Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCharacters...
Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!
Why does C# sound extremely flat when saxophone is tuned to G?
How to get regions to plot as graphics
Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?
How do I get the green key off the shelf in the Dobby level of Lego Harry Potter 2?
The King's new dress
How easy is it to start Magic from scratch?
What is the purpose of the Evocation wizard's Potent Cantrip feature?
Why do remote companies require working in the US?
What does this shorthand mean?
What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?
Was a professor correct to chastise me for writing "Prof. X" rather than "Professor X"?
Does the Brexit deal have to be agreed by both Houses?
Rotate a column
Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python
How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?
Why were Madagascar and New Zealand discovered so late?
Inappropriate reference requests from Journal reviewers
Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis
How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?
How to make a variable always equal to the result of some calculations?
Robert Sheckley short story about vacation spots being overwhelmed
Return the Closest Prime Number
Why is there a PLL in CPU?
Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowCharacters which have several different shapesHow useful are the kanji in reading Chinese?Can Chinese readers scan large amounts of text faster/more accurately than their alphabet-using counterparts?丼: why is “well” also “bowl of food”?What Does Unicode 8.0 Mean For Chinese?How are blanks indicated for placeholders in Chinese (like ???)Is there a dictionary of standard character variants?How to display CJK Extension F?How is it decided as to which character is used on the tech terminology?How does 子 come to mean 'midnight'?
CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?
characters
add a comment |
CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?
characters
unicode.org
– fefe
1 hour ago
@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.
– fefe
1 hour ago
unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
add a comment |
CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?
characters
CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?
characters
characters
asked 1 hour ago
AdministratorAdministrator
1675
1675
unicode.org
– fefe
1 hour ago
@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.
– fefe
1 hour ago
unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
add a comment |
unicode.org
– fefe
1 hour ago
@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.
– fefe
1 hour ago
unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
unicode.org
– fefe
1 hour ago
unicode.org
– fefe
1 hour ago
@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.
– fefe
1 hour ago
Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.
– fefe
1 hour ago
unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:
Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?
The answer reads:
A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.
The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).
Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.
Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:
Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?
which is answered:
A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.
The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "371"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchinese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33433%2fwhich-organization-defines-cjk-unified-ideographs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:
Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?
The answer reads:
A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.
The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).
Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.
Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:
Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?
which is answered:
A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.
The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.
add a comment |
On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:
Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?
The answer reads:
A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.
The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).
Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.
Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:
Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?
which is answered:
A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.
The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.
add a comment |
On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:
Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?
The answer reads:
A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.
The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).
Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.
Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:
Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?
which is answered:
A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.
The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.
On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:
Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?
The answer reads:
A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.
The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).
Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.
Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:
Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?
which is answered:
A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.
The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
user3306356♦user3306356
16.7k52972
16.7k52972
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chinese Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchinese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33433%2fwhich-organization-defines-cjk-unified-ideographs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
unicode.org
– fefe
1 hour ago
@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.
– Zhang
1 hour ago
Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.
– fefe
1 hour ago
unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.
– Zhang
1 hour ago