What tool would a Roman-age civilization have to grind silver and other metals into dust? The...
Where does the "burst of radiance" from Holy Weapon originate?
On the insanity of kings as an argument against Monarchy
Feasability of miniature nuclear reactors for humanoid cyborgs
Idiomatic way to prevent slicing?
Why is it "Tumoren" and not "Tumore"?
How was Skylab's orbit inclination chosen?
Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?
What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?
Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size
Is this food a bread or a loaf?
Any good smartcontract for "business calendar" oracles?
Springs with some finite mass
Can we apply L'Hospital's rule where the derivative is not continuous?
What is a mixture ratio of propellant?
Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?
Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently
aging parents with no investments
Spanish for "widget"
The difference between dialogue marks
What does "rabbited" mean/imply in this sentence?
JSON.serialize: is it possible to suppress null values of a map?
Why is the maximum length of openwrt’s root password 8 characters?
I see my dog run
Inflated grade on resume at previous job, might former employer tell new employer?
What tool would a Roman-age civilization have to grind silver and other metals into dust?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat consequences would ancestral guidance have?What effect would a known but lost precursor civilization have on religion and philosophy?What adaptations would an elephant's trunk need to have human-like prehensility?What aspects of a creature's hand would make it good for climbing but not good for tool use?What would iron-age tools and weapons be like if they were redesigned with modern metallurgy?What difficulty would the Roman Empire have besieging a fantasy kingdom's 49 m wall?How would early and unlimited access to gunpowder change bronze age warfare and technology?Can early civilization utilize gold and silver when they are abundant, and copper and iron are rare?Would a Roman civilization be willing and capable of building large scale sea defences against a serious but unrealised flood threat?What could have prevented the decline of the Western Roman Empire, and its fall in AD 476?
$begingroup$
Assume a guy who has a lump of silver, and needs to get it into really small pieces. Ideally down to dust level, if possible. The technology level of the society around him is comparable to late-roman (200-400 A.D).
From my research I already know, that they had no real steel, but high quality iron for the use in tools.
How can he produce tiny fragments of metal from a solid chunk?
- Will heating the chunk help?
- What about other (harder) metals, like platinum or tungsten? Any chance with that?
ancient-history tools metalworking
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume a guy who has a lump of silver, and needs to get it into really small pieces. Ideally down to dust level, if possible. The technology level of the society around him is comparable to late-roman (200-400 A.D).
From my research I already know, that they had no real steel, but high quality iron for the use in tools.
How can he produce tiny fragments of metal from a solid chunk?
- Will heating the chunk help?
- What about other (harder) metals, like platinum or tungsten? Any chance with that?
ancient-history tools metalworking
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The Romans had files and rasps. They also had emery and used it similar to how we use sandpaper today. What I don't understand is why do you think that reducing a lump of silver into dust will make it occupy a smaller volume? Tungsten is not obtainable with pre-modern technology. Platinum can be found in native (= metallic) form, but not in any area remotely accessible by the Romans. As for steel, it is a much longer discussion; they could make "hard iron".
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I dont understand your comment about volume? I did not say anything about volume, right? Or do we have misunderstanding here? Btw he is not roman, only on a quasi-roman tech-level. And thanks for files and rasps :)
$endgroup$
– openend
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
You said you wanted to get the lump "really small". The solid lump of silver is already the smallest volume which can hold the amount of silver; in any other form it will be bigger. Did you want to say get it into small pieces?
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Right, its just about the individual fragment size.
$endgroup$
– openend
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
The word "reduce" in a chemistry/metallurgy context means something quite different from your goal of dividing into small pieces.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
45 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assume a guy who has a lump of silver, and needs to get it into really small pieces. Ideally down to dust level, if possible. The technology level of the society around him is comparable to late-roman (200-400 A.D).
From my research I already know, that they had no real steel, but high quality iron for the use in tools.
How can he produce tiny fragments of metal from a solid chunk?
- Will heating the chunk help?
- What about other (harder) metals, like platinum or tungsten? Any chance with that?
ancient-history tools metalworking
$endgroup$
Assume a guy who has a lump of silver, and needs to get it into really small pieces. Ideally down to dust level, if possible. The technology level of the society around him is comparable to late-roman (200-400 A.D).
From my research I already know, that they had no real steel, but high quality iron for the use in tools.
How can he produce tiny fragments of metal from a solid chunk?
- Will heating the chunk help?
- What about other (harder) metals, like platinum or tungsten? Any chance with that?
ancient-history tools metalworking
ancient-history tools metalworking
edited 28 mins ago
ltmauve
2,839718
2,839718
asked 13 hours ago
openendopenend
2,28711643
2,28711643
$begingroup$
The Romans had files and rasps. They also had emery and used it similar to how we use sandpaper today. What I don't understand is why do you think that reducing a lump of silver into dust will make it occupy a smaller volume? Tungsten is not obtainable with pre-modern technology. Platinum can be found in native (= metallic) form, but not in any area remotely accessible by the Romans. As for steel, it is a much longer discussion; they could make "hard iron".
