How to write cases in LaTeX?Capital Sigma in bold mathrmUndefined control sequence error for sum expression...
Is the fingering of thirds flexible or do I have to follow the rules?
Why did Mr. Elliot have to decide whose boots were thickest in "Persuasion"?
How to create a label containing values from different layers in QGIS
Why does 0.-5 evaluate to -5?
How big is a framed opening for a door relative to the finished door opening width?
How to deal with an underperforming subordinate?
Word for something that's always reliable, but never the best?
How can I prevent an oracle who can see into the past from knowing everything that has happened?
How do I narratively explain how in-game circumstances do not mechanically allow a PC to instantly kill an NPC?
Can a player sacrifice a creature after declaring that creature as blocker while taking lethal damage?
Count repetitions of an array
Possible issue with my W4 and tax return
What to do with threats of blacklisting?
Article. The word "Respect"
What is a good reason for every spaceship to carry gun on board?
Where does documentation like business and software requirement spec docs fit in an agile project?
Am I correct in stating that the study of topology is purely theoretical?
Allow console draw poker game to output more hands
Why did Ylvis use "go" instead of "say" in phrases like "Dog goes 'woof'"?
Non-Cancer terminal illness that can affect young (age 10-13) girls?
Charging phone battery with a lower voltage, coming from a bike charger?
What does an unprocessed RAW file look like?
What species should be used for storage of human minds?
Plausible reason for gold-digging ant
How to write cases in LaTeX?
Capital Sigma in bold mathrmUndefined control sequence error for sum expression in equationEquation: How to create nested/multiple cases in LaTeX to align the qualifiersHow to break a line in a long equation?mathpazo package and changing font within begin{equation} … end{equation}Cases with long text at the end.How to place a sim over equiv similar to simeq and cong?Itemize with cases in beamerHow to align two begin{equation}begin{cases}?Parenthesis vertically misaligned in “cases” environment
I want to write following system of equation in my paper, but I don't know how:
Here is a code that I've tried, but it does not work:
Rgeqslant R_t equiv begin{cases} frac{r_{t+1} (1-W(k_t)}{f'(k{t+1}
lambda} &mbox{if } k_t < K(lambda) \
frac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})} & mbox{if } k_tgeqslant K(lambda)
end{cases}
Any suggestions will be very helpful. Thanks
math-mode cases
New contributor
add a comment |
I want to write following system of equation in my paper, but I don't know how:
Here is a code that I've tried, but it does not work:
Rgeqslant R_t equiv begin{cases} frac{r_{t+1} (1-W(k_t)}{f'(k{t+1}
lambda} &mbox{if } k_t < K(lambda) \
frac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})} & mbox{if } k_tgeqslant K(lambda)
end{cases}
Any suggestions will be very helpful. Thanks
math-mode cases
New contributor
Excuse me but the code is different from the image. Have I understood well?
– Sebastiano
3 hours ago
3
Consider accepting one of the provided answers if your question is solved (check mark on the left hand side of the answers).
– Dr. Manuel Kuehner
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I want to write following system of equation in my paper, but I don't know how:
Here is a code that I've tried, but it does not work:
Rgeqslant R_t equiv begin{cases} frac{r_{t+1} (1-W(k_t)}{f'(k{t+1}
lambda} &mbox{if } k_t < K(lambda) \
frac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})} & mbox{if } k_tgeqslant K(lambda)
end{cases}
Any suggestions will be very helpful. Thanks
math-mode cases
New contributor
I want to write following system of equation in my paper, but I don't know how:
Here is a code that I've tried, but it does not work:
Rgeqslant R_t equiv begin{cases} frac{r_{t+1} (1-W(k_t)}{f'(k{t+1}
lambda} &mbox{if } k_t < K(lambda) \
frac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})} & mbox{if } k_tgeqslant K(lambda)
end{cases}
Any suggestions will be very helpful. Thanks
math-mode cases
math-mode cases
New contributor
New contributor
edited 3 hours ago
siracusa
5,04011429
5,04011429
New contributor
asked 3 hours ago
Nurzada DiushalievaNurzada Diushalieva
211
211
New contributor
New contributor
Excuse me but the code is different from the image. Have I understood well?
