Best mythical creature to use as livestock?How would a human livestock facility run by aliens...

Want to switch to tankless, but can I use my existing wiring?

Is it ok to include an epilogue dedicated to colleagues who passed away in the end of the manuscript?

Word for a person who has no opinion about whether god exists

Is all copper pipe pretty much the same?

Deleting missing values from a dataset

How to discourage/prevent PCs from using door choke-points?

Giving Plot options defined outside of the Plot expression

Replacing Windows 7 security updates with anti-virus?

Why would a jet engine that runs at temps excess of 2000°C burn when it crashes?

How to deal with a cynical class?

Force user to remove USB token

what does the apostrophe mean in this notation?

Sword in the Stone story where the sword was held in place by electromagnets

Confusion with the nameplate of an induction motor

What is the difference between "shut" and "close"?

Am I not good enough for you?

Why don't MCU characters ever seem to have language issues?

How could a female member of a species produce eggs unto death?

Can infringement of a trademark be pursued for using a company's name in a sentence?

Is it true that real estate prices mainly go up?

Are there situations where a child is permitted to refer to their parent by their first name?

Time dilation for a moving electronic clock

Format picture and text with TikZ and minipage

Good allowance savings plan?



Best mythical creature to use as livestock?


How would a human livestock facility run by aliens operate?Anatomically Correct: 4-legged sapient creatures (“centaurs” etc.)How can orcs “tame” a low-intelligence creature like an ogre for battleHow to build a fortress to survive against mythical creaturesFeeding the griffin: Determining approximate food requirements for mythical creatures?In obligate carnivores, can I have animal husbandry (livestock-keeping) without farming ever developing?Would a 'silk road' type caravan butcher and prepare livestock en route?What mythical creature might be a match for the MEU?How can sharks be domesticated to become man's best friend?What changes to the livestock industry would slowly evolve the animals to become a threat to humanity?













5












$begingroup$


Imagine a world where all the magical and fantastical creatures that exist in mythology or folklore actually exist. Everything from dragons, griffins, goblins, harpies, trolls, etc. - they can taken from any history or culture, and assume that the ecosystem has evolved to accept them all.



In that world, which fantastical creature would be the most likely candidate to be domesticated and used by humans as livestock? What would be a fantasy world's equivalent of cows and sheep?



Mythical creatures rooted in folklore are preferred, but modern fantasy variations are also acceptable. Bonus for any lesser known mythical creatures suggested.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "What is the best X?" questions are frequently closed if you do not avoid being primarily opinion-based, which you haven't. Every fantasy creature has be described, used, redefined, reused, over and over. (a) You must specifically define the physiological characteristics of the creatures you want us to evaluate. (b) You must define the specific aspects of "livestock" in consideration (food source? transport? etc.). (c) You must explain how you will judge the (or what makes a) best answer.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Would you accept the Shmoo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shmoo) as a mythical creature?
    $endgroup$
    – Logan R. Kearsley
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH When it comes to animal domestication, there are very specific attributes that make a species viable or not, so I would argue that there is a best answer to this question which could be given by someone who specialises in that field.
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII, who specializes in the domestication of mythical creatures? A mythical creature would have those attributes by definition of the author.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII, you have a point. (*sigh*) I wish the OP was online. Without his/her clarifications, we're guessing as to intent. After all, who but the OP can assume any such trait belongs to a dragon, a pixie, or a leprechaun? All these creatures have been defined by so many authors in so many ways that we're forced to make assumptions. Blech.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    21 mins ago
















5












$begingroup$


Imagine a world where all the magical and fantastical creatures that exist in mythology or folklore actually exist. Everything from dragons, griffins, goblins, harpies, trolls, etc. - they can taken from any history or culture, and assume that the ecosystem has evolved to accept them all.



In that world, which fantastical creature would be the most likely candidate to be domesticated and used by humans as livestock? What would be a fantasy world's equivalent of cows and sheep?



Mythical creatures rooted in folklore are preferred, but modern fantasy variations are also acceptable. Bonus for any lesser known mythical creatures suggested.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "What is the best X?" questions are frequently closed if you do not avoid being primarily opinion-based, which you haven't. Every fantasy creature has be described, used, redefined, reused, over and over. (a) You must specifically define the physiological characteristics of the creatures you want us to evaluate. (b) You must define the specific aspects of "livestock" in consideration (food source? transport? etc.). (c) You must explain how you will judge the (or what makes a) best answer.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Would you accept the Shmoo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shmoo) as a mythical creature?
    $endgroup$
    – Logan R. Kearsley
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH When it comes to animal domestication, there are very specific attributes that make a species viable or not, so I would argue that there is a best answer to this question which could be given by someone who specialises in that field.
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII, who specializes in the domestication of mythical creatures? A mythical creature would have those attributes by definition of the author.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII, you have a point. (*sigh*) I wish the OP was online. Without his/her clarifications, we're guessing as to intent. After all, who but the OP can assume any such trait belongs to a dragon, a pixie, or a leprechaun? All these creatures have been defined by so many authors in so many ways that we're forced to make assumptions. Blech.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    21 mins ago














5












5








5


1



$begingroup$


Imagine a world where all the magical and fantastical creatures that exist in mythology or folklore actually exist. Everything from dragons, griffins, goblins, harpies, trolls, etc. - they can taken from any history or culture, and assume that the ecosystem has evolved to accept them all.



In that world, which fantastical creature would be the most likely candidate to be domesticated and used by humans as livestock? What would be a fantasy world's equivalent of cows and sheep?



Mythical creatures rooted in folklore are preferred, but modern fantasy variations are also acceptable. Bonus for any lesser known mythical creatures suggested.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Imagine a world where all the magical and fantastical creatures that exist in mythology or folklore actually exist. Everything from dragons, griffins, goblins, harpies, trolls, etc. - they can taken from any history or culture, and assume that the ecosystem has evolved to accept them all.



In that world, which fantastical creature would be the most likely candidate to be domesticated and used by humans as livestock? What would be a fantasy world's equivalent of cows and sheep?



