What does the integral of a function times a function of a random variable represent, conceptually?Expected...
Why does Mind Blank stop the Feeblemind spell?
Why does nature favour the Laplacian?
How to limit Drive Letters Windows assigns to new removable USB drives
Can someone publish a story that happened to you?
What is the most expensive material in the world that could be used to create Pun-Pun's lute?
How to fry ground beef so it is well-browned
Which big number is bigger?
How exactly does Hawking radiation decrease the mass of black holes?
Two field separators (colon and space) in awk
How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?
What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?
Was there a shared-world project before "Thieves World"?
Farming on the moon
What is meant by "Prämie" in this letter? Do I have to pay it or it is just a reminder?
Minor Revision with suggestion of an alternative proof by reviewer
Can SQL Server create collisions in system generated constraint names?
How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?
What causes platform events to fail to be published and should I cater for failed platform event creations?
How can I practically buy stocks?
Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?
Does a large simulator bay have standard public address announcements?
Did the BCPL programming language support floats?
How to have a sharp product image?
Rivers without rain
What does the integral of a function times a function of a random variable represent, conceptually?
Expected value of a Gaussian random variable transformed with a logistic functionWhat is the expected partial value function really called?indicator variable - dirac delta or step functionExpected value of bounded function?Why does MLE not include the integral for joint probability of a contious random variableHow to calculate the expected value of a standard normal distribution?Plot the density function of a normal random variable knowing only the characteristic function in RExpectation of a function of a random variable from CDFDerivation of variance of normal distribution with gamma functionMoment Generating Function for Lognormal Random Variable
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
$begingroup$
I am trying to understand conceptually what does the following give me or tell me:
$$int f(x) cdot g(x) , dx$$
where $f(x)$ is any continuous function of $x$ and $g(x)$ is the probability density function for a random variable, for example a normal distribution's PDF is:
$$ g(x) = frac1 {2 pi sigma^2} expleft(frac{- (x - mu)^2 }{ 2 sigma ^2}right) $$
I understand the integral of a PDF gives me the CDF. So:
$$int_{-infty}^0 g(x) , dx$$
Gives me the probability of $x$ being less than $0$. However, what happens when you multiply $g(x)$ by another function $f(x)$ and take the integral? I heard it gives you the expected payoff assuming $f(x)$ is a function of payoffs and you take an integral from -infinity to +infinity. This, if true, I conceptually understand. sum of payoffs times the probabilities is the expected value of whatever game you are playing.
I start getting confused when the boundaries of the integral are not $pm infty$. I'm not sure in that case what integral conceptually means. For example:
$$int_{-infty}^0 f(x) g(x) , dx$$
What does that tell me?
probability distributions normal-distribution random-variable expected-value
New contributor
vt_og is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to understand conceptually what does the following give me or tell me:
$$int f(x) cdot g(x) , dx$$
where $f(x)$ is any continuous function of $x$ and $g(x)$ is the probability density function for a random variable, for example a normal distribution's PDF is:
$$ g(x) = frac1 {2 pi sigma^2} expleft(frac{- (x - mu)^2 }{ 2 sigma ^2}right) $$
I understand the integral of a PDF gives me the CDF. So:
$$int_{-infty}^0 g(x) , dx$$
Gives me the probability of $x$ being less than $0$. However, what happens when you multiply $g(x)$ by another function $f(x)$ and take the integral? I heard it gives you the expected payoff assuming $f(x)$ is a function of payoffs and you take an integral from -infinity to +infinity. This, if true, I conceptually understand. sum of payoffs times the probabilities is the expected value of whatever game you are playing.
I start getting confused when the boundaries of the integral are not $pm infty$. I'm not sure in that case what integral conceptually means. For example:
$$int_{-infty}^0 f(x) g(x) , dx$$
What does that tell me?
probability distributions normal-distribution random-variable expected-value
New contributor
vt_og is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to understand conceptually what does the following give me or tell me:
$$int f(x) cdot g(x) , dx$$
where $f(x)$ is any continuous function of $x$ and $g(x)$ is the probability density function for a random variable, for example a normal distribution's PDF is:
$$ g(x) = frac1 {2 pi sigma^2} expleft(frac{- (x - mu)^2 }{ 2 sigma ^2}right) $$
I understand the integral of a PDF gives me the CDF. So:
$$int_{-infty}^0 g(x) , dx$$
Gives me the probability of $x$ being less than $0$. However, what happens when you multiply $g(x)$ by another function $f(x)$ and take the integral? I heard it gives you the expected payoff assuming $f(x)$ is a function of payoffs and you take an integral from -infinity to +infinity. This, if true, I conceptually understand. sum of payoffs times the probabilities is the expected value of whatever game you are playing.
