Using mt2pro with times: PARENS{…} vs left(…right)Automatic left and right commandsWide accents in Times...

Why must traveling waves have the same amplitude to form a standing wave?

US to Europe trip with Canada layover- is 52 minutes enough?

What is the definition of "Natural Selection"?

Ban on all campaign finance?

Time travel short story where dinosaur doesn't taste like chicken

If Invisibility ends because the original caster casts a non-concentration spell, does Invisibility also end on other targets of the original casting?

Co-worker team leader wants to inject the crap software product of his friends into our development. What should I say to our common boss?

Running a subshell from the middle of the current command

Why don't MCU characters ever seem to have language issues?

Decoding assembly instructions in a Game Boy disassembler

How does Dispel Magic work against Stoneskin?

When were linguistics departments first established

My adviser wants to be the first author

Want to switch to tankless, but can I use my existing wiring?

Making a sword in the stone, in a medieval world without magic

What wound would be of little consequence to a biped but terrible for a quadruped?

How could a female member of a species produce eggs unto death?

What Happens when Passenger Refuses to Fly Boeing 737 Max?

Is it true that real estate prices mainly go up?

Can someone explain this Mudra being done by Ramakrishna Paramhansa in Samadhi?

Good allowance savings plan?

Can "semicircle" be used to refer to a part-circle that is not a exact half-circle?

Should QA ask requirements to developers?

What is the difference between "shut" and "close"?



Using mt2pro with times: PARENS{…} vs left(…right)


Automatic left and right commandsWide accents in Times font are not positioned correctlyOld style numerals using times and mtpro2Times New Roman font with TeXnicCenterUsing Times New RomanHow to change hslash into Times-Roman font?Modify characters of mt2pro[lite] using TimesAdjusting the size of rightleftarrows in mathmode with mt2pro[lite]Blank space with left[ and right]Environment left| right| and left( right) not working properly with fourier package













7















If I use the command PARENS{.....} with mtpro2 (green color into the figure in attachment) for to obtain a perfect brace curve (round bracket) I have 1 (one) problem:
the first and the second line of the fractions of the first equal are aligned and they have the same thick (you can see the two red rectangles).



But the line of the third fraction (green color) is not perfectly aligned with the previous fractions (infact two are below and the third is above) and the thick is different of the previous red fractions. To create a correct fraction with the two parens at the same distance with the command PARENS{.....}, using the package mtpro2, I have added a matrix, the command phantom{Z} and hspace{-.3cm} (you can see the green color).



Is there a different idea or solution to obtain of the perfect aligned fractions, with the same thick and perfect PARENS (...) (round brackets) so as when I use the command left(....right)?



enter image description here



documentclass[12pt]{book} 
usepackage{times}
usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}
usepackage{classico}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
overline F =frac{doverline p}{dt}&=\
&=frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}frac{doverline u}{dt}+moverline uPARENS{begin{matrix}phantom{Z}&\
dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}} hspace{-.3cm}end{matrix}}=\
&=frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}},overline a +frac{overline u}{c^2}frac{d}{dt}left(dfrac{mc^2}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}right)\
end{aligned}
end{equation}


end{document}









share|improve this question




















  • 3





    Good question with a probably disappointing answer: the code for PARENS is a big collection of low level hacks and fixing that issue would mean add some more after a few days' work (assuming a solution can be found in a finite amount of time).

    – egreg
    Jan 19 '18 at 7:34











  • Thanks a lot, always, for your comments. I never imagined that there were such problems.

    – Sebastiano
    Jan 19 '18 at 7:36






  • 2





    To the downvoter: If you do not explain/comment why the question is wrong, the downvote itself is meaningless.

    – yo'
    Jan 21 '18 at 20:39
















7















If I use the command PARENS{.....} with mtpro2 (green color into the figure in attachment) for to obtain a perfect brace curve (round bracket) I have 1 (one) problem:
the first and the second line of the fractions of the first equal are aligned and they have the same thick (you can see the two red rectangles).



