Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review? The...

Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons

Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"

Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed considered Gaussian?

What is the value of α and β in a triangle?

Why, when going from special to general relativity, do we just replace partial derivatives with covariant derivatives?

Writing differences on a blackboard

Newlines in BSD sed vs gsed

Some questions about different axiomatic systems for neighbourhoods

Is it possible to replace duplicates of a character with one character using tr

Why does the flight controls check come before arming the autobrake on the A320?

Why isn't the Mueller report being released completely and unredacted?

When you upcast Blindness/Deafness, do all targets suffer the same effect?

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

Proper way to express "He disappeared them"

WOW air has ceased operation, can I get my tickets refunded?

I want to delete every two lines after 3rd lines in file contain very large number of lines :

Bartok - Syncopation (1): Meaning of notes in between Grand Staff

Rotate a column

Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?

Domestic-to-international connection at Orlando (MCO)

Math-accent symbol over parentheses enclosing accented symbol (amsmath)

Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?

Does soap repel water?

Why the difference in type-inference over the as-pattern in two similar function definitions?



Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow long is reasonable to wait for reply from an editor?How much time should one spend refereeing a paper?Should I choose the same editor for two papers?Slightly revised version of submitted paper two days afterwards: will the editor be annoyed?Referee report ignored and not sent to authorsFirstly manuscipt 'rejected' and then status changed to 'revise'Elsevier Editorial System: is this scam?Editor is asking for two referees and single columnResubmitting a Paper to a Mathematics Journal After Questionable RejectionHow is the Journal for an annual Review Chosen












5















I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.



I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but It'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the Editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.

    – Roland
    4 hours ago











  • Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.

    – Monkia
    1 hour ago
















5















I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.



I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but It'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the Editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.

    – Roland
    4 hours ago











  • Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.

    – Monkia
    1 hour ago














5












5








5








I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.



I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but It'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the Editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?










share|improve this question
















I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.



I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but It'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the Editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?







journals peer-review review-articles






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago







Babak

















asked 5 hours ago









BabakBabak

1,4501827




1,4501827








  • 1





    A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.

    – Roland
    4 hours ago











  • Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.

    – Monkia
    1 hour ago














  • 1





    A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.

    – Roland
    4 hours ago











  • Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.

    – Monkia
    1 hour ago








1




1





A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.

– Roland
4 hours ago





A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.

– Roland
4 hours ago













Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.

– Monkia
1 hour ago





Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.

– Monkia
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.






share|improve this answer































    5














    I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".



    Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).



    If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.



    In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "415"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127299%2fis-it-convenient-to-ask-the-journals-editor-for-two-additional-days-to-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5














      Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.






      share|improve this answer




























        5














        Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.






        share|improve this answer


























          5












          5








          5







          Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.






          share|improve this answer













          Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 2 hours ago









          StrongBadStrongBad

          86.2k24215422




          86.2k24215422























              5














              I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".



              Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).



              If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.



              In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                5














                I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".



                Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).



                If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.



                In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.























                  5












                  5








                  5







                  I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".



                  Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).



                  If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.



                  In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.










                  I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".



                  Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).



                  If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.



                  In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 1 hour ago









                  guestguest

                  511




                  511




                  New contributor




                  guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127299%2fis-it-convenient-to-ask-the-journals-editor-for-two-additional-days-to-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Can't compile dgruyter and caption packagesLaTeX templates/packages for writing a patent specificationLatex...

                      Schneeberg (Smreczany) Bibliografia | Menu...

                      Hans Bellmer Spis treści Życiorys | Upamiętnienie | Przypisy | Bibliografia | Linki zewnętrzne |...