subjects as well?

Why did Democrats in the Senate oppose the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (2019 S.130)?

speculum - A simple, straightforward Arch Linux mirror list optimizer

Transpose a matrix and parenthesis

Does a phylactery of a lich have to be a box?

What is causing the chain skip after chain replacement?

Using only 1s, make 29 with the minimum number of digits

A starship is travelling at 0.9c and collides with a small rock. Will it leave a clean hole through, or will more happen?

Can a person refuse a presidential pardon?

How would an AI self awareness kill switch work?

kill -0 <PID> は何をするのでしょうか？

Can we use the stored gravitational potential energy of a building to produce power?

Why is Agricola named as such?

Can a long polymer chain interact with itself via van der Waals forces?

Is the timing of the US-North-Korea summit in Vietnam and Michael Cohen's testimony in Congress coincidence?

Aid to North KoreaWhy are many of the roofs in North Korea blue?Does North Korea accept asylum seekers?What's the relationship between North Korea and RussiaHow will Trump’s tariffs affect North Korea?Who negotiated the release of the prisoners out of North Korea?Did North Korea say “we will meet you on the nuclear battlefield”, causing Trump to cancel June 12 summit?Why does North Korea frequently send teams to the Olympics?Letter from North KoreaHow Could Michael Cohen Stand to Benefit by Lying to Congress Again

7

1

Both event happened more or less at the same time. I wonder if this is a coincidence? In particular, was the summit arranged by Trump at the same time as the hearing, perhaps to distract attention from it? Or is it perhaps the opposite, i.e. Congress timing the hearing when the summit was taking place, so as to undermine Trumps' potential success in the NK issue? Is there any evidence of any arrangement of this sort?

united-states donald-trump congress north-korea

share|improve this question

asked 5 hours ago

luchonacholuchonacho

1,6551728

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I am speculating that it has more to do with the 2020 presidential season. The Cohen meeting is step one of a 12 month plan for primary season effect. I think it is a coincidence because it would be too hard to precisely plan either event. For example, Trump had a magic wand so that he could control the schedule of 2 sovereign countries (Vietnam and N. Korea) to coincide with the hearing, or did the congressional leader have a magic wand that could control the justice department and the schedule of numerous congress people?
  
  – Frank Cedeno
  1 hour ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Maybe it's better to rephrase it asking if there's evidence that someone coordinated it to be like this. It's hard to prove something is coincidence but in the differently phrased question we could say there is no such evidence.
  
  – JJJ
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

7

1

Both event happened more or less at the same time. I wonder if this is a coincidence? In particular, was the summit arranged by Trump at the same time as the hearing, perhaps to distract attention from it? Or is it perhaps the opposite, i.e. Congress timing the hearing when the summit was taking place, so as to undermine Trumps' potential success in the NK issue? Is there any evidence of any arrangement of this sort?

united-states donald-trump congress north-korea

share|improve this question

asked 5 hours ago

luchonacholuchonacho

1,6551728

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I am speculating that it has more to do with the 2020 presidential season. The Cohen meeting is step one of a 12 month plan for primary season effect. I think it is a coincidence because it would be too hard to precisely plan either event. For example, Trump had a magic wand so that he could control the schedule of 2 sovereign countries (Vietnam and N. Korea) to coincide with the hearing, or did the congressional leader have a magic wand that could control the justice department and the schedule of numerous congress people?
  
  – Frank Cedeno
  1 hour ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Maybe it's better to rephrase it asking if there's evidence that someone coordinated it to be like this. It's hard to prove something is coincidence but in the differently phrased question we could say there is no such evidence.
  
  – JJJ
  1 hour ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Both event happened more or less at the same time. I wonder if this is a coincidence? In particular, was the summit arranged by Trump at the same time as the hearing, perhaps to distract attention from it? Or is it perhaps the opposite, i.e. Congress timing the hearing when the summit was taking place, so as to undermine Trumps' potential success in the NK issue? Is there any evidence of any arrangement of this sort?

united-states donald-trump congress north-korea

share|improve this question

asked 5 hours ago

luchonacholuchonacho

1,6551728

share|improve this question

asked 5 hours ago

luchonacholuchonacho

1,6551728

share|improve this question

asked 5 hours ago

luchonacholuchonacho

1,6551728

asked 5 hours ago

luchonacholuchonacho

1,6551728

asked 5 hours ago

luchonacholuchonacho

1,6551728

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

4

It's highly unlikely it was anything but a coincidence. While they both happened on the same day, it's important to remember that neither event can simply be executed on short notice. Consider

Congressional Testimony

Requires scheduling of

• The committee members (typically a dozen or so members)


• The person testifying

Cohen was originally set to testify on Feb 7 but that was postponed by Cohen, who felt threatened by Trump and his legal team. On Feb 20, Cohen accepted Feb 27 as a new date.

Diplomatic Events

Requires scheduling of

• The President


• The foreign entourage (in this case DPRK officials, who prefer to travel by train)


• The host country

The summit was announced in Jan, and appears to have been set for the 27th on Feb 16, some 4 days before Cohen's revised date.