Mythical creatures rooted in folklore are preferred, but modern fantasy variations are also acceptable. Bonus for any lesser known mythical creatures suggested.







fantasy-races mythical-creatures domestication low-fantasy livestock






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 hours ago









CSNCSN

12116




12116








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "What is the best X?" questions are frequently closed if you do not avoid being primarily opinion-based, which you haven't. Every fantasy creature has be described, used, redefined, reused, over and over. (a) You must specifically define the physiological characteristics of the creatures you want us to evaluate. (b) You must define the specific aspects of "livestock" in consideration (food source? transport? etc.). (c) You must explain how you will judge the (or what makes a) best answer.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Would you accept the Shmoo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shmoo) as a mythical creature?
    $endgroup$
    – Logan R. Kearsley
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH When it comes to animal domestication, there are very specific attributes that make a species viable or not, so I would argue that there is a best answer to this question which could be given by someone who specialises in that field.
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII, who specializes in the domestication of mythical creatures? A mythical creature would have those attributes by definition of the author.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII, you have a point. (*sigh*) I wish the OP was online. Without his/her clarifications, we're guessing as to intent. After all, who but the OP can assume any such trait belongs to a dragon, a pixie, or a leprechaun? All these creatures have been defined by so many authors in so many ways that we're forced to make assumptions. Blech.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    21 mins ago














  • 3




    $begingroup$
    "What is the best X?" questions are frequently closed if you do not avoid being primarily opinion-based, which you haven't. Every fantasy creature has be described, used, redefined, reused, over and over. (a) You must specifically define the physiological characteristics of the creatures you want us to evaluate. (b) You must define the specific aspects of "livestock" in consideration (food source? transport? etc.). (c) You must explain how you will judge the (or what makes a) best answer.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Would you accept the Shmoo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shmoo) as a mythical creature?
    $endgroup$
    – Logan R. Kearsley
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JBH When it comes to animal domestication, there are very specific attributes that make a species viable or not, so I would argue that there is a best answer to this question which could be given by someone who specialises in that field.
    $endgroup$
    – Arkenstein XII
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII, who specializes in the domestication of mythical creatures? A mythical creature would have those attributes by definition of the author.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ArkensteinXII, you have a point. (*sigh*) I wish the OP was online. Without his/her clarifications, we're guessing as to intent. After all, who but the OP can assume any such trait belongs to a dragon, a pixie, or a leprechaun? All these creatures have been defined by so many authors in so many ways that we're forced to make assumptions. Blech.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    21 mins ago








3




3




$begingroup$
"What is the best X?" questions are frequently closed if you do not avoid being primarily opinion-based, which you haven't. Every fantasy creature has be described, used, redefined, reused, over and over. (a) You must specifically define the physiological characteristics of the creatures you want us to evaluate. (b) You must define the specific aspects of "livestock" in consideration (food source? transport? etc.). (c) You must explain how you will judge the (or what makes a) best answer.
$endgroup$
– JBH
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
"What is the best X?" questions are frequently closed if you do not avoid being primarily opinion-based, which you haven't. Every fantasy creature has be described, used, redefined, reused, over and over. (a) You must specifically define the physiological characteristics of the creatures you want us to evaluate. (b) You must define the specific aspects of "livestock" in consideration (food source? transport? etc.). (c) You must explain how you will judge the (or what makes a) best answer.
$endgroup$
– JBH
2 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Would you accept the Shmoo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shmoo) as a mythical creature?
$endgroup$
– Logan R. Kearsley
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Would you accept the Shmoo (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shmoo) as a mythical creature?
$endgroup$
– Logan R. Kearsley
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@JBH When it comes to animal domestication, there are very specific attributes that make a species viable or not, so I would argue that there is a best answer to this question which could be given by someone who specialises in that field.
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@JBH When it comes to animal domestication, there are very specific attributes that make a species viable or not, so I would argue that there is a best answer to this question which could be given by someone who specialises in that field.
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
@ArkensteinXII, who specializes in the domestication of mythical creatures? A mythical creature would have those attributes by definition of the author.
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@ArkensteinXII, who specializes in the domestication of mythical creatures? A mythical creature would have those attributes by definition of the author.
$endgroup$
– JBH
1 hour ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@ArkensteinXII, you have a point. (*sigh*) I wish the OP was online. Without his/her clarifications, we're guessing as to intent. After all, who but the OP can assume any such trait belongs to a dragon, a pixie, or a leprechaun? All these creatures have been defined by so many authors in so many ways that we're forced to make assumptions. Blech.
$endgroup$
– JBH
21 mins ago




$begingroup$
@ArkensteinXII, you have a point. (*sigh*) I wish the OP was online. Without his/her clarifications, we're guessing as to intent. After all, who but the OP can assume any such trait belongs to a dragon, a pixie, or a leprechaun? All these creatures have been defined by so many authors in so many ways that we're forced to make assumptions. Blech.
$endgroup$
– JBH
21 mins ago










7 Answers
7






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Perfectly Normal Beast



Source: Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy (mostly harmless).



Location: Lamuella, Anhondo Plain



Food benefit: Arthur Dent makes their meat into a rather nice sandwich, and for it he become's "Sandwich Maker" to the people of Lamuella. Some actually call him "Bob's only Begotten Sandwich Maker" which should be a testament to the quality of the sandwich which is made from the meat of the Perfectly Normal Beast. Arthur claims that it is a bit like a cow.



Mysterious property: They migrate in an unexplained way twice a year on the planet of Lamuella before disappearing completely into oblivion.



Old Thrashbarg calls them "Perfectly Normal" Saying that "they come from where they come from, and they go to where they go to, and it's all Bob's will, so it's all perfectly normal".



"Who's "Bob"?"... "Don't ask."



Spoiler: They go to the Domain of "The King", which is apparently their true home.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    The Hydra



    It would probably be a real bitch to tame. But the reward for doing so is awesome: an essentially infinite supply of hydra heads that grow back near instantly.



    (There's probably other mythical creatures with similarly fantastical regeneration/multiplicative abilities, perhaps ones that are less dangerous, but the hydra's the first that came to mind.)






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Trolls are the obvious other choice, I doubt they taste good though. This was my obvious first thought too though :)
      $endgroup$
      – Tim B
      1 hour ago












    • $begingroup$
      Wasn't the hydra's blood poisonous?
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      18 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      The Lernaean Hydra or Hydra of Lerna more often known simply as the Hydra, is a serpentine .... Heracles would later use arrows dipped in the Hydra's poisonous blood to kill other foes during his remaining labors, such as Stymphalian Birds
      $endgroup$
      – Thorne
      12 mins ago



















    1












    $begingroup$

    Though it is extremely dangerous, if a Hydra were domesticated (or held in captivity successfully), it does provide enough meat to feed virtually any size population. If you cut off one head, two more grow back immediately, so the Hydra only increases in total head count. Presumably, there is some amount of Hydra neck which also comes with each head, from which several good sized Hydra steaks can be cut. I'd imagine the meat would be a bit like crocodile; probably about halfway between chicken and fish. Obviously, Hydra farming is not for the faint of heart, but considering how much high quality meat could be harvested from a single Hydra in a very short time, it would certainly be worth it.



    Griffons and Hippogriffs are obvious candidates for domesticated riding beasts. The ability to fly with a passenger is a pretty good reason to use them.



