Cite a youtube video in master thesis using Latex [on hold]How can I use BibTeX to cite a web page?Bibtex...
When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?
Can I find out the caloric content of bread by dehydrating it?
Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?
Is this food a bread or a loaf?
What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?
Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python
Could Giant Ground Sloths have been a good pack animal for the ancient Mayans?
Are objects structures and/or vice versa?
Re-submission of rejected manuscript without informing co-authors
Does bootstrapped regression allow for inference?
Crop image to path created in TikZ?
Can a planet have a different gravitational pull depending on its location in orbit around its sun?
Prime joint compound before latex paint?
Typesetting a double Over Dot on top of a symbol
Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?
What is the meaning of "of trouble" in the following sentence?
If a centaur druid Wild Shapes into a Giant Elk, do their Charge features stack?
Why was the "bread communication" in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?
What does 'script /dev/null' do?
How can I plot a Farey diagram?
extract characters between two commas?
Why do we use polarized capacitors?
What do the Banks children have against barley water?
Information to fellow intern about hiring?
Cite a youtube video in master thesis using Latex [on hold]
How can I use BibTeX to cite a web page?Bibtex failing to cite one entry?Bibtex references, citing from same reference but different pageGetting BibTex to work in the first placeLyx citation style: et al only when three or more authorsCitation of a thesis under a CC licenseMultiple citations condensed (different types) - FUQTrying to view citations in Bibtex as an import file from Mendely isn't workingusing @misc to cite a text but get odd outputhow to add commands before and after each citation item (number) when using natbib with bibtexProblem with citing a reference multiple times
I've come across to a very explanatory video on youtube regarding a specific topic very related to my master thesis. Am I allowed to cite a youtube video in a master thesis and if so, how is it being done with BibTeX reference? Thank you.
biblatex bibtex citing
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by Phelype Oleinik, Raaja, Stefan Pinnow, JouleV, Tiuri 14 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question does not fall within the scope of TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems as defined in the help center." – Phelype Oleinik, Raaja, Stefan Pinnow, JouleV, Tiuri
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
I've come across to a very explanatory video on youtube regarding a specific topic very related to my master thesis. Am I allowed to cite a youtube video in a master thesis and if so, how is it being done with BibTeX reference? Thank you.
biblatex bibtex citing
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by Phelype Oleinik, Raaja, Stefan Pinnow, JouleV, Tiuri 14 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question does not fall within the scope of TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems as defined in the help center." – Phelype Oleinik, Raaja, Stefan Pinnow, JouleV, Tiuri
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
You should ask your supervisor about whether or not it is allowed.
– albert
18 hours ago
1
It is probably allowed. You can use the@misc
entry type (miscellaneous) for such references, or use one of the suggestions on tex.stackexchange.com/questions/3587/….
– Marijn
17 hours ago
2
Which bibliography style do you employ?
– Mico
17 hours ago
I do use BibTex
– theroglu
17 hours ago
2
The question whether or not you are allowed to cite a youtube video in your thesis can only be answered by those who are going to read (and grade) it. The question of whether or not it is in general a good idea/accepted to do so is off-topic here and might be appropriate for academia.stackexchange.com. The question of how it can be done in TeX depends on the bibliography package and style you use (the argument tobibliographystyle
). Withbiblatex
@online
might work.
– moewe
17 hours ago
add a comment |
I've come across to a very explanatory video on youtube regarding a specific topic very related to my master thesis. Am I allowed to cite a youtube video in a master thesis and if so, how is it being done with BibTeX reference? Thank you.
biblatex bibtex citing
New contributor
I've come across to a very explanatory video on youtube regarding a specific topic very related to my master thesis. Am I allowed to cite a youtube video in a master thesis and if so, how is it being done with BibTeX reference? Thank you.
biblatex bibtex citing
biblatex bibtex citing
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 18 hours ago
theroglutheroglu
132
132
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by Phelype Oleinik, Raaja, Stefan Pinnow, JouleV, Tiuri 14 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question does not fall within the scope of TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems as defined in the help center." – Phelype Oleinik, Raaja, Stefan Pinnow, JouleV, Tiuri
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by Phelype Oleinik, Raaja, Stefan Pinnow, JouleV, Tiuri 14 hours ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question does not fall within the scope of TeX, LaTeX or related typesetting systems as defined in the help center." – Phelype Oleinik, Raaja, Stefan Pinnow, JouleV, Tiuri
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
You should ask your supervisor about whether or not it is allowed.
– albert
18 hours ago
1
It is probably allowed. You can use the@misc
entry type (miscellaneous) for such references, or use one of the suggestions on tex.stackexchange.com/questions/3587/….
– Marijn
17 hours ago
2
Which bibliography style do you employ?
