Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey...

Is it possible for the two major parties in the UK to form a coalition with each other instead of a much smaller party?

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

Falsification in Math vs Science

is usb on wall sockets live all the time with out switches off

Why can Shazam do this?

Why is the maximum length of openwrt’s root password 8 characters?

Polarization lost upon 2nd reflection?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

aging parents with no investments

Where to refill my bottle in India?

Evaluating number of iteration with a certain map with While

Does duplicating a spell with wish count as casting that spell?

What is this 4-propeller plane?

Can we apply L'Hospital's rule where the derivative is not continuous?

Deadlock Graph and Interpretation, solution to avoid

Any good smartcontract for "business calendar" oracles?

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

Should I use my personal or workplace e-mail when registering to external websites for work purpose?

Carnot-Caratheodory metric

"To split hairs" vs "To be pedantic"

Why don't Unix/Linux systems traverse through directories until they find the required version of a linked library?

JSON.serialize: is it possible to suppress null values of a map?

How to manage monthly salary

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?



Confusion about non-derivable continuous functions



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InAre there any implicit, continuous, non-differentiable functions?Logical Relations Between Three Statements about Continuous FunctionsCombination of continuous and discontinuous functionsIs there only one continuous-everywhere non-differentiable function?Intuition behind uniformly continuous functionsWhy weren't continuous functions defined as Darboux functions?Examples of functions that do not belong to any Baire classFind all continuous functions that satisfy the Jensen inequality(?) $f(frac{x+y}{2})=frac{f(x)+f(y)}{2}$Confused About Limit Points and Closed SetsConfusion About Differentiability of Function












2












$begingroup$


I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    1 hour ago
















2












$begingroup$


I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    1 hour ago














2












2








2


1



$begingroup$


I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am reading a definition which claims that a function is continuous in point $p$ iff all its first derivations exist and are continuous in the point $p$.



And what confuses me are functions such as $f(x)=|x|$ which should be continuous by intuition, but is clearly not derivable in $x=0$.



I am almost certain I am getting something wrong here, but I can not even pin-point what.







real-analysis functions derivatives continuity






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









fazanfazan

537




537












  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    1 hour ago


















  • $begingroup$
    For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
    $endgroup$
    – coffeemath
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
    $endgroup$
    – avs
    3 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Where did you read that erroneous definition?
    $endgroup$
    – bof
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
    $endgroup$
    – fazan
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @avs That is false.
    $endgroup$
    – zhw.
    1 hour ago
















$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
For $|x|$ its derivative isn't continuous t zero.
$endgroup$
– coffeemath
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
A function can be continuous at a point without having any derivatives at that point; e.g., coffeemath's example. The statement you probably want is that a function of several variables is differentiable at a point iff all of its partial derivatives exist and are continuous at that point.
$endgroup$
– avs
3 hours ago












$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Where did you read that erroneous definition?
$endgroup$
– bof
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
lecture notes by my prof. i might be mosreading them though
$endgroup$
– fazan
2 hours ago












$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
@avs That is false.
$endgroup$
– zhw.
1 hour ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    1












    $begingroup$

    As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



    If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
    $$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
    at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
      $endgroup$
      – Haris Gusic
      2 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
      $endgroup$
      – K.Power
      2 hours ago



















    0












    $begingroup$

    Sounds like the wrong definition of what a "continuous function" is. Any function $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb {R}$ like in your original post is continuous at every point $left(a,fleft(aright)right)$ wherever $$limlimits_{xto a^-}fleft(xright)=limlimits_{xto a^+}fleft(xright)$$ (denoting the left and right-hand limits accordingly)






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$














      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181529%2fconfusion-about-non-derivable-continuous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$

      That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



      The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$


















        3












        $begingroup$

        That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



        The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$
















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



          The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          That "definition" is wrong. You are right, the function $|x|$ is continuous but is not differentiable at $x=0$. Continuity doesn't imply differentiability. However, differentiability does imply continuity.