    Medieval Europe and Japan both had lots of stories about domestic fey which would hide around a peasant hut and (in return for small amounts of food left out for it) would do work that benefited the peasants, like repairing furniture or buildings or reaping a field in the night. Certainly no mythology-derived economy would be complete without worker fey.



    Dragons are always interesting, not so much as something that is likely to be domesticated, but potentially as something which might be partnered with. Most myths have dragons being as intelligent as humans, and certainly in Western myths, they could often belt out fire hotter than that produced by any forge. The natural outcome of that might be a dragon-powered blast furnace that can produce alloys unavailable anywhere else. Obviously, the dragon would have to benefit from this arrangement, so there would have to be a quid-pro-quo of something they want in return for a few hours blowing into a big stone tower.



    Will-o-wisps or pixies kept in jars may be useful sources of light in a pre-electrical setting. Maybe they can be fed with honey, or something equally cheap (though the tales of will-o-wisps usually imply that they "feed" on the dead souls of poor fools who follow their lights into a bog and die).



    There are many, many more possibilities...






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      The Vegetable Lamb of Tartary



      An odd Northern European tale says there's a plant that grows in asia with sheep as its fruit. The sheep are very much alive, so it's not all plant - they walk around and graze the grass, attached to the plant by an umbilical cord. The plant and sheep die when the grass runs out, but I suppose you could keep feeding them more grass and get by.



      The advantages? You don't have to support livestock except to feed them, which are usually harder to raise than plants and jack up your prices. You don't have to tame them, or watch them carefully so they don't wander away, worry about legendary enclosures for legendary creatures, etc. You just plant, tend, make sure the Big Bad Wolf stays on the appropriate side of your fence, and prune in season!



      You'll even get the wool as a bonus. Livestock are good for more than just meat you know!



      (In fairness about obscurity: it was at the top of a Wikipedia page. But who doesn't wish mutton grew on trees?)






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$





















        1












        $begingroup$

        Humans



        (And other humanoids such as elves, orcs etc.)



        Outrageous, you say? Wait until I'm done.



        It may seem a little evil and inhuman to raise intelligent, sentient beings for food and leather. That's clearly not enough, so use the polymorph spell to make it proper and a lot evil by turning them into actual livestock! And then you can turn them into whatever beast suits your economic needs at the moment.



        Advantage over other alternatives: besides having the right cattle for the right time, you solve problems related to POW's, overpopulation, crowded prisons and dissidency, all in one go.





        share









        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          Well, we found the evil emperor...
          $endgroup$
          – Arkenstein XII
          1 min ago



















        0












        $begingroup$

        A Cockatrice might pass for a decent farm animal. It is part chicken, which means it probably tasted good. They also lay sizable eggs, which can serve as an additional source of protein.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        $endgroup$













        • $begingroup$
          Where do you find that Cockatrice's lay eggs? According to the Wiki page you link to, a cockatrice is the product of a cock's egg (an egg laid by a male chicken) incubated in a toad or a snake. Can you cite an authority that suggests the mythology of the Cockatrice included laying eggs?
          $endgroup$
          – JBH
          2 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          Here is a source that says cockatrice lay eggs. Cockatrice have to reproduce some way and only mammals give birth to live young generally. It stands to reason that since both dragons and chickens lay eggs that a cockatrice would to. biblestudy.org/bible-study-by-topic/…
          $endgroup$
          – SciFiGuy
          2 hours ago








        • 1




          $begingroup$
          The biblical cockatrice was most likely a snake - even that bible study link says that. Most snakes do lay eggs (even the Adder, which many think the biblical cockatrice refers to, although they're ovoviviparous). The biblical cockatrice is not the cockatrice of fantasy described by your Wiki link or, without clarification, what the OP intended.
          $endgroup$
          – JBH
          2 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          @SciFiGuy They probably do lay eggs, but I'm not familiar with any bird-cockatrices in the bible, and the link also references the asp incorrectly (I believe that is a type of snake?)
          $endgroup$
          – theREALyumdub
          23 mins ago












        • $begingroup$
          I think they're better as eatchdogs than as livedtock, just like geese.
          $endgroup$
          – Renan
          18 mins ago



















        0












        $begingroup$

        Of course, a serious economical evaluation—what is the most profitable creature to use as livestock?—should consider feeding and well-being costs specific to the species, which may vary wildly for the same creature in different traditions (something like creature X in tradition Y only mates once per millenium, but in tradition Z it mates on every blue Moon)



        Option 1: The Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs assuming you can clone it or get it to reproduce in in some other way and it qualifies as a mythical creature (which arguably does).



        Option 2: Unicorns. They can provide both transportation and food. Their horns purify water and have several medical properties, including serving as antipoison. Their tails and blood also have magical properties.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$









        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Canned Unicorn meat thinkgeek.com/product/e5a7
          $endgroup$
          – Thorne
          11 mins ago











        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "579"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141446%2fbest-mythical-creature-to-use-as-livestock%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes








        7 Answers
        7






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        4












        $begingroup$

        Perfectly Normal Beast



        Source: Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy (mostly harmless).



        Location: Lamuella, Anhondo Plain



        Food benefit: Arthur Dent makes their meat into a rather nice sandwich, and for it he become's "Sandwich Maker" to the people of Lamuella. Some actually call him "Bob's only Begotten Sandwich Maker" which should be a testament to the quality of the sandwich which is made from the meat of the Perfectly Normal Beast. Arthur claims that it is a bit like a cow.



        Mysterious property: They migrate in an unexplained way twice a year on the planet of Lamuella before disappearing completely into oblivion.



        Old Thrashbarg calls them "Perfectly Normal" Saying that "they come from where they come from, and they go to where they go to, and it's all Bob's will, so it's all perfectly normal".



        "Who's "Bob"?"... "Don't ask."



        Spoiler: They go to the Domain of "The King", which is apparently their true home.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Perfectly Normal Beast



          Source: Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy (mostly harmless).



          Location: Lamuella, Anhondo Plain



          Food benefit: Arthur Dent makes their meat into a rather nice sandwich, and for it he become's "Sandwich Maker" to the people of Lamuella. Some actually call him "Bob's only Begotten Sandwich Maker" which should be a testament to the quality of the sandwich which is made from the meat of the Perfectly Normal Beast. Arthur claims that it is a bit like a cow.



          Mysterious property: They migrate in an unexplained way twice a year on the planet of Lamuella before disappearing completely into oblivion.



          Old Thrashbarg calls them "Perfectly Normal" Saying that "they come from where they come from, and they go to where they go to, and it's all Bob's will, so it's all perfectly normal".



          "Who's "Bob"?"... "Don't ask."



          Spoiler: They go to the Domain of "The King", which is apparently their true home.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$
















            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            Perfectly Normal Beast



            Source: Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy (mostly harmless).



