Salesforce package error error “You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace...
Odd 74HCT1G125 behaviour
Words and Words with "ver-" Prefix
What is the difference between rolling more dice versus fewer dice?
Quickly creating a sparse array
Is there a weight limit to Feather Fall?
How do I append a character to the end of every line in an Excel cell?
use of 4/2 chord more compelling than root position?
Why publish a research paper when a blog post or a lecture slide can have more citation count than a journal paper?
If I delete my router's history can my ISP still provide it to my parents?
Should I reinstall Linux when changing the laptop's CPU?
Why don't hotels mount air conditioning units outside the rooms?
Dilemma of explaining to interviewer that he is the reason for declining second interview
What's a good word to describe a public place that looks like it wouldn't be rough?
Why is working on the same position for more than 15 years not a red flag?
What evolutionary advantage do viruses have in host specificity?
It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)
Nested word series [humans only]
Why would space fleets be aligned?
Why did Democrats in the Senate oppose the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (2019 S.130)?
Flipping axis on a LogPlot
Is it possible to grant users sftp access without shell access? If yes, how is it implemented?
using 'echo' & 'printf' in bash function calls
Move fast ...... Or you will lose
Why avoid shared user accounts?
Salesforce package error error “You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace is not installed to your organization.”
Can a managed package cease to depend on another managed package?Managed app installation on Salesforce Production OrgWhen building a package with a dependency how is the minimum version of the dependent package determined?Why does code coverage consider pre-installed packages?When does it make sense to add a Connected App to a Managed Package?Does post-install script run when a patch version of the package is installed?From inside a Salesforce packaging org, how do you query the list of created versions for a managed package?What namespace to use when developing Lightning components for a managed package?How to specify namespace and partition for Org Cache when creating managed package?Is there a way to figure out how a previously installed package was installed when upgrading?
I'm having an odd issue where a package I've been maintaining for a while has now decided it is dependent on Salesforce Connected Apps (namespace sf_com_apps). Even when I try to remove the dependency by editing the metadata of the pages, components and lightning components it's being automatically added back. I don't believe any of my code is actually using anything from this package and I don't want my users to have to install it (as there isn't an easy way to do it, you seem to have to log into the org through workbench for it to install).
The only thing I can think that might have had something to do with this is upgrading API versions for all my code to 45.
The error the org will receive if installing my package but sf_com_apps doesn't exist is: "You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace is not installed to your organization."
managed-package
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
add a comment |
I'm having an odd issue where a package I've been maintaining for a while has now decided it is dependent on Salesforce Connected Apps (namespace sf_com_apps). Even when I try to remove the dependency by editing the metadata of the pages, components and lightning components it's being automatically added back. I don't believe any of my code is actually using anything from this package and I don't want my users to have to install it (as there isn't an easy way to do it, you seem to have to log into the org through workbench for it to install).
The only thing I can think that might have had something to do with this is upgrading API versions for all my code to 45.
The error the org will receive if installing my package but sf_com_apps doesn't exist is: "You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace is not installed to your organization."
managed-package
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I'm having an odd issue where a package I've been maintaining for a while has now decided it is dependent on Salesforce Connected Apps (namespace sf_com_apps). Even when I try to remove the dependency by editing the metadata of the pages, components and lightning components it's being automatically added back. I don't believe any of my code is actually using anything from this package and I don't want my users to have to install it (as there isn't an easy way to do it, you seem to have to log into the org through workbench for it to install).
The only thing I can think that might have had something to do with this is upgrading API versions for all my code to 45.
The error the org will receive if installing my package but sf_com_apps doesn't exist is: "You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace is not installed to your organization."
managed-package
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
I'm having an odd issue where a package I've been maintaining for a while has now decided it is dependent on Salesforce Connected Apps (namespace sf_com_apps). Even when I try to remove the dependency by editing the metadata of the pages, components and lightning components it's being automatically added back. I don't believe any of my code is actually using anything from this package and I don't want my users to have to install it (as there isn't an easy way to do it, you seem to have to log into the org through workbench for it to install).
The only thing I can think that might have had something to do with this is upgrading API versions for all my code to 45.