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I dont understand your comment about volume? I did not say anything about volume, right? Or do we have misunderstanding here? Btw he is not roman, only on a quasi-roman tech-level. And thanks for files and rasps :)
$endgroup$
– openend
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
You said you wanted to get the lump "really small". The solid lump of silver is already the smallest volume which can hold the amount of silver; in any other form it will be bigger. Did you want to say get it into small pieces?
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Right, its just about the individual fragment size.
$endgroup$
– openend
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
The word "reduce" in a chemistry/metallurgy context means something quite different from your goal of dividing into small pieces.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
45 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Romans had files and rasps. They also had emery and used it similar to how we use sandpaper today. What I don't understand is why do you think that reducing a lump of silver into dust will make it occupy a smaller volume? Tungsten is not obtainable with pre-modern technology. Platinum can be found in native (= metallic) form, but not in any area remotely accessible by the Romans. As for steel, it is a much longer discussion; they could make "hard iron".
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I dont understand your comment about volume? I did not say anything about volume, right? Or do we have misunderstanding here? Btw he is not roman, only on a quasi-roman tech-level. And thanks for files and rasps :)
$endgroup$
– openend
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
You said you wanted to get the lump "really small". The solid lump of silver is already the smallest volume which can hold the amount of silver; in any other form it will be bigger. Did you want to say get it into small pieces?
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Right, its just about the individual fragment size.
$endgroup$
– openend
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
The word "reduce" in a chemistry/metallurgy context means something quite different from your goal of dividing into small pieces.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
45 mins ago
$begingroup$
The Romans had files and rasps. They also had emery and used it similar to how we use sandpaper today. What I don't understand is why do you think that reducing a lump of silver into dust will make it occupy a smaller volume? Tungsten is not obtainable with pre-modern technology. Platinum can be found in native (= metallic) form, but not in any area remotely accessible by the Romans. As for steel, it is a much longer discussion; they could make "hard iron".
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
The Romans had files and rasps. They also had emery and used it similar to how we use sandpaper today. What I don't understand is why do you think that reducing a lump of silver into dust will make it occupy a smaller volume? Tungsten is not obtainable with pre-modern technology. Platinum can be found in native (= metallic) form, but not in any area remotely accessible by the Romans. As for steel, it is a much longer discussion; they could make "hard iron".
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I dont understand your comment about volume? I did not say anything about volume, right? Or do we have misunderstanding here? Btw he is not roman, only on a quasi-roman tech-level. And thanks for files and rasps :)
$endgroup$
– openend
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
I dont understand your comment about volume? I did not say anything about volume, right? Or do we have misunderstanding here? Btw he is not roman, only on a quasi-roman tech-level. And thanks for files and rasps :)
$endgroup$
– openend
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
You said you wanted to get the lump "really small". The solid lump of silver is already the smallest volume which can hold the amount of silver; in any other form it will be bigger. Did you want to say get it into small pieces?
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
You said you wanted to get the lump "really small". The solid lump of silver is already the smallest volume which can hold the amount of silver; in any other form it will be bigger. Did you want to say get it into small pieces?
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Right, its just about the individual fragment size.
$endgroup$
– openend
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Right, its just about the individual fragment size.
$endgroup$
– openend
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
The word "reduce" in a chemistry/metallurgy context means something quite different from your goal of dividing into small pieces.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
45 mins ago
$begingroup$
The word "reduce" in a chemistry/metallurgy context means something quite different from your goal of dividing into small pieces.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
45 mins ago
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Well, one way they could do it is to use a file, essentially a tool-steel bar with an abrasive surface, and rub it against the surface of an ingot of silver. This would produce a relatively fine powder though it would be a painfully long process to get a lot of it.
Another option is to dissolve some silver in Aqua Regia, a mixture of hydrochloric acid and nitric acid. Adding urea will then consume the residual nitric acid and ferrous sulphate to precipitate fine silver powder which can be filtered out of the solution. Assuming the Romans had access to these chemicals, they could use them in order to create a very fine silver powder. One thing to note, silver is resistant to Aqua Regia at room temperature. In order for the silver to be broken down, the temperature, pressure, or concentration of acid must be changed. Here is a link to an answer on Chemistry.SE which explains it.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's not how alchemy is supposed to work, I don't think...
$endgroup$
– nwhaught
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you look at how people obtained red ink or silk in ancient times you will know that they were really up to painfully long processes. No internet and no TV back then made for an awful need for a distraction and laser sharp focus.
$endgroup$
– Renan
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Renan Not just that, often using a painfully long method was the only feasible way to achieve something. For example, in the modern world, if i wanted to sand down a plank of wood, i’d grab a sander and be done in a matter of minutes. If i instead used sand paper, i could be going for hours. In the past, they did not have the option of a sander so were forced to go with the much longer process.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oil of Vitriol dates back at least to Roman times, but Aqua Fortis doesn't appear to pre-date the Arabic alchemists. That rules out your Aqua Regia method.
$endgroup$
– Mark
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
There's no reason to go to this mess or effort when better methods were known
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
41 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Roman age? I can give you a stone age method: Grind it between two rocks.