– Mico
17 hours ago
I do use BibTex
– theroglu
17 hours ago
2
The question whether or not you are allowed to cite a youtube video in your thesis can only be answered by those who are going to read (and grade) it. The question of whether or not it is in general a good idea/accepted to do so is off-topic here and might be appropriate for academia.stackexchange.com. The question of how it can be done in TeX depends on the bibliography package and style you use (the argument tobibliographystyle
). Withbiblatex
@online
might work.
– moewe
17 hours ago
add a comment |
You should ask your supervisor about whether or not it is allowed.
– albert
18 hours ago
1
It is probably allowed. You can use the@misc
entry type (miscellaneous) for such references, or use one of the suggestions on tex.stackexchange.com/questions/3587/….
– Marijn
17 hours ago
2
Which bibliography style do you employ?
– Mico
17 hours ago
I do use BibTex
– theroglu
17 hours ago
2
The question whether or not you are allowed to cite a youtube video in your thesis can only be answered by those who are going to read (and grade) it. The question of whether or not it is in general a good idea/accepted to do so is off-topic here and might be appropriate for academia.stackexchange.com. The question of how it can be done in TeX depends on the bibliography package and style you use (the argument tobibliographystyle
). Withbiblatex
@online
might work.
– moewe
17 hours ago
You should ask your supervisor about whether or not it is allowed.
– albert
18 hours ago
You should ask your supervisor about whether or not it is allowed.
– albert
18 hours ago
1
1
It is probably allowed. You can use the
@misc
entry type (miscellaneous) for such references, or use one of the suggestions on tex.stackexchange.com/questions/3587/….– Marijn
17 hours ago
It is probably allowed. You can use the
@misc
entry type (miscellaneous) for such references, or use one of the suggestions on tex.stackexchange.com/questions/3587/….– Marijn
17 hours ago
2
2
Which bibliography style do you employ?
– Mico
17 hours ago
Which bibliography style do you employ?
– Mico
17 hours ago
I do use BibTex
– theroglu
17 hours ago
I do use BibTex
– theroglu
17 hours ago
2
2
The question whether or not you are allowed to cite a youtube video in your thesis can only be answered by those who are going to read (and grade) it. The question of whether or not it is in general a good idea/accepted to do so is off-topic here and might be appropriate for academia.stackexchange.com. The question of how it can be done in TeX depends on the bibliography package and style you use (the argument to
bibliographystyle
). With biblatex
@online
might work.– moewe
17 hours ago
The question whether or not you are allowed to cite a youtube video in your thesis can only be answered by those who are going to read (and grade) it. The question of whether or not it is in general a good idea/accepted to do so is off-topic here and might be appropriate for academia.stackexchange.com. The question of how it can be done in TeX depends on the bibliography package and style you use (the argument to
bibliographystyle
). With biblatex
@online
might work.– moewe
17 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Concerning your first question: please ask your supervisor. Users here can only guess what is suitable for references in your field of studies and your masters thesis.
The second question:
@misc{Author.year,
author = {Name, Given-Name},
year = {2019},
title = {A tutorial video},
url = {http://www.youtube.com/xyz},
urldate = {2019-04-08} %date of last access
}
The @misc
entry for bibtex allows several fields that are relevant for online references (ie: URL and access date). The notation here is for bibtex. This is to be seperated from the actual package you use in your document to create reference from bibtex
files (ie: biblatex
, natbib
or jurabib
) and their respective bibliography stlyes. As moeve mentions in his*her comment, biblatex
can also make use of @online
.
Cf also How can I use BibTeX to cite a web page?
2
Note thaturl
andurldate
are not supported by allBibTeX
styles (.bst
), but they should be supported by allbiblatex
styles. (The distinction might be important here, the question is tagged with both tags, but so far the OP has only mentioned BibTeX)
– moewe
17 hours ago
Thanks for the update. I must admit that I find the explanation still slightly confusing or misleading. It is not really "BibTeX" that decides which fields are valid (and with 'valid' I actually mean: are accepted and shown in the output). That decision is down to the bibliography style (.bst
file) that is used (not the package, but of course some packages are associated with a certain set of.bst
files). While there is a common core that most (all?).bst
files support, fields likeurl
andurldate
are only supported by some styles. ...
– moewe
10 hours ago
... So it is slightly misleading to say that "BibTeX allows" the fields or that the notation is for BibTeX as a whole. (Technically, of course this is valid.bib
syntax, but the real question is about the output in the document, which is not governed by.bib
file syntax rules but by the.bst
files.)
– moewe
10 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Concerning your first question: please ask your supervisor. Users here can only guess what is suitable for references in your field of studies and your masters thesis.