The error the org will receive if installing my package but sf_com_apps doesn't exist is: "You can't specify version for namespace sf_com_apps because this namespace is not installed to your organization."
managed-package
managed-package
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
edited 1 hour ago
Matt Lacey♦
20.9k547120
20.9k547120
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
asked 2 hours ago
Kenji776Kenji776
285412
285412
I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You can't directly "undo" a dependency once you upload a "released" version that causes the dependency. What you need to do is open a case with Partner Support and request that they roll back all versions that caused the dependency to "beta," at which point you should be able to fix the problem. This will involve uninstalling all affected versions from any orgs they are installed in. It would be ideal to uninstall/delete any apps that should not be in your org, as that can cause packaging issues (as you've unfortunately discovered).
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
@Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.
– sfdcfox
1 hour ago
I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.
– Kenji776
50 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f252011%2fsalesforce-package-error-error-you-cant-specify-version-for-namespace-sf-com-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can't directly "undo" a dependency once you upload a "released" version that causes the dependency. What you need to do is open a case with Partner Support and request that they roll back all versions that caused the dependency to "beta," at which point you should be able to fix the problem. This will involve uninstalling all affected versions from any orgs they are installed in. It would be ideal to uninstall/delete any apps that should not be in your org, as that can cause packaging issues (as you've unfortunately discovered).
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
@Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.
– sfdcfox
1 hour ago
I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.
– Kenji776
50 mins ago
add a comment |
You can't directly "undo" a dependency once you upload a "released" version that causes the dependency. What you need to do is open a case with Partner Support and request that they roll back all versions that caused the dependency to "beta," at which point you should be able to fix the problem. This will involve uninstalling all affected versions from any orgs they are installed in. It would be ideal to uninstall/delete any apps that should not be in your org, as that can cause packaging issues (as you've unfortunately discovered).
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
@Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.
– sfdcfox
1 hour ago
I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.
– Kenji776
50 mins ago
add a comment |
You can't directly "undo" a dependency once you upload a "released" version that causes the dependency. What you need to do is open a case with Partner Support and request that they roll back all versions that caused the dependency to "beta," at which point you should be able to fix the problem. This will involve uninstalling all affected versions from any orgs they are installed in. It would be ideal to uninstall/delete any apps that should not be in your org, as that can cause packaging issues (as you've unfortunately discovered).
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
You can't directly "undo" a dependency once you upload a "released" version that causes the dependency. What you need to do is open a case with Partner Support and request that they roll back all versions that caused the dependency to "beta," at which point you should be able to fix the problem. This will involve uninstalling all affected versions from any orgs they are installed in. It would be ideal to uninstall/delete any apps that should not be in your org, as that can cause packaging issues (as you've unfortunately discovered).
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
answered 1 hour ago
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
257k12201444
257k12201444
Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
@Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.
– sfdcfox
1 hour ago
I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.
– Kenji776
50 mins ago
add a comment |
Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
@Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.
– sfdcfox
1 hour ago
I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.
– Kenji776
50 mins ago
Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
Awesome, thank you for the info. What I suspect happened is when I copied all my code from my dev into the packaging org the SF connected apps dependency got somehow included. This is going to sound really dumb, but since this is a developer org I'm not able to open a case from that account. How would I go about logging a case with them for this org?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
@Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.
– sfdcfox
1 hour ago
@Kenji776 If you're an ISV, you'd just log a case through your ISV account. If not, there's probably nothing you can do about it short of building a new package. Managed packages are not to be trifled with, they are very finicky.
– sfdcfox
1 hour ago
I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
I'd log something through the partner portal and provide the org ID. Good luck though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.
– Kenji776
50 mins ago
Alright, thanks guys. I'll see about getting a case opened. This package is being developed for a client and they already have a released version that went through security review and all that so building a new package is all but off the table. Lets hope support can help fix this mess or else I'm hosed.
– Kenji776
50 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f252011%2fsalesforce-package-error-error-you-cant-specify-version-for-namespace-sf-com-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I've had this in sandboxes and have always managed to remove the dependancy, never with the actual package though.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago
So packages always have this dependency now? Like all packages created now will have this error if sf_com_apps isn't installed?
– Kenji776
1 hour ago
I wasn't sure where it was coming from tbh, but workbench makes sense. It's not always a dependency.
– Matt Lacey♦
1 hour ago