The Ohm's law calculations of the parts do not agree with the wholeOhm's Law for voltage dividerWhy doesn't...

Every subset equal to original set?

Was it really inappropriate to write a pull request for the company I interviewed with?

Is divide-by-zero a security vulnerability?

Giving a talk in my old university, how prominently should I tell students my salary?

Is every open circuit a capacitor?

Did Amazon pay $0 in taxes last year?

Sometimes a banana is just a banana

Can an earth elemental drown/bury its opponent underground using earth glide?

Where is this quote about overcoming the impossible said in "Interstellar"?

Do AL rules let me pick different starting equipment?

Practical reasons to have both a large police force and bounty hunting network?

Create chunks from an array

What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?

I encountered my boss during an on-site interview at another company. Should I bring it up when seeing him next time?

How can I handle a player who pre-plans arguments about my rulings on RAW?

Lock enemy's y-axis when using Vector3.MoveTowards to follow the player

What could be a means to defeat a childrens’ nightmare?

How to fix my table, centering of columns

How to use math.log10 function on whole pandas dataframe

What does each site of a vanilla 9.1 installation do?

Why do phishing e-mails use faked e-mail addresses instead of the real one?

Why is my Contribution Detail Report (native CiviCRM Core report) not accurate?

Are small insurances worth it

How to disable or uninstall iTunes under High Sierra without disabling SIP



The Ohm's law calculations of the parts do not agree with the whole


Ohm's Law for voltage dividerWhy doesn't it matter if a resistor is before or behind an LED wrt voltage drop?brief explanation of Ohm's lawOhm's Law confusion — can there be voltage without current?Voltage Drop Between Battery and LoadPlacing just an LED in a circuit?Voltage drops are not adding up to voltage of the sourceHow is open-circuit voltage calculated?What is the problem with this circuit? ( MOSFET + OPAMP) Battery protection circuit (draw current from battery)Resistor for buzzer current consumption limiting calculation













0












$begingroup$


In the circuit below, the Ohm's law calculations of the parts do not agree with the whole:




  1. the voltage drops of the parts do not add up to the total voltage, and

  2. the current does not calculate to be the same throughout the entire circuit.


Why? Actual VOM readings are in red and done with a digital VOM.



Circuit anomaly










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What instrument was used to measure the voltages?
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I assume you realize that I should have asked "Why?" before adding the last sentence, but I can see how that might be confusing. Maybe I can still edit my original comment and put "why?" in the correct place. The device I used is a E SUN DT830 Digital Multimeter.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanity Check
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is there a resistance or loss between the components? Meaning if you check from the lead of 1 bulb to the other lead of the other is there a loss there? Is there a voltage drop between the last bulb and the battery? Voltage doesn't just disappear there is something that is measured when you measure both that is not being measured when measuring individually. If not then you have a bad meter.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Fay
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Mine was a poorly-phrased request for instrument type and model number -- because a meter with an offset could give you results such as you see. Voltage loss in the wires, or shooting at a moving target as the battery voltage decreases, is much more likely.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago
















0












$begingroup$


In the circuit below, the Ohm's law calculations of the parts do not agree with the whole:




  1. the voltage drops of the parts do not add up to the total voltage, and

  2. the current does not calculate to be the same throughout the entire circuit.


Why? Actual VOM readings are in red and done with a digital VOM.



Circuit anomaly










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What instrument was used to measure the voltages?
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I assume you realize that I should have asked "Why?" before adding the last sentence, but I can see how that might be confusing. Maybe I can still edit my original comment and put "why?" in the correct place. The device I used is a E SUN DT830 Digital Multimeter.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanity Check
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is there a resistance or loss between the components? Meaning if you check from the lead of 1 bulb to the other lead of the other is there a loss there? Is there a voltage drop between the last bulb and the battery? Voltage doesn't just disappear there is something that is measured when you measure both that is not being measured when measuring individually. If not then you have a bad meter.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Fay
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Mine was a poorly-phrased request for instrument type and model number -- because a meter with an offset could give you results such as you see. Voltage loss in the wires, or shooting at a moving target as the battery voltage decreases, is much more likely.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago














0












0








0





$begingroup$


In the circuit below, the Ohm's law calculations of the parts do not agree with the whole:




  1. the voltage drops of the parts do not add up to the total voltage, and

  2. the current does not calculate to be the same throughout the entire circuit.