But the line of the third fraction (green color) is not perfectly aligned with the previous fractions (infact two are below and the third is above) and the thick is different of the previous red fractions. To create a correct fraction with the two parens at the same distance with the command PARENS{.....}, using the package mtpro2, I have added a matrix, the command phantom{Z} and hspace{-.3cm} (you can see the green color).



Is there a different idea or solution to obtain of the perfect aligned fractions, with the same thick and perfect PARENS (...) (round brackets) so as when I use the command left(....right)?



enter image description here



documentclass[12pt]{book} 
usepackage{times}
usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}
usepackage{classico}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
overline F =frac{doverline p}{dt}&=\
&=frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}frac{doverline u}{dt}+moverline uPARENS{begin{matrix}phantom{Z}&\
dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}} hspace{-.3cm}end{matrix}}=\
&=frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}},overline a +frac{overline u}{c^2}frac{d}{dt}left(dfrac{mc^2}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}right)\
end{aligned}
end{equation}


end{document}









share|improve this question




















  • 3





    Good question with a probably disappointing answer: the code for PARENS is a big collection of low level hacks and fixing that issue would mean add some more after a few days' work (assuming a solution can be found in a finite amount of time).

    – egreg
    Jan 19 '18 at 7:34











  • Thanks a lot, always, for your comments. I never imagined that there were such problems.

    – Sebastiano
    Jan 19 '18 at 7:36






  • 2





    To the downvoter: If you do not explain/comment why the question is wrong, the downvote itself is meaningless.

    – yo'
    Jan 21 '18 at 20:39














7












7








7


2






If I use the command PARENS{.....} with mtpro2 (green color into the figure in attachment) for to obtain a perfect brace curve (round bracket) I have 1 (one) problem:
the first and the second line of the fractions of the first equal are aligned and they have the same thick (you can see the two red rectangles).



But the line of the third fraction (green color) is not perfectly aligned with the previous fractions (infact two are below and the third is above) and the thick is different of the previous red fractions. To create a correct fraction with the two parens at the same distance with the command PARENS{.....}, using the package mtpro2, I have added a matrix, the command phantom{Z} and hspace{-.3cm} (you can see the green color).



Is there a different idea or solution to obtain of the perfect aligned fractions, with the same thick and perfect PARENS (...) (round brackets) so as when I use the command left(....right)?



enter image description here



documentclass[12pt]{book} 
usepackage{times}
usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}
usepackage{classico}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
overline F =frac{doverline p}{dt}&=\
&=frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}frac{doverline u}{dt}+moverline uPARENS{begin{matrix}phantom{Z}&\
dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}} hspace{-.3cm}end{matrix}}=\
&=frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}},overline a +frac{overline u}{c^2}frac{d}{dt}left(dfrac{mc^2}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}right)\
end{aligned}
end{equation}


end{document}









share|improve this question
















If I use the command PARENS{.....} with mtpro2 (green color into the figure in attachment) for to obtain a perfect brace curve (round bracket) I have 1 (one) problem:
the first and the second line of the fractions of the first equal are aligned and they have the same thick (you can see the two red rectangles).



But the line of the third fraction (green color) is not perfectly aligned with the previous fractions (infact two are below and the third is above) and the thick is different of the previous red fractions. To create a correct fraction with the two parens at the same distance with the command PARENS{.....}, using the package mtpro2, I have added a matrix, the command phantom{Z} and hspace{-.3cm} (you can see the green color).



Is there a different idea or solution to obtain of the perfect aligned fractions, with the same thick and perfect PARENS (...) (round brackets) so as when I use the command left(....right)?



enter image description here



documentclass[12pt]{book} 
usepackage{times}
usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}
usepackage{classico}
usepackage{mathtools}
begin{document}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
begin{equation}
begin{aligned}
overline F =frac{doverline p}{dt}&=\
&=frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}frac{doverline u}{dt}+moverline uPARENS{begin{matrix}phantom{Z}&\
dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}} hspace{-.3cm}end{matrix}}=\
&=frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}},overline a +frac{overline u}{c^2}frac{d}{dt}left(dfrac{mc^2}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}right)\
end{aligned}
end{equation}


end{document}






brackets fractions times mtpro






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 19 '18 at 20:41







Sebastiano

















asked Jan 19 '18 at 7:16









SebastianoSebastiano

10.8k42163




10.8k42163








  • 3





    Good question with a probably disappointing answer: the code for PARENS is a big collection of low level hacks and fixing that issue would mean add some more after a few days' work (assuming a solution can be found in a finite amount of time).

