Saving TeX formulae as imagesslice up latex pdf to little jpeg'sFormulae PNG anti-aliasingPostscript, EPS and...
Can someone publish a story that happened to you?
What happened to Captain America in Endgame?
Was there a shared-world project before "Thieves World"?
"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?
What's the polite way to say "I need to urinate"?
What causes platform events to fail to be published and should I cater for failed platform event creations?
How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?
Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?
Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?
Why was the Spitfire's elliptical wing almost uncopied by other aircraft of World War 2?
How do I deal with a coworker that keeps asking to make small superficial changes to a report, and it is seriously triggering my anxiety?
Thesis on avalanche prediction using One Class SVM
Does tea made with boiling water cool faster than tea made with boiled (but still hot) water?
How would 10 generations of living underground change the human body?
How to not starve gigantic beasts
Random Forest different results for same observation
How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?
Is there a way to generate a list of distinct numbers such that no two subsets ever have an equal sum?
How did Captain America manage to do this?
Is the claim "Employers won't employ people with no 'social media presence'" realistic?
Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?
Dynamic SOQL query relationship with field visibility for Users
Check if a string is entirely made of the same substring
How could Tony Stark make this in Endgame?
Saving TeX formulae as images
slice up latex pdf to little jpeg'sFormulae PNG anti-aliasingPostscript, EPS and PSTricks: what are the differences at this conditions?Transparency vs image compression dilemmaAvoiding compression artifacts when displaying results of image processing experimentsRendering a pdf in a different location, from a standalone tex-file that combines several chaptersPDF looks ugly in Okular/Acrobat Reader and fine in EvinceCustom text in placeholder without filepathjpeg gets inserted in different size after saving, fbox still uses old sizeSaving an SVG image to TeX code in InkscapePositioning doesnt work even when using float
I have a bit of a problem. I want to publish all things mathematical on blogs that do not have any MathJax support and, as a result, I'm forced to use images instead. Now, I've seen LyX and MATLAB and the like save LaTeX formulae to images but I'm not impressed with the result. In particular, I find Word's rendering of formulae to be vastly superior, but it's not a TeX environment.
So my question is, can I have the best of both worlds? I want to write in TeX but I want rendering as beautiful as this:

(source: hexlet.org)
graphics rendering
|
show 4 more comments
I have a bit of a problem. I want to publish all things mathematical on blogs that do not have any MathJax support and, as a result, I'm forced to use images instead. Now, I've seen LyX and MATLAB and the like save LaTeX formulae to images but I'm not impressed with the result. In particular, I find Word's rendering of formulae to be vastly superior, but it's not a TeX environment.
So my question is, can I have the best of both worlds? I want to write in TeX but I want rendering as beautiful as this:

(source: hexlet.org)
graphics rendering
1
You can just do as you just did in your question: post a tex generated image. (tex4ht or latex2html would automate that, or just do it by hand if there are only a few) of course posting math as images is just wrong If the math were in MathML then reasonable browsers (=firefox and safari, currently) would render it in a manner more suitable for the web than a fixed bitmap image.
– David Carlisle
Sep 22 '13 at 18:18
1
The best solution is to use MathJax as your source for web and non-web will be almost identical. Having different source for each will be painful if you need to update. Wordpress, for example, allows you to use MathJax, see this article.
– kiss my armpit
Sep 22 '13 at 18:39
@DavidCarlisle typical output from these tools is of a low quality
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 22 '13 at 19:59
1
You should use MathJax, there is no better option. :-)
– kiss my armpit
Sep 22 '13 at 20:03
1
If you are hosting wordpress then it is trivial to link to the CDN version of MathJax you don't even need to install any software.
– David Carlisle
Sep 22 '13 at 21:27
|
show 4 more comments
I have a bit of a problem. I want to publish all things mathematical on blogs that do not have any MathJax support and, as a result, I'm forced to use images instead. Now, I've seen LyX and MATLAB and the like save LaTeX formulae to images but I'm not impressed with the result. In particular, I find Word's rendering of formulae to be vastly superior, but it's not a TeX environment.
So my question is, can I have the best of both worlds? I want to write in TeX but I want rendering as beautiful as this:

(source: hexlet.org)
graphics rendering
I have a bit of a problem. I want to publish all things mathematical on blogs that do not have any MathJax support and, as a result, I'm forced to use images instead. Now, I've seen LyX and MATLAB and the like save LaTeX formulae to images but I'm not impressed with the result. In particular, I find Word's rendering of formulae to be vastly superior, but it's not a TeX environment.
So my question is, can I have the best of both worlds? I want to write in TeX but I want rendering as beautiful as this:

(source: hexlet.org)
graphics rendering
graphics rendering
edited 7 mins ago
Glorfindel
297139
297139
asked Sep 22 '13 at 18:11
Dmitri NesterukDmitri Nesteruk
203312
203312
1
You can just do as you just did in your question: post a tex generated image. (tex4ht or latex2html would automate that, or just do it by hand if there are only a few) of course posting math as images is just wrong If the math were in MathML then reasonable browsers (=firefox and safari, currently) would render it in a manner more suitable for the web than a fixed bitmap image.
– David Carlisle
Sep 22 '13 at 18:18
1
The best solution is to use MathJax as your source for web and non-web will be almost identical. Having different source for each will be painful if you need to update. Wordpress, for example, allows you to use MathJax, see this article.
– kiss my armpit
Sep 22 '13 at 18:39
@DavidCarlisle typical output from these tools is of a low quality
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 22 '13 at 19:59
1
You should use MathJax, there is no better option. :-)
– kiss my armpit
Sep 22 '13 at 20:03
1
If you are hosting wordpress then it is trivial to link to the CDN version of MathJax you don't even need to install any software.
– David Carlisle
Sep 22 '13 at 21:27
|
show 4 more comments
1
You can just do as you just did in your question: post a tex generated image. (tex4ht or latex2html would automate that, or just do it by hand if there are only a few) of course posting math as images is just wrong If the math were in MathML then reasonable browsers (=firefox and safari, currently) would render it in a manner more suitable for the web than a fixed bitmap image.
– David Carlisle
Sep 22 '13 at 18:18
1
The best solution is to use MathJax as your source for web and non-web will be almost identical. Having different source for each will be painful if you need to update. Wordpress, for example, allows you to use MathJax, see this article.
– kiss my armpit
Sep 22 '13 at 18:39
@DavidCarlisle typical output from these tools is of a low quality
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 22 '13 at 19:59
1
You should use MathJax, there is no better option. :-)
– kiss my armpit
Sep 22 '13 at 20:03
1
If you are hosting wordpress then it is trivial to link to the CDN version of MathJax you don't even need to install any software.
– David Carlisle
Sep 22 '13 at 21:27
1
1
You can just do as you just did in your question: post a tex generated image. (tex4ht or latex2html would automate that, or just do it by hand if there are only a few) of course posting math as images is just wrong If the math were in MathML then reasonable browsers (=firefox and safari, currently) would render it in a manner more suitable for the web than a fixed bitmap image.
– David Carlisle
Sep 22 '13 at 18:18
You can just do as you just did in your question: post a tex generated image. (tex4ht or latex2html would automate that, or just do it by hand if there are only a few) of course posting math as images is just wrong If the math were in MathML then reasonable browsers (=firefox and safari, currently) would render it in a manner more suitable for the web than a fixed bitmap image.
– David Carlisle
Sep 22 '13 at 18:18
1
1
The best solution is to use MathJax as your source for web and non-web will be almost identical. Having different source for each will be painful if you need to update. Wordpress, for example, allows you to use MathJax, see this article.
– kiss my armpit
Sep 22 '13 at 18:39
The best solution is to use MathJax as your source for web and non-web will be almost identical. Having different source for each will be painful if you need to update. Wordpress, for example, allows you to use MathJax, see this article.
– kiss my armpit
Sep 22 '13 at 18:39
@DavidCarlisle typical output from these tools is of a low quality
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 22 '13 at 19:59
@DavidCarlisle typical output from these tools is of a low quality
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 22 '13 at 19:59
1
1
You should use MathJax, there is no better option. :-)
– kiss my armpit
Sep 22 '13 at 20:03
You should use MathJax, there is no better option. :-)
– kiss my armpit
Sep 22 '13 at 20:03
1
1
If you are hosting wordpress then it is trivial to link to the CDN version of MathJax you don't even need to install any software.
– David Carlisle
Sep 22 '13 at 21:27
If you are hosting wordpress then it is trivial to link to the CDN version of MathJax you don't even need to install any software.
– David Carlisle
Sep 22 '13 at 21:27
|
show 4 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
See this:
http://www.sciweavers.org/tex2img.php?eq=%5Cmathcal%7BL%7D%5C%7Bf%28t%29%5C%7D%20%3D%20%5Cint_0%5Et%20e%5E%7B-st%7D%20f%28t%29%20dt&bc=Transparent&fc=Black&im=png&fs=12&ff=arev&edit=0
It was done using the Sciweavers Online Latex Equation Editor.
However, for a blog, I'd suggest uploading images there, so that you don't depend on the Sciweaver's site. You can use "upload from web option", like I did here (using "Copy image location" on the generated image):

