Why Prushim were the ones who “separated”?Parashat Vayakhel + ShekalimPurim and Shushan PurimWho were the...
Can placing a counter on a creature after it has been assigned as an attacker remove it from combat
How long is the D&D Starter Set campaign?
Can a hotel cancel a confirmed reservation?
How would an AI self awareness kill switch work?
Writing Cyrillic text to a file
Why did other German political parties disband so fast when Hitler was appointed chancellor?
Why would the Pakistan airspace closure cancel flights not headed to Pakistan itself?
Better VM Ubuntu on Windows 10 or VM Windows 10 on Ubuntu?
Avoiding morning and evening handshakes
It took me a lot of time to make this, pls like. (YouTube Comments #1)
Am I a Rude Number?
Incorporating research and background: How much is too much?
Can you share a component pouch with another creature?
What incentives do banks have to gather up loans into pools (backed by Ginnie Mae)and selling them?
How can I get my players to come to the game session after agreeing to a date?
Why do no American passenger airlines still operate dedicated cargo flights?
Who is this Ant Woman character in this image alongside the Wasp?
Do authors have to be politically correct in article-writing?
If I delete my router's history can my ISP still provide it to my parents?
Why zero tolerance on nudity in space?
Equation with several exponents
awk + sum all numbers
Intern applicant asking for compensation equivalent to that of permanent employee
Using only 1s, make 29 with the minimum number of digits
Why Prushim were the ones who “separated”?
Parashat Vayakhel + ShekalimPurim and Shushan PurimWho were the Magharians?Who were the Rambam's students?Who were the Therapeutae?Who were the original users of Ktav Ashuri?Were there non-Jewish prophets? If yes, who were they and what were their purpose?Who were the Jewish Governors during the Persian Era?Who were the בני ברית מערביים mentioned in the Trumas HaDeshen, and what was their agenda?Why does the Torah mention the lineage of Yishma'el and Esav?Are professor Daniel Boyarin's writings about the messiah supported in traditional Jewish sources?Why there were TWO separate tablets - Luchot HaBrit?
As I understand the tradition of the Prushim - Pharisees (basically us all), our lineage held steady since Moses to the Tannayim and further and all the prominent figures in Judaism were of our sect (Moses, Jehoshuah, King David, the Maccabim etc.)
The name, however, clearly suggests that Prushim, the minority, had separated from the mainstream, the majority. The WIKI doesn't explain why this name was chosen, by whom and who were the majority.
I would like to consolidate our approach to the tradition with the name Prushim.
history parshanut-theory
asked 2 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
5,747527
add a comment |
As I understand the tradition of the Prushim - Pharisees (basically us all), our lineage held steady since Moses to the Tannayim and further and all the prominent figures in Judaism were of our sect (Moses, Jehoshuah, King David, the Maccabim etc.)
The name, however, clearly suggests that Prushim, the minority, had separated from the mainstream, the majority. The WIKI doesn't explain why this name was chosen, by whom and who were the majority.
I would like to consolidate our approach to the tradition with the name Prushim.
history parshanut-theory
asked 2 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
5,747527
1
The theory I’ve heard is that they separated from the amei haaretz to avoid becoming tamei
– Joel K
2 hours ago
add a comment |
As I understand the tradition of the Prushim - Pharisees (basically us all), our lineage held steady since Moses to the Tannayim and further and all the prominent figures in Judaism were of our sect (Moses, Jehoshuah, King David, the Maccabim etc.)
The name, however, clearly suggests that Prushim, the minority, had separated from the mainstream, the majority. The WIKI doesn't explain why this name was chosen, by whom and who were the majority.
I would like to consolidate our approach to the tradition with the name Prushim.
history parshanut-theory
asked 2 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
5,747527
As I understand the tradition of the Prushim - Pharisees (basically us all), our lineage held steady since Moses to the Tannayim and further and all the prominent figures in Judaism were of our sect (Moses, Jehoshuah, King David, the Maccabim etc.)
The name, however, clearly suggests that Prushim, the minority, had separated from the mainstream, the majority. The WIKI doesn't explain why this name was chosen, by whom and who were the majority.