          The definition you stated looks to me as an attempt to define a smooth function, although it is not correct.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 2 hours ago

























          answered 3 hours ago









          Haris GusicHaris Gusic

          3,506627




          3,506627























              1












              $begingroup$

              As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



              If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
              $$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
              at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
                $endgroup$
                – Haris Gusic
                2 hours ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
                $endgroup$
                – K.Power
                2 hours ago
















              1












              $begingroup$

              As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



              If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
              $$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
              at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
                $endgroup$
                – Haris Gusic
                2 hours ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
                $endgroup$
                – K.Power
                2 hours ago














              1












              1








              1





              $begingroup$

              As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



              If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
              $$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
              at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              As has been pointed out this definition is incorrect, as it is inconsistent with the usual definitions of continuity and differentiability. Your example $|x|$ suffices to show this.



              If you are encountering this in multivariable calculus then your professor might be trying to state the theorem mentioned by avs in the comments: that a function is differentiable at a point if all its first order partial derivatives exist in a neighbourhood of that point, and are continuous at that point. However the converse is not generally true: consider for example the function
              $$f(x,y)=begin{cases}(x^2+y^2)sin(frac{1}{sqrt{x^2+y^2}}) &(x,y)neq(0,0)\0&(x,y)=(0,0)end{cases}$$
              at the origin. Thus this assumption might be completely false. It might be best to give a word for word reproduction of the statement and the paragraph before and after.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited 2 hours ago

























              answered 2 hours ago









              K.PowerK.Power

              3,710926




              3,710926












              • $begingroup$
                The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
                $endgroup$
                – Haris Gusic
                2 hours ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
                $endgroup$
                – K.Power
                2 hours ago


















              • $begingroup$
                The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
                $endgroup$
                – Haris Gusic
                2 hours ago






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
                $endgroup$
                – K.Power
                2 hours ago
















              $begingroup$
              The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
              $endgroup$
              – Haris Gusic
              2 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              The partial derivatives need not be continuous for differentiability.
              $endgroup$
              – Haris Gusic
              2 hours ago




              1




              1




              $begingroup$
              @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
              $endgroup$
              – K.Power
              2 hours ago




              $begingroup$
              @HarisGusic yes I realized as I posted. Fixed it
              $endgroup$
              – K.Power
              2 hours ago











              0












              $begingroup$

              Sounds like the wrong definition of what a "continuous function" is. Any function $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb {R}$ like in your original post is continuous at every point $left(a,fleft(aright)right)$ wherever $$limlimits_{xto a^-}fleft(xright)=limlimits_{xto a^+}fleft(xright)$$ (denoting the left and right-hand limits accordingly)






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                Sounds like the wrong definition of what a "continuous function" is. Any function $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb {R}$ like in your original post is continuous at every point $left(a,fleft(aright)right)$ wherever $$limlimits_{xto a^-}fleft(xright)=limlimits_{xto a^+}fleft(xright)$$ (denoting the left and right-hand limits accordingly)






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  Sounds like the wrong definition of what a "continuous function" is. Any function $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb {R}$ like in your original post is continuous at every point $left(a,fleft(aright)right)$ wherever $$limlimits_{xto a^-}fleft(xright)=limlimits_{xto a^+}fleft(xright)$$ (denoting the left and right-hand limits accordingly)






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Sounds like the wrong definition of what a "continuous function" is. Any function $f:mathbb{R}tomathbb {R}$ like in your original post is continuous at every point $left(a,fleft(aright)right)$ wherever $$limlimits_{xto a^-}fleft(xright)=limlimits_{xto a^+}fleft(xright)$$ (denoting the left and right-hand limits accordingly)







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 26 mins ago









                  ManRowManRow

                  24618




                  24618






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3181529%2fconfusion-about-non-derivable-continuous-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Can't compile dgruyter and caption packagesLaTeX templates/packages for writing a patent specificationLatex...

                      Schneeberg (Smreczany) Bibliografia | Menu...

                      Hans Bellmer Spis treści Życiorys | Upamiętnienie | Przypisy | Bibliografia | Linki zewnętrzne |...