– Sebastiano
3 hours ago
3
Consider accepting one of the provided answers if your question is solved (check mark on the left hand side of the answers).
– Dr. Manuel Kuehner
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Excuse me but the code is different from the image. Have I understood well?
– Sebastiano
3 hours ago
3
Consider accepting one of the provided answers if your question is solved (check mark on the left hand side of the answers).
– Dr. Manuel Kuehner
2 hours ago
Excuse me but the code is different from the image. Have I understood well?
– Sebastiano
3 hours ago
Excuse me but the code is different from the image. Have I understood well?
– Sebastiano
3 hours ago
3
3
Consider accepting one of the provided answers if your question is solved (check mark on the left hand side of the answers).
– Dr. Manuel Kuehner
2 hours ago
Consider accepting one of the provided answers if your question is solved (check mark on the left hand side of the answers).
– Dr. Manuel Kuehner
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I would load the mathtools
package, which is a superset of the amsmath
package, and employ that package's dcases*
environment.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'dcases*' env.
begin{document}
[
Rge R_t equiv
begin{dcases*}
frac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})}frac{1-W(k_t)}{lambda}
& if $k_t < K(lambda)$,, \[1ex]
frac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})}
& if $k_tge K(lambda)$,.
end{dcases*}
]
end{document}
Is this command better than the usualcases
command?
– knzhou
5 mins ago
add a comment |
Welcome to TeX.SE. Here my (fast) proposal from your original code:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
[Rgeqslant R_t equiv begin{cases} dfrac{r_{t+1} (1-W(k_t))}{f'(k{t+1}
lambda)} &mbox{if } k_t < K(lambda) \
&\
dfrac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})} & mbox{if } k_tgeqslant K(lambda)
end{cases}]
end{document}
EDIT: By correct comment of @Yorgos:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
[
Rgeqslant R_t equiv
begin{cases}
dfrac{r_{t+1} (1-W(k_t))}{f'(k{t+1} lambda)}
& text{if } k_t < K(lambda) \
&\ % blank row
dfrac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})}
& text{if } k_tgeqslant K(lambda)
end{cases}
]
end{document}
1
i don't think thatmbox
is necessary, since&
aligns. also i preferequation
environment, since it allows for numbering the equation
– Yorgos
3 hours ago
@Yorgos I accept your suggestion correctly. I have only taken the code from the user. :(
– Sebastiano
3 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano Thanks a lot :)
– Nurzada Diushalieva
3 hours ago
I believe that thek{t+1}
term in the first denominator should be changed tok_{t+1}
.
– Mico
3 hours ago
@Mico Thank you very much for edit and all ....You're right for you comment.
– Sebastiano
44 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Nurzada Diushalieva is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476591%2fhow-to-write-cases-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I would load the mathtools
package, which is a superset of the amsmath
package, and employ that package's dcases*
environment.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'dcases*' env.
begin{document}
[
Rge R_t equiv
begin{dcases*}
frac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})}frac{1-W(k_t)}{lambda}
& if $k_t < K(lambda)$,, \[1ex]
frac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})}
& if $k_tge K(lambda)$,.
end{dcases*}
]
end{document}
Is this command better than the usualcases
command?
– knzhou
5 mins ago
add a comment |
I would load the mathtools
package, which is a superset of the amsmath
package, and employ that package's dcases*
environment.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'dcases*' env.
begin{document}
[
Rge R_t equiv
begin{dcases*}
frac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})}frac{1-W(k_t)}{lambda}
& if $k_t < K(lambda)$,, \[1ex]
frac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})}
& if $k_tge K(lambda)$,.
end{dcases*}
]
end{document}
Is this command better than the usualcases
command?