The second question:
@misc{Author.year,
author = {Name, Given-Name},
year = {2019},
title = {A tutorial video},
url = {http://www.youtube.com/xyz},
urldate = {2019-04-08} %date of last access
}
The @misc
entry for bibtex allows several fields that are relevant for online references (ie: URL and access date). The notation here is for bibtex. This is to be seperated from the actual package you use in your document to create reference from bibtex
files (ie: biblatex
, natbib
or jurabib
) and their respective bibliography stlyes. As moeve mentions in his*her comment, biblatex
can also make use of @online
.
Cf also How can I use BibTeX to cite a web page?
2
Note thaturl
andurldate
are not supported by allBibTeX
styles (.bst
), but they should be supported by allbiblatex
styles. (The distinction might be important here, the question is tagged with both tags, but so far the OP has only mentioned BibTeX)
– moewe
17 hours ago
Thanks for the update. I must admit that I find the explanation still slightly confusing or misleading. It is not really "BibTeX" that decides which fields are valid (and with 'valid' I actually mean: are accepted and shown in the output). That decision is down to the bibliography style (.bst
file) that is used (not the package, but of course some packages are associated with a certain set of.bst
files). While there is a common core that most (all?).bst
files support, fields likeurl
andurldate
are only supported by some styles. ...
– moewe
10 hours ago
... So it is slightly misleading to say that "BibTeX allows" the fields or that the notation is for BibTeX as a whole. (Technically, of course this is valid.bib
syntax, but the real question is about the output in the document, which is not governed by.bib
file syntax rules but by the.bst
files.)
– moewe
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Concerning your first question: please ask your supervisor. Users here can only guess what is suitable for references in your field of studies and your masters thesis.
The second question:
@misc{Author.year,
author = {Name, Given-Name},
year = {2019},
title = {A tutorial video},
url = {http://www.youtube.com/xyz},
urldate = {2019-04-08} %date of last access
}
The @misc
entry for bibtex allows several fields that are relevant for online references (ie: URL and access date). The notation here is for bibtex. This is to be seperated from the actual package you use in your document to create reference from bibtex
files (ie: biblatex
, natbib
or jurabib
) and their respective bibliography stlyes. As moeve mentions in his*her comment, biblatex
can also make use of @online
.
Cf also How can I use BibTeX to cite a web page?
2
Note thaturl
andurldate
are not supported by allBibTeX
styles (.bst
), but they should be supported by allbiblatex
styles. (The distinction might be important here, the question is tagged with both tags, but so far the OP has only mentioned BibTeX)
– moewe
17 hours ago
Thanks for the update. I must admit that I find the explanation still slightly confusing or misleading. It is not really "BibTeX" that decides which fields are valid (and with 'valid' I actually mean: are accepted and shown in the output). That decision is down to the bibliography style (.bst
file) that is used (not the package, but of course some packages are associated with a certain set of.bst
files). While there is a common core that most (all?).bst
files support, fields likeurl
andurldate
are only supported by some styles. ...
– moewe
10 hours ago
... So it is slightly misleading to say that "BibTeX allows" the fields or that the notation is for BibTeX as a whole. (Technically, of course this is valid.bib
syntax, but the real question is about the output in the document, which is not governed by.bib
file syntax rules but by the.bst
files.)
– moewe
10 hours ago
add a comment |
Concerning your first question: please ask your supervisor. Users here can only guess what is suitable for references in your field of studies and your masters thesis.
The second question:
@misc{Author.year,
author = {Name, Given-Name},
year = {2019},
title = {A tutorial video},
url = {http://www.youtube.com/xyz},
urldate = {2019-04-08} %date of last access
}
The @misc
entry for bibtex allows several fields that are relevant for online references (ie: URL and access date). The notation here is for bibtex. This is to be seperated from the actual package you use in your document to create reference from bibtex
files (ie: biblatex
, natbib
or jurabib
) and their respective bibliography stlyes. As moeve mentions in his*her comment, biblatex
can also make use of @online
.
Cf also How can I use BibTeX to cite a web page?
Concerning your first question: please ask your supervisor. Users here can only guess what is suitable for references in your field of studies and your masters thesis.
The second question:
@misc{Author.year,
author = {Name, Given-Name},
year = {2019},
title = {A tutorial video},
url = {http://www.youtube.com/xyz},
urldate = {2019-04-08} %date of last access
}
The @misc
entry for bibtex allows several fields that are relevant for online references (ie: URL and access date). The notation here is for bibtex. This is to be seperated from the actual package you use in your document to create reference from bibtex
files (ie: biblatex
, natbib
or jurabib
) and their respective bibliography stlyes. As moeve mentions in his*her comment, biblatex
can also make use of @online
.