Why? Actual VOM readings are in red and done with a digital VOM.



Circuit anomaly










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




In the circuit below, the Ohm's law calculations of the parts do not agree with the whole:




  1. the voltage drops of the parts do not add up to the total voltage, and

  2. the current does not calculate to be the same throughout the entire circuit.


Why? Actual VOM readings are in red and done with a digital VOM.



Circuit anomaly







voltage voltage-measurement






share|improve this question









New contributor




Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Dave Tweed

120k9149257




120k9149257






New contributor




Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 1 hour ago









Sanity CheckSanity Check

43




43




New contributor




Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Sanity Check is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What instrument was used to measure the voltages?
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I assume you realize that I should have asked "Why?" before adding the last sentence, but I can see how that might be confusing. Maybe I can still edit my original comment and put "why?" in the correct place. The device I used is a E SUN DT830 Digital Multimeter.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanity Check
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is there a resistance or loss between the components? Meaning if you check from the lead of 1 bulb to the other lead of the other is there a loss there? Is there a voltage drop between the last bulb and the battery? Voltage doesn't just disappear there is something that is measured when you measure both that is not being measured when measuring individually. If not then you have a bad meter.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Fay
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Mine was a poorly-phrased request for instrument type and model number -- because a meter with an offset could give you results such as you see. Voltage loss in the wires, or shooting at a moving target as the battery voltage decreases, is much more likely.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What instrument was used to measure the voltages?
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    I assume you realize that I should have asked "Why?" before adding the last sentence, but I can see how that might be confusing. Maybe I can still edit my original comment and put "why?" in the correct place. The device I used is a E SUN DT830 Digital Multimeter.
    $endgroup$
    – Sanity Check
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Is there a resistance or loss between the components? Meaning if you check from the lead of 1 bulb to the other lead of the other is there a loss there? Is there a voltage drop between the last bulb and the battery? Voltage doesn't just disappear there is something that is measured when you measure both that is not being measured when measuring individually. If not then you have a bad meter.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Fay
    1 hour ago












  • $begingroup$
    Mine was a poorly-phrased request for instrument type and model number -- because a meter with an offset could give you results such as you see. Voltage loss in the wires, or shooting at a moving target as the battery voltage decreases, is much more likely.
    $endgroup$
    – TimWescott
    1 hour ago








1




1




$begingroup$
What instrument was used to measure the voltages?
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
What instrument was used to measure the voltages?
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
I assume you realize that I should have asked "Why?" before adding the last sentence, but I can see how that might be confusing. Maybe I can still edit my original comment and put "why?" in the correct place. The device I used is a E SUN DT830 Digital Multimeter.
$endgroup$
– Sanity Check
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
I assume you realize that I should have asked "Why?" before adding the last sentence, but I can see how that might be confusing. Maybe I can still edit my original comment and put "why?" in the correct place. The device I used is a E SUN DT830 Digital Multimeter.
$endgroup$
– Sanity Check
1 hour ago






1




1




$begingroup$
Is there a resistance or loss between the components? Meaning if you check from the lead of 1 bulb to the other lead of the other is there a loss there? Is there a voltage drop between the last bulb and the battery? Voltage doesn't just disappear there is something that is measured when you measure both that is not being measured when measuring individually. If not then you have a bad meter.
$endgroup$
– Robert Fay
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
Is there a resistance or loss between the components? Meaning if you check from the lead of 1 bulb to the other lead of the other is there a loss there? Is there a voltage drop between the last bulb and the battery? Voltage doesn't just disappear there is something that is measured when you measure both that is not being measured when measuring individually. If not then you have a bad meter.
$endgroup$
– Robert Fay
1 hour ago














