How do I avoid eval and parse? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAvoiding the infamous...

How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?

Are there any unintended negative consequences to allowing PCs to gain multiple levels at once in a short milestone-XP game?

Why do professional authors make "consistency" mistakes? And how to avoid them?

In excess I'm lethal

Indicator light circuit

How to count occurrences of text in a file?

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

What connection does MS Office have to Netscape Navigator?

Why do remote companies require working in the US?

Skipping indices in a product

I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin

Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons

Can I equip Skullclamp on a creature I am sacrificing?

Would a galaxy be visible from outside, but nearby?

Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords

Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?

Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?

sp_blitzCache results Memory grants

Contours of a clandestine nature

Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"

Inappropriate reference requests from Journal reviewers

Why do we use the plural of movies in this phrase "We went to the movies last night."?

How to invert MapIndexed on a ragged structure? How to construct a tree from rules?

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?



How do I avoid eval and parse?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAvoiding the infamous “eval(parse())” constructR: eval(parse(…)) is often suboptimalWhy is using the JavaScript eval function a bad idea?When is JavaScript's eval() not evil?How to sort a dataframe by multiple column(s)?How to join (merge) data frames (inner, outer, left, right)What's the difference between eval, exec, and compile?How to make a great R reproducible exampleWhat does Python's eval() do? Avoiding the infamous “eval(parse())” constructUse argument value as variable name in R during function runR: eval parse function call not accessing correct environments












11















I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...)):



# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...) {
if (environment %in% search()) {
while (environment %in% search()) {
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1
}
cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
} else {cat("no", environment, "attachedn")}
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T)) {
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
} else {cat(environment, "already existsn")}
sapply(functions, function(func) {
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
})
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")
}


Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...)) construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...)) in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).



Is there a way to call new.env(...) and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name] without resorting to eval(parse(...))? Thanks.



N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name to hide them in the global environment










share|improve this question























  • Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

    – Josh
    25 mins ago


















11















I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...)):



# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...) {
if (environment %in% search()) {
while (environment %in% search()) {
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1
}
cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
} else {cat("no", environment, "attachedn")}
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T)) {
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
} else {cat(environment, "already existsn")}
sapply(functions, function(func) {
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
})
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")
}


Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...)) construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...)) in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).



Is there a way to call new.env(...) and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name] without resorting to eval(parse(...))? Thanks.



N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name to hide them in the global environment










share|improve this question























  • Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

    – Josh
    25 mins ago
















11












11








11








I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...)):



# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...) {
if (environment %in% search()) {
while (environment %in% search()) {
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1
}
cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
} else {cat("no", environment, "attachedn")}
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T)) {
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
} else {cat(environment, "already existsn")}
sapply(functions, function(func) {
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
})
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")
}


Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...)) construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...)) in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).



Is there a way to call new.env(...) and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name] without resorting to eval(parse(...))? Thanks.



N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name to hide them in the global environment










share|improve this question














I have written a function that sources files that contain scripts for other functions and stores these functions in an alternative environment so that they aren't cluttering up the global environment. The code works, but contains two instances of eval(parse(...)):



# sourceFunctionHidden ---------------------------
# source a function and hide the function from the global environment
sourceFunctionHidden <- function(functions, environment = "env", ...) {
if (environment %in% search()) {
while (environment %in% search()) {
if (!exists("counter", inherits = F)) counter <- 0
eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")")))
counter <- counter + 1
}
cat("detached", counter, environment, "sn")
} else {cat("no", environment, "attachedn")}
if (!environment %in% ls(.GlobalEnv, all.names = T)) {
assign(environment, new.env(), pos = .GlobalEnv)
cat("created", environment, "n")
} else {cat(environment, "already existsn")}
sapply(functions, function(func) {
# source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), .env)
source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"))
eval(parse(text = paste0(environment, "$", func," <- ", func)))
cat(func, "created in", environment, "n")
})
# rm(list = functions, pos = .GlobalEnv)
eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")")))
cat("attached", environment, "nn")
}


Much has been written about the sub-optimality of the eval(parse(...)) construction (see here and here). However, the discussions that I've found mostly deal with alternate strategies for subsetting. The first instance of eval(parse(...)) in my code doesn't involve subsetting (the second instance might be related to subsetting).



Is there a way to call new.env(...) and [environment name]$[function name] <- [function name] without resorting to eval(parse(...))? Thanks.



N.B.: I don't want to change the names of my functions to .name to hide them in the global environment







r eval






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 4 hours ago









JoshJosh

300113




300113













  • Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

    – Josh
    25 mins ago





















  • Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

    – Josh
    25 mins ago



















Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

– Josh
25 mins ago







Just discovered that eval(parse(text = paste0("detach(", environment, ")"))) can be replaced with detach(environment, character.only = T). The question about improving eval(parse(text = paste0("attach(", environment, ")"))) remains.