In order for this to not be a coincidence, you would have to believe that Cohen or Democrats wanted to do this opposite the the Summit. That makes little sense, since coverage of Cohen's testimony (which was not beneficial to Trump) was diminished somewhat by coverage of the Summit (which was beneficial for Trump).

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

MachavityMachavity

17.6k55484

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I agree that this was likely coincidental, but your last paragraph also allows the possibility that they wanted to diminish the positive coverage of the summit, rather than be diminished by it as you put it.
  
  – Geobits
  15 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Geobits Not really. Trump's story had the potential to be much larger and overshadow the Cohen story entirely. Indeed. some were afraid Trump would take any deal just to have one to dominate the news cycle. Trump walking away empty-handed left some oxygen for the Cohen story
  
  – Machavity
  2 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39108%2fis-the-timing-of-the-us-north-korea-summit-in-vietnam-and-michael-cohens-testim%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

4

It's highly unlikely it was anything but a coincidence. While they both happened on the same day, it's important to remember that neither event can simply be executed on short notice. Consider

Congressional Testimony

Requires scheduling of

• The committee members (typically a dozen or so members)


• The person testifying

Cohen was originally set to testify on Feb 7 but that was postponed by Cohen, who felt threatened by Trump and his legal team. On Feb 20, Cohen accepted Feb 27 as a new date.

Diplomatic Events

Requires scheduling of

• The President


• The foreign entourage (in this case DPRK officials, who prefer to travel by train)


• The host country

The summit was announced in Jan, and appears to have been set for the 27th on Feb 16, some 4 days before Cohen's revised date.

In order for this to not be a coincidence, you would have to believe that Cohen or Democrats wanted to do this opposite the the Summit. That makes little sense, since coverage of Cohen's testimony (which was not beneficial to Trump) was diminished somewhat by coverage of the Summit (which was beneficial for Trump).

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

MachavityMachavity

17.6k55484

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I agree that this was likely coincidental, but your last paragraph also allows the possibility that they wanted to diminish the positive coverage of the summit, rather than be diminished by it as you put it.
  
  – Geobits
  15 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Geobits Not really. Trump's story had the potential to be much larger and overshadow the Cohen story entirely. Indeed. some were afraid Trump would take any deal just to have one to dominate the news cycle. Trump walking away empty-handed left some oxygen for the Cohen story
  
  – Machavity
  2 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

4

It's highly unlikely it was anything but a coincidence. While they both happened on the same day, it's important to remember that neither event can simply be executed on short notice. Consider

Congressional Testimony

Requires scheduling of

• The committee members (typically a dozen or so members)


• The person testifying

Cohen was originally set to testify on Feb 7 but that was postponed by Cohen, who felt threatened by Trump and his legal team. On Feb 20, Cohen accepted Feb 27 as a new date.

Diplomatic Events

Requires scheduling of

• The President


• The foreign entourage (in this case DPRK officials, who prefer to travel by train)


• The host country

The summit was announced in Jan, and appears to have been set for the 27th on Feb 16, some 4 days before Cohen's revised date.

In order for this to not be a coincidence, you would have to believe that Cohen or Democrats wanted to do this opposite the the Summit. That makes little sense, since coverage of Cohen's testimony (which was not beneficial to Trump) was diminished somewhat by coverage of the Summit (which was beneficial for Trump).

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

MachavityMachavity

17.6k55484

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I agree that this was likely coincidental, but your last paragraph also allows the possibility that they wanted to diminish the positive coverage of the summit, rather than be diminished by it as you put it.
  
  – Geobits
  15 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @Geobits Not really. Trump's story had the potential to be much larger and overshadow the Cohen story entirely. Indeed. some were afraid Trump would take any deal just to have one to dominate the news cycle. Trump walking away empty-handed left some oxygen for the Cohen story
  
  – Machavity
  2 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

It's highly unlikely it was anything but a coincidence. While they both happened on the same day, it's important to remember that neither event can simply be executed on short notice. Consider

Congressional Testimony

Requires scheduling of

• The committee members (typically a dozen or so members)


• The person testifying

Cohen was originally set to testify on Feb 7 but that was postponed by Cohen, who felt threatened by Trump and his legal team. On Feb 20, Cohen accepted Feb 27 as a new date.

Diplomatic Events

Requires scheduling of

• The President


• The foreign entourage (in this case DPRK officials, who prefer to travel by train)


• The host country

The summit was announced in Jan, and appears to have been set for the 27th on Feb 16, some 4 days before Cohen's revised date.

In order for this to not be a coincidence, you would have to believe that Cohen or Democrats wanted to do this opposite the the Summit. That makes little sense, since coverage of Cohen's testimony (which was not beneficial to Trump) was diminished somewhat by coverage of the Summit (which was beneficial for Trump).

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

MachavityMachavity

17.6k55484

share|improve this answer

answered 1 hour ago

MachavityMachavity

17.6k55484

answered 1 hour ago

MachavityMachavity

17.6k55484

answered 1 hour ago

MachavityMachavity

17.6k55484