It may give better results with "Modern" font.
One other solution is CodeCogs Online LaTeX Equation Editor:

You can also "upload from web", picking "URL" in the form at the bottom of a page.
While readable, the quality of the image rendered in this editor is strictly inferior to what is output by Word. Thanks for the pointer though!
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 22 '13 at 19:58
Try it with "Modern" or some other font. I've added another on-line solution to my post.
– Vedran Šego
Sep 22 '13 at 20:16
add a comment |
If you have Acrobat, you can also convert the PDF to a PNG.
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) node{$displaystyle{
mathcal{L} lbrace f(t)rbrace = int_{t=0}^infty e^{-st} f(t),dt}$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

Neat idea. And I'm sure I can do a better rendering that way with what you have above (no offense).
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 24 '13 at 8:19
Actually, Acrobat converts at 200 dpi (ugh!). The standalone manual lists several other conversion programs which probably do better.
– John Kormylo
Sep 25 '13 at 3:51
If you have a Mac, use Preview to convert a PDF to PNG. You can specify the resolution (I use 360 dpi in many cases).
– Derek
Aug 9 '18 at 14:13
add a comment |
For easy embedding in a blog post you could also use texit (found via hacker news), which is available at http://tex.sh/.
Your formula is rendered as image with a call to the relevant URL, boiling down to this: http://tex.sh/tex/$math$.png.
add a comment |
You don't say what operating system you're on, but if on macOS, there is always the LaTeXiT application, which is bundled with macTeX. Now, for your specific problem, using MathJax is superior, but there are other circumstances where LaTeXiT shines: For example, if you must use presentation software with poor equation support (a common affliction, sad to say).
In other words, I added this answer for completeness and because it might help other users coming across this question, even though it may not be a solution in the OP' case.
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Aug 9 '18 at 12:34
add a comment |
Auto-Latex Equations add-on for Google Docs
The simplest way is definitely Auto-Latex Equations add-on for Google Docs. It simply replaces all your equations with crisp, high-quality images of the equation.
All you have to do is type an equation within delimiters, like $$55 + sqrt{5}$$ and it can be rendered in super high quality at whatever time you like by rendering all the equations in your document. If you mess up, you can always undo one or all the equations.
You can get it for free at the Google Docs add-ons store.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134573%2fsaving-tex-formulae-as-images%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
See this:
http://www.sciweavers.org/tex2img.php?eq=%5Cmathcal%7BL%7D%5C%7Bf%28t%29%5C%7D%20%3D%20%5Cint_0%5Et%20e%5E%7B-st%7D%20f%28t%29%20dt&bc=Transparent&fc=Black&im=png&fs=12&ff=arev&edit=0
It was done using the Sciweavers Online Latex Equation Editor.
However, for a blog, I'd suggest uploading images there, so that you don't depend on the Sciweaver's site. You can use "upload from web option", like I did here (using "Copy image location" on the generated image):

It may give better results with "Modern" font.
One other solution is CodeCogs Online LaTeX Equation Editor:

You can also "upload from web", picking "URL" in the form at the bottom of a page.
While readable, the quality of the image rendered in this editor is strictly inferior to what is output by Word. Thanks for the pointer though!
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 22 '13 at 19:58
Try it with "Modern" or some other font. I've added another on-line solution to my post.
– Vedran Šego
Sep 22 '13 at 20:16
add a comment |
See this:
http://www.sciweavers.org/tex2img.php?eq=%5Cmathcal%7BL%7D%5C%7Bf%28t%29%5C%7D%20%3D%20%5Cint_0%5Et%20e%5E%7B-st%7D%20f%28t%29%20dt&bc=Transparent&fc=Black&im=png&fs=12&ff=arev&edit=0
It was done using the Sciweavers Online Latex Equation Editor.
However, for a blog, I'd suggest uploading images there, so that you don't depend on the Sciweaver's site. You can use "upload from web option", like I did here (using "Copy image location" on the generated image):

