Do ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} effectively differ, and is there a “canonical” specification of the...
For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?
Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?
Cooking pasta in a water boiler
Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation
APIPA and LAN Broadcast Domain
Is it possible for absolutely everyone to attain enlightenment?
What's the name of these plastic connectors
Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?
How to charge AirPods to keep battery healthy?
Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?
Is it okay to consider publishing in my first year of PhD?
Star Trek - X-shaped Item on Regula/Orbital Office Starbases
Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?
How come people say “Would of”?
writing variables above the numbers in tikz picture
Getting crown tickets for Statue of Liberty
Why “相同意思的词” is called “同义词” instead of "同意词"？
How do PCB vias affect signal quality?
Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?
Is bread bad for ducks?
What information about me do stores get via my credit card?
Straighten subgroup lattice
How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?
How to obtain a position of last non-zero element
Do ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} effectively differ, and is there a “canonical” specification of the naturals?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InUsing `mathbb` fonts from other packagesmathbb{0} and mathbb{1} with mathdesign/Utopia?mathbb{0} and mathbb{1} without affecting mathbb{R} and mathbb{N}How to produce a character like 𝕜 (the nonexisting mathbb{k})?mathbb generates strange characters for numbers and greek lettersXeLaTeX, Latin Modern, mathbb and mathcalWhy does mathbb{N_0} render the 0 as nvdash?Is there a “new” canonical test for fonts and languages?Is there a blackboard version of Omega (the capital letter)Typesetting a computer-science book with XeLaTeX+biber
Continuing https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/22167/, as far as I understand, all the four of ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} work now, and BbbN is advised against. Is there any reasonably default context (e.g., a self-constructed context that would redefine these macros and symbols wouldn't count) in which some of ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} produce different results than some others when using amssymb+unicode-math+{xe|lua}latex? Compiling the example
documentclass{book}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{unicode-math}
usepackage{microtype}
setmainfont{TeX Gyre Termes}
setsansfont{TeX Gyre Heros}[Scale=0.88]
setmonofont{TeX Gyre Cursor}
setmathfont{TeX Gyre Termes Math}
setmathfont{Asana Math}[
range={setminus},
]
setmathfont{XITSMath-Regular}[
Extension=.otf,
range={"2A3E},
BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]
begin{document}
(ℕ mathbb{N} BbbN symbb{N})
end{document}
with xelatex, e.g., I get visibly indistinguishable letters
ℕℕℕℕ
I cannot distinguish them either when I put them as subscripts or superscripts.
Moreover, is there a consensus in the {xe|lua}[La]TeX world to name any of these ways as the standard way to denote the set of natural numbers?
(Of course, I leave aside the question whether the zero should belong to this set or not; it could flame up a war here and is up to the author anyway.)
xetex symbols unicode-math amssymb blackboard
asked 3 mins ago
user49915user49915
759122
add a comment |
Continuing https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/22167/, as far as I understand, all the four of ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} work now, and BbbN is advised against. Is there any reasonably default context (e.g., a self-constructed context that would redefine these macros and symbols wouldn't count) in which some of ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} produce different results than some others when using amssymb+unicode-math+{xe|lua}latex? Compiling the example
documentclass{book}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{unicode-math}
usepackage{microtype}
setmainfont{TeX Gyre Termes}
setsansfont{TeX Gyre Heros}[Scale=0.88]
setmonofont{TeX Gyre Cursor}
setmathfont{TeX Gyre Termes Math}
setmathfont{Asana Math}[
range={setminus},
]
setmathfont{XITSMath-Regular}[
Extension=.otf,
range={"2A3E},
BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]
begin{document}
(ℕ mathbb{N} BbbN symbb{N})
end{document}
with xelatex, e.g., I get visibly indistinguishable letters
ℕℕℕℕ
I cannot distinguish them either when I put them as subscripts or superscripts.
Moreover, is there a consensus in the {xe|lua}[La]TeX world to name any of these ways as the standard way to denote the set of natural numbers?
(Of course, I leave aside the question whether the zero should belong to this set or not; it could flame up a war here and is up to the author anyway.)
xetex symbols unicode-math amssymb blackboard
asked 3 mins ago
user49915user49915
759122
add a comment |
Continuing https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/22167/, as far as I understand, all the four of ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} work now, and BbbN is advised against. Is there any reasonably default context (e.g., a self-constructed context that would redefine these macros and symbols wouldn't count) in which some of ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} produce different results than some others when using amssymb+unicode-math+{xe|lua}latex? Compiling the example
documentclass{book}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{unicode-math}
usepackage{microtype}
setmainfont{TeX Gyre Termes}
setsansfont{TeX Gyre Heros}[Scale=0.88]
setmonofont{TeX Gyre Cursor}
setmathfont{TeX Gyre Termes Math}
setmathfont{Asana Math}[
range={setminus},
]
setmathfont{XITSMath-Regular}[
Extension=.otf,
range={"2A3E},
BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]
begin{document}
(ℕ mathbb{N} BbbN symbb{N})
end{document}
with xelatex, e.g., I get visibly indistinguishable letters
ℕℕℕℕ
I cannot distinguish them either when I put them as subscripts or superscripts.
Moreover, is there a consensus in the {xe|lua}[La]TeX world to name any of these ways as the standard way to denote the set of natural numbers?
(Of course, I leave aside the question whether the zero should belong to this set or not; it could flame up a war here and is up to the author anyway.)
xetex symbols unicode-math amssymb blackboard
asked 3 mins ago
user49915user49915
759122
Continuing https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/22167/, as far as I understand, all the four of ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} work now, and BbbN is advised against. Is there any reasonably default context (e.g., a self-constructed context that would redefine these macros and symbols wouldn't count) in which some of ℕ, mathbb{N}, BbbN, symbb{N} produce different results than some others when using amssymb+unicode-math+{xe|lua}latex? Compiling the example
documentclass{book}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{unicode-math}
usepackage{microtype}
setmainfont{TeX Gyre Termes}
setsansfont{TeX Gyre Heros}[Scale=0.88]
setmonofont{TeX Gyre Cursor}
setmathfont{TeX Gyre Termes Math}
setmathfont{Asana Math}[
range={setminus},
]
setmathfont{XITSMath-Regular}[
Extension=.otf,
range={"2A3E},
BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]
begin{document}
(ℕ mathbb{N} BbbN symbb{N})
end{document}
with xelatex, e.g., I get visibly indistinguishable letters
ℕℕℕℕ
I cannot distinguish them either when I put them as subscripts or superscripts.
Moreover, is there a consensus in the {xe|lua}[La]TeX world to name any of these ways as the standard way to denote the set of natural numbers?
(Of course, I leave aside the question whether the zero should belong to this set or not; it could flame up a war here and is up to the author anyway.)
xetex symbols unicode-math amssymb blackboard
xetex symbols unicode-math amssymb blackboard
asked 3 mins ago
user49915user49915
759122
asked 3 mins ago
user49915user49915
759122
asked 3 mins ago
user49915user49915
759122
asked 3 mins ago
user49915user49915
759122
asked 3 mins ago
user49915user49915
759122
759122
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484425%2fdo-%25e2%2584%2595-mathbbn-bbbn-symbbn-effectively-differ-and-is-there-a-canonical%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484425%2fdo-%25e2%2584%2595-mathbbn-bbbn-symbbn-effectively-differ-and-is-there-a-canonical%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
