Can the alpha, lambda values of a glmnet object output determine whether ridge or Lasso?Why do Lars and...
How do we create new idioms and use them in a novel?
Doubts in understanding some concepts of potential energy
What is better: yes / no radio, or simple checkbox?
Which situations would cause a company to ground or recall a aircraft series?
How exactly does an Ethernet collision happen in the cable, since nodes use different circuits for Tx and Rx?
After `ssh` without `-X` to a machine, is it possible to change `$DISPLAY` to make it work like `ssh -X`?
What's the 'present simple' form of the word "нашла́" in 3rd person singular female?
Can't make sense of a paragraph from Lovecraft
How to resolve: Reviewer #1 says remove section X vs. Reviewer #2 says expand section X
Power Strip for Europe
Virginia employer terminated employee and wants signing bonus returned
How to design an organic heat-shield?
This Alpine town?
School performs periodic password audits. Is my password compromised?
How do I print a field from the bibliography
What will be the sign of work done?
Is it safe to abruptly remove Arduino power?
Do I really need to have a scientific explanation for my premise?
For which categories of spectra is there an explicit description of the fibrant objects via lifting properties?
What is the population of Romulus in the TNG era?
How many characters using PHB rules does it take to be able to have access to any PHB spell at the start of an adventuring day?
Ballot RPC message
What would be the most expensive material to an intergalactic society?
Why does Solve lock up when trying to solve the quadratic equation with large integers?
Can the alpha, lambda values of a glmnet object output determine whether ridge or Lasso?
Why do Lars and Glmnet give different solutions for the Lasso problem?What does the varImp function in the caret package actually compute for a glmnet (elastic net) objectWhat are the differences between Ridge regression using R's glmnet and Python's scikit-learn?Using lasso regression in Matlab with constraints on lambda valuesHow to interpret the results when both ridge and lasso separately perform well but produce different coefficientsUsing different alpha values in glmnet when comparing two feature sets?r: coefficients from glmnet and caret are different for the same lambdaWhat is the difference between the lambda function in ridge regression vs in lasso regression?In LASSO, does it make sense to choose lambda based on the mean error associated with different lambda values, over multiple cross-validations?glmnet: Nested cross validation, tuning alpha and lambda
$begingroup$
Given a glmnet object using train() where trControl method is "cv" and number of iterations is 5, I obtained that the bestTune alpha and lambda values are alpha=0.1 and lambda= 0.007688342. On running the glmnet object, I notice that the alpha values start from 0.1.
Can the inference here be that the method used is Lasso and not ridge because of the non-negative alpha value?
In general, can the values of alpha, lambda indicate which model is being used?
regression generalized-linear-model cross-validation caret
asked 2 hours ago
red4life93red4life93
111
New contributor
red4life93 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given a glmnet object using train() where trControl method is "cv" and number of iterations is 5, I obtained that the bestTune alpha and lambda values are alpha=0.1 and lambda= 0.007688342. On running the glmnet object, I notice that the alpha values start from 0.1.
Can the inference here be that the method used is Lasso and not ridge because of the non-negative alpha value?
In general, can the values of alpha, lambda indicate which model is being used?
regression generalized-linear-model cross-validation caret
asked 2 hours ago
red4life93red4life93
111
New contributor
red4life93 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given a glmnet object using train() where trControl method is "cv" and number of iterations is 5, I obtained that the bestTune alpha and lambda values are alpha=0.1 and lambda= 0.007688342. On running the glmnet object, I notice that the alpha values start from 0.1.
Can the inference here be that the method used is Lasso and not ridge because of the non-negative alpha value?
In general, can the values of alpha, lambda indicate which model is being used?
regression generalized-linear-model cross-validation caret
asked 2 hours ago
red4life93red4life93
111
New contributor
red4life93 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Given a glmnet object using train() where trControl method is "cv" and number of iterations is 5, I obtained that the bestTune alpha and lambda values are alpha=0.1 and lambda= 0.007688342. On running the glmnet object, I notice that the alpha values start from 0.1.
Can the inference here be that the method used is Lasso and not ridge because of the non-negative alpha value?
In general, can the values of alpha, lambda indicate which model is being used?
regression generalized-linear-model cross-validation caret
regression generalized-linear-model cross-validation caret
asked 2 hours ago
red4life93red4life93
111
New contributor
red4life93 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 hours ago
red4life93red4life93
111
New contributor
red4life93 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 hours ago
red4life93red4life93
111
New contributor
red4life93 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 hours ago
red4life93red4life93
111
asked 2 hours ago
red4life93red4life93
111
111
New contributor
red4life93 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
red4life93 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
red4life93 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Absolutely! The $alpha$ parameter can be adjusted to either fit a Lasso or a Ridge regression (or something in between). Recall that the loss function which Elastic Net minimizes is $$frac{1}{2N}sum^N_{i=1}(y_i-beta_0-x_i^tbeta)^2+lambdasum_{j=1}^p(frac{1}{2}(1-alpha)beta_j^2+alpha|beta_j|).$$
Focus on the second big sum (the one multiplied by $lambda$). If you let $alpha=1$, the first term inside this sum becomes $0$, and the whole function becomes exactly the function that Lasso minimizes (or the Lasso loss function). If you let $alpha=0$, the second term becomes $0$ and you are left with Ridge.