    – egreg
    Jan 19 '18 at 7:34











  • Thanks a lot, always, for your comments. I never imagined that there were such problems.

    – Sebastiano
    Jan 19 '18 at 7:36






  • 2





    To the downvoter: If you do not explain/comment why the question is wrong, the downvote itself is meaningless.

    – yo'
    Jan 21 '18 at 20:39














  • 3





    Good question with a probably disappointing answer: the code for PARENS is a big collection of low level hacks and fixing that issue would mean add some more after a few days' work (assuming a solution can be found in a finite amount of time).

    – egreg
    Jan 19 '18 at 7:34











  • Thanks a lot, always, for your comments. I never imagined that there were such problems.

    – Sebastiano
    Jan 19 '18 at 7:36






  • 2





    To the downvoter: If you do not explain/comment why the question is wrong, the downvote itself is meaningless.

    – yo'
    Jan 21 '18 at 20:39








3




3





Good question with a probably disappointing answer: the code for PARENS is a big collection of low level hacks and fixing that issue would mean add some more after a few days' work (assuming a solution can be found in a finite amount of time).

– egreg
Jan 19 '18 at 7:34





Good question with a probably disappointing answer: the code for PARENS is a big collection of low level hacks and fixing that issue would mean add some more after a few days' work (assuming a solution can be found in a finite amount of time).

– egreg
Jan 19 '18 at 7:34













Thanks a lot, always, for your comments. I never imagined that there were such problems.

– Sebastiano
Jan 19 '18 at 7:36





Thanks a lot, always, for your comments. I never imagined that there were such problems.

– Sebastiano
Jan 19 '18 at 7:36




2




2





To the downvoter: If you do not explain/comment why the question is wrong, the downvote itself is meaningless.

– yo'
Jan 21 '18 at 20:39





To the downvoter: If you do not explain/comment why the question is wrong, the downvote itself is meaningless.

– yo'
Jan 21 '18 at 20:39










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














The thickness just appears to be different (probably due to how each pixel is rendered on screen). It should be fine if you print them out.



The PARENS command puts its content in a vcenter, thus, it will ignore the positioning of its baseline and the surrounding baseline. We can use some low-level box tricks to make the content symmetric with respect to the math axis, so that the two baselines are the same. The new command is called symmPARENS.



documentclass[12pt]{book}
usepackage{mathtools} % Load this early
%usepackage{times}
usepackage{newtxtext} % This is better :)
usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}

% Low-level hacks:
makeatletter
newsaveboxmtp@symm@box % The box to be made symmetric
% User level command:
newcommand*symmPARENS[1]{%
setboxmtp@symm@boxhbox{$m@thdisplaystyle#1$}%
dimen@dpmtp@symm@box
advancedimen@fontdimen22textfonttw@ % dimen@ is the length from the math axis to the bottom
dimen@iihtmtp@symm@box
advancedimen@ii-fontdimen22textfonttw@ % dimen@ii is the length from the math axis to the top
ifdimdimen@>dimen@ii
advancedimen@fontdimen22textfonttw@
htmtp@symm@boxdimen@ % Make mtp@symm@box higher
else
advancedimen@ii-fontdimen22textfonttw@
dpmtp@symm@boxdimen@ii % Make mtp@symm@box deeper
fi
PARENS{copymtp@symm@box}%
}
makeatother