Cf also How can I use BibTeX to cite a web page?
edited 17 hours ago
answered 17 hours ago
HATEthePLOTHATEthePLOT
740412
740412
2
Note thaturl
andurldate
are not supported by allBibTeX
styles (.bst
), but they should be supported by allbiblatex
styles. (The distinction might be important here, the question is tagged with both tags, but so far the OP has only mentioned BibTeX)
– moewe
17 hours ago
Thanks for the update. I must admit that I find the explanation still slightly confusing or misleading. It is not really "BibTeX" that decides which fields are valid (and with 'valid' I actually mean: are accepted and shown in the output). That decision is down to the bibliography style (.bst
file) that is used (not the package, but of course some packages are associated with a certain set of.bst
files). While there is a common core that most (all?).bst
files support, fields likeurl
andurldate
are only supported by some styles. ...
– moewe
10 hours ago
... So it is slightly misleading to say that "BibTeX allows" the fields or that the notation is for BibTeX as a whole. (Technically, of course this is valid.bib
syntax, but the real question is about the output in the document, which is not governed by.bib
file syntax rules but by the.bst
files.)
– moewe
10 hours ago
add a comment |
2
Note thaturl
andurldate
are not supported by allBibTeX
styles (.bst
), but they should be supported by allbiblatex
styles. (The distinction might be important here, the question is tagged with both tags, but so far the OP has only mentioned BibTeX)
– moewe
17 hours ago
Thanks for the update. I must admit that I find the explanation still slightly confusing or misleading. It is not really "BibTeX" that decides which fields are valid (and with 'valid' I actually mean: are accepted and shown in the output). That decision is down to the bibliography style (.bst
file) that is used (not the package, but of course some packages are associated with a certain set of.bst
files). While there is a common core that most (all?).bst
files support, fields likeurl
andurldate
are only supported by some styles. ...
– moewe
10 hours ago
... So it is slightly misleading to say that "BibTeX allows" the fields or that the notation is for BibTeX as a whole. (Technically, of course this is valid.bib
syntax, but the real question is about the output in the document, which is not governed by.bib
file syntax rules but by the.bst
files.)
– moewe
10 hours ago
2
2
Note that
url
and urldate
are not supported by all BibTeX
styles (.bst
), but they should be supported by all biblatex
styles. (The distinction might be important here, the question is tagged with both tags, but so far the OP has only mentioned BibTeX)– moewe
17 hours ago
Note that
url
and urldate
are not supported by all BibTeX
styles (.bst
), but they should be supported by all biblatex
styles. (The distinction might be important here, the question is tagged with both tags, but so far the OP has only mentioned BibTeX)– moewe
17 hours ago
Thanks for the update. I must admit that I find the explanation still slightly confusing or misleading. It is not really "BibTeX" that decides which fields are valid (and with 'valid' I actually mean: are accepted and shown in the output). That decision is down to the bibliography style (
.bst
file) that is used (not the package, but of course some packages are associated with a certain set of .bst
files). While there is a common core that most (all?) .bst
files support, fields like url
and urldate
are only supported by some styles. ...– moewe
10 hours ago
Thanks for the update. I must admit that I find the explanation still slightly confusing or misleading. It is not really "BibTeX" that decides which fields are valid (and with 'valid' I actually mean: are accepted and shown in the output). That decision is down to the bibliography style (
.bst
file) that is used (not the package, but of course some packages are associated with a certain set of .bst
files). While there is a common core that most (all?) .bst
files support, fields like url
and urldate
are only supported by some styles. ...– moewe
10 hours ago
... So it is slightly misleading to say that "BibTeX allows" the fields or that the notation is for BibTeX as a whole. (Technically, of course this is valid
.bib
syntax, but the real question is about the output in the document, which is not governed by .bib
file syntax rules but by the .bst
files.)– moewe
10 hours ago
... So it is slightly misleading to say that "BibTeX allows" the fields or that the notation is for BibTeX as a whole. (Technically, of course this is valid
.bib
syntax, but the real question is about the output in the document, which is not governed by .bib
file syntax rules but by the .bst
files.)– moewe
10 hours ago
add a comment |
You should ask your supervisor about whether or not it is allowed.
– albert
18 hours ago
1
It is probably allowed. You can use the
@misc
entry type (miscellaneous) for such references, or use one of the suggestions on tex.stackexchange.com/questions/3587/….– Marijn
17 hours ago
2
Which bibliography style do you employ?
– Mico
17 hours ago
I do use BibTex
– theroglu
17 hours ago
2
The question whether or not you are allowed to cite a youtube video in your thesis can only be answered by those who are going to read (and grade) it. The question of whether or not it is in general a good idea/accepted to do so is off-topic here and might be appropriate for academia.stackexchange.com. The question of how it can be done in TeX depends on the bibliography package and style you use (the argument to
bibliographystyle
). Withbiblatex
@online
might work.– moewe
17 hours ago