Silver has a mohs hardness of 2.5. Granite has a mohs hardness of 6-7. So you can use a rough granite stone to grind silver to dust. It might take a while and take some muscle, but it should work.
When you are lazy, you might try to just throw your silver into a grain mill. It should work if the millstones are from a mineral which is harder than silver and if the mechanics are sturdy enough to handle the stress. The Romans had water-powered mills since the 1st century.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Grinding (And/or pounding with rocks to break stuff up into smaller chunks that a grind stone can manage better) would be the most sensible course. Stone tools are highly effective.
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I doubt whether grinding would work, since it is quite malleable. It might well just smear between your stones.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Silver powder was actually used by Romans and earlier civilisations. But it was produced by grinding ore containing silver between two large stones, not starting from a block of refined silver. I still think this method would work though.
$endgroup$
– K Mo
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Several possibilities:
- You could heat the silver, beat it into a thin plate, and then cut it into small pieces using scissors or a knife.
- You could probably use a file or iron or stone to grind the silver to dust, since silver is less hard than iron, not to mention stone.
- You could melt the silver and make it drip into water and collect the droplets.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
They had files and rasps and emery and corundum...
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Nice, i like the droplet idea, might be small enough for my purposes. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– openend
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
re: droplet idea en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_tower
$endgroup$
– aaaaaa
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The trip hammer was historically used for this
First, this process is called comminution. In the most ancient of days, to break up an ore into small chunks to work it in a forge, you simply hit it with a rock hammer. Eventually, the process improved until some sort of mechanical power could be applied: enter the trip hammer.
Image source.
A water-powered trip hammer is essentially a very large hammer, mounted on a fulcrum, with one end (the helve) moved by a cam. The cam is in turn driven by a water wheel. Alternative, you could have a donkey or ox provide the motive force, though there isn't a lot of evidence that this happened. There is significant mechanical loss in older mechanical systems, lubricated with animal fat and made of wood. A donkey powered trip hammer probably provided no mechanical advantage to a slave with a sledgehammer.
The trip hammer was used for exactly the case you describe, pulverizing rocks to find gravel. The gravel could then be reduced in a furnace to extract valuable materials. This is historically how copper, tin, silver, and gold (along with rarer metals like antimony) were extracted and refined from ore.
As far as hardness goes; don't even worry about it. You can break up rocks using other rocks. Find a polish the hardest rock you can get, and use it as your hammer head. When it breaks, replace. In Roman times in the 4th century AD in Britain, there is an find of large iron hammer heads used for pounding ore.
The water-powered trip hammer is certainly in use in Han China by the first century BC. It is potentially in use in China several hundred years earlier, and there is sporadic evidence that it was used in the Roman empire from the 1st to 4th century AD. It returned to Europe in the 12th century where it achieved its widest use; and the mechanical principles behind its operation were crucial to the Industrial Revolution.
An alternative, used often in the Islamic world with limited access to waterpower, was the stamp mill, though this was not attested until the 10th century in Central Asia. However, creating a stamp mill is feasible with a Roman/Classical-era technology level.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Cupellation: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cupellation
Cupellation is the process of heating ores to separate noble metals (silver, gold, etc) from them. Silver is pretty reactive so finding silver by itself in nature is kind a hard so you are more likely to find it bonded with something like lead.
If your silver is still one solid chunk then all you need to do is heat it in a furnace and then cut or hammer it into smaller pieces. Or pour the molten silver into multiple canals that lead to multiple molds. Silver is a pretty easy metal to work with compared to iron and the Romans where already knowledgeable in iron working (Celts were better smiths however)
Smelting silver and silver working has been around since the bronze age so to someone with Roman tech smelting silver is a easy process. Heck the Romans where able to make alloys like pewter.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143554%2fwhat-tool-would-a-roman-age-civilization-have-to-grind-silver-and-other-metals-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Well, one way they could do it is to use a file, essentially a tool-steel bar with an abrasive surface, and rub it against the surface of an ingot of silver. This would produce a relatively fine powder though it would be a painfully long process to get a lot of it.
Another option is to dissolve some silver in Aqua Regia, a mixture of hydrochloric acid and nitric acid. Adding urea will then consume the residual nitric acid and ferrous sulphate to precipitate fine silver powder which can be filtered out of the solution. Assuming the Romans had access to these chemicals, they could use them in order to create a very fine silver powder. One thing to note, silver is resistant to Aqua Regia at room temperature. In order for the silver to be broken down, the temperature, pressure, or concentration of acid must be changed. Here is a link to an answer on Chemistry.SE which explains it.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's not how alchemy is supposed to work, I don't think...
$endgroup$
– nwhaught
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you look at how people obtained red ink or silk in ancient times you will know that they were really up to painfully long processes. No internet and no TV back then made for an awful need for a distraction and laser sharp focus.
