How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

How to support a colleague who finds meetings extremely tiring?

Slides for 30 min~1 hr Skype tenure track application interview

The difference between dialogue marks

What is the most efficient way to store a numeric range?

Mathematics of imaging the black hole

How to type this arrow in math mode?

Can there be female White Walkers?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

"consumers choosing to rely" vs. "consumers to choose to rely"

"as much details as you can remember"

Why is the Constellation's nose gear so long?

Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?

Why couldn't they take pictures of a closer black hole?

How come people say “Would of”?

If a sorcerer casts the Banishment spell on a PC while in Avernus, does the PC return to their home plane?

What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?

How to check whether the reindex working or not in Magento?

Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?

Can a flute soloist sit?

The phrase "to the numbers born"?

Replicating `SetKwInOut` and the format from `algorithm2e` in `algorithmicx`

4

Brief

I've heard that algorithmicx is the best algorithm package to use. However, in my work I've been using algorithm2e. On looking at a few examples on here its clear that it is a bit difficult converting between the two.

In particular, I've notice that the SetKwInOutcommands do not exist in algorithmicx. For example:

MWE

documentclass{book}



%for original algorithm 

usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage[linesnumbered,ruled]{algorithm2e}



%usepackage{algorithm,algpseudocode}



usepackage{lipsum}







begin{document}



%Original table to try and replicate



lipsum[1-1] 





begin{algorithm}[H]

    SetKwInOut{Input}{Input}

    SetKwInOut{Output}{Output}

    SetKwInOut{Define}{Define}

    underline{Initialise:} Conditions for algorithm;

    Define {Definition of algorithm}

    Input{Input of Algorithm} 

    Output{Output of algorithm}



    underline{Sequence In Full:} 



      {



       hspace{5pt}  textbf{Start}: 



      }

      {



       hspace{17pt}  Step 1  ;



      }

      {





        bgroupleftskip 15pt hspace{1pt}  lipsum[1-1] ; paregroup



      }



      {



       hspace{17pt}  Step 2  ;



      }

      {





        bgroupleftskip 15pt hspace{1pt}  lipsum[1-1] ; paregroup



      }

      {



       hspace{17pt}  Step 3  ;



      }

      {



      hspace {5pt} textbf{End}



      }



    caption{Name of algorithm}label{alg:Name} 

end{algorithm} 







end{document}

Goal

Is there any way to replicate the above into algorithmicx. (As you can see the reason as to why i want to convert it is because i've read that algorithmicxis the only package which allows you to separate the algorithm over multiple pages). Thank-you in advance?

formatting algorithms algorithmicx

share|improve this question

asked Jan 15 '18 at 10:16

HELPHELP

815

add a comment | 

4

Brief

I've heard that algorithmicx is the best algorithm package to use. However, in my work I've been using algorithm2e. On looking at a few examples on here its clear that it is a bit difficult converting between the two.

In particular, I've notice that the SetKwInOutcommands do not exist in algorithmicx. For example:

MWE

documentclass{book}



%for original algorithm 

usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage[linesnumbered,ruled]{algorithm2e}



%usepackage{algorithm,algpseudocode}



usepackage{lipsum}







begin{document}



%Original table to try and replicate



lipsum[1-1] 





begin{algorithm}[H]

    SetKwInOut{Input}{Input}

    SetKwInOut{Output}{Output}

    SetKwInOut{Define}{Define}

    underline{Initialise:} Conditions for algorithm;

    Define {Definition of algorithm}

    Input{Input of Algorithm} 

    Output{Output of algorithm}



    underline{Sequence In Full:} 



      {



       hspace{5pt}  textbf{Start}: 



      }

      {



       hspace{17pt}  Step 1  ;



      }

      {





        bgroupleftskip 15pt hspace{1pt}  lipsum[1-1] ; paregroup



      }



      {



       hspace{17pt}  Step 2  ;



      }

      {





        bgroupleftskip 15pt hspace{1pt}  lipsum[1-1] ; paregroup



      }

      {



       hspace{17pt}  Step 3  ;



      }

      {



      hspace {5pt} textbf{End}



      }



    caption{Name of algorithm}label{alg:Name} 

end{algorithm} 







end{document}

Goal

Is there any way to replicate the above into algorithmicx. (As you can see the reason as to why i want to convert it is because i've read that algorithmicxis the only package which allows you to separate the algorithm over multiple pages). Thank-you in advance?

formatting algorithms algorithmicx

share|improve this question

asked Jan 15 '18 at 10:16

HELPHELP

815

add a comment | 

Brief

I've heard that algorithmicx is the best algorithm package to use. However, in my work I've been using algorithm2e. On looking at a few examples on here its clear that it is a bit difficult converting between the two.