I start getting confused when the boundaries of the integral are not $pm infty$. I'm not sure in that case what integral conceptually means. For example:
$$int_{-infty}^0 f(x) g(x) , dx$$
What does that tell me?
probability distributions normal-distribution random-variable expected-value
New contributor
vt_og is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
I am trying to understand conceptually what does the following give me or tell me:
$$int f(x) cdot g(x) , dx$$
where $f(x)$ is any continuous function of $x$ and $g(x)$ is the probability density function for a random variable, for example a normal distribution's PDF is:
$$ g(x) = frac1 {2 pi sigma^2} expleft(frac{- (x - mu)^2 }{ 2 sigma ^2}right) $$
I understand the integral of a PDF gives me the CDF. So:
$$int_{-infty}^0 g(x) , dx$$
Gives me the probability of $x$ being less than $0$. However, what happens when you multiply $g(x)$ by another function $f(x)$ and take the integral? I heard it gives you the expected payoff assuming $f(x)$ is a function of payoffs and you take an integral from -infinity to +infinity. This, if true, I conceptually understand. sum of payoffs times the probabilities is the expected value of whatever game you are playing.
I start getting confused when the boundaries of the integral are not $pm infty$. I'm not sure in that case what integral conceptually means. For example:
$$int_{-infty}^0 f(x) g(x) , dx$$
What does that tell me?
probability distributions normal-distribution random-variable expected-value
probability distributions normal-distribution random-variable expected-value
New contributor
vt_og is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
vt_og is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 5 hours ago
Siong Thye Goh
3,0842621
3,0842621
New contributor
vt_og is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 5 hours ago
vt_ogvt_og
141
141
New contributor
vt_og is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
vt_og is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
vt_og is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Suppose $g$ is the pdf of random variable $X$, then
$$E[f(X)|X in A]= frac{int_A f(x)g(x) , dx}{int_A g(t) , dt}$$
Hence $$int_A f(x) g(x) , dt = Pr(X in A) E[f(X)|X in A],$$
it gives you the product of the conditional expectation of $f(X)$ given that $X in A$ and the probability that $X$ is in $A$.
I think $E[f(X)|X in A]$ is a more interesting quantity, and I would divide your integral with $Pr(X in A)$ to recover it.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The expected value of $X$ following distribution $g$ is
$$
E[X] = int x ,g(x) ,dx
$$
By the law of the unconscious statistician we know that the expected value of a function $f$ of random variable $X$ is
$$
E[f(X)] = int f(x) ,g(x) ,dx
$$
What does it tell you? It tells you what would be the expected value of your random variable if you transformed it somehow. For example, say that you have know what is the distribution of height for humans in centimetres, but are interested of distribution in meters, i.e. $f(x) = x/100$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another way to look at this integral is through the random variable transformation point of view. You can think of $Y=f(x)$ as a new random variable, and your integral is the expectation (mean) $E[Y]$ of the new variable $Y$.
Let's build the probability density function of the new variable $Y$. Unfortunately, we can't derive an analytical expression. We'll have to use a more complex, integral form of it.
What is the probability that $Y$ will have values between $y$ and $y+dy$? We look at all $x$ where $y<f(x)<y+dy$ and add up their probabilities:
$$g_y(y)dy=int_x mathbb1_{y<f(x)<y+dy} g(x)dx $$
Next, we simply integrate over all values of $Y$:
$$E[y]=int_yyg_y(y)dy$$
Since $int_y$ runs through all possible $y$, it's the same as running the integral through all possible $x$.
Just pause for a moment and agree with me...
Now that you agreed with me you'll see that:
$$E[Y]=int_xf(x)g(x)dx$$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This could use some elaboration. Perhaps an example would help. If you would also bring into consideration the idea of truncation or conditioning (which seems to be the main stumbling block), I think your point would be an excellent answer.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@whuber, i did impossible: explained Lebesque integral without measure theory!
$endgroup$
– Aksakal
4 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
vt_og is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f405242%2fwhat-does-the-integral-of-a-function-times-a-function-of-a-random-variable-repre%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Suppose $g$ is the pdf of random variable $X$, then
$$E[f(X)|X in A]= frac{int_A f(x)g(x) , dx}{int_A g(t) , dt}$$
Hence $$int_A f(x) g(x) , dt = Pr(X in A) E[f(X)|X in A],$$
it gives you the product of the conditional expectation of $f(X)$ given that $X in A$ and the probability that $X$ is in $A$.