$endgroup$
– Renan
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Renan Not just that, often using a painfully long method was the only feasible way to achieve something. For example, in the modern world, if i wanted to sand down a plank of wood, i’d grab a sander and be done in a matter of minutes. If i instead used sand paper, i could be going for hours. In the past, they did not have the option of a sander so were forced to go with the much longer process.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oil of Vitriol dates back at least to Roman times, but Aqua Fortis doesn't appear to pre-date the Arabic alchemists. That rules out your Aqua Regia method.
$endgroup$
– Mark
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
There's no reason to go to this mess or effort when better methods were known
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
41 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well, one way they could do it is to use a file, essentially a tool-steel bar with an abrasive surface, and rub it against the surface of an ingot of silver. This would produce a relatively fine powder though it would be a painfully long process to get a lot of it.
Another option is to dissolve some silver in Aqua Regia, a mixture of hydrochloric acid and nitric acid. Adding urea will then consume the residual nitric acid and ferrous sulphate to precipitate fine silver powder which can be filtered out of the solution. Assuming the Romans had access to these chemicals, they could use them in order to create a very fine silver powder. One thing to note, silver is resistant to Aqua Regia at room temperature. In order for the silver to be broken down, the temperature, pressure, or concentration of acid must be changed. Here is a link to an answer on Chemistry.SE which explains it.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That's not how alchemy is supposed to work, I don't think...
$endgroup$
– nwhaught
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you look at how people obtained red ink or silk in ancient times you will know that they were really up to painfully long processes. No internet and no TV back then made for an awful need for a distraction and laser sharp focus.
$endgroup$
– Renan
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Renan Not just that, often using a painfully long method was the only feasible way to achieve something. For example, in the modern world, if i wanted to sand down a plank of wood, i’d grab a sander and be done in a matter of minutes. If i instead used sand paper, i could be going for hours. In the past, they did not have the option of a sander so were forced to go with the much longer process.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oil of Vitriol dates back at least to Roman times, but Aqua Fortis doesn't appear to pre-date the Arabic alchemists. That rules out your Aqua Regia method.
$endgroup$
– Mark
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
There's no reason to go to this mess or effort when better methods were known
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
41 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Well, one way they could do it is to use a file, essentially a tool-steel bar with an abrasive surface, and rub it against the surface of an ingot of silver. This would produce a relatively fine powder though it would be a painfully long process to get a lot of it.
Another option is to dissolve some silver in Aqua Regia, a mixture of hydrochloric acid and nitric acid. Adding urea will then consume the residual nitric acid and ferrous sulphate to precipitate fine silver powder which can be filtered out of the solution. Assuming the Romans had access to these chemicals, they could use them in order to create a very fine silver powder. One thing to note, silver is resistant to Aqua Regia at room temperature. In order for the silver to be broken down, the temperature, pressure, or concentration of acid must be changed. Here is a link to an answer on Chemistry.SE which explains it.
$endgroup$
Well, one way they could do it is to use a file, essentially a tool-steel bar with an abrasive surface, and rub it against the surface of an ingot of silver. This would produce a relatively fine powder though it would be a painfully long process to get a lot of it.
Another option is to dissolve some silver in Aqua Regia, a mixture of hydrochloric acid and nitric acid. Adding urea will then consume the residual nitric acid and ferrous sulphate to precipitate fine silver powder which can be filtered out of the solution. Assuming the Romans had access to these chemicals, they could use them in order to create a very fine silver powder. One thing to note, silver is resistant to Aqua Regia at room temperature. In order for the silver to be broken down, the temperature, pressure, or concentration of acid must be changed. Here is a link to an answer on Chemistry.SE which explains it.
edited 6 hours ago
Community♦
1
1
answered 13 hours ago
Liam MorrisLiam Morris
1,466323
1,466323
$begingroup$
That's not how alchemy is supposed to work, I don't think...
$endgroup$
– nwhaught
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you look at how people obtained red ink or silk in ancient times you will know that they were really up to painfully long processes. No internet and no TV back then made for an awful need for a distraction and laser sharp focus.
$endgroup$
– Renan
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Renan Not just that, often using a painfully long method was the only feasible way to achieve something. For example, in the modern world, if i wanted to sand down a plank of wood, i’d grab a sander and be done in a matter of minutes. If i instead used sand paper, i could be going for hours. In the past, they did not have the option of a sander so were forced to go with the much longer process.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oil of Vitriol dates back at least to Roman times, but Aqua Fortis doesn't appear to pre-date the Arabic alchemists. That rules out your Aqua Regia method.
$endgroup$
– Mark
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
There's no reason to go to this mess or effort when better methods were known
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
41 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That's not how alchemy is supposed to work, I don't think...
$endgroup$
– nwhaught
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you look at how people obtained red ink or silk in ancient times you will know that they were really up to painfully long processes. No internet and no TV back then made for an awful need for a distraction and laser sharp focus.
$endgroup$
– Renan
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Renan Not just that, often using a painfully long method was the only feasible way to achieve something. For example, in the modern world, if i wanted to sand down a plank of wood, i’d grab a sander and be done in a matter of minutes. If i instead used sand paper, i could be going for hours. In the past, they did not have the option of a sander so were forced to go with the much longer process.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oil of Vitriol dates back at least to Roman times, but Aqua Fortis doesn't appear to pre-date the Arabic alchemists. That rules out your Aqua Regia method.