I would like to consolidate our approach to the tradition with the name Prushim.
history parshanut-theory
history parshanut-theory
asked 2 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
5,747527
asked 2 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
5,747527
asked 2 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
5,747527
asked 2 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
5,747527
asked 2 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
5,747527
5,747527
1
The theory I’ve heard is that they separated from the amei haaretz to avoid becoming tamei
– Joel K
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
The theory I’ve heard is that they separated from the amei haaretz to avoid becoming tamei
– Joel K
2 hours ago
1
1
The theory I’ve heard is that they separated from the amei haaretz to avoid becoming tamei
– Joel K
2 hours ago
The theory I’ve heard is that they separated from the amei haaretz to avoid becoming tamei
– Joel K
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Bartenura to Mishnah Yadayim 4:6 explains the name as follows:
פרושים. לחכמי ישראל היו קורין פרושים, לפי שאוכלין חוליהן בטהרה ופרושים ממגע עם הארץ, דתנן בגדי עם הארץ מדרס לפרושים:
To the Sages of Israel [the Tzedukim] would call Perushim [lit. “those who separate”], for they would eat their non-sacred food in purity and separate from touching Amei Ha’aretz. As we taught in the Mishnah (Chagigah 2:7): “The clothing of Amei Ha’aretz [contaminates by] treading for Perushim.”
answered 1 hour ago
DonielFDonielF
14.1k12379
Interesting, how come it (the name/party/movement/sect) happened only in the times of the destruction of the second Temple? What was before that?
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
@AlBerko Mu theory, based on the wording of the Bartenura, based on the wording of the Mishnah in Yadayim, is that the Tzedukim gave the name to them, perhaps disparagingly, and they proudly wore it as a badge of honor instead (as indicated by Mishnayos such as the one in Chagigah which use the name independently of the Tzedukim).
– DonielF
1 hour ago
Good, but why did it start all of sudden? what was the Halacha before, what the majority followed for the 420 years of the Second Temple, for example?
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
@AlBerko (Tzedukim came around fairly early during Bayis Sheini, btw.) I don’t think the chumra was new; apparently Avraham Avinu held of it (BM 87b; yes, I know that BM was written much later). I think the only thing that changed was giving that group of people a name.
– DonielF
1 hour ago
Look at his previous explanation: "אומרים צדוקין. המכחישין תורה שבעל פה נקראים צדוקים, על שם צדוק וביתוס תלמידיו של אנטיגנוס איש סוכו שהתחילו בקלקלה זו תחילה." it clearly point to the fact that the Zdukim were ones to stray (according to us).
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
|
show 5 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Bartenura to Mishnah Yadayim 4:6 explains the name as follows:
פרושים. לחכמי ישראל היו קורין פרושים, לפי שאוכלין חוליהן בטהרה ופרושים ממגע עם הארץ, דתנן בגדי עם הארץ מדרס לפרושים:
To the Sages of Israel [the Tzedukim] would call Perushim [lit. “those who separate”], for they would eat their non-sacred food in purity and separate from touching Amei Ha’aretz. As we taught in the Mishnah (Chagigah 2:7): “The clothing of Amei Ha’aretz [contaminates by] treading for Perushim.”
answered 1 hour ago
DonielFDonielF
14.1k12379
Interesting, how come it (the name/party/movement/sect) happened only in the times of the destruction of the second Temple? What was before that?
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
@AlBerko Mu theory, based on the wording of the Bartenura, based on the wording of the Mishnah in Yadayim, is that the Tzedukim gave the name to them, perhaps disparagingly, and they proudly wore it as a badge of honor instead (as indicated by Mishnayos such as the one in Chagigah which use the name independently of the Tzedukim).
– DonielF
1 hour ago
Good, but why did it start all of sudden? what was the Halacha before, what the majority followed for the 420 years of the Second Temple, for example?
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
@AlBerko (Tzedukim came around fairly early during Bayis Sheini, btw.) I don’t think the chumra was new; apparently Avraham Avinu held of it (BM 87b; yes, I know that BM was written much later). I think the only thing that changed was giving that group of people a name.
– DonielF
1 hour ago
Look at his previous explanation: "אומרים צדוקין. המכחישין תורה שבעל פה נקראים צדוקים, על שם צדוק וביתוס תלמידיו של אנטיגנוס איש סוכו שהתחילו בקלקלה זו תחילה." it clearly point to the fact that the Zdukim were ones to stray (according to us).