begin{document}
noindent
With verb|PARENS|, not so good:
begin{equation}
wbar{F} = frac{d wbar{p}}{dt}
= frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}} frac{d wbar{u}}{dt}
+ m wbar{u} PARENS{dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}}
end{equation}
With verb|symmPARENS|, centered, but not aesthetically pleasing:
begin{equation}
wbar{F} = frac{d wbar{p}}{dt}
= frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}} frac{d wbar{u}}{dt}
+ m wbar{u} symmPARENS{dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}}
end{equation}
Why not:
begin{equation}
wbar{F} = frac{d wbar{p}}{dt}
= gamma m frac{d wbar{u}}{dt}
+ gamma m wbar{u},
quad text{where } gamma = dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}
end{equation}
Please don't abuse verb|symmPARENS|:
begin{equation}
frac{1}{2} f(xi) = frac{1}{2} symmPARENS{frac{displaystyleint_a^b f(x) , dx}{b-a}}
text{ versus }
frac{1}{2} f(xi) = frac{1}{2} symmPARENS{frac{1}{b-a} displaystyleint_a^b f(x) , dx}
end{equation}
end{document}



parens




Seriously, though, I would just write Eq. (3) instead.





share























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f411095%2fusing-mt2pro-with-times-parens-vs-left-right%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    The thickness just appears to be different (probably due to how each pixel is rendered on screen). It should be fine if you print them out.



    The PARENS command puts its content in a vcenter, thus, it will ignore the positioning of its baseline and the surrounding baseline. We can use some low-level box tricks to make the content symmetric with respect to the math axis, so that the two baselines are the same. The new command is called symmPARENS.



    documentclass[12pt]{book}
    usepackage{mathtools} % Load this early
    %usepackage{times}
    usepackage{newtxtext} % This is better :)
    usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}

    % Low-level hacks:
    makeatletter
    newsaveboxmtp@symm@box % The box to be made symmetric
    % User level command:
    newcommand*symmPARENS[1]{%
    setboxmtp@symm@boxhbox{$m@thdisplaystyle#1$}%
    dimen@dpmtp@symm@box
    advancedimen@fontdimen22textfonttw@ % dimen@ is the length from the math axis to the bottom
    dimen@iihtmtp@symm@box
    advancedimen@ii-fontdimen22textfonttw@ % dimen@ii is the length from the math axis to the top
    ifdimdimen@>dimen@ii
    advancedimen@fontdimen22textfonttw@
    htmtp@symm@boxdimen@ % Make mtp@symm@box higher
    else
    advancedimen@ii-fontdimen22textfonttw@
    dpmtp@symm@boxdimen@ii % Make mtp@symm@box deeper
    fi
    PARENS{copymtp@symm@box}%
    }
    makeatother

    begin{document}
    noindent
    With verb|PARENS|, not so good:
    begin{equation}
    wbar{F} = frac{d wbar{p}}{dt}
    = frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}} frac{d wbar{u}}{dt}
    + m wbar{u} PARENS{dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}}
    end{equation}
    With verb|symmPARENS|, centered, but not aesthetically pleasing:
    begin{equation}
    wbar{F} = frac{d wbar{p}}{dt}
    = frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}} frac{d wbar{u}}{dt}
    + m wbar{u} symmPARENS{dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}}
    end{equation}
    Why not:
    begin{equation}
    wbar{F} = frac{d wbar{p}}{dt}
    = gamma m frac{d wbar{u}}{dt}
    + gamma m wbar{u},
    quad text{where } gamma = dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}
    end{equation}
    Please don't abuse verb|symmPARENS|:
    begin{equation}
    frac{1}{2} f(xi) = frac{1}{2} symmPARENS{frac{displaystyleint_a^b f(x) , dx}{b-a}}
    text{ versus }
    frac{1}{2} f(xi) = frac{1}{2} symmPARENS{frac{1}{b-a} displaystyleint_a^b f(x) , dx}
    end{equation}
    end{document}



    parens




    Seriously, though, I would just write Eq. (3) instead.





    share




























      0














      The thickness just appears to be different (probably due to how each pixel is rendered on screen). It should be fine if you print them out.