$endgroup$
– Mark
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
There's no reason to go to this mess or effort when better methods were known
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
41 mins ago
$begingroup$
That's not how alchemy is supposed to work, I don't think...
$endgroup$
– nwhaught
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
That's not how alchemy is supposed to work, I don't think...
$endgroup$
– nwhaught
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you look at how people obtained red ink or silk in ancient times you will know that they were really up to painfully long processes. No internet and no TV back then made for an awful need for a distraction and laser sharp focus.
$endgroup$
– Renan
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
If you look at how people obtained red ink or silk in ancient times you will know that they were really up to painfully long processes. No internet and no TV back then made for an awful need for a distraction and laser sharp focus.
$endgroup$
– Renan
6 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Renan Not just that, often using a painfully long method was the only feasible way to achieve something. For example, in the modern world, if i wanted to sand down a plank of wood, i’d grab a sander and be done in a matter of minutes. If i instead used sand paper, i could be going for hours. In the past, they did not have the option of a sander so were forced to go with the much longer process.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Renan Not just that, often using a painfully long method was the only feasible way to achieve something. For example, in the modern world, if i wanted to sand down a plank of wood, i’d grab a sander and be done in a matter of minutes. If i instead used sand paper, i could be going for hours. In the past, they did not have the option of a sander so were forced to go with the much longer process.
$endgroup$
– Liam Morris
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Oil of Vitriol dates back at least to Roman times, but Aqua Fortis doesn't appear to pre-date the Arabic alchemists. That rules out your Aqua Regia method.
$endgroup$
– Mark
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Oil of Vitriol dates back at least to Roman times, but Aqua Fortis doesn't appear to pre-date the Arabic alchemists. That rules out your Aqua Regia method.
$endgroup$
– Mark
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
There's no reason to go to this mess or effort when better methods were known
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
41 mins ago
$begingroup$
There's no reason to go to this mess or effort when better methods were known
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
41 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Roman age? I can give you a stone age method: Grind it between two rocks.
Silver has a mohs hardness of 2.5. Granite has a mohs hardness of 6-7. So you can use a rough granite stone to grind silver to dust. It might take a while and take some muscle, but it should work.
When you are lazy, you might try to just throw your silver into a grain mill. It should work if the millstones are from a mineral which is harder than silver and if the mechanics are sturdy enough to handle the stress. The Romans had water-powered mills since the 1st century.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Grinding (And/or pounding with rocks to break stuff up into smaller chunks that a grind stone can manage better) would be the most sensible course. Stone tools are highly effective.
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I doubt whether grinding would work, since it is quite malleable. It might well just smear between your stones.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Silver powder was actually used by Romans and earlier civilisations. But it was produced by grinding ore containing silver between two large stones, not starting from a block of refined silver. I still think this method would work though.
$endgroup$
– K Mo
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Roman age? I can give you a stone age method: Grind it between two rocks.
Silver has a mohs hardness of 2.5. Granite has a mohs hardness of 6-7. So you can use a rough granite stone to grind silver to dust. It might take a while and take some muscle, but it should work.
When you are lazy, you might try to just throw your silver into a grain mill. It should work if the millstones are from a mineral which is harder than silver and if the mechanics are sturdy enough to handle the stress. The Romans had water-powered mills since the 1st century.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Grinding (And/or pounding with rocks to break stuff up into smaller chunks that a grind stone can manage better) would be the most sensible course. Stone tools are highly effective.
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I doubt whether grinding would work, since it is quite malleable. It might well just smear between your stones.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Silver powder was actually used by Romans and earlier civilisations. But it was produced by grinding ore containing silver between two large stones, not starting from a block of refined silver. I still think this method would work though.
$endgroup$
– K Mo
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Roman age? I can give you a stone age method: Grind it between two rocks.
Silver has a mohs hardness of 2.5. Granite has a mohs hardness of 6-7. So you can use a rough granite stone to grind silver to dust. It might take a while and take some muscle, but it should work.
When you are lazy, you might try to just throw your silver into a grain mill. It should work if the millstones are from a mineral which is harder than silver and if the mechanics are sturdy enough to handle the stress. The Romans had water-powered mills since the 1st century.
$endgroup$
Roman age? I can give you a stone age method: Grind it between two rocks.
Silver has a mohs hardness of 2.5. Granite has a mohs hardness of 6-7. So you can use a rough granite stone to grind silver to dust. It might take a while and take some muscle, but it should work.
When you are lazy, you might try to just throw your silver into a grain mill. It should work if the millstones are from a mineral which is harder than silver and if the mechanics are sturdy enough to handle the stress. The Romans had water-powered mills since the 1st century.
edited 10 hours ago
answered 11 hours ago
PhilippPhilipp
31.7k1265121
31.7k1265121
$begingroup$
Grinding (And/or pounding with rocks to break stuff up into smaller chunks that a grind stone can manage better) would be the most sensible course. Stone tools are highly effective.