            Location: Lamuella, Anhondo Plain



            Food benefit: Arthur Dent makes their meat into a rather nice sandwich, and for it he become's "Sandwich Maker" to the people of Lamuella. Some actually call him "Bob's only Begotten Sandwich Maker" which should be a testament to the quality of the sandwich which is made from the meat of the Perfectly Normal Beast. Arthur claims that it is a bit like a cow.



            Mysterious property: They migrate in an unexplained way twice a year on the planet of Lamuella before disappearing completely into oblivion.



            Old Thrashbarg calls them "Perfectly Normal" Saying that "they come from where they come from, and they go to where they go to, and it's all Bob's will, so it's all perfectly normal".



            "Who's "Bob"?"... "Don't ask."



            Spoiler: They go to the Domain of "The King", which is apparently their true home.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Perfectly Normal Beast



            Source: Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy (mostly harmless).



            Location: Lamuella, Anhondo Plain



            Food benefit: Arthur Dent makes their meat into a rather nice sandwich, and for it he become's "Sandwich Maker" to the people of Lamuella. Some actually call him "Bob's only Begotten Sandwich Maker" which should be a testament to the quality of the sandwich which is made from the meat of the Perfectly Normal Beast. Arthur claims that it is a bit like a cow.



            Mysterious property: They migrate in an unexplained way twice a year on the planet of Lamuella before disappearing completely into oblivion.



            Old Thrashbarg calls them "Perfectly Normal" Saying that "they come from where they come from, and they go to where they go to, and it's all Bob's will, so it's all perfectly normal".



            "Who's "Bob"?"... "Don't ask."



            Spoiler: They go to the Domain of "The King", which is apparently their true home.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 hours ago









            MathaddictMathaddict

            4,352532




            4,352532























                2












                $begingroup$

                The Hydra



                It would probably be a real bitch to tame. But the reward for doing so is awesome: an essentially infinite supply of hydra heads that grow back near instantly.



                (There's probably other mythical creatures with similarly fantastical regeneration/multiplicative abilities, perhaps ones that are less dangerous, but the hydra's the first that came to mind.)






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  Trolls are the obvious other choice, I doubt they taste good though. This was my obvious first thought too though :)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Tim B
                  1 hour ago












                • $begingroup$
                  Wasn't the hydra's blood poisonous?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Thorne
                  18 mins ago










                • $begingroup$
                  The Lernaean Hydra or Hydra of Lerna more often known simply as the Hydra, is a serpentine .... Heracles would later use arrows dipped in the Hydra's poisonous blood to kill other foes during his remaining labors, such as Stymphalian Birds
                  $endgroup$
                  – Thorne
                  12 mins ago
















                2












                $begingroup$

                The Hydra



                It would probably be a real bitch to tame. But the reward for doing so is awesome: an essentially infinite supply of hydra heads that grow back near instantly.



                (There's probably other mythical creatures with similarly fantastical regeneration/multiplicative abilities, perhaps ones that are less dangerous, but the hydra's the first that came to mind.)






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  Trolls are the obvious other choice, I doubt they taste good though. This was my obvious first thought too though :)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Tim B
                  1 hour ago












                • $begingroup$
                  Wasn't the hydra's blood poisonous?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Thorne
                  18 mins ago










                • $begingroup$
                  The Lernaean Hydra or Hydra of Lerna more often known simply as the Hydra, is a serpentine .... Heracles would later use arrows dipped in the Hydra's poisonous blood to kill other foes during his remaining labors, such as Stymphalian Birds
                  $endgroup$
                  – Thorne
                  12 mins ago














                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                The Hydra



                It would probably be a real bitch to tame. But the reward for doing so is awesome: an essentially infinite supply of hydra heads that grow back near instantly.



                (There's probably other mythical creatures with similarly fantastical regeneration/multiplicative abilities, perhaps ones that are less dangerous, but the hydra's the first that came to mind.)






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                The Hydra



                It would probably be a real bitch to tame. But the reward for doing so is awesome: an essentially infinite supply of hydra heads that grow back near instantly.



                (There's probably other mythical creatures with similarly fantastical regeneration/multiplicative abilities, perhaps ones that are less dangerous, but the hydra's the first that came to mind.)







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 1 hour ago

























                answered 1 hour ago









                GeneGene

                85217




                85217












                • $begingroup$
                  Trolls are the obvious other choice, I doubt they taste good though. This was my obvious first thought too though :)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Tim B
                  1 hour ago












                • $begingroup$
                  Wasn't the hydra's blood poisonous?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Thorne
                  18 mins ago










                • $begingroup$
                  The Lernaean Hydra or Hydra of Lerna more often known simply as the Hydra, is a serpentine .... Heracles would later use arrows dipped in the Hydra's poisonous blood to kill other foes during his remaining labors, such as Stymphalian Birds
                  $endgroup$
                  – Thorne
                  12 mins ago


















                • $begingroup$
                  Trolls are the obvious other choice, I doubt they taste good though. This was my obvious first thought too though :)
                  $endgroup$
                  – Tim B
                  1 hour ago












                • $begingroup$
                  Wasn't the hydra's blood poisonous?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Thorne
                  18 mins ago










                • $begingroup$
                  The Lernaean Hydra or Hydra of Lerna more often known simply as the Hydra, is a serpentine .... Heracles would later use arrows dipped in the Hydra's poisonous blood to kill other foes during his remaining labors, such as Stymphalian Birds
                  $endgroup$
                  – Thorne
                  12 mins ago
















                $begingroup$
                Trolls are the obvious other choice, I doubt they taste good though. This was my obvious first thought too though :)
                $endgroup$
                – Tim B
                1 hour ago






                $begingroup$
                Trolls are the obvious other choice, I doubt they taste good though. This was my obvious first thought too though :)
                $endgroup$
                – Tim B
                1 hour ago














                $begingroup$
                Wasn't the hydra's blood poisonous?
                $endgroup$
                – Thorne
                18 mins ago




                $begingroup$
                Wasn't the hydra's blood poisonous?
                $endgroup$
                – Thorne
                18 mins ago












                $begingroup$
                The Lernaean Hydra or Hydra of Lerna more often known simply as the Hydra, is a serpentine .... Heracles would later use arrows dipped in the Hydra's poisonous blood to kill other foes during his remaining labors, such as Stymphalian Birds
                $endgroup$
                – Thorne
                12 mins ago




                $begingroup$
                The Lernaean Hydra or Hydra of Lerna more often known simply as the Hydra, is a serpentine .... Heracles would later use arrows dipped in the Hydra's poisonous blood to kill other foes during his remaining labors, such as Stymphalian Birds
                $endgroup$
                – Thorne
                12 mins ago











                1












                $begingroup$

                Though it is extremely dangerous, if a Hydra were domesticated (or held in captivity successfully), it does provide enough meat to feed virtually any size population. If you cut off one head, two more grow back immediately, so the Hydra only increases in total head count. Presumably, there is some amount of Hydra neck which also comes with each head, from which several good sized Hydra steaks can be cut. I'd imagine the meat would be a bit like crocodile; probably about halfway between chicken and fish. Obviously, Hydra farming is not for the faint of heart, but considering how much high quality meat could be harvested from a single Hydra in a very short time, it would certainly be worth it.



