Why one of virtual NICs called bond0? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar...

Stars Make Stars

What is the longest distance a 13th-level monk can jump while attacking on the same turn?

What does the "x" in "x86" represent?

"Seemed to had" is it correct?

What is the correct way to use the pinch test for dehydration?

Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

How to find all the available tools in macOS terminal?

What are the motives behind Cersei's orders given to Bronn?

Is the address of a local variable a constexpr?

Should gear shift center itself while in neutral?

Why did the IBM 650 use bi-quinary?

If 'B is more likely given A', then 'A is more likely given B'

Disable hyphenation for an entire paragraph

How discoverable are IPv6 addresses and AAAA names by potential attackers?

How to bypass password on Windows XP account?

Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?

Should I discuss the type of campaign with my players?

What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?

How does cp -a work

How do I mention the quality of my school without bragging

Do you forfeit tax refunds/credits if you aren't required to and don't file by April 15?

Is it true to say that an hosting provider's DNS server is what links the entire hosting environment to ICANN?

Why is "Consequences inflicted." not a sentence?



Why one of virtual NICs called bond0?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!Why does ethernet have a minimum frame size specified?Why straight-through ethernet cables?Virtual Ethernet Adapter / Multiple MAC and IP address for one adapterMulti-NIC Linux machine's NICs are responding to each other's ARPs regardless of arp_filter settingVirtual interfaces with default routesWhy do ethernet cables have 8 wires?Bond0 Failover when link light stays up: High Availability NetworkDifferent speed on Internet connection by switching NICs. Can someone make sense of this?Is one 10 gig port the same as ten 1 gig portsubuntu-14.04 - why can I only connect only on one ethernet interface





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
}







1















I just took over a very old network cluster(no documents and manual left) so I have to imagine the meaning of configuration by myself. Some of the servers' IP configure as following(when I issue ifconfig)



bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST>
inet 10.1.237.11 netmask 255.255.255.192 broadcast 10.1.237.63
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)

bond0.901: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>
inet 147.146.67.13 netmask 255.255.255.240 broadcast 147.146.67.15
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)

bond0.901:1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>
inet 147.185.211.5 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 147.185.211.255
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)

eth2: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)

eth3: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)

lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
loop txqueuelen 0 (Local Loopback)


From the same mac address, I can see there is only one NIC. I was told that bond0 for inner IP, bond0.901 for internet IP, bond0.901:1 for Anycast IP. So my question is that what do eth2 and eth3 for and why one of the virtual NIC called bond0, is there anything need to be bond together?



When I issued the command: lspci|grep Ether, I got the following:



01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
01:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
01:00.2 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
01:00.3 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
04:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
07:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
07:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
09:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
09:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)


Does the above mean I have 10 physical Network cards please?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • What does the output of ifenslave -a and ip link show and ip addr show look like?

    – Zoredache
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Does the above mean I have 10 physical Network cards please - Sure looks like it. Not sure which one of your interfaces are actually being used though.

    – Zoredache
    2 hours ago


















1















I just took over a very old network cluster(no documents and manual left) so I have to imagine the meaning of configuration by myself. Some of the servers' IP configure as following(when I issue ifconfig)



bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST>
inet 10.1.237.11 netmask 255.255.255.192 broadcast 10.1.237.63
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)

bond0.901: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>
inet 147.146.67.13 netmask 255.255.255.240 broadcast 147.146.67.15
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)

bond0.901:1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>
inet 147.185.211.5 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 147.185.211.255
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)

eth2: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)

eth3: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)

lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
loop txqueuelen 0 (Local Loopback)


From the same mac address, I can see there is only one NIC. I was told that bond0 for inner IP, bond0.901 for internet IP, bond0.901:1 for Anycast IP. So my question is that what do eth2 and eth3 for and why one of the virtual NIC called bond0, is there anything need to be bond together?



When I issued the command: lspci|grep Ether, I got the following:



01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
01:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
01:00.2 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
01:00.3 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
04:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
07:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
07:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
09:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
09:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)


Does the above mean I have 10 physical Network cards please?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • What does the output of ifenslave -a and ip link show and ip addr show look like?

    – Zoredache
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Does the above mean I have 10 physical Network cards please - Sure looks like it. Not sure which one of your interfaces are actually being used though.