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I doubt whether grinding would work, since it is quite malleable. It might well just smear between your stones.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Silver powder was actually used by Romans and earlier civilisations. But it was produced by grinding ore containing silver between two large stones, not starting from a block of refined silver. I still think this method would work though.
$endgroup$
– K Mo
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Grinding (And/or pounding with rocks to break stuff up into smaller chunks that a grind stone can manage better) would be the most sensible course. Stone tools are highly effective.
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I doubt whether grinding would work, since it is quite malleable. It might well just smear between your stones.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Silver powder was actually used by Romans and earlier civilisations. But it was produced by grinding ore containing silver between two large stones, not starting from a block of refined silver. I still think this method would work though.
$endgroup$
– K Mo
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Grinding (And/or pounding with rocks to break stuff up into smaller chunks that a grind stone can manage better) would be the most sensible course. Stone tools are highly effective.
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Grinding (And/or pounding with rocks to break stuff up into smaller chunks that a grind stone can manage better) would be the most sensible course. Stone tools are highly effective.
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I doubt whether grinding would work, since it is quite malleable. It might well just smear between your stones.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I doubt whether grinding would work, since it is quite malleable. It might well just smear between your stones.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Silver powder was actually used by Romans and earlier civilisations. But it was produced by grinding ore containing silver between two large stones, not starting from a block of refined silver. I still think this method would work though.
$endgroup$
– K Mo
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Silver powder was actually used by Romans and earlier civilisations. But it was produced by grinding ore containing silver between two large stones, not starting from a block of refined silver. I still think this method would work though.
$endgroup$
– K Mo
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Several possibilities:
- You could heat the silver, beat it into a thin plate, and then cut it into small pieces using scissors or a knife.
- You could probably use a file or iron or stone to grind the silver to dust, since silver is less hard than iron, not to mention stone.
- You could melt the silver and make it drip into water and collect the droplets.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
They had files and rasps and emery and corundum...
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Nice, i like the droplet idea, might be small enough for my purposes. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– openend
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
re: droplet idea en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_tower
$endgroup$
– aaaaaa
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Several possibilities:
- You could heat the silver, beat it into a thin plate, and then cut it into small pieces using scissors or a knife.
- You could probably use a file or iron or stone to grind the silver to dust, since silver is less hard than iron, not to mention stone.
- You could melt the silver and make it drip into water and collect the droplets.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
They had files and rasps and emery and corundum...
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Nice, i like the droplet idea, might be small enough for my purposes. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– openend
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
re: droplet idea en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_tower
$endgroup$
– aaaaaa
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Several possibilities:
- You could heat the silver, beat it into a thin plate, and then cut it into small pieces using scissors or a knife.
- You could probably use a file or iron or stone to grind the silver to dust, since silver is less hard than iron, not to mention stone.
- You could melt the silver and make it drip into water and collect the droplets.
$endgroup$
Several possibilities:
- You could heat the silver, beat it into a thin plate, and then cut it into small pieces using scissors or a knife.
- You could probably use a file or iron or stone to grind the silver to dust, since silver is less hard than iron, not to mention stone.
- You could melt the silver and make it drip into water and collect the droplets.
answered 13 hours ago
Klaus Æ. MogensenKlaus Æ. Mogensen
1,139137
1,139137
1
$begingroup$
They had files and rasps and emery and corundum...
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Nice, i like the droplet idea, might be small enough for my purposes. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– openend
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
re: droplet idea en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_tower
$endgroup$
– aaaaaa
3 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
They had files and rasps and emery and corundum...
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Nice, i like the droplet idea, might be small enough for my purposes. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– openend
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
re: droplet idea en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_tower
$endgroup$
– aaaaaa
3 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
They had files and rasps and emery and corundum...
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
They had files and rasps and emery and corundum...
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Nice, i like the droplet idea, might be small enough for my purposes. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– openend
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
Nice, i like the droplet idea, might be small enough for my purposes. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– openend
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
re: droplet idea en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_tower
$endgroup$
– aaaaaa
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
re: droplet idea en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_tower
$endgroup$
– aaaaaa
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The trip hammer was historically used for this
First, this process is called comminution. In the most ancient of days, to break up an ore into small chunks to work it in a forge, you simply hit it with a rock hammer. Eventually, the process improved until some sort of mechanical power could be applied: enter the trip hammer.
Image source.
A water-powered trip hammer is essentially a very large hammer, mounted on a fulcrum, with one end (the helve) moved by a cam. The cam is in turn driven by a water wheel. Alternative, you could have a donkey or ox provide the motive force, though there isn't a lot of evidence that this happened. There is significant mechanical loss in older mechanical systems, lubricated with animal fat and made of wood. A donkey powered trip hammer probably provided no mechanical advantage to a slave with a sledgehammer.
The trip hammer was used for exactly the case you describe, pulverizing rocks to find gravel. The gravel could then be reduced in a furnace to extract valuable materials. This is historically how copper, tin, silver, and gold (along with rarer metals like antimony) were extracted and refined from ore.