– Josh
25 mins ago














2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














For what its worth, the function source actually uses eval(parse(...)), albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...)) is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval. So eval(parse(...)) seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.



That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source provides an argument local that can be used for precisely this.




local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.




An example:



env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)


testing it works:



env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)


And an example test.r file to use this on:



test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)





share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

    – Josh
    17 mins ago













  • You should create an environment to save into. For example as I demonstrated with env = new.env(). Then pass the environment as your argument (in this case env)

    – dww
    1 min ago





















3














If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.






share|improve this answer
























  • I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

    – Josh
    24 mins ago












Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55426015%2fhow-do-i-avoid-eval-and-parse%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














For what its worth, the function source actually uses eval(parse(...)), albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...)) is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval. So eval(parse(...)) seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.



That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source provides an argument local that can be used for precisely this.




local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.




An example:



env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)


testing it works:



env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)


And an example test.r file to use this on:



test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)





share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

    – Josh
    17 mins ago













  • You should create an environment to save into. For example as I demonstrated with env = new.env(). Then pass the environment as your argument (in this case env)

    – dww
    1 min ago


















4














For what its worth, the function source actually uses eval(parse(...)), albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...)) is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval. So eval(parse(...)) seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.



That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source provides an argument local that can be used for precisely this.




local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.




An example:



env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)


testing it works:



env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)


And an example test.r file to use this on:



test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)





share|improve this answer
























  • Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

    – Josh
    17 mins ago













  • You should create an environment to save into. For example as I demonstrated with env = new.env(). Then pass the environment as your argument (in this case env)

    – dww
    1 min ago
















4












4








4







For what its worth, the function source actually uses eval(parse(...)), albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...)) is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval. So eval(parse(...)) seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.



That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source provides an argument local that can be used for precisely this.




local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.




An example:



env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)


testing it works:



env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)


And an example test.r file to use this on:



test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)





share|improve this answer













For what its worth, the function source actually uses eval(parse(...)), albeit in a somewhat subtle way. First, .Internal(parse(...)) is used to create expressions, which after more processing are later passed to eval. So eval(parse(...)) seems to be good enough for the R core team in this instance.



That said, you don't need to jump through hoops to source functions into a new environment. source provides an argument local that can be used for precisely this.




local: TRUE, FALSE or an environment, determining where the parsed expressions are evaluated.




An example:



env = new.env()
source('test.r', local = env)


testing it works:



env$test('hello', 'world')
# [1] "hello world"
ls(pattern = 'test')
# character(0)


And an example test.r file to use this on:



test = function(a,b) paste(a,b)






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 hours ago









dwwdww

15.9k32659




15.9k32659













  • Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

    – Josh
    17 mins ago













  • You should create an environment to save into. For example as I demonstrated with env = new.env(). Then pass the environment as your argument (in this case env)

    – dww
    1 min ago





















  • Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

    – Josh
    17 mins ago













  • You should create an environment to save into. For example as I demonstrated with env = new.env(). Then pass the environment as your argument (in this case env)

    – dww
    1 min ago



















Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

– Josh
17 mins ago







Thank you, I missed that aspect of source(). However, if I change that line of code to source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) I get the error Error in source(paste0("C:/Users/JT/R/Functions/", func, ".R"), local = environment) : 'local' must be TRUE, FALSE or an environment. Is there a way to convert the "env" that comes from environment to env?

– Josh
17 mins ago















You should create an environment to save into. For example as I demonstrated with env = new.env(). Then pass the environment as your argument (in this case env)

– dww
1 min ago







You should create an environment to save into. For example as I demonstrated with env = new.env(). Then pass the environment as your argument (in this case env)

– dww
1 min ago















3














If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.






share|improve this answer
























  • I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

    – Josh
    24 mins ago
















3














If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.






share|improve this answer
























  • I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

    – Josh
    24 mins ago














3












3








3







If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.






share|improve this answer













If you want to keep it off global_env, put it into a package. It's common for people in the R community to put a bunch of frequently used helper functions into their own personal package.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









thcthc

5,37611224




5,37611224













  • I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

    – Josh
    24 mins ago



















  • I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

    – Josh
    24 mins ago

















I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

– Josh
24 mins ago





I agree. I eventually need to learn how to do this.

– Josh
24 mins ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55426015%2fhow-do-i-avoid-eval-and-parse%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can't compile dgruyter and caption packagesLaTeX templates/packages for writing a patent specificationLatex...

Schneeberg (Smreczany) Bibliografia | Menu...

Hans Bellmer Spis treści Życiorys | Upamiętnienie | Przypisy | Bibliografia | Linki zewnętrzne |...