    – Zoredache
    2 hours ago














1












1








1








I just took over a very old network cluster(no documents and manual left) so I have to imagine the meaning of configuration by myself. Some of the servers' IP configure as following(when I issue ifconfig)



bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST>
inet 10.1.237.11 netmask 255.255.255.192 broadcast 10.1.237.63
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)

bond0.901: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>
inet 147.146.67.13 netmask 255.255.255.240 broadcast 147.146.67.15
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)

bond0.901:1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>
inet 147.185.211.5 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 147.185.211.255
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)

eth2: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)

eth3: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)

lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
loop txqueuelen 0 (Local Loopback)


From the same mac address, I can see there is only one NIC. I was told that bond0 for inner IP, bond0.901 for internet IP, bond0.901:1 for Anycast IP. So my question is that what do eth2 and eth3 for and why one of the virtual NIC called bond0, is there anything need to be bond together?



When I issued the command: lspci|grep Ether, I got the following:



01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
01:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
01:00.2 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
01:00.3 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
04:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
07:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
07:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
09:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
09:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)


Does the above mean I have 10 physical Network cards please?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I just took over a very old network cluster(no documents and manual left) so I have to imagine the meaning of configuration by myself. Some of the servers' IP configure as following(when I issue ifconfig)



bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST>
inet 10.1.237.11 netmask 255.255.255.192 broadcast 10.1.237.63
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)

bond0.901: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>
inet 147.146.67.13 netmask 255.255.255.240 broadcast 147.146.67.15
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)

bond0.901:1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>
inet 147.185.211.5 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 147.185.211.255
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet)

eth2: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)

eth3: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>
ether 6c:90:af:68:5a:28 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)

lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
loop txqueuelen 0 (Local Loopback)


From the same mac address, I can see there is only one NIC. I was told that bond0 for inner IP, bond0.901 for internet IP, bond0.901:1 for Anycast IP. So my question is that what do eth2 and eth3 for and why one of the virtual NIC called bond0, is there anything need to be bond together?



When I issued the command: lspci|grep Ether, I got the following:



01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
01:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
01:00.2 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
01:00.3 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01)
04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
04:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
07:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
07:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
09:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)
09:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01)


Does the above mean I have 10 physical Network cards please?







ethernet






share|improve this question









New contributor




Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago







Jack













New contributor




Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 5 hours ago









JackJack

1085




1085




New contributor




Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Jack is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • What does the output of ifenslave -a and ip link show and ip addr show look like?

    – Zoredache
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Does the above mean I have 10 physical Network cards please - Sure looks like it. Not sure which one of your interfaces are actually being used though.

    – Zoredache
    2 hours ago



















  • What does the output of ifenslave -a and ip link show and ip addr show look like?

    – Zoredache
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    Does the above mean I have 10 physical Network cards please - Sure looks like it. Not sure which one of your interfaces are actually being used though.

    – Zoredache
    2 hours ago

















What does the output of ifenslave -a and ip link show and ip addr show look like?

– Zoredache
4 hours ago





What does the output of ifenslave -a and ip link show and ip addr show look like?

– Zoredache
4 hours ago




1




1





Does the above mean I have 10 physical Network cards please - Sure looks like it. Not sure which one of your interfaces are actually being used though.

– Zoredache
2 hours ago





Does the above mean I have 10 physical Network cards please - Sure looks like it. Not sure which one of your interfaces are actually being used though.

– Zoredache
2 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














I suspect that eth2, and eth3 are the physical devices that make up the bond0 device. See the master/slave flags. But your system probably has 2 physical interfaces, these are being combined in some kind of fault tolerance, or link aggregation setup. Try looking at the output of these tools which query the physical hardware lspci | grep Ether, or lshw -class network. You probably will see at least 2 interfaces.



bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST>
eth2: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>
eth3: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>


The contents of the file /proc/net/bonding/bond0 would tell you more.




  • Bonding docs https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/networking/bonding#ethernet-device-renaming


The bond0.901 is a virtual device allowing for a tagged vlan 901 on bond0.



The bond0.901:1 is just an secondary IP address for the bond0.901 VLAN 901 interface. This is not a real interface, or even a virtual one. This 'interface' is just just a way for ifconfig to show you the second address. But it is a deprecated tool that can give you confusing output like this. Use ip addr, or ip link instead.






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you! I appended description on my question about lspci results. And, you mentioned VLAN 901, where can I find the VLAN config please, what purpose of this VLAN please.

    – Jack
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    No idea what it is for, and no idea where it is configured. There is no way for me to possibly know what it is for. It is probably something local to your network environment. The location for the configuration is distro specific. On Debian it might be under /etc/network/interfaces, but it might also be under /etc/systemd/network, or maybe one of a dozen other places.

    – Zoredache
    2 hours ago













  • one more question please, should the Switch has 901 Vlan configure, but I didn't find this Vlan in switch.

    – Jack
    1 hour ago











  • Modern Linux systems no longer even install ifconfig and route by default anymore, unless some legacy package gets installed that needs them. It's a good idea to get out of the habit of using them.