                Griffons and Hippogriffs are obvious candidates for domesticated riding beasts. The ability to fly with a passenger is a pretty good reason to use them.



                Medieval Europe and Japan both had lots of stories about domestic fey which would hide around a peasant hut and (in return for small amounts of food left out for it) would do work that benefited the peasants, like repairing furniture or buildings or reaping a field in the night. Certainly no mythology-derived economy would be complete without worker fey.



                Dragons are always interesting, not so much as something that is likely to be domesticated, but potentially as something which might be partnered with. Most myths have dragons being as intelligent as humans, and certainly in Western myths, they could often belt out fire hotter than that produced by any forge. The natural outcome of that might be a dragon-powered blast furnace that can produce alloys unavailable anywhere else. Obviously, the dragon would have to benefit from this arrangement, so there would have to be a quid-pro-quo of something they want in return for a few hours blowing into a big stone tower.



                Will-o-wisps or pixies kept in jars may be useful sources of light in a pre-electrical setting. Maybe they can be fed with honey, or something equally cheap (though the tales of will-o-wisps usually imply that they "feed" on the dead souls of poor fools who follow their lights into a bog and die).



                There are many, many more possibilities...






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$


















                  1












                  $begingroup$

                  Though it is extremely dangerous, if a Hydra were domesticated (or held in captivity successfully), it does provide enough meat to feed virtually any size population. If you cut off one head, two more grow back immediately, so the Hydra only increases in total head count. Presumably, there is some amount of Hydra neck which also comes with each head, from which several good sized Hydra steaks can be cut. I'd imagine the meat would be a bit like crocodile; probably about halfway between chicken and fish. Obviously, Hydra farming is not for the faint of heart, but considering how much high quality meat could be harvested from a single Hydra in a very short time, it would certainly be worth it.



                  Griffons and Hippogriffs are obvious candidates for domesticated riding beasts. The ability to fly with a passenger is a pretty good reason to use them.



                  Medieval Europe and Japan both had lots of stories about domestic fey which would hide around a peasant hut and (in return for small amounts of food left out for it) would do work that benefited the peasants, like repairing furniture or buildings or reaping a field in the night. Certainly no mythology-derived economy would be complete without worker fey.



                  Dragons are always interesting, not so much as something that is likely to be domesticated, but potentially as something which might be partnered with. Most myths have dragons being as intelligent as humans, and certainly in Western myths, they could often belt out fire hotter than that produced by any forge. The natural outcome of that might be a dragon-powered blast furnace that can produce alloys unavailable anywhere else. Obviously, the dragon would have to benefit from this arrangement, so there would have to be a quid-pro-quo of something they want in return for a few hours blowing into a big stone tower.



                  Will-o-wisps or pixies kept in jars may be useful sources of light in a pre-electrical setting. Maybe they can be fed with honey, or something equally cheap (though the tales of will-o-wisps usually imply that they "feed" on the dead souls of poor fools who follow their lights into a bog and die).



                  There are many, many more possibilities...






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$
















                    1












                    1








                    1





                    $begingroup$

                    Though it is extremely dangerous, if a Hydra were domesticated (or held in captivity successfully), it does provide enough meat to feed virtually any size population. If you cut off one head, two more grow back immediately, so the Hydra only increases in total head count. Presumably, there is some amount of Hydra neck which also comes with each head, from which several good sized Hydra steaks can be cut. I'd imagine the meat would be a bit like crocodile; probably about halfway between chicken and fish. Obviously, Hydra farming is not for the faint of heart, but considering how much high quality meat could be harvested from a single Hydra in a very short time, it would certainly be worth it.



                    Griffons and Hippogriffs are obvious candidates for domesticated riding beasts. The ability to fly with a passenger is a pretty good reason to use them.



                    Medieval Europe and Japan both had lots of stories about domestic fey which would hide around a peasant hut and (in return for small amounts of food left out for it) would do work that benefited the peasants, like repairing furniture or buildings or reaping a field in the night. Certainly no mythology-derived economy would be complete without worker fey.



                    Dragons are always interesting, not so much as something that is likely to be domesticated, but potentially as something which might be partnered with. Most myths have dragons being as intelligent as humans, and certainly in Western myths, they could often belt out fire hotter than that produced by any forge. The natural outcome of that might be a dragon-powered blast furnace that can produce alloys unavailable anywhere else. Obviously, the dragon would have to benefit from this arrangement, so there would have to be a quid-pro-quo of something they want in return for a few hours blowing into a big stone tower.



                    Will-o-wisps or pixies kept in jars may be useful sources of light in a pre-electrical setting. Maybe they can be fed with honey, or something equally cheap (though the tales of will-o-wisps usually imply that they "feed" on the dead souls of poor fools who follow their lights into a bog and die).



                    There are many, many more possibilities...






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Though it is extremely dangerous, if a Hydra were domesticated (or held in captivity successfully), it does provide enough meat to feed virtually any size population. If you cut off one head, two more grow back immediately, so the Hydra only increases in total head count. Presumably, there is some amount of Hydra neck which also comes with each head, from which several good sized Hydra steaks can be cut. I'd imagine the meat would be a bit like crocodile; probably about halfway between chicken and fish. Obviously, Hydra farming is not for the faint of heart, but considering how much high quality meat could be harvested from a single Hydra in a very short time, it would certainly be worth it.



                    Griffons and Hippogriffs are obvious candidates for domesticated riding beasts. The ability to fly with a passenger is a pretty good reason to use them.



                    Medieval Europe and Japan both had lots of stories about domestic fey which would hide around a peasant hut and (in return for small amounts of food left out for it) would do work that benefited the peasants, like repairing furniture or buildings or reaping a field in the night. Certainly no mythology-derived economy would be complete without worker fey.



                    Dragons are always interesting, not so much as something that is likely to be domesticated, but potentially as something which might be partnered with. Most myths have dragons being as intelligent as humans, and certainly in Western myths, they could often belt out fire hotter than that produced by any forge. The natural outcome of that might be a dragon-powered blast furnace that can produce alloys unavailable anywhere else. Obviously, the dragon would have to benefit from this arrangement, so there would have to be a quid-pro-quo of something they want in return for a few hours blowing into a big stone tower.