– knzhou
5 mins ago
add a comment |
I would load the mathtools
package, which is a superset of the amsmath
package, and employ that package's dcases*
environment.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'dcases*' env.
begin{document}
[
Rge R_t equiv
begin{dcases*}
frac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})}frac{1-W(k_t)}{lambda}
& if $k_t < K(lambda)$,, \[1ex]
frac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})}
& if $k_tge K(lambda)$,.
end{dcases*}
]
end{document}
I would load the mathtools
package, which is a superset of the amsmath
package, and employ that package's dcases*
environment.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{mathtools} % for 'dcases*' env.
begin{document}
[
Rge R_t equiv
begin{dcases*}
frac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})}frac{1-W(k_t)}{lambda}
& if $k_t < K(lambda)$,, \[1ex]
frac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})}
& if $k_tge K(lambda)$,.
end{dcases*}
]
end{document}
answered 3 hours ago
MicoMico
280k31383771
280k31383771
Is this command better than the usualcases
command?
– knzhou
5 mins ago
add a comment |
Is this command better than the usualcases
command?
– knzhou
5 mins ago
Is this command better than the usual
cases
command?– knzhou
5 mins ago
Is this command better than the usual
cases
command?– knzhou
5 mins ago
add a comment |
Welcome to TeX.SE. Here my (fast) proposal from your original code:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
[Rgeqslant R_t equiv begin{cases} dfrac{r_{t+1} (1-W(k_t))}{f'(k{t+1}
lambda)} &mbox{if } k_t < K(lambda) \
&\
dfrac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})} & mbox{if } k_tgeqslant K(lambda)
end{cases}]
end{document}
EDIT: By correct comment of @Yorgos:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
[
Rgeqslant R_t equiv
begin{cases}
dfrac{r_{t+1} (1-W(k_t))}{f'(k{t+1} lambda)}
& text{if } k_t < K(lambda) \
&\ % blank row
dfrac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})}
& text{if } k_tgeqslant K(lambda)
end{cases}
]
end{document}
1
i don't think thatmbox
is necessary, since&
aligns. also i preferequation
environment, since it allows for numbering the equation
– Yorgos
3 hours ago
@Yorgos I accept your suggestion correctly. I have only taken the code from the user. :(
– Sebastiano
3 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano Thanks a lot :)
– Nurzada Diushalieva
3 hours ago
I believe that thek{t+1}
term in the first denominator should be changed tok_{t+1}
.
– Mico
3 hours ago
@Mico Thank you very much for edit and all ....You're right for you comment.
– Sebastiano
44 mins ago
add a comment |
Welcome to TeX.SE. Here my (fast) proposal from your original code:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
[Rgeqslant R_t equiv begin{cases} dfrac{r_{t+1} (1-W(k_t))}{f'(k{t+1}
lambda)} &mbox{if } k_t < K(lambda) \
&\
dfrac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})} & mbox{if } k_tgeqslant K(lambda)
end{cases}]
end{document}
EDIT: By correct comment of @Yorgos:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
[
Rgeqslant R_t equiv
begin{cases}
dfrac{r_{t+1} (1-W(k_t))}{f'(k{t+1} lambda)}
& text{if } k_t < K(lambda) \
&\ % blank row
dfrac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})}
& text{if } k_tgeqslant K(lambda)
end{cases}
]
end{document}
1
i don't think thatmbox
is necessary, since&
aligns. also i preferequation
environment, since it allows for numbering the equation
– Yorgos
3 hours ago
@Yorgos I accept your suggestion correctly. I have only taken the code from the user. :(
– Sebastiano
3 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano Thanks a lot :)
– Nurzada Diushalieva
3 hours ago
I believe that thek{t+1}
term in the first denominator should be changed tok_{t+1}
.
– Mico
3 hours ago
@Mico Thank you very much for edit and all ....You're right for you comment.