It may give better results with "Modern" font.
One other solution is CodeCogs Online LaTeX Equation Editor:

You can also "upload from web", picking "URL" in the form at the bottom of a page.
While readable, the quality of the image rendered in this editor is strictly inferior to what is output by Word. Thanks for the pointer though!
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 22 '13 at 19:58
Try it with "Modern" or some other font. I've added another on-line solution to my post.
– Vedran Šego
Sep 22 '13 at 20:16
add a comment |
See this:
http://www.sciweavers.org/tex2img.php?eq=%5Cmathcal%7BL%7D%5C%7Bf%28t%29%5C%7D%20%3D%20%5Cint_0%5Et%20e%5E%7B-st%7D%20f%28t%29%20dt&bc=Transparent&fc=Black&im=png&fs=12&ff=arev&edit=0
It was done using the Sciweavers Online Latex Equation Editor.
However, for a blog, I'd suggest uploading images there, so that you don't depend on the Sciweaver's site. You can use "upload from web option", like I did here (using "Copy image location" on the generated image):

It may give better results with "Modern" font.
One other solution is CodeCogs Online LaTeX Equation Editor:

You can also "upload from web", picking "URL" in the form at the bottom of a page.
See this:
http://www.sciweavers.org/tex2img.php?eq=%5Cmathcal%7BL%7D%5C%7Bf%28t%29%5C%7D%20%3D%20%5Cint_0%5Et%20e%5E%7B-st%7D%20f%28t%29%20dt&bc=Transparent&fc=Black&im=png&fs=12&ff=arev&edit=0
It was done using the Sciweavers Online Latex Equation Editor.
However, for a blog, I'd suggest uploading images there, so that you don't depend on the Sciweaver's site. You can use "upload from web option", like I did here (using "Copy image location" on the generated image):

It may give better results with "Modern" font.
One other solution is CodeCogs Online LaTeX Equation Editor:

You can also "upload from web", picking "URL" in the form at the bottom of a page.
edited Sep 22 '13 at 20:16
answered Sep 22 '13 at 18:28
Vedran ŠegoVedran Šego
5571313
5571313
While readable, the quality of the image rendered in this editor is strictly inferior to what is output by Word. Thanks for the pointer though!
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 22 '13 at 19:58
Try it with "Modern" or some other font. I've added another on-line solution to my post.
– Vedran Šego
Sep 22 '13 at 20:16
add a comment |
While readable, the quality of the image rendered in this editor is strictly inferior to what is output by Word. Thanks for the pointer though!
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 22 '13 at 19:58
Try it with "Modern" or some other font. I've added another on-line solution to my post.
– Vedran Šego
Sep 22 '13 at 20:16
While readable, the quality of the image rendered in this editor is strictly inferior to what is output by Word. Thanks for the pointer though!
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 22 '13 at 19:58
While readable, the quality of the image rendered in this editor is strictly inferior to what is output by Word. Thanks for the pointer though!
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 22 '13 at 19:58
Try it with "Modern" or some other font. I've added another on-line solution to my post.
– Vedran Šego
Sep 22 '13 at 20:16
Try it with "Modern" or some other font. I've added another on-line solution to my post.
– Vedran Šego
Sep 22 '13 at 20:16
add a comment |
If you have Acrobat, you can also convert the PDF to a PNG.
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) node{$displaystyle{
mathcal{L} lbrace f(t)rbrace = int_{t=0}^infty e^{-st} f(t),dt}$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

Neat idea. And I'm sure I can do a better rendering that way with what you have above (no offense).
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 24 '13 at 8:19
Actually, Acrobat converts at 200 dpi (ugh!). The standalone manual lists several other conversion programs which probably do better.
– John Kormylo
Sep 25 '13 at 3:51
If you have a Mac, use Preview to convert a PDF to PNG. You can specify the resolution (I use 360 dpi in many cases).
– Derek
Aug 9 '18 at 14:13
add a comment |
If you have Acrobat, you can also convert the PDF to a PNG.
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) node{$displaystyle{
mathcal{L} lbrace f(t)rbrace = int_{t=0}^infty e^{-st} f(t),dt}$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

Neat idea. And I'm sure I can do a better rendering that way with what you have above (no offense).
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 24 '13 at 8:19
Actually, Acrobat converts at 200 dpi (ugh!). The standalone manual lists several other conversion programs which probably do better.
– John Kormylo
Sep 25 '13 at 3:51
If you have a Mac, use Preview to convert a PDF to PNG. You can specify the resolution (I use 360 dpi in many cases).
– Derek
Aug 9 '18 at 14:13
add a comment |
If you have Acrobat, you can also convert the PDF to a PNG.
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) node{$displaystyle{
mathcal{L} lbrace f(t)rbrace = int_{t=0}^infty e^{-st} f(t),dt}$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

If you have Acrobat, you can also convert the PDF to a PNG.
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{amssymb}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
draw (0,0) node{$displaystyle{
mathcal{L} lbrace f(t)rbrace = int_{t=0}^infty e^{-st} f(t),dt}$};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}

edited Sep 24 '13 at 5:37
answered Sep 24 '13 at 5:13
John KormyloJohn Kormylo
47.1k22672
47.1k22672
Neat idea. And I'm sure I can do a better rendering that way with what you have above (no offense).
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 24 '13 at 8:19
Actually, Acrobat converts at 200 dpi (ugh!). The standalone manual lists several other conversion programs which probably do better.
– John Kormylo
Sep 25 '13 at 3:51
If you have a Mac, use Preview to convert a PDF to PNG. You can specify the resolution (I use 360 dpi in many cases).
– Derek
Aug 9 '18 at 14:13
add a comment |
Neat idea. And I'm sure I can do a better rendering that way with what you have above (no offense).
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 24 '13 at 8:19
Actually, Acrobat converts at 200 dpi (ugh!). The standalone manual lists several other conversion programs which probably do better.
– John Kormylo
Sep 25 '13 at 3:51
If you have a Mac, use Preview to convert a PDF to PNG. You can specify the resolution (I use 360 dpi in many cases).
– Derek
Aug 9 '18 at 14:13
Neat idea. And I'm sure I can do a better rendering that way with what you have above (no offense).
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 24 '13 at 8:19
Neat idea. And I'm sure I can do a better rendering that way with what you have above (no offense).
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 24 '13 at 8:19
Actually, Acrobat converts at 200 dpi (ugh!). The standalone manual lists several other conversion programs which probably do better.
– John Kormylo
Sep 25 '13 at 3:51
Actually, Acrobat converts at 200 dpi (ugh!). The standalone manual lists several other conversion programs which probably do better.
– John Kormylo
Sep 25 '13 at 3:51
If you have a Mac, use Preview to convert a PDF to PNG. You can specify the resolution (I use 360 dpi in many cases).
– Derek
Aug 9 '18 at 14:13
If you have a Mac, use Preview to convert a PDF to PNG. You can specify the resolution (I use 360 dpi in many cases).
– Derek
Aug 9 '18 at 14:13
add a comment |
For easy embedding in a blog post you could also use texit (found via hacker news), which is available at http://tex.sh/.
Your formula is rendered as image with a call to the relevant URL, boiling down to this: http://tex.sh/tex/$math$.png.
add a comment |
For easy embedding in a blog post you could also use texit (found via hacker news), which is available at http://tex.sh/.
Your formula is rendered as image with a call to the relevant URL, boiling down to this: http://tex.sh/tex/$math$.png.
add a comment |
For easy embedding in a blog post you could also use texit (found via hacker news), which is available at http://tex.sh/.
Your formula is rendered as image with a call to the relevant URL, boiling down to this: http://tex.sh/tex/$math$.png.
For easy embedding in a blog post you could also use texit (found via hacker news), which is available at http://tex.sh/.
Your formula is rendered as image with a call to the relevant URL, boiling down to this: http://tex.sh/tex/$math$.png.
answered Sep 23 '13 at 8:22
HabiHabi
5,6882338
5,6882338
add a comment |
add a comment |
You don't say what operating system you're on, but if on macOS, there is always the LaTeXiT application, which is bundled with macTeX. Now, for your specific problem, using MathJax is superior, but there are other circumstances where LaTeXiT shines: For example, if you must use presentation software with poor equation support (a common affliction, sad to say).
In other words, I added this answer for completeness and because it might help other users coming across this question, even though it may not be a solution in the OP' case.
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Aug 9 '18 at 12:34
add a comment |
You don't say what operating system you're on, but if on macOS, there is always the LaTeXiT application, which is bundled with macTeX. Now, for your specific problem, using MathJax is superior, but there are other circumstances where LaTeXiT shines: For example, if you must use presentation software with poor equation support (a common affliction, sad to say).
In other words, I added this answer for completeness and because it might help other users coming across this question, even though it may not be a solution in the OP' case.