I think $E[f(X)|X in A]$ is a more interesting quantity, and I would divide your integral with $Pr(X in A)$ to recover it.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $g$ is the pdf of random variable $X$, then
$$E[f(X)|X in A]= frac{int_A f(x)g(x) , dx}{int_A g(t) , dt}$$
Hence $$int_A f(x) g(x) , dt = Pr(X in A) E[f(X)|X in A],$$
it gives you the product of the conditional expectation of $f(X)$ given that $X in A$ and the probability that $X$ is in $A$.
I think $E[f(X)|X in A]$ is a more interesting quantity, and I would divide your integral with $Pr(X in A)$ to recover it.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose $g$ is the pdf of random variable $X$, then
$$E[f(X)|X in A]= frac{int_A f(x)g(x) , dx}{int_A g(t) , dt}$$
Hence $$int_A f(x) g(x) , dt = Pr(X in A) E[f(X)|X in A],$$
it gives you the product of the conditional expectation of $f(X)$ given that $X in A$ and the probability that $X$ is in $A$.
I think $E[f(X)|X in A]$ is a more interesting quantity, and I would divide your integral with $Pr(X in A)$ to recover it.
$endgroup$
Suppose $g$ is the pdf of random variable $X$, then
$$E[f(X)|X in A]= frac{int_A f(x)g(x) , dx}{int_A g(t) , dt}$$
Hence $$int_A f(x) g(x) , dt = Pr(X in A) E[f(X)|X in A],$$
it gives you the product of the conditional expectation of $f(X)$ given that $X in A$ and the probability that $X$ is in $A$.
I think $E[f(X)|X in A]$ is a more interesting quantity, and I would divide your integral with $Pr(X in A)$ to recover it.
answered 5 hours ago
Siong Thye GohSiong Thye Goh
3,0842621
3,0842621
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The expected value of $X$ following distribution $g$ is
$$
E[X] = int x ,g(x) ,dx
$$
By the law of the unconscious statistician we know that the expected value of a function $f$ of random variable $X$ is
$$
E[f(X)] = int f(x) ,g(x) ,dx
$$
What does it tell you? It tells you what would be the expected value of your random variable if you transformed it somehow. For example, say that you have know what is the distribution of height for humans in centimetres, but are interested of distribution in meters, i.e. $f(x) = x/100$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The expected value of $X$ following distribution $g$ is
$$
E[X] = int x ,g(x) ,dx
$$
By the law of the unconscious statistician we know that the expected value of a function $f$ of random variable $X$ is
$$
E[f(X)] = int f(x) ,g(x) ,dx
$$
What does it tell you? It tells you what would be the expected value of your random variable if you transformed it somehow. For example, say that you have know what is the distribution of height for humans in centimetres, but are interested of distribution in meters, i.e. $f(x) = x/100$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The expected value of $X$ following distribution $g$ is
$$
E[X] = int x ,g(x) ,dx
$$
By the law of the unconscious statistician we know that the expected value of a function $f$ of random variable $X$ is
$$
E[f(X)] = int f(x) ,g(x) ,dx
$$
What does it tell you? It tells you what would be the expected value of your random variable if you transformed it somehow. For example, say that you have know what is the distribution of height for humans in centimetres, but are interested of distribution in meters, i.e. $f(x) = x/100$.
$endgroup$
The expected value of $X$ following distribution $g$ is
$$
E[X] = int x ,g(x) ,dx
$$
By the law of the unconscious statistician we know that the expected value of a function $f$ of random variable $X$ is
$$
E[f(X)] = int f(x) ,g(x) ,dx
$$
What does it tell you? It tells you what would be the expected value of your random variable if you transformed it somehow. For example, say that you have know what is the distribution of height for humans in centimetres, but are interested of distribution in meters, i.e. $f(x) = x/100$.
answered 4 hours ago
Tim♦Tim
60.8k9134230
60.8k9134230
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another way to look at this integral is through the random variable transformation point of view. You can think of $Y=f(x)$ as a new random variable, and your integral is the expectation (mean) $E[Y]$ of the new variable $Y$.
Let's build the probability density function of the new variable $Y$. Unfortunately, we can't derive an analytical expression. We'll have to use a more complex, integral form of it.
What is the probability that $Y$ will have values between $y$ and $y+dy$? We look at all $x$ where $y<f(x)<y+dy$ and add up their probabilities:
$$g_y(y)dy=int_x mathbb1_{y<f(x)<y+dy} g(x)dx $$
Next, we simply integrate over all values of $Y$:
$$E[y]=int_yyg_y(y)dy$$
Since $int_y$ runs through all possible $y$, it's the same as running the integral through all possible $x$.
Just pause for a moment and agree with me...
Now that you agreed with me you'll see that:
$$E[Y]=int_xf(x)g(x)dx$$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This could use some elaboration. Perhaps an example would help. If you would also bring into consideration the idea of truncation or conditioning (which seems to be the main stumbling block), I think your point would be an excellent answer.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@whuber, i did impossible: explained Lebesque integral without measure theory!