    – Michael Hampton
    26 mins ago












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f963188%2fwhy-one-of-virtual-nics-called-bond0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














I suspect that eth2, and eth3 are the physical devices that make up the bond0 device. See the master/slave flags. But your system probably has 2 physical interfaces, these are being combined in some kind of fault tolerance, or link aggregation setup. Try looking at the output of these tools which query the physical hardware lspci | grep Ether, or lshw -class network. You probably will see at least 2 interfaces.



bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST>
eth2: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>
eth3: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>


The contents of the file /proc/net/bonding/bond0 would tell you more.




  • Bonding docs https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/networking/bonding#ethernet-device-renaming


The bond0.901 is a virtual device allowing for a tagged vlan 901 on bond0.



The bond0.901:1 is just an secondary IP address for the bond0.901 VLAN 901 interface. This is not a real interface, or even a virtual one. This 'interface' is just just a way for ifconfig to show you the second address. But it is a deprecated tool that can give you confusing output like this. Use ip addr, or ip link instead.






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you! I appended description on my question about lspci results. And, you mentioned VLAN 901, where can I find the VLAN config please, what purpose of this VLAN please.

    – Jack
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    No idea what it is for, and no idea where it is configured. There is no way for me to possibly know what it is for. It is probably something local to your network environment. The location for the configuration is distro specific. On Debian it might be under /etc/network/interfaces, but it might also be under /etc/systemd/network, or maybe one of a dozen other places.

    – Zoredache
    2 hours ago













  • one more question please, should the Switch has 901 Vlan configure, but I didn't find this Vlan in switch.

    – Jack
    1 hour ago











  • Modern Linux systems no longer even install ifconfig and route by default anymore, unless some legacy package gets installed that needs them. It's a good idea to get out of the habit of using them.

    – Michael Hampton
    26 mins ago
















5














I suspect that eth2, and eth3 are the physical devices that make up the bond0 device. See the master/slave flags. But your system probably has 2 physical interfaces, these are being combined in some kind of fault tolerance, or link aggregation setup. Try looking at the output of these tools which query the physical hardware lspci | grep Ether, or lshw -class network. You probably will see at least 2 interfaces.



bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST>
eth2: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>
eth3: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>


The contents of the file /proc/net/bonding/bond0 would tell you more.




  • Bonding docs https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/networking/bonding#ethernet-device-renaming


The bond0.901 is a virtual device allowing for a tagged vlan 901 on bond0.



The bond0.901:1 is just an secondary IP address for the bond0.901 VLAN 901 interface. This is not a real interface, or even a virtual one. This 'interface' is just just a way for ifconfig to show you the second address. But it is a deprecated tool that can give you confusing output like this. Use ip addr, or ip link instead.






share|improve this answer


























  • Thank you! I appended description on my question about lspci results. And, you mentioned VLAN 901, where can I find the VLAN config please, what purpose of this VLAN please.

    – Jack
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    No idea what it is for, and no idea where it is configured. There is no way for me to possibly know what it is for. It is probably something local to your network environment. The location for the configuration is distro specific. On Debian it might be under /etc/network/interfaces, but it might also be under /etc/systemd/network, or maybe one of a dozen other places.

    – Zoredache
    2 hours ago













  • one more question please, should the Switch has 901 Vlan configure, but I didn't find this Vlan in switch.

    – Jack
    1 hour ago











  • Modern Linux systems no longer even install ifconfig and route by default anymore, unless some legacy package gets installed that needs them. It's a good idea to get out of the habit of using them.

    – Michael Hampton
    26 mins ago














5












5








5







I suspect that eth2, and eth3 are the physical devices that make up the bond0 device. See the master/slave flags. But your system probably has 2 physical interfaces, these are being combined in some kind of fault tolerance, or link aggregation setup. Try looking at the output of these tools which query the physical hardware lspci | grep Ether, or lshw -class network. You probably will see at least 2 interfaces.



bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST>
eth2: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>
eth3: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>


The contents of the file /proc/net/bonding/bond0 would tell you more.




  • Bonding docs https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/networking/bonding#ethernet-device-renaming


The bond0.901 is a virtual device allowing for a tagged vlan 901 on bond0.