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
|
show 5 more comments
Bartenura to Mishnah Yadayim 4:6 explains the name as follows:
פרושים. לחכמי ישראל היו קורין פרושים, לפי שאוכלין חוליהן בטהרה ופרושים ממגע עם הארץ, דתנן בגדי עם הארץ מדרס לפרושים:
To the Sages of Israel [the Tzedukim] would call Perushim [lit. “those who separate”], for they would eat their non-sacred food in purity and separate from touching Amei Ha’aretz. As we taught in the Mishnah (Chagigah 2:7): “The clothing of Amei Ha’aretz [contaminates by] treading for Perushim.”
answered 1 hour ago
DonielFDonielF
14.1k12379
Interesting, how come it (the name/party/movement/sect) happened only in the times of the destruction of the second Temple? What was before that?
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
@AlBerko Mu theory, based on the wording of the Bartenura, based on the wording of the Mishnah in Yadayim, is that the Tzedukim gave the name to them, perhaps disparagingly, and they proudly wore it as a badge of honor instead (as indicated by Mishnayos such as the one in Chagigah which use the name independently of the Tzedukim).
– DonielF
1 hour ago
Good, but why did it start all of sudden? what was the Halacha before, what the majority followed for the 420 years of the Second Temple, for example?
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
@AlBerko (Tzedukim came around fairly early during Bayis Sheini, btw.) I don’t think the chumra was new; apparently Avraham Avinu held of it (BM 87b; yes, I know that BM was written much later). I think the only thing that changed was giving that group of people a name.
– DonielF
1 hour ago
Look at his previous explanation: "אומרים צדוקין. המכחישין תורה שבעל פה נקראים צדוקים, על שם צדוק וביתוס תלמידיו של אנטיגנוס איש סוכו שהתחילו בקלקלה זו תחילה." it clearly point to the fact that the Zdukim were ones to stray (according to us).
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
|
show 5 more comments
Bartenura to Mishnah Yadayim 4:6 explains the name as follows:
פרושים. לחכמי ישראל היו קורין פרושים, לפי שאוכלין חוליהן בטהרה ופרושים ממגע עם הארץ, דתנן בגדי עם הארץ מדרס לפרושים:
To the Sages of Israel [the Tzedukim] would call Perushim [lit. “those who separate”], for they would eat their non-sacred food in purity and separate from touching Amei Ha’aretz. As we taught in the Mishnah (Chagigah 2:7): “The clothing of Amei Ha’aretz [contaminates by] treading for Perushim.”
answered 1 hour ago
DonielFDonielF
14.1k12379
Bartenura to Mishnah Yadayim 4:6 explains the name as follows:
פרושים. לחכמי ישראל היו קורין פרושים, לפי שאוכלין חוליהן בטהרה ופרושים ממגע עם הארץ, דתנן בגדי עם הארץ מדרס לפרושים:
To the Sages of Israel [the Tzedukim] would call Perushim [lit. “those who separate”], for they would eat their non-sacred food in purity and separate from touching Amei Ha’aretz. As we taught in the Mishnah (Chagigah 2:7): “The clothing of Amei Ha’aretz [contaminates by] treading for Perushim.”
answered 1 hour ago
DonielFDonielF
14.1k12379
answered 1 hour ago
DonielFDonielF
14.1k12379
answered 1 hour ago
DonielFDonielF
14.1k12379
answered 1 hour ago
DonielFDonielF
14.1k12379
14.1k12379
Interesting, how come it (the name/party/movement/sect) happened only in the times of the destruction of the second Temple? What was before that?
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
@AlBerko Mu theory, based on the wording of the Bartenura, based on the wording of the Mishnah in Yadayim, is that the Tzedukim gave the name to them, perhaps disparagingly, and they proudly wore it as a badge of honor instead (as indicated by Mishnayos such as the one in Chagigah which use the name independently of the Tzedukim).
– DonielF
1 hour ago
Good, but why did it start all of sudden? what was the Halacha before, what the majority followed for the 420 years of the Second Temple, for example?
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
@AlBerko (Tzedukim came around fairly early during Bayis Sheini, btw.) I don’t think the chumra was new; apparently Avraham Avinu held of it (BM 87b; yes, I know that BM was written much later). I think the only thing that changed was giving that group of people a name.
– DonielF
1 hour ago
Look at his previous explanation: "אומרים צדוקין. המכחישין תורה שבעל פה נקראים צדוקים, על שם צדוק וביתוס תלמידיו של אנטיגנוס איש סוכו שהתחילו בקלקלה זו תחילה." it clearly point to the fact that the Zdukim were ones to stray (according to us).
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
|
show 5 more comments
Interesting, how come it (the name/party/movement/sect) happened only in the times of the destruction of the second Temple? What was before that?
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
@AlBerko Mu theory, based on the wording of the Bartenura, based on the wording of the Mishnah in Yadayim, is that the Tzedukim gave the name to them, perhaps disparagingly, and they proudly wore it as a badge of honor instead (as indicated by Mishnayos such as the one in Chagigah which use the name independently of the Tzedukim).
– DonielF
1 hour ago
Good, but why did it start all of sudden? what was the Halacha before, what the majority followed for the 420 years of the Second Temple, for example?
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
@AlBerko (Tzedukim came around fairly early during Bayis Sheini, btw.) I don’t think the chumra was new; apparently Avraham Avinu held of it (BM 87b; yes, I know that BM was written much later). I think the only thing that changed was giving that group of people a name.
– DonielF
1 hour ago
Look at his previous explanation: "אומרים צדוקין. המכחישין תורה שבעל פה נקראים צדוקים, על שם צדוק וביתוס תלמידיו של אנטיגנוס איש סוכו שהתחילו בקלקלה זו תחילה." it clearly point to the fact that the Zdukim were ones to stray (according to us).
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
Interesting, how come it (the name/party/movement/sect) happened only in the times of the destruction of the second Temple? What was before that?
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
Interesting, how come it (the name/party/movement/sect) happened only in the times of the destruction of the second Temple? What was before that?
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
@AlBerko Mu theory, based on the wording of the Bartenura, based on the wording of the Mishnah in Yadayim, is that the Tzedukim gave the name to them, perhaps disparagingly, and they proudly wore it as a badge of honor instead (as indicated by Mishnayos such as the one in Chagigah which use the name independently of the Tzedukim).
– DonielF
1 hour ago
@AlBerko Mu theory, based on the wording of the Bartenura, based on the wording of the Mishnah in Yadayim, is that the Tzedukim gave the name to them, perhaps disparagingly, and they proudly wore it as a badge of honor instead (as indicated by Mishnayos such as the one in Chagigah which use the name independently of the Tzedukim).
– DonielF
1 hour ago
Good, but why did it start all of sudden? what was the Halacha before, what the majority followed for the 420 years of the Second Temple, for example?
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
Good, but why did it start all of sudden? what was the Halacha before, what the majority followed for the 420 years of the Second Temple, for example?
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
@AlBerko (Tzedukim came around fairly early during Bayis Sheini, btw.) I don’t think the chumra was new; apparently Avraham Avinu held of it (BM 87b; yes, I know that BM was written much later). I think the only thing that changed was giving that group of people a name.
– DonielF
1 hour ago
@AlBerko (Tzedukim came around fairly early during Bayis Sheini, btw.) I don’t think the chumra was new; apparently Avraham Avinu held of it (BM 87b; yes, I know that BM was written much later). I think the only thing that changed was giving that group of people a name.
– DonielF
1 hour ago
Look at his previous explanation: "אומרים צדוקין. המכחישין תורה שבעל פה נקראים צדוקים, על שם צדוק וביתוס תלמידיו של אנטיגנוס איש סוכו שהתחילו בקלקלה זו תחילה." it clearly point to the fact that the Zdukim were ones to stray (according to us).
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
Look at his previous explanation: "אומרים צדוקין. המכחישין תורה שבעל פה נקראים צדוקים, על שם צדוק וביתוס תלמידיו של אנטיגנוס איש סוכו שהתחילו בקלקלה זו תחילה." it clearly point to the fact that the Zdukim were ones to stray (according to us).
– Al Berko
1 hour ago
|
show 5 more comments
1
The theory I’ve heard is that they separated from the amei haaretz to avoid becoming tamei
– Joel K
2 hours ago