You can check the loss for Ridge and Lasso in this book and for elastic net in this paper.
answered 1 hour ago
BananinBananin
1795
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This looks like a good answer but can you edit to include citations for the hyperlinks? Over time, links die.
$endgroup$
– Sycorax
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As far as I understand glmnet, $alpha=0$ would actually be a ridge penalty, and $alpha=1$ would be a Lasso penalty (rather than the other way around) and as far as glmnet is concerned you can fit those end cases.
The penalty with $alpha=0.1$ would be fairly similar to the ridge penalty but it is not the ridge penalty; if it's not considering $alpha$ below $0.1$ you can't necessarily infer much more than that just from the fact that you had that endpoint. If you know that an $alpha$ value that was only slightly larger was worse then it would be likely that a larger range might have chosen a smaller $alpha$, but it doesn't suggest it would have been $0$; I expect it would not. If the grid of values is coarse it may well have been that a larger value than $0.1$ would be better.
[You may want to check whether there was some other reason that $alpha$ might have been at an endpoint; e.g. I seem to recall $lambda$ got set to an endpoint in forecasting if coefficients for lambdaOpt were not saved.]
answered 2 hours ago
Glen_b♦Glen_b
213k22412762
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
red4life93 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f396748%2fcan-the-alpha-lambda-values-of-a-glmnet-object-output-determine-whether-ridge-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Absolutely! The $alpha$ parameter can be adjusted to either fit a Lasso or a Ridge regression (or something in between). Recall that the loss function which Elastic Net minimizes is $$frac{1}{2N}sum^N_{i=1}(y_i-beta_0-x_i^tbeta)^2+lambdasum_{j=1}^p(frac{1}{2}(1-alpha)beta_j^2+alpha|beta_j|).$$
Focus on the second big sum (the one multiplied by $lambda$). If you let $alpha=1$, the first term inside this sum becomes $0$, and the whole function becomes exactly the function that Lasso minimizes (or the Lasso loss function). If you let $alpha=0$, the second term becomes $0$ and you are left with Ridge.
You can check the loss for Ridge and Lasso in this book and for elastic net in this paper.
answered 1 hour ago
BananinBananin
1795
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This looks like a good answer but can you edit to include citations for the hyperlinks? Over time, links die.
$endgroup$
– Sycorax
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Absolutely! The $alpha$ parameter can be adjusted to either fit a Lasso or a Ridge regression (or something in between). Recall that the loss function which Elastic Net minimizes is $$frac{1}{2N}sum^N_{i=1}(y_i-beta_0-x_i^tbeta)^2+lambdasum_{j=1}^p(frac{1}{2}(1-alpha)beta_j^2+alpha|beta_j|).$$
Focus on the second big sum (the one multiplied by $lambda$). If you let $alpha=1$, the first term inside this sum becomes $0$, and the whole function becomes exactly the function that Lasso minimizes (or the Lasso loss function). If you let $alpha=0$, the second term becomes $0$ and you are left with Ridge.
You can check the loss for Ridge and Lasso in this book and for elastic net in this paper.
answered 1 hour ago
BananinBananin
1795
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
This looks like a good answer but can you edit to include citations for the hyperlinks? Over time, links die.
$endgroup$
– Sycorax
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Absolutely! The $alpha$ parameter can be adjusted to either fit a Lasso or a Ridge regression (or something in between). Recall that the loss function which Elastic Net minimizes is $$frac{1}{2N}sum^N_{i=1}(y_i-beta_0-x_i^tbeta)^2+lambdasum_{j=1}^p(frac{1}{2}(1-alpha)beta_j^2+alpha|beta_j|).$$
Focus on the second big sum (the one multiplied by $lambda$). If you let $alpha=1$, the first term inside this sum becomes $0$, and the whole function becomes exactly the function that Lasso minimizes (or the Lasso loss function). If you let $alpha=0$, the second term becomes $0$ and you are left with Ridge.
You can check the loss for Ridge and Lasso in this book and for elastic net in this paper.
answered 1 hour ago
BananinBananin
1795
$endgroup$
Absolutely! The $alpha$ parameter can be adjusted to either fit a Lasso or a Ridge regression (or something in between). Recall that the loss function which Elastic Net minimizes is $$frac{1}{2N}sum^N_{i=1}(y_i-beta_0-x_i^tbeta)^2+lambdasum_{j=1}^p(frac{1}{2}(1-alpha)beta_j^2+alpha|beta_j|).$$
Focus on the second big sum (the one multiplied by $lambda$). If you let $alpha=1$, the first term inside this sum becomes $0$, and the whole function becomes exactly the function that Lasso minimizes (or the Lasso loss function). If you let $alpha=0$, the second term becomes $0$ and you are left with Ridge.