      The PARENS command puts its content in a vcenter, thus, it will ignore the positioning of its baseline and the surrounding baseline. We can use some low-level box tricks to make the content symmetric with respect to the math axis, so that the two baselines are the same. The new command is called symmPARENS.



      documentclass[12pt]{book}
      usepackage{mathtools} % Load this early
      %usepackage{times}
      usepackage{newtxtext} % This is better :)
      usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}

      % Low-level hacks:
      makeatletter
      newsaveboxmtp@symm@box % The box to be made symmetric
      % User level command:
      newcommand*symmPARENS[1]{%
      setboxmtp@symm@boxhbox{$m@thdisplaystyle#1$}%
      dimen@dpmtp@symm@box
      advancedimen@fontdimen22textfonttw@ % dimen@ is the length from the math axis to the bottom
      dimen@iihtmtp@symm@box
      advancedimen@ii-fontdimen22textfonttw@ % dimen@ii is the length from the math axis to the top
      ifdimdimen@>dimen@ii
      advancedimen@fontdimen22textfonttw@
      htmtp@symm@boxdimen@ % Make mtp@symm@box higher
      else
      advancedimen@ii-fontdimen22textfonttw@
      dpmtp@symm@boxdimen@ii % Make mtp@symm@box deeper
      fi
      PARENS{copymtp@symm@box}%
      }
      makeatother

      begin{document}
      noindent
      With verb|PARENS|, not so good:
      begin{equation}
      wbar{F} = frac{d wbar{p}}{dt}
      = frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}} frac{d wbar{u}}{dt}
      + m wbar{u} PARENS{dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}}
      end{equation}
      With verb|symmPARENS|, centered, but not aesthetically pleasing:
      begin{equation}
      wbar{F} = frac{d wbar{p}}{dt}
      = frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}} frac{d wbar{u}}{dt}
      + m wbar{u} symmPARENS{dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}}
      end{equation}
      Why not:
      begin{equation}
      wbar{F} = frac{d wbar{p}}{dt}
      = gamma m frac{d wbar{u}}{dt}
      + gamma m wbar{u},
      quad text{where } gamma = dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}
      end{equation}
      Please don't abuse verb|symmPARENS|:
      begin{equation}
      frac{1}{2} f(xi) = frac{1}{2} symmPARENS{frac{displaystyleint_a^b f(x) , dx}{b-a}}
      text{ versus }
      frac{1}{2} f(xi) = frac{1}{2} symmPARENS{frac{1}{b-a} displaystyleint_a^b f(x) , dx}
      end{equation}
      end{document}



      parens




      Seriously, though, I would just write Eq. (3) instead.





      share


























        0












        0








        0







        The thickness just appears to be different (probably due to how each pixel is rendered on screen). It should be fine if you print them out.



        The PARENS command puts its content in a vcenter, thus, it will ignore the positioning of its baseline and the surrounding baseline. We can use some low-level box tricks to make the content symmetric with respect to the math axis, so that the two baselines are the same. The new command is called symmPARENS.



        documentclass[12pt]{book}
        usepackage{mathtools} % Load this early
        %usepackage{times}
        usepackage{newtxtext} % This is better :)
        usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}

        % Low-level hacks:
        makeatletter
        newsaveboxmtp@symm@box % The box to be made symmetric
        % User level command:
        newcommand*symmPARENS[1]{%
        setboxmtp@symm@boxhbox{$m@thdisplaystyle#1$}%
        dimen@dpmtp@symm@box
        advancedimen@fontdimen22textfonttw@ % dimen@ is the length from the math axis to the bottom
        dimen@iihtmtp@symm@box
        advancedimen@ii-fontdimen22textfonttw@ % dimen@ii is the length from the math axis to the top
        ifdimdimen@>dimen@ii
        advancedimen@fontdimen22textfonttw@
        htmtp@symm@boxdimen@ % Make mtp@symm@box higher
        else
        advancedimen@ii-fontdimen22textfonttw@
        dpmtp@symm@boxdimen@ii % Make mtp@symm@box deeper
        fi
        PARENS{copymtp@symm@box}%
        }
        makeatother

