View Angle CalculationCalculating View Angle?Calculating View Angle?Calculate field of view / angle of a...

Recrystallisation of dibenzylideneacetone

How Internet Communication Works on a Coaxial Cable

Overfitting and Underfitting

What's the most convenient time of year in the USA to end the world?

How do creatures spend Hit Dice after a short rest (if they can do so)?

Can pricing be copyrighted?

Rear brake cable temporary fix possible?

What is a good way to foreshadow that magic is actually very advanced technology?

Slow moving projectiles from a hand-held weapon - how do they reach the target?

Does the "particle exchange" operator have any validity?

Avoiding morning and evening handshakes

Can polymorphing monsters spam their ability to effectively give themselves a massive health pool?

What to do when being responsible for data protection in your lab, yet advice is ignored?

what are the advantages of using makefile for small projects?

En Passant For Beginners

What is the wife of a henpecked husband called?

What is this metal M-shaped device for?

How to generate a matrix with certain conditions

Why a 352GB NumPy ndarray can be used on a 8GB memory macOS computer?

How to define new environment, using proof-environment

How would an AI self awareness kill switch work?

Using loops to create tables

Why did Jodrell Bank assist the Soviet Union to collect data from their spacecraft in the mid 1960's?

How do you funnel food off a cutting board?



View Angle Calculation


Calculating View Angle?Calculating View Angle?Calculate field of view / angle of a point to a shapefileTrasformation from ECEF to ENURotate symbol base on polyline angleMeasuring Angle of two Points from North in ArcGIS 10.3 C# SDKHow to measure angle in QGISRotate feature by angle (QGIS)tool to output xy from an input xy, distant, and angleAdvanced Digitizing Panel angle unitsSolar angle of Incident calculation confusion!













1















In Calculating View Angle? the accepted answer contains the following calculations:




Given two points (x,y,z) and (x',y',z') in an earth-centered coordinate system, the vector from the first to the second is (dx,dy,dz) = (x'-x, y'-y, z'-z)




And then provides an example:




The XYZ coordinates of the airplanes are (x,y,z) = (1285410, -4797210, 3994830) and (x',y',z') = (1202990, -4824940, 3999870), respectively (in the ITRF00 datum, which uses the GRS80 ellipsoid). The pilot's view vector therefore is (dx,dy,dz) = (-82404.5, -27735.3, 5034.56).




What am I missing such that:



1202990 - 1285410 = -82404.5 (vice -82420)



-4824940 - -4797210 = -27735.3 (vice -27730)



3999870 - 3994830 = 5034.56 (vice 5040) ?










share|improve this question









New contributor




RudolfSchmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    1















    In Calculating View Angle? the accepted answer contains the following calculations:




    Given two points (x,y,z) and (x',y',z') in an earth-centered coordinate system, the vector from the first to the second is (dx,dy,dz) = (x'-x, y'-y, z'-z)




    And then provides an example:




    The XYZ coordinates of the airplanes are (x,y,z) = (1285410, -4797210, 3994830) and (x',y',z') = (1202990, -4824940, 3999870), respectively (in the ITRF00 datum, which uses the GRS80 ellipsoid). The pilot's view vector therefore is (dx,dy,dz) = (-82404.5, -27735.3, 5034.56).




    What am I missing such that:



    1202990 - 1285410 = -82404.5 (vice -82420)



    -4824940 - -4797210 = -27735.3 (vice -27730)



    3999870 - 3994830 = 5034.56 (vice 5040) ?










    share|improve this question









    New contributor




    RudolfSchmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      1












      1








      1








      In Calculating View Angle? the accepted answer contains the following calculations:




      Given two points (x,y,z) and (x',y',z') in an earth-centered coordinate system, the vector from the first to the second is (dx,dy,dz) = (x'-x, y'-y, z'-z)




      And then provides an example:




      The XYZ coordinates of the airplanes are (x,y,z) = (1285410, -4797210, 3994830) and (x',y',z') = (1202990, -4824940, 3999870), respectively (in the ITRF00 datum, which uses the GRS80 ellipsoid). The pilot's view vector therefore is (dx,dy,dz) = (-82404.5, -27735.3, 5034.56).




      What am I missing such that:



      1202990 - 1285410 = -82404.5 (vice -82420)



      -4824940 - -4797210 = -27735.3 (vice -27730)



      3999870 - 3994830 = 5034.56 (vice 5040) ?










      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      RudolfSchmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      In Calculating View Angle? the accepted answer contains the following calculations:




      Given two points (x,y,z) and (x',y',z') in an earth-centered coordinate system, the vector from the first to the second is (dx,dy,dz) = (x'-x, y'-y, z'-z)




      And then provides an example:




      The XYZ coordinates of the airplanes are (x,y,z) = (1285410, -4797210, 3994830) and (x',y',z') = (1202990, -4824940, 3999870), respectively (in the ITRF00 datum, which uses the GRS80 ellipsoid). The pilot's view vector therefore is (dx,dy,dz) = (-82404.5, -27735.3, 5034.56).