You can check the loss for Ridge and Lasso in this book and for elastic net in this paper.
answered 1 hour ago
BananinBananin
1795
answered 1 hour ago
BananinBananin
1795
answered 1 hour ago
BananinBananin
1795
answered 1 hour ago
BananinBananin
1795
1795
$begingroup$
This looks like a good answer but can you edit to include citations for the hyperlinks? Over time, links die.
$endgroup$
– Sycorax
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This looks like a good answer but can you edit to include citations for the hyperlinks? Over time, links die.
$endgroup$
– Sycorax
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This looks like a good answer but can you edit to include citations for the hyperlinks? Over time, links die.
$endgroup$
– Sycorax
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
This looks like a good answer but can you edit to include citations for the hyperlinks? Over time, links die.
$endgroup$
– Sycorax
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As far as I understand glmnet, $alpha=0$ would actually be a ridge penalty, and $alpha=1$ would be a Lasso penalty (rather than the other way around) and as far as glmnet is concerned you can fit those end cases.
The penalty with $alpha=0.1$ would be fairly similar to the ridge penalty but it is not the ridge penalty; if it's not considering $alpha$ below $0.1$ you can't necessarily infer much more than that just from the fact that you had that endpoint. If you know that an $alpha$ value that was only slightly larger was worse then it would be likely that a larger range might have chosen a smaller $alpha$, but it doesn't suggest it would have been $0$; I expect it would not. If the grid of values is coarse it may well have been that a larger value than $0.1$ would be better.
[You may want to check whether there was some other reason that $alpha$ might have been at an endpoint; e.g. I seem to recall $lambda$ got set to an endpoint in forecasting if coefficients for lambdaOpt were not saved.]
answered 2 hours ago
Glen_b♦Glen_b
213k22412762
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As far as I understand glmnet, $alpha=0$ would actually be a ridge penalty, and $alpha=1$ would be a Lasso penalty (rather than the other way around) and as far as glmnet is concerned you can fit those end cases.
The penalty with $alpha=0.1$ would be fairly similar to the ridge penalty but it is not the ridge penalty; if it's not considering $alpha$ below $0.1$ you can't necessarily infer much more than that just from the fact that you had that endpoint. If you know that an $alpha$ value that was only slightly larger was worse then it would be likely that a larger range might have chosen a smaller $alpha$, but it doesn't suggest it would have been $0$; I expect it would not. If the grid of values is coarse it may well have been that a larger value than $0.1$ would be better.
[You may want to check whether there was some other reason that $alpha$ might have been at an endpoint; e.g. I seem to recall $lambda$ got set to an endpoint in forecasting if coefficients for lambdaOpt were not saved.]
answered 2 hours ago
Glen_b♦Glen_b
213k22412762
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As far as I understand glmnet, $alpha=0$ would actually be a ridge penalty, and $alpha=1$ would be a Lasso penalty (rather than the other way around) and as far as glmnet is concerned you can fit those end cases.
The penalty with $alpha=0.1$ would be fairly similar to the ridge penalty but it is not the ridge penalty; if it's not considering $alpha$ below $0.1$ you can't necessarily infer much more than that just from the fact that you had that endpoint. If you know that an $alpha$ value that was only slightly larger was worse then it would be likely that a larger range might have chosen a smaller $alpha$, but it doesn't suggest it would have been $0$; I expect it would not. If the grid of values is coarse it may well have been that a larger value than $0.1$ would be better.
[You may want to check whether there was some other reason that $alpha$ might have been at an endpoint; e.g. I seem to recall $lambda$ got set to an endpoint in forecasting if coefficients for lambdaOpt were not saved.]
answered 2 hours ago
Glen_b♦Glen_b
213k22412762
$endgroup$
As far as I understand glmnet, $alpha=0$ would actually be a ridge penalty, and $alpha=1$ would be a Lasso penalty (rather than the other way around) and as far as glmnet is concerned you can fit those end cases.
The penalty with $alpha=0.1$ would be fairly similar to the ridge penalty but it is not the ridge penalty; if it's not considering $alpha$ below $0.1$ you can't necessarily infer much more than that just from the fact that you had that endpoint. If you know that an $alpha$ value that was only slightly larger was worse then it would be likely that a larger range might have chosen a smaller $alpha$, but it doesn't suggest it would have been $0$; I expect it would not. If the grid of values is coarse it may well have been that a larger value than $0.1$ would be better.
[You may want to check whether there was some other reason that $alpha$ might have been at an endpoint; e.g. I seem to recall $lambda$ got set to an endpoint in forecasting if coefficients for lambdaOpt were not saved.]
answered 2 hours ago
Glen_b♦Glen_b
213k22412762
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 hours ago
Glen_b♦Glen_b
213k22412762
answered 2 hours ago
Glen_b♦Glen_b
213k22412762
answered 2 hours ago
Glen_b♦Glen_b
213k22412762
213k22412762
add a comment |
add a comment |
red4life93 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
red4life93 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
red4life93 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
red4life93 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f396748%2fcan-the-alpha-lambda-values-of-a-glmnet-object-output-determine-whether-ridge-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