$begingroup$
Mine was a poorly-phrased request for instrument type and model number -- because a meter with an offset could give you results such as you see. Voltage loss in the wires, or shooting at a moving target as the battery voltage decreases, is much more likely.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Mine was a poorly-phrased request for instrument type and model number -- because a meter with an offset could give you results such as you see. Voltage loss in the wires, or shooting at a moving target as the battery voltage decreases, is much more likely.
$endgroup$
– TimWescott
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

the most probable causses for the discrepancies are the following:




  1. The DT830 is not known as a quality meter. Inaccuracies in the readings are one cause of the problem.

  2. You are drawing almost 300 ma from a D battery. At that level the voltage of the battery will tend to drop fairly quickly. Depending on how fast you take the measurements, the readings can vary due to that factor. Note that your own readings show a 0.2 drop in voltage from no load to full load.
    As a test of your meter try measuring the voltage of each of your D cells and compare it to the total voltage.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    Ohm's Law and KVL always applies but the voltage drop is nonlinear with time due to thermal effects so bulbs never match perfectly and the voltages are never equal.



    Bulbs are nonlinear PTC ( positive temp coefficient ) conductors that rise in R by 10x at rated power with temperatures of say 2500'K.



    So R (hot/cold) ratio ~ 10:1 for bright warm white light (hot) and room temp (cold).



    This means if you put two 6V bulbs in series with a 6V battery, you will never ever get 3V each.



    The bulb with even the slightest higher cold resistance heats up faster in temperature will rise in resistance faster and thus drop more voltage than the other bulb, resulting in a runaway condition where that bulb will have full power and the other about 10 %. Putting a resistor in series as you have done reduces the balance difference between R cold= est. 0.5 Ohms and R hot est= 5 Ohms x 0.3A 1.5V



    Although this is the extreme case where the bulbs are most sensitive to resistance changes at half voltage, it means your measurements probably changed while you were taking the readings.



    Is it repeatable? Is it stable? Measure again.



    If the load voltage is 5.9V @ 0.3A and the no-load Vbat=6.1V then the 4 battery cells have an internal resistance ESR = 0.2V/0.3A= 0.67 Ohms total.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      let me run a quick simulation to prove that
      $endgroup$
      – Sunnyskyguy EE75
      1 hour ago










    • $begingroup$
      Close approximation tinyurl.com/yxvdmqyk
      $endgroup$
      – Sunnyskyguy EE75
      46 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      Here using 1.05W@3V bulb and 1.1W bulb @ 3V tinyurl.com/y6etgsxk
      $endgroup$
      – Sunnyskyguy EE75
      36 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      Wow, give me a chance to digest all that. Very sharp action diagram, but with my limited knowledge I don't see the + end distinguished on the circuits. And right now the wife says dinner is ready...later!
      $endgroup$
      – Sanity Check
      17 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      a nitpick: saying that "Ohm's [l]aw always applies" is a heavy overstatement. No physical "law" known to human always applies. Every "law" is just a model - and every model is false, because every model is just an approximation - albeit some, as OL or KVL, are indeed extremely useful.
      $endgroup$
      – vaxquis
      1 min ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    });
    }, "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Sanity Check is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f425985%2fthe-ohms-law-calculations-of-the-parts-do-not-agree-with-the-whole%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4












    $begingroup$

    the most probable causses for the discrepancies are the following:




    1. The DT830 is not known as a quality meter. Inaccuracies in the readings are one cause of the problem.

    2. You are drawing almost 300 ma from a D battery. At that level the voltage of the battery will tend to drop fairly quickly. Depending on how fast you take the measurements, the readings can vary due to that factor. Note that your own readings show a 0.2 drop in voltage from no load to full load.
      As a test of your meter try measuring the voltage of each of your D cells and compare it to the total voltage.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      the most probable causses for the discrepancies are the following:




      1. The DT830 is not known as a quality meter. Inaccuracies in the readings are one cause of the problem.

      2. You are drawing almost 300 ma from a D battery. At that level the voltage of the battery will tend to drop fairly quickly. Depending on how fast you take the measurements, the readings can vary due to that factor. Note that your own readings show a 0.2 drop in voltage from no load to full load.
        As a test of your meter try measuring the voltage of each of your D cells and compare it to the total voltage.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        the most probable causses for the discrepancies are the following:




        1. The DT830 is not known as a quality meter. Inaccuracies in the readings are one cause of the problem.

        2. You are drawing almost 300 ma from a D battery. At that level the voltage of the battery will tend to drop fairly quickly. Depending on how fast you take the measurements, the readings can vary due to that factor. Note that your own readings show a 0.2 drop in voltage from no load to full load.
          As a test of your meter try measuring the voltage of each of your D cells and compare it to the total voltage.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        the most probable causses for the discrepancies are the following:




        1. The DT830 is not known as a quality meter. Inaccuracies in the readings are one cause of the problem.

        2. You are drawing almost 300 ma from a D battery. At that level the voltage of the battery will tend to drop fairly quickly. Depending on how fast you take the measurements, the readings can vary due to that factor. Note that your own readings show a 0.2 drop in voltage from no load to full load.
          As a test of your meter try measuring the voltage of each of your D cells and compare it to the total voltage.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 1 hour ago









        Dave Tweed

        120k9149257




        120k9149257










        answered 1 hour ago









        BarryBarry

        9,95211516




        9,95211516

























            1












            $begingroup$

            Ohm's Law and KVL always applies but the voltage drop is nonlinear with time due to thermal effects so bulbs never match perfectly and the voltages are never equal.



            Bulbs are nonlinear PTC ( positive temp coefficient ) conductors that rise in R by 10x at rated power with temperatures of say 2500'K.



            So R (hot/cold) ratio ~ 10:1 for bright warm white light (hot) and room temp (cold).



            This means if you put two 6V bulbs in series with a 6V battery, you will never ever get 3V each.



            The bulb with even the slightest higher cold resistance heats up faster in temperature will rise in resistance faster and thus drop more voltage than the other bulb, resulting in a runaway condition where that bulb will have full power and the other about 10 %. Putting a resistor in series as you have done reduces the balance difference between R cold= est. 0.5 Ohms and R hot est= 5 Ohms x 0.3A 1.5V



            Although this is the extreme case where the bulbs are most sensitive to resistance changes at half voltage, it means your measurements probably changed while you were taking the readings.



            Is it repeatable? Is it stable? Measure again.



            If the load voltage is 5.9V @ 0.3A and the no-load Vbat=6.1V then the 4 battery cells have an internal resistance ESR = 0.2V/0.3A= 0.67 Ohms total.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              let me run a quick simulation to prove that
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Close approximation tinyurl.com/yxvdmqyk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              46 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Here using 1.05W@3V bulb and 1.1W bulb @ 3V tinyurl.com/y6etgsxk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              36 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, give me a chance to digest all that. Very sharp action diagram, but with my limited knowledge I don't see the + end distinguished on the circuits. And right now the wife says dinner is ready...later!
              $endgroup$
              – Sanity Check
              17 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              a nitpick: saying that "Ohm's [l]aw always applies" is a heavy overstatement. No physical "law" known to human always applies. Every "law" is just a model - and every model is false, because every model is just an approximation - albeit some, as OL or KVL, are indeed extremely useful.
              $endgroup$
              – vaxquis
              1 min ago
















            1












            $begingroup$

            Ohm's Law and KVL always applies but the voltage drop is nonlinear with time due to thermal effects so bulbs never match perfectly and the voltages are never equal.



            Bulbs are nonlinear PTC ( positive temp coefficient ) conductors that rise in R by 10x at rated power with temperatures of say 2500'K.



            So R (hot/cold) ratio ~ 10:1 for bright warm white light (hot) and room temp (cold).



            This means if you put two 6V bulbs in series with a 6V battery, you will never ever get 3V each.