                    Will-o-wisps or pixies kept in jars may be useful sources of light in a pre-electrical setting. Maybe they can be fed with honey, or something equally cheap (though the tales of will-o-wisps usually imply that they "feed" on the dead souls of poor fools who follow their lights into a bog and die).



                    There are many, many more possibilities...







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 1 hour ago









                    JBiggsJBiggs

                    8,76811840




                    8,76811840























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        The Vegetable Lamb of Tartary



                        An odd Northern European tale says there's a plant that grows in asia with sheep as its fruit. The sheep are very much alive, so it's not all plant - they walk around and graze the grass, attached to the plant by an umbilical cord. The plant and sheep die when the grass runs out, but I suppose you could keep feeding them more grass and get by.



                        The advantages? You don't have to support livestock except to feed them, which are usually harder to raise than plants and jack up your prices. You don't have to tame them, or watch them carefully so they don't wander away, worry about legendary enclosures for legendary creatures, etc. You just plant, tend, make sure the Big Bad Wolf stays on the appropriate side of your fence, and prune in season!



                        You'll even get the wool as a bonus. Livestock are good for more than just meat you know!



                        (In fairness about obscurity: it was at the top of a Wikipedia page. But who doesn't wish mutton grew on trees?)






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          The Vegetable Lamb of Tartary



                          An odd Northern European tale says there's a plant that grows in asia with sheep as its fruit. The sheep are very much alive, so it's not all plant - they walk around and graze the grass, attached to the plant by an umbilical cord. The plant and sheep die when the grass runs out, but I suppose you could keep feeding them more grass and get by.



                          The advantages? You don't have to support livestock except to feed them, which are usually harder to raise than plants and jack up your prices. You don't have to tame them, or watch them carefully so they don't wander away, worry about legendary enclosures for legendary creatures, etc. You just plant, tend, make sure the Big Bad Wolf stays on the appropriate side of your fence, and prune in season!



                          You'll even get the wool as a bonus. Livestock are good for more than just meat you know!



                          (In fairness about obscurity: it was at the top of a Wikipedia page. But who doesn't wish mutton grew on trees?)






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            The Vegetable Lamb of Tartary



                            An odd Northern European tale says there's a plant that grows in asia with sheep as its fruit. The sheep are very much alive, so it's not all plant - they walk around and graze the grass, attached to the plant by an umbilical cord. The plant and sheep die when the grass runs out, but I suppose you could keep feeding them more grass and get by.



                            The advantages? You don't have to support livestock except to feed them, which are usually harder to raise than plants and jack up your prices. You don't have to tame them, or watch them carefully so they don't wander away, worry about legendary enclosures for legendary creatures, etc. You just plant, tend, make sure the Big Bad Wolf stays on the appropriate side of your fence, and prune in season!



                            You'll even get the wool as a bonus. Livestock are good for more than just meat you know!



                            (In fairness about obscurity: it was at the top of a Wikipedia page. But who doesn't wish mutton grew on trees?)






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            The Vegetable Lamb of Tartary



                            An odd Northern European tale says there's a plant that grows in asia with sheep as its fruit. The sheep are very much alive, so it's not all plant - they walk around and graze the grass, attached to the plant by an umbilical cord. The plant and sheep die when the grass runs out, but I suppose you could keep feeding them more grass and get by.



                            The advantages? You don't have to support livestock except to feed them, which are usually harder to raise than plants and jack up your prices. You don't have to tame them, or watch them carefully so they don't wander away, worry about legendary enclosures for legendary creatures, etc. You just plant, tend, make sure the Big Bad Wolf stays on the appropriate side of your fence, and prune in season!



                            You'll even get the wool as a bonus. Livestock are good for more than just meat you know!



                            (In fairness about obscurity: it was at the top of a Wikipedia page. But who doesn't wish mutton grew on trees?)







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 30 mins ago









                            theREALyumdubtheREALyumdub

                            2828




                            2828























                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                Humans



                                (And other humanoids such as elves, orcs etc.)



                                Outrageous, you say? Wait until I'm done.



                                It may seem a little evil and inhuman to raise intelligent, sentient beings for food and leather. That's clearly not enough, so use the polymorph spell to make it proper and a lot evil by turning them into actual livestock! And then you can turn them into whatever beast suits your economic needs at the moment.



                                Advantage over other alternatives: besides having the right cattle for the right time, you solve problems related to POW's, overpopulation, crowded prisons and dissidency, all in one go.





                                share









                                $endgroup$













                                • $begingroup$
                                  Well, we found the evil emperor...
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Arkenstein XII
                                  1 min ago
















                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                Humans



                                (And other humanoids such as elves, orcs etc.)



                                Outrageous, you say? Wait until I'm done.



                                It may seem a little evil and inhuman to raise intelligent, sentient beings for food and leather. That's clearly not enough, so use the polymorph spell to make it proper and a lot evil by turning them into actual livestock! And then you can turn them into whatever beast suits your economic needs at the moment.



                                Advantage over other alternatives: besides having the right cattle for the right time, you solve problems related to POW's, overpopulation, crowded prisons and dissidency, all in one go.





                                share









                                $endgroup$













                                • $begingroup$
                                  Well, we found the evil emperor...
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Arkenstein XII
                                  1 min ago














                                1












                                1








                                1





                                $begingroup$

                                Humans



                                (And other humanoids such as elves, orcs etc.)



                                Outrageous, you say? Wait until I'm done.



                                It may seem a little evil and inhuman to raise intelligent, sentient beings for food and leather. That's clearly not enough, so use the polymorph spell to make it proper and a lot evil by turning them into actual livestock! And then you can turn them into whatever beast suits your economic needs at the moment.



                                Advantage over other alternatives: besides having the right cattle for the right time, you solve problems related to POW's, overpopulation, crowded prisons and dissidency, all in one go.





                                share









                                $endgroup$



                                Humans



                                (And other humanoids such as elves, orcs etc.)



                                Outrageous, you say? Wait until I'm done.



                                It may seem a little evil and inhuman to raise intelligent, sentient beings for food and leather. That's clearly not enough, so use the polymorph spell to make it proper and a lot evil by turning them into actual livestock! And then you can turn them into whatever beast suits your economic needs at the moment.



                                Advantage over other alternatives: besides having the right cattle for the right time, you solve problems related to POW's, overpopulation, crowded prisons and dissidency, all in one go.