      What am I missing such that:



      1202990 - 1285410 = -82404.5 (vice -82420)



      -4824940 - -4797210 = -27735.3 (vice -27730)



      3999870 - 3994830 = 5034.56 (vice 5040) ?







      coordinates angles






      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      RudolfSchmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question









      New contributor




      RudolfSchmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      PolyGeo

      53.6k1780240




      53.6k1780240






      New contributor




      RudolfSchmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 4 hours ago









      RudolfSchmidtRudolfSchmidt

      83




      83




      New contributor




      RudolfSchmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      RudolfSchmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      RudolfSchmidt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          The ECEF coordinates that @whuber provided appear to have been rounded to the nearest 10 meters. Looking at the revisions to the answer reveals that originally, the reference points that he used were (N39°, W75°, 4000m) and (N39°, W76°, 12000m), translating to ECEF coordinates:



          (1285408.203, -4797208.722, 3994834.304)
          (1202993.662, -4824944.042, 3999868.867)


          The vectors are then:



          dX = -82414.541
          dY = -27735.320
          dZ = 5034.563


          So they all match except dX which looks like a typo.



          EDIT



          After checking @whuber 's answer more carefully, I noticed that there is a slight issue with the methodology. The vector that is used is from the center of the Earth to the reference point, but that vector is not the appropriate "up" direction to base the calculation on. On the ellipsoid, the normal does not pass through the center of the Earth, except for the Equator or the Poles:



          enter image description here



          That difference amounts to around 0.2° at most.



          To get a slightly better result, I would suggest translating and rotating the frame to topocentric (ENU), as mentioned in this Wikipedia article. A previous version of this article used the wrong calculations, but it has been fixed.



          Also, you can take a look at this answer on Math that states the whole formulas for the calculation of the distance and angles.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Thanks for taking the time to share your knowledge! I hope to be able to do the same.

            – RudolfSchmidt
            3 hours ago











          • You're welcome. Also, you can have a look at my answer on Math StackExchange, which describes the full formulas as well.

            – FSimardGIS
            3 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "79"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          RudolfSchmidt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f314160%2fview-angle-calculation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          The ECEF coordinates that @whuber provided appear to have been rounded to the nearest 10 meters. Looking at the revisions to the answer reveals that originally, the reference points that he used were (N39°, W75°, 4000m) and (N39°, W76°, 12000m), translating to ECEF coordinates:



          (1285408.203, -4797208.722, 3994834.304)
          (1202993.662, -4824944.042, 3999868.867)


          The vectors are then:



          dX = -82414.541
          dY = -27735.320
          dZ = 5034.563


          So they all match except dX which looks like a typo.



          EDIT



          After checking @whuber 's answer more carefully, I noticed that there is a slight issue with the methodology. The vector that is used is from the center of the Earth to the reference point, but that vector is not the appropriate "up" direction to base the calculation on. On the ellipsoid, the normal does not pass through the center of the Earth, except for the Equator or the Poles:



          enter image description here



          That difference amounts to around 0.2° at most.



          To get a slightly better result, I would suggest translating and rotating the frame to topocentric (ENU), as mentioned in this Wikipedia article. A previous version of this article used the wrong calculations, but it has been fixed.



          Also, you can take a look at this answer on Math that states the whole formulas for the calculation of the distance and angles.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Thanks for taking the time to share your knowledge! I hope to be able to do the same.

            – RudolfSchmidt
            3 hours ago











          • You're welcome. Also, you can have a look at my answer on Math StackExchange, which describes the full formulas as well.

            – FSimardGIS
            3 hours ago
















          2














          The ECEF coordinates that @whuber provided appear to have been rounded to the nearest 10 meters. Looking at the revisions to the answer reveals that originally, the reference points that he used were (N39°, W75°, 4000m) and (N39°, W76°, 12000m), translating to ECEF coordinates:



          (1285408.203, -4797208.722, 3994834.304)
          (1202993.662, -4824944.042, 3999868.867)


          The vectors are then:



          dX = -82414.541
          dY = -27735.320
          dZ = 5034.563


          So they all match except dX which looks like a typo.



          EDIT



          After checking @whuber 's answer more carefully, I noticed that there is a slight issue with the methodology. The vector that is used is from the center of the Earth to the reference point, but that vector is not the appropriate "up" direction to base the calculation on. On the ellipsoid, the normal does not pass through the center of the Earth, except for the Equator or the Poles:



          enter image description here



          That difference amounts to around 0.2° at most.