            The bulb with even the slightest higher cold resistance heats up faster in temperature will rise in resistance faster and thus drop more voltage than the other bulb, resulting in a runaway condition where that bulb will have full power and the other about 10 %. Putting a resistor in series as you have done reduces the balance difference between R cold= est. 0.5 Ohms and R hot est= 5 Ohms x 0.3A 1.5V



            Although this is the extreme case where the bulbs are most sensitive to resistance changes at half voltage, it means your measurements probably changed while you were taking the readings.



            Is it repeatable? Is it stable? Measure again.



            If the load voltage is 5.9V @ 0.3A and the no-load Vbat=6.1V then the 4 battery cells have an internal resistance ESR = 0.2V/0.3A= 0.67 Ohms total.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              let me run a quick simulation to prove that
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Close approximation tinyurl.com/yxvdmqyk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              46 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Here using 1.05W@3V bulb and 1.1W bulb @ 3V tinyurl.com/y6etgsxk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              36 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, give me a chance to digest all that. Very sharp action diagram, but with my limited knowledge I don't see the + end distinguished on the circuits. And right now the wife says dinner is ready...later!
              $endgroup$
              – Sanity Check
              17 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              a nitpick: saying that "Ohm's [l]aw always applies" is a heavy overstatement. No physical "law" known to human always applies. Every "law" is just a model - and every model is false, because every model is just an approximation - albeit some, as OL or KVL, are indeed extremely useful.
              $endgroup$
              – vaxquis
              1 min ago














            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Ohm's Law and KVL always applies but the voltage drop is nonlinear with time due to thermal effects so bulbs never match perfectly and the voltages are never equal.



            Bulbs are nonlinear PTC ( positive temp coefficient ) conductors that rise in R by 10x at rated power with temperatures of say 2500'K.



            So R (hot/cold) ratio ~ 10:1 for bright warm white light (hot) and room temp (cold).



            This means if you put two 6V bulbs in series with a 6V battery, you will never ever get 3V each.



            The bulb with even the slightest higher cold resistance heats up faster in temperature will rise in resistance faster and thus drop more voltage than the other bulb, resulting in a runaway condition where that bulb will have full power and the other about 10 %. Putting a resistor in series as you have done reduces the balance difference between R cold= est. 0.5 Ohms and R hot est= 5 Ohms x 0.3A 1.5V



            Although this is the extreme case where the bulbs are most sensitive to resistance changes at half voltage, it means your measurements probably changed while you were taking the readings.



            Is it repeatable? Is it stable? Measure again.



            If the load voltage is 5.9V @ 0.3A and the no-load Vbat=6.1V then the 4 battery cells have an internal resistance ESR = 0.2V/0.3A= 0.67 Ohms total.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Ohm's Law and KVL always applies but the voltage drop is nonlinear with time due to thermal effects so bulbs never match perfectly and the voltages are never equal.



            Bulbs are nonlinear PTC ( positive temp coefficient ) conductors that rise in R by 10x at rated power with temperatures of say 2500'K.



            So R (hot/cold) ratio ~ 10:1 for bright warm white light (hot) and room temp (cold).



            This means if you put two 6V bulbs in series with a 6V battery, you will never ever get 3V each.



            The bulb with even the slightest higher cold resistance heats up faster in temperature will rise in resistance faster and thus drop more voltage than the other bulb, resulting in a runaway condition where that bulb will have full power and the other about 10 %. Putting a resistor in series as you have done reduces the balance difference between R cold= est. 0.5 Ohms and R hot est= 5 Ohms x 0.3A 1.5V



            Although this is the extreme case where the bulbs are most sensitive to resistance changes at half voltage, it means your measurements probably changed while you were taking the readings.



            Is it repeatable? Is it stable? Measure again.



            If the load voltage is 5.9V @ 0.3A and the no-load Vbat=6.1V then the 4 battery cells have an internal resistance ESR = 0.2V/0.3A= 0.67 Ohms total.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 34 mins ago

























            answered 1 hour ago









            Sunnyskyguy EE75Sunnyskyguy EE75

            68k22398




            68k22398












            • $begingroup$
              let me run a quick simulation to prove that
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Close approximation tinyurl.com/yxvdmqyk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              46 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Here using 1.05W@3V bulb and 1.1W bulb @ 3V tinyurl.com/y6etgsxk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              36 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, give me a chance to digest all that. Very sharp action diagram, but with my limited knowledge I don't see the + end distinguished on the circuits. And right now the wife says dinner is ready...later!
              $endgroup$
              – Sanity Check
              17 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              a nitpick: saying that "Ohm's [l]aw always applies" is a heavy overstatement. No physical "law" known to human always applies. Every "law" is just a model - and every model is false, because every model is just an approximation - albeit some, as OL or KVL, are indeed extremely useful.
              $endgroup$
              – vaxquis
              1 min ago


















            • $begingroup$
              let me run a quick simulation to prove that
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              Close approximation tinyurl.com/yxvdmqyk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              46 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Here using 1.05W@3V bulb and 1.1W bulb @ 3V tinyurl.com/y6etgsxk
              $endgroup$
              – Sunnyskyguy EE75
              36 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              Wow, give me a chance to digest all that. Very sharp action diagram, but with my limited knowledge I don't see the + end distinguished on the circuits. And right now the wife says dinner is ready...later!
              $endgroup$
              – Sanity Check
              17 mins ago










            • $begingroup$
              a nitpick: saying that "Ohm's [l]aw always applies" is a heavy overstatement. No physical "law" known to human always applies. Every "law" is just a model - and every model is false, because every model is just an approximation - albeit some, as OL or KVL, are indeed extremely useful.
              $endgroup$
              – vaxquis
              1 min ago
















            $begingroup$
            let me run a quick simulation to prove that
            $endgroup$
            – Sunnyskyguy EE75
            1 hour ago




            $begingroup$
            let me run a quick simulation to prove that
            $endgroup$
            – Sunnyskyguy EE75
            1 hour ago












            $begingroup$
            Close approximation tinyurl.com/yxvdmqyk
            $endgroup$
            – Sunnyskyguy EE75
            46 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Close approximation tinyurl.com/yxvdmqyk
            $endgroup$
            – Sunnyskyguy EE75
            46 mins ago












            $begingroup$
            Here using 1.05W@3V bulb and 1.1W bulb @ 3V tinyurl.com/y6etgsxk
            $endgroup$
            – Sunnyskyguy EE75
            36 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Here using 1.05W@3V bulb and 1.1W bulb @ 3V tinyurl.com/y6etgsxk
            $endgroup$
            – Sunnyskyguy EE75
            36 mins ago












            $begingroup$
            Wow, give me a chance to digest all that. Very sharp action diagram, but with my limited knowledge I don't see the + end distinguished on the circuits. And right now the wife says dinner is ready...later!
            $endgroup$
            – Sanity Check
            17 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Wow, give me a chance to digest all that. Very sharp action diagram, but with my limited knowledge I don't see the + end distinguished on the circuits. And right now the wife says dinner is ready...later!
            $endgroup$
            – Sanity Check
            17 mins ago












            $begingroup$
            a nitpick: saying that "Ohm's [l]aw always applies" is a heavy overstatement. No physical "law" known to human always applies. Every "law" is just a model - and every model is false, because every model is just an approximation - albeit some, as OL or KVL, are indeed extremely useful.
            $endgroup$
            – vaxquis
            1 min ago




            $begingroup$
            a nitpick: saying that "Ohm's [l]aw always applies" is a heavy overstatement. No physical "law" known to human always applies. Every "law" is just a model - and every model is false, because every model is just an approximation - albeit some, as OL or KVL, are indeed extremely useful.
            $endgroup$
            – vaxquis
            1 min ago










            Sanity Check is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Sanity Check is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Sanity Check is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Sanity Check is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f425985%2fthe-ohms-law-calculations-of-the-parts-do-not-agree-with-the-whole%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            IEEEtran - How to include ORCID in TeX/PDF with PdfLatexIs there a standard way to include ORCID in TeX /...

            Cicindela nigrior Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneCicindela varians unicolorManual for the Identification of the...

            Glossaries-extra: Adding glossaries package to “Clas­sicTh­e­sis” template by Dr. André Miede v. 4.6 ...