In particular, I've notice that the SetKwInOutcommands do not exist in algorithmicx. For example:

MWE

documentclass{book}



%for original algorithm 

usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage[linesnumbered,ruled]{algorithm2e}



%usepackage{algorithm,algpseudocode}



usepackage{lipsum}







begin{document}



%Original table to try and replicate



lipsum[1-1] 





begin{algorithm}[H]

    SetKwInOut{Input}{Input}

    SetKwInOut{Output}{Output}

    SetKwInOut{Define}{Define}

    underline{Initialise:} Conditions for algorithm;

    Define {Definition of algorithm}

    Input{Input of Algorithm} 

    Output{Output of algorithm}



    underline{Sequence In Full:} 



      {



       hspace{5pt}  textbf{Start}: 



      }

      {



       hspace{17pt}  Step 1  ;



      }

      {





        bgroupleftskip 15pt hspace{1pt}  lipsum[1-1] ; paregroup



      }



      {



       hspace{17pt}  Step 2  ;



      }

      {





        bgroupleftskip 15pt hspace{1pt}  lipsum[1-1] ; paregroup



      }

      {



       hspace{17pt}  Step 3  ;



      }

      {



      hspace {5pt} textbf{End}



      }



    caption{Name of algorithm}label{alg:Name} 

end{algorithm} 







end{document}

Goal

Is there any way to replicate the above into algorithmicx. (As you can see the reason as to why i want to convert it is because i've read that algorithmicxis the only package which allows you to separate the algorithm over multiple pages). Thank-you in advance?

formatting algorithms algorithmicx

share|improve this question

asked Jan 15 '18 at 10:16

HELPHELP

815

documentclass{book}



%for original algorithm 

usepackage{amsmath}

usepackage[linesnumbered,ruled]{algorithm2e}



%usepackage{algorithm,algpseudocode}



usepackage{lipsum}







begin{document}



%Original table to try and replicate



lipsum[1-1] 





begin{algorithm}[H]

    SetKwInOut{Input}{Input}

    SetKwInOut{Output}{Output}

    SetKwInOut{Define}{Define}

    underline{Initialise:} Conditions for algorithm;

    Define {Definition of algorithm}

    Input{Input of Algorithm} 

    Output{Output of algorithm}



    underline{Sequence In Full:} 



      {



       hspace{5pt}  textbf{Start}: 



      }

      {



       hspace{17pt}  Step 1  ;



      }

      {





        bgroupleftskip 15pt hspace{1pt}  lipsum[1-1] ; paregroup



      }



      {



       hspace{17pt}  Step 2  ;



      }

      {





        bgroupleftskip 15pt hspace{1pt}  lipsum[1-1] ; paregroup



      }

      {



       hspace{17pt}  Step 3  ;



      }

      {



      hspace {5pt} textbf{End}



      }



    caption{Name of algorithm}label{alg:Name} 

end{algorithm} 







end{document}

share|improve this question

asked Jan 15 '18 at 10:16

HELPHELP

815

share|improve this question

asked Jan 15 '18 at 10:16

HELPHELP

815

asked Jan 15 '18 at 10:16

HELPHELP

815

asked Jan 15 '18 at 10:16

HELPHELP

815

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

0

Yes algorithmicx has something like: SetKwInOut it's called : Require and Ensure in the algopseudocode layout of algorithmicx (you will have to use usepcakage{algopseudocode}`).

Then you can rename it as you want using this methods:

algrenewcommandalgorithmicrequire{textbf{Input:}}

algrenewcommandalgorithmicensure{textbf{Output:}}

as suggested here: Align Input and Output of algorithm to left

share

answered 3 mins ago

Simon C.Simon C.

1135

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f410448%2freplicating-setkwinout-and-the-format-from-algorithm2e-in-algorithmicx%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

0

Yes algorithmicx has something like: SetKwInOut it's called : Require and Ensure in the algopseudocode layout of algorithmicx (you will have to use usepcakage{algopseudocode}`).

Then you can rename it as you want using this methods:

algrenewcommandalgorithmicrequire{textbf{Input:}}

algrenewcommandalgorithmicensure{textbf{Output:}}

as suggested here: Align Input and Output of algorithm to left

share

answered 3 mins ago

Simon C.Simon C.

1135

add a comment | 

0

Yes algorithmicx has something like: SetKwInOut it's called : Require and Ensure in the algopseudocode layout of algorithmicx (you will have to use usepcakage{algopseudocode}`).

Then you can rename it as you want using this methods:

algrenewcommandalgorithmicrequire{textbf{Input:}}

algrenewcommandalgorithmicensure{textbf{Output:}}

as suggested here: Align Input and Output of algorithm to left

share

answered 3 mins ago

Simon C.Simon C.

1135

add a comment | 

Yes algorithmicx has something like: SetKwInOut it's called : Require and Ensure in the algopseudocode layout of algorithmicx (you will have to use usepcakage{algopseudocode}`).

Then you can rename it as you want using this methods:

algrenewcommandalgorithmicrequire{textbf{Input:}}

algrenewcommandalgorithmicensure{textbf{Output:}}

as suggested here: Align Input and Output of algorithm to left

share

answered 3 mins ago

Simon C.Simon C.

1135

algrenewcommandalgorithmicrequire{textbf{Input:}}

algrenewcommandalgorithmicensure{textbf{Output:}}

share

answered 3 mins ago

Simon C.Simon C.

1135

answered 3 mins ago

Simon C.Simon C.

1135

answered 3 mins ago

Simon C.Simon C.

1135