As far as hardness goes; don't even worry about it. You can break up rocks using other rocks. Find a polish the hardest rock you can get, and use it as your hammer head. When it breaks, replace. In Roman times in the 4th century AD in Britain, there is an find of large iron hammer heads used for pounding ore.
The water-powered trip hammer is certainly in use in Han China by the first century BC. It is potentially in use in China several hundred years earlier, and there is sporadic evidence that it was used in the Roman empire from the 1st to 4th century AD. It returned to Europe in the 12th century where it achieved its widest use; and the mechanical principles behind its operation were crucial to the Industrial Revolution.
An alternative, used often in the Islamic world with limited access to waterpower, was the stamp mill, though this was not attested until the 10th century in Central Asia. However, creating a stamp mill is feasible with a Roman/Classical-era technology level.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The trip hammer was historically used for this
First, this process is called comminution. In the most ancient of days, to break up an ore into small chunks to work it in a forge, you simply hit it with a rock hammer. Eventually, the process improved until some sort of mechanical power could be applied: enter the trip hammer.
Image source.
A water-powered trip hammer is essentially a very large hammer, mounted on a fulcrum, with one end (the helve) moved by a cam. The cam is in turn driven by a water wheel. Alternative, you could have a donkey or ox provide the motive force, though there isn't a lot of evidence that this happened. There is significant mechanical loss in older mechanical systems, lubricated with animal fat and made of wood. A donkey powered trip hammer probably provided no mechanical advantage to a slave with a sledgehammer.
The trip hammer was used for exactly the case you describe, pulverizing rocks to find gravel. The gravel could then be reduced in a furnace to extract valuable materials. This is historically how copper, tin, silver, and gold (along with rarer metals like antimony) were extracted and refined from ore.
As far as hardness goes; don't even worry about it. You can break up rocks using other rocks. Find a polish the hardest rock you can get, and use it as your hammer head. When it breaks, replace. In Roman times in the 4th century AD in Britain, there is an find of large iron hammer heads used for pounding ore.
The water-powered trip hammer is certainly in use in Han China by the first century BC. It is potentially in use in China several hundred years earlier, and there is sporadic evidence that it was used in the Roman empire from the 1st to 4th century AD. It returned to Europe in the 12th century where it achieved its widest use; and the mechanical principles behind its operation were crucial to the Industrial Revolution.
An alternative, used often in the Islamic world with limited access to waterpower, was the stamp mill, though this was not attested until the 10th century in Central Asia. However, creating a stamp mill is feasible with a Roman/Classical-era technology level.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The trip hammer was historically used for this
First, this process is called comminution. In the most ancient of days, to break up an ore into small chunks to work it in a forge, you simply hit it with a rock hammer. Eventually, the process improved until some sort of mechanical power could be applied: enter the trip hammer.
Image source.
A water-powered trip hammer is essentially a very large hammer, mounted on a fulcrum, with one end (the helve) moved by a cam. The cam is in turn driven by a water wheel. Alternative, you could have a donkey or ox provide the motive force, though there isn't a lot of evidence that this happened. There is significant mechanical loss in older mechanical systems, lubricated with animal fat and made of wood. A donkey powered trip hammer probably provided no mechanical advantage to a slave with a sledgehammer.
The trip hammer was used for exactly the case you describe, pulverizing rocks to find gravel. The gravel could then be reduced in a furnace to extract valuable materials. This is historically how copper, tin, silver, and gold (along with rarer metals like antimony) were extracted and refined from ore.
As far as hardness goes; don't even worry about it. You can break up rocks using other rocks. Find a polish the hardest rock you can get, and use it as your hammer head. When it breaks, replace. In Roman times in the 4th century AD in Britain, there is an find of large iron hammer heads used for pounding ore.
The water-powered trip hammer is certainly in use in Han China by the first century BC. It is potentially in use in China several hundred years earlier, and there is sporadic evidence that it was used in the Roman empire from the 1st to 4th century AD. It returned to Europe in the 12th century where it achieved its widest use; and the mechanical principles behind its operation were crucial to the Industrial Revolution.
An alternative, used often in the Islamic world with limited access to waterpower, was the stamp mill, though this was not attested until the 10th century in Central Asia. However, creating a stamp mill is feasible with a Roman/Classical-era technology level.
$endgroup$
The trip hammer was historically used for this
First, this process is called comminution. In the most ancient of days, to break up an ore into small chunks to work it in a forge, you simply hit it with a rock hammer. Eventually, the process improved until some sort of mechanical power could be applied: enter the trip hammer.
Image source.
A water-powered trip hammer is essentially a very large hammer, mounted on a fulcrum, with one end (the helve) moved by a cam. The cam is in turn driven by a water wheel. Alternative, you could have a donkey or ox provide the motive force, though there isn't a lot of evidence that this happened. There is significant mechanical loss in older mechanical systems, lubricated with animal fat and made of wood. A donkey powered trip hammer probably provided no mechanical advantage to a slave with a sledgehammer.