          To get a slightly better result, I would suggest translating and rotating the frame to topocentric (ENU), as mentioned in this Wikipedia article. A previous version of this article used the wrong calculations, but it has been fixed.



          Also, you can take a look at this answer on Math that states the whole formulas for the calculation of the distance and angles.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Thanks for taking the time to share your knowledge! I hope to be able to do the same.

            – RudolfSchmidt
            3 hours ago











          • You're welcome. Also, you can have a look at my answer on Math StackExchange, which describes the full formulas as well.

            – FSimardGIS
            3 hours ago














          2












          2








          2







          The ECEF coordinates that @whuber provided appear to have been rounded to the nearest 10 meters. Looking at the revisions to the answer reveals that originally, the reference points that he used were (N39°, W75°, 4000m) and (N39°, W76°, 12000m), translating to ECEF coordinates:



          (1285408.203, -4797208.722, 3994834.304)
          (1202993.662, -4824944.042, 3999868.867)


          The vectors are then:



          dX = -82414.541
          dY = -27735.320
          dZ = 5034.563


          So they all match except dX which looks like a typo.



          EDIT



          After checking @whuber 's answer more carefully, I noticed that there is a slight issue with the methodology. The vector that is used is from the center of the Earth to the reference point, but that vector is not the appropriate "up" direction to base the calculation on. On the ellipsoid, the normal does not pass through the center of the Earth, except for the Equator or the Poles:



          enter image description here



          That difference amounts to around 0.2° at most.



          To get a slightly better result, I would suggest translating and rotating the frame to topocentric (ENU), as mentioned in this Wikipedia article. A previous version of this article used the wrong calculations, but it has been fixed.



          Also, you can take a look at this answer on Math that states the whole formulas for the calculation of the distance and angles.






          share|improve this answer















          The ECEF coordinates that @whuber provided appear to have been rounded to the nearest 10 meters. Looking at the revisions to the answer reveals that originally, the reference points that he used were (N39°, W75°, 4000m) and (N39°, W76°, 12000m), translating to ECEF coordinates:



          (1285408.203, -4797208.722, 3994834.304)
          (1202993.662, -4824944.042, 3999868.867)


          The vectors are then:



          dX = -82414.541
          dY = -27735.320
          dZ = 5034.563


          So they all match except dX which looks like a typo.



          EDIT



          After checking @whuber 's answer more carefully, I noticed that there is a slight issue with the methodology. The vector that is used is from the center of the Earth to the reference point, but that vector is not the appropriate "up" direction to base the calculation on. On the ellipsoid, the normal does not pass through the center of the Earth, except for the Equator or the Poles:



          enter image description here



          That difference amounts to around 0.2° at most.



          To get a slightly better result, I would suggest translating and rotating the frame to topocentric (ENU), as mentioned in this Wikipedia article. A previous version of this article used the wrong calculations, but it has been fixed.



          Also, you can take a look at this answer on Math that states the whole formulas for the calculation of the distance and angles.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 26 mins ago

























          answered 3 hours ago









          FSimardGISFSimardGIS

          1,38129




          1,38129













          • Thanks for taking the time to share your knowledge! I hope to be able to do the same.

            – RudolfSchmidt
            3 hours ago











          • You're welcome. Also, you can have a look at my answer on Math StackExchange, which describes the full formulas as well.

            – FSimardGIS
            3 hours ago



















          • Thanks for taking the time to share your knowledge! I hope to be able to do the same.

            – RudolfSchmidt
            3 hours ago











          • You're welcome. Also, you can have a look at my answer on Math StackExchange, which describes the full formulas as well.

            – FSimardGIS
            3 hours ago

















          Thanks for taking the time to share your knowledge! I hope to be able to do the same.

          – RudolfSchmidt
          3 hours ago





          Thanks for taking the time to share your knowledge! I hope to be able to do the same.

          – RudolfSchmidt
          3 hours ago













          You're welcome. Also, you can have a look at my answer on Math StackExchange, which describes the full formulas as well.

          – FSimardGIS
          3 hours ago





          You're welcome. Also, you can have a look at my answer on Math StackExchange, which describes the full formulas as well.

          – FSimardGIS
          3 hours ago










          RudolfSchmidt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          RudolfSchmidt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          RudolfSchmidt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          RudolfSchmidt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f314160%2fview-angle-calculation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          IEEEtran - How to include ORCID in TeX/PDF with PdfLatexIs there a standard way to include ORCID in TeX /...

          Cicindela nigrior Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneCicindela varians unicolorManual for the Identification of the...

          Glossaries-extra: Adding glossaries package to “Clas­sicTh­e­sis” template by Dr. André Miede v. 4.6 ...