                                share











                                share


                                share










                                answered 9 mins ago









                                RenanRenan

                                49.9k13115250




                                49.9k13115250












                                • $begingroup$
                                  Well, we found the evil emperor...
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Arkenstein XII
                                  1 min ago


















                                • $begingroup$
                                  Well, we found the evil emperor...
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Arkenstein XII
                                  1 min ago
















                                $begingroup$
                                Well, we found the evil emperor...
                                $endgroup$
                                – Arkenstein XII
                                1 min ago




                                $begingroup$
                                Well, we found the evil emperor...
                                $endgroup$
                                – Arkenstein XII
                                1 min ago











                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                A Cockatrice might pass for a decent farm animal. It is part chicken, which means it probably tasted good. They also lay sizable eggs, which can serve as an additional source of protein.






                                share|improve this answer








                                New contributor




                                SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                $endgroup$













                                • $begingroup$
                                  Where do you find that Cockatrice's lay eggs? According to the Wiki page you link to, a cockatrice is the product of a cock's egg (an egg laid by a male chicken) incubated in a toad or a snake. Can you cite an authority that suggests the mythology of the Cockatrice included laying eggs?
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – JBH
                                  2 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  Here is a source that says cockatrice lay eggs. Cockatrice have to reproduce some way and only mammals give birth to live young generally. It stands to reason that since both dragons and chickens lay eggs that a cockatrice would to. biblestudy.org/bible-study-by-topic/…
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – SciFiGuy
                                  2 hours ago








                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  The biblical cockatrice was most likely a snake - even that bible study link says that. Most snakes do lay eggs (even the Adder, which many think the biblical cockatrice refers to, although they're ovoviviparous). The biblical cockatrice is not the cockatrice of fantasy described by your Wiki link or, without clarification, what the OP intended.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – JBH
                                  2 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @SciFiGuy They probably do lay eggs, but I'm not familiar with any bird-cockatrices in the bible, and the link also references the asp incorrectly (I believe that is a type of snake?)
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – theREALyumdub
                                  23 mins ago












                                • $begingroup$
                                  I think they're better as eatchdogs than as livedtock, just like geese.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Renan
                                  18 mins ago
















                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                A Cockatrice might pass for a decent farm animal. It is part chicken, which means it probably tasted good. They also lay sizable eggs, which can serve as an additional source of protein.






                                share|improve this answer








                                New contributor




                                SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                $endgroup$













                                • $begingroup$
                                  Where do you find that Cockatrice's lay eggs? According to the Wiki page you link to, a cockatrice is the product of a cock's egg (an egg laid by a male chicken) incubated in a toad or a snake. Can you cite an authority that suggests the mythology of the Cockatrice included laying eggs?
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – JBH
                                  2 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  Here is a source that says cockatrice lay eggs. Cockatrice have to reproduce some way and only mammals give birth to live young generally. It stands to reason that since both dragons and chickens lay eggs that a cockatrice would to. biblestudy.org/bible-study-by-topic/…
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – SciFiGuy
                                  2 hours ago








                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  The biblical cockatrice was most likely a snake - even that bible study link says that. Most snakes do lay eggs (even the Adder, which many think the biblical cockatrice refers to, although they're ovoviviparous). The biblical cockatrice is not the cockatrice of fantasy described by your Wiki link or, without clarification, what the OP intended.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – JBH
                                  2 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @SciFiGuy They probably do lay eggs, but I'm not familiar with any bird-cockatrices in the bible, and the link also references the asp incorrectly (I believe that is a type of snake?)
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – theREALyumdub
                                  23 mins ago












                                • $begingroup$
                                  I think they're better as eatchdogs than as livedtock, just like geese.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Renan
                                  18 mins ago














                                0












                                0








                                0





                                $begingroup$

                                A Cockatrice might pass for a decent farm animal. It is part chicken, which means it probably tasted good. They also lay sizable eggs, which can serve as an additional source of protein.






                                share|improve this answer








                                New contributor




                                SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                $endgroup$



                                A Cockatrice might pass for a decent farm animal. It is part chicken, which means it probably tasted good. They also lay sizable eggs, which can serve as an additional source of protein.







                                share|improve this answer








                                New contributor




                                SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer






                                New contributor




                                SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                answered 2 hours ago









                                SciFiGuySciFiGuy

                                5826




                                5826




                                New contributor




                                SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                New contributor





                                SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                SciFiGuy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                Check out our Code of Conduct.












                                • $begingroup$
                                  Where do you find that Cockatrice's lay eggs? According to the Wiki page you link to, a cockatrice is the product of a cock's egg (an egg laid by a male chicken) incubated in a toad or a snake. Can you cite an authority that suggests the mythology of the Cockatrice included laying eggs?
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – JBH
                                  2 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  Here is a source that says cockatrice lay eggs. Cockatrice have to reproduce some way and only mammals give birth to live young generally. It stands to reason that since both dragons and chickens lay eggs that a cockatrice would to. biblestudy.org/bible-study-by-topic/…
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – SciFiGuy
                                  2 hours ago








                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  The biblical cockatrice was most likely a snake - even that bible study link says that. Most snakes do lay eggs (even the Adder, which many think the biblical cockatrice refers to, although they're ovoviviparous). The biblical cockatrice is not the cockatrice of fantasy described by your Wiki link or, without clarification, what the OP intended.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – JBH
                                  2 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @SciFiGuy They probably do lay eggs, but I'm not familiar with any bird-cockatrices in the bible, and the link also references the asp incorrectly (I believe that is a type of snake?)
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – theREALyumdub
                                  23 mins ago












                                • $begingroup$
                                  I think they're better as eatchdogs than as livedtock, just like geese.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Renan
                                  18 mins ago


















                                • $begingroup$
                                  Where do you find that Cockatrice's lay eggs? According to the Wiki page you link to, a cockatrice is the product of a cock's egg (an egg laid by a male chicken) incubated in a toad or a snake. Can you cite an authority that suggests the mythology of the Cockatrice included laying eggs?
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – JBH
                                  2 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  Here is a source that says cockatrice lay eggs. Cockatrice have to reproduce some way and only mammals give birth to live young generally. It stands to reason that since both dragons and chickens lay eggs that a cockatrice would to. biblestudy.org/bible-study-by-topic/…
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – SciFiGuy
                                  2 hours ago








                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  The biblical cockatrice was most likely a snake - even that bible study link says that. Most snakes do lay eggs (even the Adder, which many think the biblical cockatrice refers to, although they're ovoviviparous). The biblical cockatrice is not the cockatrice of fantasy described by your Wiki link or, without clarification, what the OP intended.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – JBH
                                  2 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @SciFiGuy They probably do lay eggs, but I'm not familiar with any bird-cockatrices in the bible, and the link also references the asp incorrectly (I believe that is a type of snake?)
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – theREALyumdub
                                  23 mins ago












                                • $begingroup$
                                  I think they're better as eatchdogs than as livedtock, just like geese.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Renan
                                  18 mins ago
