The trip hammer was used for exactly the case you describe, pulverizing rocks to find gravel. The gravel could then be reduced in a furnace to extract valuable materials. This is historically how copper, tin, silver, and gold (along with rarer metals like antimony) were extracted and refined from ore.
As far as hardness goes; don't even worry about it. You can break up rocks using other rocks. Find a polish the hardest rock you can get, and use it as your hammer head. When it breaks, replace. In Roman times in the 4th century AD in Britain, there is an find of large iron hammer heads used for pounding ore.
The water-powered trip hammer is certainly in use in Han China by the first century BC. It is potentially in use in China several hundred years earlier, and there is sporadic evidence that it was used in the Roman empire from the 1st to 4th century AD. It returned to Europe in the 12th century where it achieved its widest use; and the mechanical principles behind its operation were crucial to the Industrial Revolution.
An alternative, used often in the Islamic world with limited access to waterpower, was the stamp mill, though this was not attested until the 10th century in Central Asia. However, creating a stamp mill is feasible with a Roman/Classical-era technology level.
edited 10 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
kingledionkingledion
74.3k26246435
74.3k26246435
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Cupellation: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cupellation
Cupellation is the process of heating ores to separate noble metals (silver, gold, etc) from them. Silver is pretty reactive so finding silver by itself in nature is kind a hard so you are more likely to find it bonded with something like lead.
If your silver is still one solid chunk then all you need to do is heat it in a furnace and then cut or hammer it into smaller pieces. Or pour the molten silver into multiple canals that lead to multiple molds. Silver is a pretty easy metal to work with compared to iron and the Romans where already knowledgeable in iron working (Celts were better smiths however)
Smelting silver and silver working has been around since the bronze age so to someone with Roman tech smelting silver is a easy process. Heck the Romans where able to make alloys like pewter.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Cupellation: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cupellation
Cupellation is the process of heating ores to separate noble metals (silver, gold, etc) from them. Silver is pretty reactive so finding silver by itself in nature is kind a hard so you are more likely to find it bonded with something like lead.
If your silver is still one solid chunk then all you need to do is heat it in a furnace and then cut or hammer it into smaller pieces. Or pour the molten silver into multiple canals that lead to multiple molds. Silver is a pretty easy metal to work with compared to iron and the Romans where already knowledgeable in iron working (Celts were better smiths however)
Smelting silver and silver working has been around since the bronze age so to someone with Roman tech smelting silver is a easy process. Heck the Romans where able to make alloys like pewter.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Cupellation: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cupellation
Cupellation is the process of heating ores to separate noble metals (silver, gold, etc) from them. Silver is pretty reactive so finding silver by itself in nature is kind a hard so you are more likely to find it bonded with something like lead.
If your silver is still one solid chunk then all you need to do is heat it in a furnace and then cut or hammer it into smaller pieces. Or pour the molten silver into multiple canals that lead to multiple molds. Silver is a pretty easy metal to work with compared to iron and the Romans where already knowledgeable in iron working (Celts were better smiths however)
Smelting silver and silver working has been around since the bronze age so to someone with Roman tech smelting silver is a easy process. Heck the Romans where able to make alloys like pewter.
$endgroup$
Cupellation: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cupellation
Cupellation is the process of heating ores to separate noble metals (silver, gold, etc) from them. Silver is pretty reactive so finding silver by itself in nature is kind a hard so you are more likely to find it bonded with something like lead.
If your silver is still one solid chunk then all you need to do is heat it in a furnace and then cut or hammer it into smaller pieces. Or pour the molten silver into multiple canals that lead to multiple molds. Silver is a pretty easy metal to work with compared to iron and the Romans where already knowledgeable in iron working (Celts were better smiths however)
Smelting silver and silver working has been around since the bronze age so to someone with Roman tech smelting silver is a easy process. Heck the Romans where able to make alloys like pewter.
answered 12 hours ago
Celestial Dragon EmperorCelestial Dragon Emperor
2,60431437
2,60431437
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143554%2fwhat-tool-would-a-roman-age-civilization-have-to-grind-silver-and-other-metals-i%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
The Romans had files and rasps. They also had emery and used it similar to how we use sandpaper today. What I don't understand is why do you think that reducing a lump of silver into dust will make it occupy a smaller volume? Tungsten is not obtainable with pre-modern technology. Platinum can be found in native (= metallic) form, but not in any area remotely accessible by the Romans. As for steel, it is a much longer discussion; they could make "hard iron".
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I dont understand your comment about volume? I did not say anything about volume, right? Or do we have misunderstanding here? Btw he is not roman, only on a quasi-roman tech-level. And thanks for files and rasps :)
$endgroup$
– openend
13 hours ago
$begingroup$
You said you wanted to get the lump "really small". The solid lump of silver is already the smallest volume which can hold the amount of silver; in any other form it will be bigger. Did you want to say get it into small pieces?
$endgroup$
– AlexP
13 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Right, its just about the individual fragment size.
$endgroup$
– openend
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
The word "reduce" in a chemistry/metallurgy context means something quite different from your goal of dividing into small pieces.
$endgroup$
– Chris Stratton
45 mins ago