The bond0.901:1 is just an secondary IP address for the bond0.901 VLAN 901 interface. This is not a real interface, or even a virtual one. This 'interface' is just just a way for ifconfig to show you the second address. But it is a deprecated tool that can give you confusing output like this. Use ip addr, or ip link instead.






share|improve this answer















I suspect that eth2, and eth3 are the physical devices that make up the bond0 device. See the master/slave flags. But your system probably has 2 physical interfaces, these are being combined in some kind of fault tolerance, or link aggregation setup. Try looking at the output of these tools which query the physical hardware lspci | grep Ether, or lshw -class network. You probably will see at least 2 interfaces.



bond0: flags=5187<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MASTER,MULTICAST>
eth2: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>
eth3: flags=6211<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SLAVE,MULTICAST>


The contents of the file /proc/net/bonding/bond0 would tell you more.




  • Bonding docs https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/networking/bonding#ethernet-device-renaming


The bond0.901 is a virtual device allowing for a tagged vlan 901 on bond0.



The bond0.901:1 is just an secondary IP address for the bond0.901 VLAN 901 interface. This is not a real interface, or even a virtual one. This 'interface' is just just a way for ifconfig to show you the second address. But it is a deprecated tool that can give you confusing output like this. Use ip addr, or ip link instead.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 4 hours ago

























answered 4 hours ago









ZoredacheZoredache

112k30231379




112k30231379













  • Thank you! I appended description on my question about lspci results. And, you mentioned VLAN 901, where can I find the VLAN config please, what purpose of this VLAN please.

    – Jack
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    No idea what it is for, and no idea where it is configured. There is no way for me to possibly know what it is for. It is probably something local to your network environment. The location for the configuration is distro specific. On Debian it might be under /etc/network/interfaces, but it might also be under /etc/systemd/network, or maybe one of a dozen other places.

    – Zoredache
    2 hours ago













  • one more question please, should the Switch has 901 Vlan configure, but I didn't find this Vlan in switch.

    – Jack
    1 hour ago











  • Modern Linux systems no longer even install ifconfig and route by default anymore, unless some legacy package gets installed that needs them. It's a good idea to get out of the habit of using them.

    – Michael Hampton
    26 mins ago



















  • Thank you! I appended description on my question about lspci results. And, you mentioned VLAN 901, where can I find the VLAN config please, what purpose of this VLAN please.

    – Jack
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    No idea what it is for, and no idea where it is configured. There is no way for me to possibly know what it is for. It is probably something local to your network environment. The location for the configuration is distro specific. On Debian it might be under /etc/network/interfaces, but it might also be under /etc/systemd/network, or maybe one of a dozen other places.

    – Zoredache
    2 hours ago













  • one more question please, should the Switch has 901 Vlan configure, but I didn't find this Vlan in switch.

    – Jack
    1 hour ago











  • Modern Linux systems no longer even install ifconfig and route by default anymore, unless some legacy package gets installed that needs them. It's a good idea to get out of the habit of using them.

    – Michael Hampton
    26 mins ago

















Thank you! I appended description on my question about lspci results. And, you mentioned VLAN 901, where can I find the VLAN config please, what purpose of this VLAN please.

– Jack
2 hours ago





Thank you! I appended description on my question about lspci results. And, you mentioned VLAN 901, where can I find the VLAN config please, what purpose of this VLAN please.

– Jack
2 hours ago




1




1





No idea what it is for, and no idea where it is configured. There is no way for me to possibly know what it is for. It is probably something local to your network environment. The location for the configuration is distro specific. On Debian it might be under /etc/network/interfaces, but it might also be under /etc/systemd/network, or maybe one of a dozen other places.

– Zoredache
2 hours ago







No idea what it is for, and no idea where it is configured. There is no way for me to possibly know what it is for. It is probably something local to your network environment. The location for the configuration is distro specific. On Debian it might be under /etc/network/interfaces, but it might also be under /etc/systemd/network, or maybe one of a dozen other places.

– Zoredache
2 hours ago















one more question please, should the Switch has 901 Vlan configure, but I didn't find this Vlan in switch.

– Jack
1 hour ago





one more question please, should the Switch has 901 Vlan configure, but I didn't find this Vlan in switch.

– Jack
1 hour ago













Modern Linux systems no longer even install ifconfig and route by default anymore, unless some legacy package gets installed that needs them. It's a good idea to get out of the habit of using them.

– Michael Hampton
26 mins ago





Modern Linux systems no longer even install ifconfig and route by default anymore, unless some legacy package gets installed that needs them. It's a good idea to get out of the habit of using them.

– Michael Hampton
26 mins ago










Jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Jack is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f963188%2fwhy-one-of-virtual-nics-called-bond0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can't compile dgruyter and caption packagesLaTeX templates/packages for writing a patent specificationLatex...

Schneeberg (Smreczany) Bibliografia | Menu...

Hans Bellmer Spis treści Życiorys | Upamiętnienie | Przypisy | Bibliografia | Linki zewnętrzne |...