– Sebastiano
44 mins ago
add a comment |
Welcome to TeX.SE. Here my (fast) proposal from your original code:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
[Rgeqslant R_t equiv begin{cases} dfrac{r_{t+1} (1-W(k_t))}{f'(k{t+1}
lambda)} &mbox{if } k_t < K(lambda) \
&\
dfrac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})} & mbox{if } k_tgeqslant K(lambda)
end{cases}]
end{document}
EDIT: By correct comment of @Yorgos:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
[
Rgeqslant R_t equiv
begin{cases}
dfrac{r_{t+1} (1-W(k_t))}{f'(k{t+1} lambda)}
& text{if } k_t < K(lambda) \
&\ % blank row
dfrac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})}
& text{if } k_tgeqslant K(lambda)
end{cases}
]
end{document}
Welcome to TeX.SE. Here my (fast) proposal from your original code:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
[Rgeqslant R_t equiv begin{cases} dfrac{r_{t+1} (1-W(k_t))}{f'(k{t+1}
lambda)} &mbox{if } k_t < K(lambda) \
&\
dfrac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})} & mbox{if } k_tgeqslant K(lambda)
end{cases}]
end{document}
EDIT: By correct comment of @Yorgos:
documentclass[12pt]{article}
usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
begin{document}
[
Rgeqslant R_t equiv
begin{cases}
dfrac{r_{t+1} (1-W(k_t))}{f'(k{t+1} lambda)}
& text{if } k_t < K(lambda) \
&\ % blank row
dfrac{r_{t+1}}{f'(k_{t+1})}
& text{if } k_tgeqslant K(lambda)
end{cases}
]
end{document}
edited 3 hours ago
Mico
280k31383771
280k31383771
answered 3 hours ago
SebastianoSebastiano
10.2k41960
10.2k41960
1
i don't think thatmbox
is necessary, since&
aligns. also i preferequation
environment, since it allows for numbering the equation
– Yorgos
3 hours ago
@Yorgos I accept your suggestion correctly. I have only taken the code from the user. :(
– Sebastiano
3 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano Thanks a lot :)
– Nurzada Diushalieva
3 hours ago
I believe that thek{t+1}
term in the first denominator should be changed tok_{t+1}
.
– Mico
3 hours ago
@Mico Thank you very much for edit and all ....You're right for you comment.
– Sebastiano
44 mins ago
add a comment |
1
i don't think thatmbox
is necessary, since&
aligns. also i preferequation
environment, since it allows for numbering the equation
– Yorgos
3 hours ago
@Yorgos I accept your suggestion correctly. I have only taken the code from the user. :(
– Sebastiano
3 hours ago
1
@Sebastiano Thanks a lot :)
– Nurzada Diushalieva
3 hours ago
I believe that thek{t+1}
term in the first denominator should be changed tok_{t+1}
.
– Mico
3 hours ago
@Mico Thank you very much for edit and all ....You're right for you comment.
– Sebastiano
44 mins ago
1
1
i don't think that
mbox
is necessary, since &
aligns. also i prefer equation
environment, since it allows for numbering the equation– Yorgos
3 hours ago
i don't think that
mbox
is necessary, since &
aligns. also i prefer equation
environment, since it allows for numbering the equation– Yorgos
3 hours ago
@Yorgos I accept your suggestion correctly. I have only taken the code from the user. :(
– Sebastiano
3 hours ago
@Yorgos I accept your suggestion correctly. I have only taken the code from the user. :(
– Sebastiano
3 hours ago
1
1
@Sebastiano Thanks a lot :)
– Nurzada Diushalieva
3 hours ago
@Sebastiano Thanks a lot :)
– Nurzada Diushalieva
3 hours ago
I believe that the
k{t+1}
term in the first denominator should be changed to k_{t+1}
.– Mico
3 hours ago
I believe that the
k{t+1}
term in the first denominator should be changed to k_{t+1}
.– Mico
3 hours ago
@Mico Thank you very much for edit and all ....You're right for you comment.
– Sebastiano
44 mins ago
@Mico Thank you very much for edit and all ....You're right for you comment.
– Sebastiano
44 mins ago
add a comment |
Nurzada Diushalieva is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Nurzada Diushalieva is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Nurzada Diushalieva is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Nurzada Diushalieva is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f476591%2fhow-to-write-cases-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Excuse me but the code is different from the image. Have I understood well?
– Sebastiano
3 hours ago
3
Consider accepting one of the provided answers if your question is solved (check mark on the left hand side of the answers).
– Dr. Manuel Kuehner
2 hours ago