        begin{document}
        noindent
        With verb|PARENS|, not so good:
        begin{equation}
        wbar{F} = frac{d wbar{p}}{dt}
        = frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}} frac{d wbar{u}}{dt}
        + m wbar{u} PARENS{dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}}
        end{equation}
        With verb|symmPARENS|, centered, but not aesthetically pleasing:
        begin{equation}
        wbar{F} = frac{d wbar{p}}{dt}
        = frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}} frac{d wbar{u}}{dt}
        + m wbar{u} symmPARENS{dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}}
        end{equation}
        Why not:
        begin{equation}
        wbar{F} = frac{d wbar{p}}{dt}
        = gamma m frac{d wbar{u}}{dt}
        + gamma m wbar{u},
        quad text{where } gamma = dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}
        end{equation}
        Please don't abuse verb|symmPARENS|:
        begin{equation}
        frac{1}{2} f(xi) = frac{1}{2} symmPARENS{frac{displaystyleint_a^b f(x) , dx}{b-a}}
        text{ versus }
        frac{1}{2} f(xi) = frac{1}{2} symmPARENS{frac{1}{b-a} displaystyleint_a^b f(x) , dx}
        end{equation}
        end{document}



        parens




        Seriously, though, I would just write Eq. (3) instead.





        share













        The thickness just appears to be different (probably due to how each pixel is rendered on screen). It should be fine if you print them out.



        The PARENS command puts its content in a vcenter, thus, it will ignore the positioning of its baseline and the surrounding baseline. We can use some low-level box tricks to make the content symmetric with respect to the math axis, so that the two baselines are the same. The new command is called symmPARENS.



        documentclass[12pt]{book}
        usepackage{mathtools} % Load this early
        %usepackage{times}
        usepackage{newtxtext} % This is better :)
        usepackage[lite]{mtpro2}

        % Low-level hacks:
        makeatletter
        newsaveboxmtp@symm@box % The box to be made symmetric
        % User level command:
        newcommand*symmPARENS[1]{%
        setboxmtp@symm@boxhbox{$m@thdisplaystyle#1$}%
        dimen@dpmtp@symm@box
        advancedimen@fontdimen22textfonttw@ % dimen@ is the length from the math axis to the bottom
        dimen@iihtmtp@symm@box
        advancedimen@ii-fontdimen22textfonttw@ % dimen@ii is the length from the math axis to the top
        ifdimdimen@>dimen@ii
        advancedimen@fontdimen22textfonttw@
        htmtp@symm@boxdimen@ % Make mtp@symm@box higher
        else
        advancedimen@ii-fontdimen22textfonttw@
        dpmtp@symm@boxdimen@ii % Make mtp@symm@box deeper
        fi
        PARENS{copymtp@symm@box}%
        }
        makeatother

        begin{document}
        noindent
        With verb|PARENS|, not so good:
        begin{equation}
        wbar{F} = frac{d wbar{p}}{dt}
        = frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}} frac{d wbar{u}}{dt}
        + m wbar{u} PARENS{dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}}
        end{equation}
        With verb|symmPARENS|, centered, but not aesthetically pleasing:
        begin{equation}
        wbar{F} = frac{d wbar{p}}{dt}
        = frac{m}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}} frac{d wbar{u}}{dt}
        + m wbar{u} symmPARENS{dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}}
        end{equation}
        Why not:
        begin{equation}
        wbar{F} = frac{d wbar{p}}{dt}
        = gamma m frac{d wbar{u}}{dt}
        + gamma m wbar{u},
        quad text{where } gamma = dfrac{1}{sqrt{1-dfrac{u^2}{c^2}}}
        end{equation}
        Please don't abuse verb|symmPARENS|:
        begin{equation}
        frac{1}{2} f(xi) = frac{1}{2} symmPARENS{frac{displaystyleint_a^b f(x) , dx}{b-a}}
        text{ versus }
        frac{1}{2} f(xi) = frac{1}{2} symmPARENS{frac{1}{b-a} displaystyleint_a^b f(x) , dx}
        end{equation}
        end{document}



        parens




        Seriously, though, I would just write Eq. (3) instead.






        share











        share


        share










        answered 2 mins ago









        Ruixi ZhangRuixi Zhang

        5,613322




        5,613322






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f411095%2fusing-mt2pro-with-times-parens-vs-left-right%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Paper upload error, “Upload failed: The top margin is 0.715 in on page 3, which is below the required...

            Emraan Hashmi Filmografia | Linki zewnętrzne | Menu nawigacyjneGulshan GroverGulshan...

            How can I write this formula?newline and italics added with leqWhy does widehat behave differently if I...