                                $begingroup$
                                Where do you find that Cockatrice's lay eggs? According to the Wiki page you link to, a cockatrice is the product of a cock's egg (an egg laid by a male chicken) incubated in a toad or a snake. Can you cite an authority that suggests the mythology of the Cockatrice included laying eggs?
                                $endgroup$
                                – JBH
                                2 hours ago




                                $begingroup$
                                Where do you find that Cockatrice's lay eggs? According to the Wiki page you link to, a cockatrice is the product of a cock's egg (an egg laid by a male chicken) incubated in a toad or a snake. Can you cite an authority that suggests the mythology of the Cockatrice included laying eggs?
                                $endgroup$
                                – JBH
                                2 hours ago












                                $begingroup$
                                Here is a source that says cockatrice lay eggs. Cockatrice have to reproduce some way and only mammals give birth to live young generally. It stands to reason that since both dragons and chickens lay eggs that a cockatrice would to. biblestudy.org/bible-study-by-topic/…
                                $endgroup$
                                – SciFiGuy
                                2 hours ago






                                $begingroup$
                                Here is a source that says cockatrice lay eggs. Cockatrice have to reproduce some way and only mammals give birth to live young generally. It stands to reason that since both dragons and chickens lay eggs that a cockatrice would to. biblestudy.org/bible-study-by-topic/…
                                $endgroup$
                                – SciFiGuy
                                2 hours ago






                                1




                                1




                                $begingroup$
                                The biblical cockatrice was most likely a snake - even that bible study link says that. Most snakes do lay eggs (even the Adder, which many think the biblical cockatrice refers to, although they're ovoviviparous). The biblical cockatrice is not the cockatrice of fantasy described by your Wiki link or, without clarification, what the OP intended.
                                $endgroup$
                                – JBH
                                2 hours ago




                                $begingroup$
                                The biblical cockatrice was most likely a snake - even that bible study link says that. Most snakes do lay eggs (even the Adder, which many think the biblical cockatrice refers to, although they're ovoviviparous). The biblical cockatrice is not the cockatrice of fantasy described by your Wiki link or, without clarification, what the OP intended.
                                $endgroup$
                                – JBH
                                2 hours ago












                                $begingroup$
                                @SciFiGuy They probably do lay eggs, but I'm not familiar with any bird-cockatrices in the bible, and the link also references the asp incorrectly (I believe that is a type of snake?)
                                $endgroup$
                                – theREALyumdub
                                23 mins ago






                                $begingroup$
                                @SciFiGuy They probably do lay eggs, but I'm not familiar with any bird-cockatrices in the bible, and the link also references the asp incorrectly (I believe that is a type of snake?)
                                $endgroup$
                                – theREALyumdub
                                23 mins ago














                                $begingroup$
                                I think they're better as eatchdogs than as livedtock, just like geese.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Renan
                                18 mins ago




                                $begingroup$
                                I think they're better as eatchdogs than as livedtock, just like geese.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Renan
                                18 mins ago











                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                Of course, a serious economical evaluation—what is the most profitable creature to use as livestock?—should consider feeding and well-being costs specific to the species, which may vary wildly for the same creature in different traditions (something like creature X in tradition Y only mates once per millenium, but in tradition Z it mates on every blue Moon)



                                Option 1: The Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs assuming you can clone it or get it to reproduce in in some other way and it qualifies as a mythical creature (which arguably does).



                                Option 2: Unicorns. They can provide both transportation and food. Their horns purify water and have several medical properties, including serving as antipoison. Their tails and blood also have magical properties.






                                share|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$









                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  Canned Unicorn meat thinkgeek.com/product/e5a7
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Thorne
                                  11 mins ago
















                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                Of course, a serious economical evaluation—what is the most profitable creature to use as livestock?—should consider feeding and well-being costs specific to the species, which may vary wildly for the same creature in different traditions (something like creature X in tradition Y only mates once per millenium, but in tradition Z it mates on every blue Moon)



                                Option 1: The Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs assuming you can clone it or get it to reproduce in in some other way and it qualifies as a mythical creature (which arguably does).



                                Option 2: Unicorns. They can provide both transportation and food. Their horns purify water and have several medical properties, including serving as antipoison. Their tails and blood also have magical properties.






                                share|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$









                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  Canned Unicorn meat thinkgeek.com/product/e5a7
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Thorne
                                  11 mins ago














                                0












                                0








                                0





                                $begingroup$

                                Of course, a serious economical evaluation—what is the most profitable creature to use as livestock?—should consider feeding and well-being costs specific to the species, which may vary wildly for the same creature in different traditions (something like creature X in tradition Y only mates once per millenium, but in tradition Z it mates on every blue Moon)



                                Option 1: The Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs assuming you can clone it or get it to reproduce in in some other way and it qualifies as a mythical creature (which arguably does).



                                Option 2: Unicorns. They can provide both transportation and food. Their horns purify water and have several medical properties, including serving as antipoison. Their tails and blood also have magical properties.






                                share|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$



                                Of course, a serious economical evaluation—what is the most profitable creature to use as livestock?—should consider feeding and well-being costs specific to the species, which may vary wildly for the same creature in different traditions (something like creature X in tradition Y only mates once per millenium, but in tradition Z it mates on every blue Moon)



                                Option 1: The Goose That Laid the Golden Eggs assuming you can clone it or get it to reproduce in in some other way and it qualifies as a mythical creature (which arguably does).



                                Option 2: Unicorns. They can provide both transportation and food. Their horns purify water and have several medical properties, including serving as antipoison. Their tails and blood also have magical properties.







                                share|improve this answer














                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited 1 hour ago

























                                answered 1 hour ago









                                RafaelRafael

                                1,710615




                                1,710615








                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  Canned Unicorn meat thinkgeek.com/product/e5a7
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Thorne
                                  11 mins ago














                                • 1




                                  $begingroup$
                                  Canned Unicorn meat thinkgeek.com/product/e5a7
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Thorne
                                  11 mins ago








                                1




                                1




                                $begingroup$
                                Canned Unicorn meat thinkgeek.com/product/e5a7
                                $endgroup$
                                – Thorne
                                11 mins ago




                                $begingroup$
                                Canned Unicorn meat thinkgeek.com/product/e5a7
                                $endgroup$
                                – Thorne
                                11 mins ago


















                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141446%2fbest-mythical-creature-to-use-as-livestock%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Can't compile dgruyter and caption packagesLaTeX templates/packages for writing a patent specificationLatex...

                                Schneeberg (Smreczany) Bibliografia | Menu...

                                Hans Bellmer Spis treści Życiorys | Upamiętnienie | Przypisy | Bibliografia | Linki zewnętrzne |...