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Aug 9 '18 at 12:34
add a comment |
You don't say what operating system you're on, but if on macOS, there is always the LaTeXiT application, which is bundled with macTeX. Now, for your specific problem, using MathJax is superior, but there are other circumstances where LaTeXiT shines: For example, if you must use presentation software with poor equation support (a common affliction, sad to say).
You don't say what operating system you're on, but if on macOS, there is always the LaTeXiT application, which is bundled with macTeX. Now, for your specific problem, using MathJax is superior, but there are other circumstances where LaTeXiT shines: For example, if you must use presentation software with poor equation support (a common affliction, sad to say).
answered Aug 9 '18 at 12:33
Harald Hanche-OlsenHarald Hanche-Olsen
13.2k24762
13.2k24762
In other words, I added this answer for completeness and because it might help other users coming across this question, even though it may not be a solution in the OP' case.
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Aug 9 '18 at 12:34
add a comment |
In other words, I added this answer for completeness and because it might help other users coming across this question, even though it may not be a solution in the OP' case.
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Aug 9 '18 at 12:34
In other words, I added this answer for completeness and because it might help other users coming across this question, even though it may not be a solution in the OP' case.
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Aug 9 '18 at 12:34
In other words, I added this answer for completeness and because it might help other users coming across this question, even though it may not be a solution in the OP' case.
– Harald Hanche-Olsen
Aug 9 '18 at 12:34
add a comment |
Auto-Latex Equations add-on for Google Docs
The simplest way is definitely Auto-Latex Equations add-on for Google Docs. It simply replaces all your equations with crisp, high-quality images of the equation.
All you have to do is type an equation within delimiters, like $$55 + sqrt{5}$$ and it can be rendered in super high quality at whatever time you like by rendering all the equations in your document. If you mess up, you can always undo one or all the equations.
You can get it for free at the Google Docs add-ons store.
add a comment |
Auto-Latex Equations add-on for Google Docs
The simplest way is definitely Auto-Latex Equations add-on for Google Docs. It simply replaces all your equations with crisp, high-quality images of the equation.
All you have to do is type an equation within delimiters, like $$55 + sqrt{5}$$ and it can be rendered in super high quality at whatever time you like by rendering all the equations in your document. If you mess up, you can always undo one or all the equations.
You can get it for free at the Google Docs add-ons store.
add a comment |
Auto-Latex Equations add-on for Google Docs
The simplest way is definitely Auto-Latex Equations add-on for Google Docs. It simply replaces all your equations with crisp, high-quality images of the equation.
All you have to do is type an equation within delimiters, like $$55 + sqrt{5}$$ and it can be rendered in super high quality at whatever time you like by rendering all the equations in your document. If you mess up, you can always undo one or all the equations.
You can get it for free at the Google Docs add-ons store.
Auto-Latex Equations add-on for Google Docs
The simplest way is definitely Auto-Latex Equations add-on for Google Docs. It simply replaces all your equations with crisp, high-quality images of the equation.
All you have to do is type an equation within delimiters, like $$55 + sqrt{5}$$ and it can be rendered in super high quality at whatever time you like by rendering all the equations in your document. If you mess up, you can always undo one or all the equations.
You can get it for free at the Google Docs add-ons store.
answered Aug 9 '18 at 7:07
John TargaryenJohn Targaryen
48749
48749
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134573%2fsaving-tex-formulae-as-images%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
You can just do as you just did in your question: post a tex generated image. (tex4ht or latex2html would automate that, or just do it by hand if there are only a few) of course posting math as images is just wrong If the math were in MathML then reasonable browsers (=firefox and safari, currently) would render it in a manner more suitable for the web than a fixed bitmap image.
– David Carlisle
Sep 22 '13 at 18:18
1
The best solution is to use MathJax as your source for web and non-web will be almost identical. Having different source for each will be painful if you need to update. Wordpress, for example, allows you to use MathJax, see this article.
– kiss my armpit
Sep 22 '13 at 18:39
@DavidCarlisle typical output from these tools is of a low quality
– Dmitri Nesteruk
Sep 22 '13 at 19:59
1
You should use MathJax, there is no better option. :-)
– kiss my armpit
Sep 22 '13 at 20:03
1
If you are hosting wordpress then it is trivial to link to the CDN version of MathJax you don't even need to install any software.
– David Carlisle
Sep 22 '13 at 21:27