$endgroup$
– Aksakal
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another way to look at this integral is through the random variable transformation point of view. You can think of $Y=f(x)$ as a new random variable, and your integral is the expectation (mean) $E[Y]$ of the new variable $Y$.
Let's build the probability density function of the new variable $Y$. Unfortunately, we can't derive an analytical expression. We'll have to use a more complex, integral form of it.
What is the probability that $Y$ will have values between $y$ and $y+dy$? We look at all $x$ where $y<f(x)<y+dy$ and add up their probabilities:
$$g_y(y)dy=int_x mathbb1_{y<f(x)<y+dy} g(x)dx $$
Next, we simply integrate over all values of $Y$:
$$E[y]=int_yyg_y(y)dy$$
Since $int_y$ runs through all possible $y$, it's the same as running the integral through all possible $x$.
Just pause for a moment and agree with me...
Now that you agreed with me you'll see that:
$$E[Y]=int_xf(x)g(x)dx$$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This could use some elaboration. Perhaps an example would help. If you would also bring into consideration the idea of truncation or conditioning (which seems to be the main stumbling block), I think your point would be an excellent answer.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@whuber, i did impossible: explained Lebesque integral without measure theory!
$endgroup$
– Aksakal
4 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another way to look at this integral is through the random variable transformation point of view. You can think of $Y=f(x)$ as a new random variable, and your integral is the expectation (mean) $E[Y]$ of the new variable $Y$.
Let's build the probability density function of the new variable $Y$. Unfortunately, we can't derive an analytical expression. We'll have to use a more complex, integral form of it.
What is the probability that $Y$ will have values between $y$ and $y+dy$? We look at all $x$ where $y<f(x)<y+dy$ and add up their probabilities:
$$g_y(y)dy=int_x mathbb1_{y<f(x)<y+dy} g(x)dx $$
Next, we simply integrate over all values of $Y$:
$$E[y]=int_yyg_y(y)dy$$
Since $int_y$ runs through all possible $y$, it's the same as running the integral through all possible $x$.
Just pause for a moment and agree with me...
Now that you agreed with me you'll see that:
$$E[Y]=int_xf(x)g(x)dx$$
$endgroup$
Another way to look at this integral is through the random variable transformation point of view. You can think of $Y=f(x)$ as a new random variable, and your integral is the expectation (mean) $E[Y]$ of the new variable $Y$.
Let's build the probability density function of the new variable $Y$. Unfortunately, we can't derive an analytical expression. We'll have to use a more complex, integral form of it.
What is the probability that $Y$ will have values between $y$ and $y+dy$? We look at all $x$ where $y<f(x)<y+dy$ and add up their probabilities:
$$g_y(y)dy=int_x mathbb1_{y<f(x)<y+dy} g(x)dx $$
Next, we simply integrate over all values of $Y$:
$$E[y]=int_yyg_y(y)dy$$
Since $int_y$ runs through all possible $y$, it's the same as running the integral through all possible $x$.
Just pause for a moment and agree with me...
Now that you agreed with me you'll see that:
$$E[Y]=int_xf(x)g(x)dx$$
edited 4 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
AksakalAksakal
39.5k452120
39.5k452120
1
$begingroup$
This could use some elaboration. Perhaps an example would help. If you would also bring into consideration the idea of truncation or conditioning (which seems to be the main stumbling block), I think your point would be an excellent answer.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@whuber, i did impossible: explained Lebesque integral without measure theory!
$endgroup$
– Aksakal
4 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
This could use some elaboration. Perhaps an example would help. If you would also bring into consideration the idea of truncation or conditioning (which seems to be the main stumbling block), I think your point would be an excellent answer.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
4 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@whuber, i did impossible: explained Lebesque integral without measure theory!
$endgroup$
– Aksakal
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
This could use some elaboration. Perhaps an example would help. If you would also bring into consideration the idea of truncation or conditioning (which seems to be the main stumbling block), I think your point would be an excellent answer.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
This could use some elaboration. Perhaps an example would help. If you would also bring into consideration the idea of truncation or conditioning (which seems to be the main stumbling block), I think your point would be an excellent answer.
$endgroup$
– whuber♦
4 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@whuber, i did impossible: explained Lebesque integral without measure theory!
$endgroup$
– Aksakal
4 hours ago
$begingroup$
@whuber, i did impossible: explained Lebesque integral without measure theory!
$endgroup$
– Aksakal
4 hours ago
add a comment |
vt_og is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
vt_og is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
vt_og is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
vt_og is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f405242%2fwhat-does-the-integral-of-a-function-times-a-function-of-a-random-variable-repre%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown