Injecting creativity into a cookbookWriting exercises to practice the art of giving unique voice to...

Why would space fleets be aligned?

Traveling through the asteriod belt?

Advice for a new journal editor

What are "industrial chops"?

Cookies - Should the toggles be on?

How can I deliver in-universe written lore to players without it being dry exposition?

Which one of these password policies is more secure?

Consequences of lack of rigour

Why would the Pakistan airspace closure cancel flights not headed to Pakistan itself?

Publishing research using outdated methods

Writing Cyrillic text to a file

Math Saturation Symbol

A starship is travelling at 0.9c and collides with a small rock. Will it leave a clean hole through, or will more happen?

What is the purpose of easy combat scenarios that don't need resource expenditure?

Pronunciation of umlaut vowels in the history of German

Do authors have to be politically correct in article-writing?

What is 6÷2×(1+2) =?

My cat mixes up the floors in my building. How can I help him?

How to say "Brexit" in Latin?

How can I get my players to come to the game session after agreeing to a date?

Explain the objections to these measures against human trafficking

Are there any modern advantages of a fire piston?

How long is the D&D Starter Set campaign?

Intern applicant asking for compensation equivalent to that of permanent employee



Injecting creativity into a cookbook


Writing exercises to practice the art of giving unique voice to characters?Does writing in a certain mood change how a writer writes?Assessing what writing skills are missingNeed help titling my book?Should I write scared?Is it acceptable to break the story up into POVs to show how the characters' stories all tie together?Do I need to have a degree to become a writer?Too much death?Is no religion a bad thing?How to write painful torture scenes without being over-the-top













4















I'm a chef. I'm also a writer. It's inevitable that I would want to write a cookbook. In fact I've probably started a dozen that I just never got around to finishing. Partly because I'm not sure how to.



Before I even get to my question I think it important to distinguish between two types of cookbooks. One is sorta a how to cook tutorial with a few recipes sprinkled in. There other is a reference book. It's mostly recipes with very little superfluous writing. I want to write the second.



And that's the problem. There's very little room for any creative flair. Surely, I can inject a little personality into it, but I'm not sure when the best way to do it is.



During the introduction that most people won't read and those that do read once? During the recipes themselves? That seems unlikely to work well. Should I write a description of each dish before each recipes. Will this be to much reading for people who just want to jump straight to the technical details? It's there perhaps something I haven't considered.










share|improve this question

























  • I feel like our tag set is failing this question, but I don't know what additional tag to create. Added non-fiction as a stopgap.

    – Monica Cellio
    2 hours ago
















4















I'm a chef. I'm also a writer. It's inevitable that I would want to write a cookbook. In fact I've probably started a dozen that I just never got around to finishing. Partly because I'm not sure how to.



Before I even get to my question I think it important to distinguish between two types of cookbooks. One is sorta a how to cook tutorial with a few recipes sprinkled in. There other is a reference book. It's mostly recipes with very little superfluous writing. I want to write the second.



And that's the problem. There's very little room for any creative flair. Surely, I can inject a little personality into it, but I'm not sure when the best way to do it is.



During the introduction that most people won't read and those that do read once? During the recipes themselves? That seems unlikely to work well. Should I write a description of each dish before each recipes. Will this be to much reading for people who just want to jump straight to the technical details? It's there perhaps something I haven't considered.










share|improve this question

























  • I feel like our tag set is failing this question, but I don't know what additional tag to create. Added non-fiction as a stopgap.

    – Monica Cellio
    2 hours ago














4












4








4








I'm a chef. I'm also a writer. It's inevitable that I would want to write a cookbook. In fact I've probably started a dozen that I just never got around to finishing. Partly because I'm not sure how to.



Before I even get to my question I think it important to distinguish between two types of cookbooks. One is sorta a how to cook tutorial with a few recipes sprinkled in. There other is a reference book. It's mostly recipes with very little superfluous writing. I want to write the second.



And that's the problem. There's very little room for any creative flair. Surely, I can inject a little personality into it, but I'm not sure when the best way to do it is.



During the introduction that most people won't read and those that do read once? During the recipes themselves? That seems unlikely to work well. Should I write a description of each dish before each recipes. Will this be to much reading for people who just want to jump straight to the technical details? It's there perhaps something I haven't considered.










share|improve this question
















I'm a chef. I'm also a writer. It's inevitable that I would want to write a cookbook. In fact I've probably started a dozen that I just never got around to finishing. Partly because I'm not sure how to.



Before I even get to my question I think it important to distinguish between two types of cookbooks. One is sorta a how to cook tutorial with a few recipes sprinkled in. There other is a reference book. It's mostly recipes with very little superfluous writing. I want to write the second.



And that's the problem. There's very little room for any creative flair. Surely, I can inject a little personality into it, but I'm not sure when the best way to do it is.



During the introduction that most people won't read and those that do read once? During the recipes themselves? That seems unlikely to work well. Should I write a description of each dish before each recipes. Will this be to much reading for people who just want to jump straight to the technical details? It's there perhaps something I haven't considered.







creative-writing non-fiction process






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









Monica Cellio

15.4k23484




15.4k23484










asked 3 hours ago









bruglescobruglesco

945223




945223













  • I feel like our tag set is failing this question, but I don't know what additional tag to create. Added non-fiction as a stopgap.

    – Monica Cellio
    2 hours ago



















  • I feel like our tag set is failing this question, but I don't know what additional tag to create. Added non-fiction as a stopgap.

    – Monica Cellio
    2 hours ago

















I feel like our tag set is failing this question, but I don't know what additional tag to create. Added non-fiction as a stopgap.

– Monica Cellio
2 hours ago





I feel like our tag set is failing this question, but I don't know what additional tag to create. Added non-fiction as a stopgap.

– Monica Cellio
2 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















2














Your cookbook's primary function is being a reference book: providing clear recipes. My personal preference is to always have a picture of the final product, and preferably also intermediary stages, especially if the process is complicated. Everything else, every bit of writing creativity, is secondary to the cookbook's primary function.



Now, secondary doesn't mean it has no place at all. That introduction, which you treat with disdain, you can do quite a lot with it. The introduction is in fact the part that should make people want to cook from your book. Not just in the general sense of "I might find a recipe from here useful", but in the immediate way of "I want to make something from here now".



How do you do that? Tell your reader, in the introduction, what your book is all about. It's not just a random selection of recipes, is it? If it's the food of a particular region, tell about that region, about the part that food plays in local culture, about local flavours. If it's all about one particular kind of food (meat, or bread, or whatever) - talk about that. If it's about recipes being easy, talk about how everyone can cook and what a delight it is. Cooking is something you love, and you love this particular selection of recipes, right? Show that.



If there are sections to your book, you can treat the introduction to each section just as you treat the general introduction, only briefer.



And then, there are the recipes. To each, you can add a note about what makes it special for you: "my mother used to make this for special occasions", "my children love helping me with the making of those, as much as with the eating", etc. Add a personal touch, help people see themselves making the thing. Encourage people to make new things - stepping outside one's comfort zone is not easy, make people feel you're right there with them.



Just don't let the creative part overwhelm your cookbook. If I'm being sold more "talk" than actual recipes, I feel I'm being swindled. I bought the book for the recipes, after all - the rest is a bonus.






share|improve this answer































    2














    I recall "Two Meatballs In The Italian Kitchen", by Pino Luongo and Mark Straussman. It was two chefs with different styles of Italian restaurants that got together for a cookbook.



    The basic premise is they told a 1/4 to one page personal story or anecdote about a dish. Where they first had it, who taught it to them, a celebrity that eats it every time they come to the restaurant, where it originated or how it became famous or where in Italy it is most popular, something like that. Sometimes its just a fond memory of a trip, or finding an unexpectedly good version in a town where you wouldn't expect it.



    Anyway, nearly every recipe has a little story with it, always on the even-numbered page. If the story it short, the recipe and any special instruction starts on the same page with a large-type heading, if there isn't much room, it starts on the facing page.



    People interested in just the recipe can skip the human-interest story pretty easily. But you are left some room for creativity. You don't have to follow their formula, exactly, your writing can be additional ideas or flairs with the dish, or what you have seen people do with it, convert it from an entreé into an appetizer, etc.



    I think its an approach that gives you the best of both worlds.






    share|improve this answer































      0














      Here's a recipe that I use often. It's brief, directly and clearly written, but it still includes some background and history about the recipe, as well as some minimal commentary that allows the writer's personality to come through:



      http://cremebrulee.com/creme.htm






      share|improve this answer































        0














        What sort of creativity would you like to add?



        Yes, most reference-style cookbooks are pretty straightforward: Here are the ingredients, here's how to put them together, cook for this long, etc.



        I suppose you could add rambling discussions on your philosophy of life or your difficult childhood, but I suspect most readers would find something like that distracting and annoying.



        More seriously, you certainly could add discussion of cooking techniques, helpful hints, etc. Maybe you could think of hopefully-interesting things to say about each dish? I'm not sure what that would be. Lots of cookbooks say things like, "goes well with a red wine" or "people with high cholesterol might want to substitute ..." and that sort of thing, but that doesn't sound all that creative either. ChrisSunami mentioned saying something about the history of the dish. I suppose it might be amusing to read, "this recipe goes back to the 1500s" or "this was served at the first White House dinner with Thomas Jefferson" or that sort of tidbit.



        I'm very much an amateur at cooking myself. When I read a recipe, I'm looking for the hard facts: here are the ingredients and here's how to make the dish. If the cookbook writer included a lot of discussion about his life or philosophy of cooking or whatever, I suspect I'd just skim over it. Maybe you could make it interesting enough that people would really want to read it.



        Every now and then I see a cookbook that includes rambling philosophical discussions, and my thought is usually, "yeah, whatever, get to the recipe". But maybe I'm not typical or not your target audience.






        share|improve this answer























          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "166"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42760%2finjecting-creativity-into-a-cookbook%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes








          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          Your cookbook's primary function is being a reference book: providing clear recipes. My personal preference is to always have a picture of the final product, and preferably also intermediary stages, especially if the process is complicated. Everything else, every bit of writing creativity, is secondary to the cookbook's primary function.



          Now, secondary doesn't mean it has no place at all. That introduction, which you treat with disdain, you can do quite a lot with it. The introduction is in fact the part that should make people want to cook from your book. Not just in the general sense of "I might find a recipe from here useful", but in the immediate way of "I want to make something from here now".



          How do you do that? Tell your reader, in the introduction, what your book is all about. It's not just a random selection of recipes, is it? If it's the food of a particular region, tell about that region, about the part that food plays in local culture, about local flavours. If it's all about one particular kind of food (meat, or bread, or whatever) - talk about that. If it's about recipes being easy, talk about how everyone can cook and what a delight it is. Cooking is something you love, and you love this particular selection of recipes, right? Show that.



          If there are sections to your book, you can treat the introduction to each section just as you treat the general introduction, only briefer.



          And then, there are the recipes. To each, you can add a note about what makes it special for you: "my mother used to make this for special occasions", "my children love helping me with the making of those, as much as with the eating", etc. Add a personal touch, help people see themselves making the thing. Encourage people to make new things - stepping outside one's comfort zone is not easy, make people feel you're right there with them.



          Just don't let the creative part overwhelm your cookbook. If I'm being sold more "talk" than actual recipes, I feel I'm being swindled. I bought the book for the recipes, after all - the rest is a bonus.






          share|improve this answer




























            2














            Your cookbook's primary function is being a reference book: providing clear recipes. My personal preference is to always have a picture of the final product, and preferably also intermediary stages, especially if the process is complicated. Everything else, every bit of writing creativity, is secondary to the cookbook's primary function.



            Now, secondary doesn't mean it has no place at all. That introduction, which you treat with disdain, you can do quite a lot with it. The introduction is in fact the part that should make people want to cook from your book. Not just in the general sense of "I might find a recipe from here useful", but in the immediate way of "I want to make something from here now".



            How do you do that? Tell your reader, in the introduction, what your book is all about. It's not just a random selection of recipes, is it? If it's the food of a particular region, tell about that region, about the part that food plays in local culture, about local flavours. If it's all about one particular kind of food (meat, or bread, or whatever) - talk about that. If it's about recipes being easy, talk about how everyone can cook and what a delight it is. Cooking is something you love, and you love this particular selection of recipes, right? Show that.



            If there are sections to your book, you can treat the introduction to each section just as you treat the general introduction, only briefer.



            And then, there are the recipes. To each, you can add a note about what makes it special for you: "my mother used to make this for special occasions", "my children love helping me with the making of those, as much as with the eating", etc. Add a personal touch, help people see themselves making the thing. Encourage people to make new things - stepping outside one's comfort zone is not easy, make people feel you're right there with them.



            Just don't let the creative part overwhelm your cookbook. If I'm being sold more "talk" than actual recipes, I feel I'm being swindled. I bought the book for the recipes, after all - the rest is a bonus.






            share|improve this answer


























              2












              2








              2







              Your cookbook's primary function is being a reference book: providing clear recipes. My personal preference is to always have a picture of the final product, and preferably also intermediary stages, especially if the process is complicated. Everything else, every bit of writing creativity, is secondary to the cookbook's primary function.



              Now, secondary doesn't mean it has no place at all. That introduction, which you treat with disdain, you can do quite a lot with it. The introduction is in fact the part that should make people want to cook from your book. Not just in the general sense of "I might find a recipe from here useful", but in the immediate way of "I want to make something from here now".



              How do you do that? Tell your reader, in the introduction, what your book is all about. It's not just a random selection of recipes, is it? If it's the food of a particular region, tell about that region, about the part that food plays in local culture, about local flavours. If it's all about one particular kind of food (meat, or bread, or whatever) - talk about that. If it's about recipes being easy, talk about how everyone can cook and what a delight it is. Cooking is something you love, and you love this particular selection of recipes, right? Show that.



              If there are sections to your book, you can treat the introduction to each section just as you treat the general introduction, only briefer.



              And then, there are the recipes. To each, you can add a note about what makes it special for you: "my mother used to make this for special occasions", "my children love helping me with the making of those, as much as with the eating", etc. Add a personal touch, help people see themselves making the thing. Encourage people to make new things - stepping outside one's comfort zone is not easy, make people feel you're right there with them.



              Just don't let the creative part overwhelm your cookbook. If I'm being sold more "talk" than actual recipes, I feel I'm being swindled. I bought the book for the recipes, after all - the rest is a bonus.






              share|improve this answer













              Your cookbook's primary function is being a reference book: providing clear recipes. My personal preference is to always have a picture of the final product, and preferably also intermediary stages, especially if the process is complicated. Everything else, every bit of writing creativity, is secondary to the cookbook's primary function.



              Now, secondary doesn't mean it has no place at all. That introduction, which you treat with disdain, you can do quite a lot with it. The introduction is in fact the part that should make people want to cook from your book. Not just in the general sense of "I might find a recipe from here useful", but in the immediate way of "I want to make something from here now".



              How do you do that? Tell your reader, in the introduction, what your book is all about. It's not just a random selection of recipes, is it? If it's the food of a particular region, tell about that region, about the part that food plays in local culture, about local flavours. If it's all about one particular kind of food (meat, or bread, or whatever) - talk about that. If it's about recipes being easy, talk about how everyone can cook and what a delight it is. Cooking is something you love, and you love this particular selection of recipes, right? Show that.



              If there are sections to your book, you can treat the introduction to each section just as you treat the general introduction, only briefer.



              And then, there are the recipes. To each, you can add a note about what makes it special for you: "my mother used to make this for special occasions", "my children love helping me with the making of those, as much as with the eating", etc. Add a personal touch, help people see themselves making the thing. Encourage people to make new things - stepping outside one's comfort zone is not easy, make people feel you're right there with them.



              Just don't let the creative part overwhelm your cookbook. If I'm being sold more "talk" than actual recipes, I feel I'm being swindled. I bought the book for the recipes, after all - the rest is a bonus.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 3 hours ago









              GalastelGalastel

              33.4k594175




              33.4k594175























                  2














                  I recall "Two Meatballs In The Italian Kitchen", by Pino Luongo and Mark Straussman. It was two chefs with different styles of Italian restaurants that got together for a cookbook.



                  The basic premise is they told a 1/4 to one page personal story or anecdote about a dish. Where they first had it, who taught it to them, a celebrity that eats it every time they come to the restaurant, where it originated or how it became famous or where in Italy it is most popular, something like that. Sometimes its just a fond memory of a trip, or finding an unexpectedly good version in a town where you wouldn't expect it.



                  Anyway, nearly every recipe has a little story with it, always on the even-numbered page. If the story it short, the recipe and any special instruction starts on the same page with a large-type heading, if there isn't much room, it starts on the facing page.



                  People interested in just the recipe can skip the human-interest story pretty easily. But you are left some room for creativity. You don't have to follow their formula, exactly, your writing can be additional ideas or flairs with the dish, or what you have seen people do with it, convert it from an entreé into an appetizer, etc.



                  I think its an approach that gives you the best of both worlds.






                  share|improve this answer




























                    2














                    I recall "Two Meatballs In The Italian Kitchen", by Pino Luongo and Mark Straussman. It was two chefs with different styles of Italian restaurants that got together for a cookbook.



                    The basic premise is they told a 1/4 to one page personal story or anecdote about a dish. Where they first had it, who taught it to them, a celebrity that eats it every time they come to the restaurant, where it originated or how it became famous or where in Italy it is most popular, something like that. Sometimes its just a fond memory of a trip, or finding an unexpectedly good version in a town where you wouldn't expect it.



                    Anyway, nearly every recipe has a little story with it, always on the even-numbered page. If the story it short, the recipe and any special instruction starts on the same page with a large-type heading, if there isn't much room, it starts on the facing page.



                    People interested in just the recipe can skip the human-interest story pretty easily. But you are left some room for creativity. You don't have to follow their formula, exactly, your writing can be additional ideas or flairs with the dish, or what you have seen people do with it, convert it from an entreé into an appetizer, etc.



                    I think its an approach that gives you the best of both worlds.






                    share|improve this answer


























                      2












                      2








                      2







                      I recall "Two Meatballs In The Italian Kitchen", by Pino Luongo and Mark Straussman. It was two chefs with different styles of Italian restaurants that got together for a cookbook.



                      The basic premise is they told a 1/4 to one page personal story or anecdote about a dish. Where they first had it, who taught it to them, a celebrity that eats it every time they come to the restaurant, where it originated or how it became famous or where in Italy it is most popular, something like that. Sometimes its just a fond memory of a trip, or finding an unexpectedly good version in a town where you wouldn't expect it.



                      Anyway, nearly every recipe has a little story with it, always on the even-numbered page. If the story it short, the recipe and any special instruction starts on the same page with a large-type heading, if there isn't much room, it starts on the facing page.



                      People interested in just the recipe can skip the human-interest story pretty easily. But you are left some room for creativity. You don't have to follow their formula, exactly, your writing can be additional ideas or flairs with the dish, or what you have seen people do with it, convert it from an entreé into an appetizer, etc.



                      I think its an approach that gives you the best of both worlds.






                      share|improve this answer













                      I recall "Two Meatballs In The Italian Kitchen", by Pino Luongo and Mark Straussman. It was two chefs with different styles of Italian restaurants that got together for a cookbook.



                      The basic premise is they told a 1/4 to one page personal story or anecdote about a dish. Where they first had it, who taught it to them, a celebrity that eats it every time they come to the restaurant, where it originated or how it became famous or where in Italy it is most popular, something like that. Sometimes its just a fond memory of a trip, or finding an unexpectedly good version in a town where you wouldn't expect it.



                      Anyway, nearly every recipe has a little story with it, always on the even-numbered page. If the story it short, the recipe and any special instruction starts on the same page with a large-type heading, if there isn't much room, it starts on the facing page.



                      People interested in just the recipe can skip the human-interest story pretty easily. But you are left some room for creativity. You don't have to follow their formula, exactly, your writing can be additional ideas or flairs with the dish, or what you have seen people do with it, convert it from an entreé into an appetizer, etc.



                      I think its an approach that gives you the best of both worlds.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 30 mins ago









                      AmadeusAmadeus

                      52.2k467168




                      52.2k467168























                          0














                          Here's a recipe that I use often. It's brief, directly and clearly written, but it still includes some background and history about the recipe, as well as some minimal commentary that allows the writer's personality to come through:



                          http://cremebrulee.com/creme.htm






                          share|improve this answer




























                            0














                            Here's a recipe that I use often. It's brief, directly and clearly written, but it still includes some background and history about the recipe, as well as some minimal commentary that allows the writer's personality to come through:



                            http://cremebrulee.com/creme.htm






                            share|improve this answer


























                              0












                              0








                              0







                              Here's a recipe that I use often. It's brief, directly and clearly written, but it still includes some background and history about the recipe, as well as some minimal commentary that allows the writer's personality to come through:



                              http://cremebrulee.com/creme.htm






                              share|improve this answer













                              Here's a recipe that I use often. It's brief, directly and clearly written, but it still includes some background and history about the recipe, as well as some minimal commentary that allows the writer's personality to come through:



                              http://cremebrulee.com/creme.htm







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered 53 mins ago









                              Chris SunamiChris Sunami

                              31.1k340113




                              31.1k340113























                                  0














                                  What sort of creativity would you like to add?



                                  Yes, most reference-style cookbooks are pretty straightforward: Here are the ingredients, here's how to put them together, cook for this long, etc.



                                  I suppose you could add rambling discussions on your philosophy of life or your difficult childhood, but I suspect most readers would find something like that distracting and annoying.



                                  More seriously, you certainly could add discussion of cooking techniques, helpful hints, etc. Maybe you could think of hopefully-interesting things to say about each dish? I'm not sure what that would be. Lots of cookbooks say things like, "goes well with a red wine" or "people with high cholesterol might want to substitute ..." and that sort of thing, but that doesn't sound all that creative either. ChrisSunami mentioned saying something about the history of the dish. I suppose it might be amusing to read, "this recipe goes back to the 1500s" or "this was served at the first White House dinner with Thomas Jefferson" or that sort of tidbit.



                                  I'm very much an amateur at cooking myself. When I read a recipe, I'm looking for the hard facts: here are the ingredients and here's how to make the dish. If the cookbook writer included a lot of discussion about his life or philosophy of cooking or whatever, I suspect I'd just skim over it. Maybe you could make it interesting enough that people would really want to read it.



                                  Every now and then I see a cookbook that includes rambling philosophical discussions, and my thought is usually, "yeah, whatever, get to the recipe". But maybe I'm not typical or not your target audience.






                                  share|improve this answer




























                                    0














                                    What sort of creativity would you like to add?



                                    Yes, most reference-style cookbooks are pretty straightforward: Here are the ingredients, here's how to put them together, cook for this long, etc.



                                    I suppose you could add rambling discussions on your philosophy of life or your difficult childhood, but I suspect most readers would find something like that distracting and annoying.



                                    More seriously, you certainly could add discussion of cooking techniques, helpful hints, etc. Maybe you could think of hopefully-interesting things to say about each dish? I'm not sure what that would be. Lots of cookbooks say things like, "goes well with a red wine" or "people with high cholesterol might want to substitute ..." and that sort of thing, but that doesn't sound all that creative either. ChrisSunami mentioned saying something about the history of the dish. I suppose it might be amusing to read, "this recipe goes back to the 1500s" or "this was served at the first White House dinner with Thomas Jefferson" or that sort of tidbit.



                                    I'm very much an amateur at cooking myself. When I read a recipe, I'm looking for the hard facts: here are the ingredients and here's how to make the dish. If the cookbook writer included a lot of discussion about his life or philosophy of cooking or whatever, I suspect I'd just skim over it. Maybe you could make it interesting enough that people would really want to read it.



                                    Every now and then I see a cookbook that includes rambling philosophical discussions, and my thought is usually, "yeah, whatever, get to the recipe". But maybe I'm not typical or not your target audience.






                                    share|improve this answer


























                                      0












                                      0








                                      0







                                      What sort of creativity would you like to add?



                                      Yes, most reference-style cookbooks are pretty straightforward: Here are the ingredients, here's how to put them together, cook for this long, etc.



                                      I suppose you could add rambling discussions on your philosophy of life or your difficult childhood, but I suspect most readers would find something like that distracting and annoying.



                                      More seriously, you certainly could add discussion of cooking techniques, helpful hints, etc. Maybe you could think of hopefully-interesting things to say about each dish? I'm not sure what that would be. Lots of cookbooks say things like, "goes well with a red wine" or "people with high cholesterol might want to substitute ..." and that sort of thing, but that doesn't sound all that creative either. ChrisSunami mentioned saying something about the history of the dish. I suppose it might be amusing to read, "this recipe goes back to the 1500s" or "this was served at the first White House dinner with Thomas Jefferson" or that sort of tidbit.



                                      I'm very much an amateur at cooking myself. When I read a recipe, I'm looking for the hard facts: here are the ingredients and here's how to make the dish. If the cookbook writer included a lot of discussion about his life or philosophy of cooking or whatever, I suspect I'd just skim over it. Maybe you could make it interesting enough that people would really want to read it.



                                      Every now and then I see a cookbook that includes rambling philosophical discussions, and my thought is usually, "yeah, whatever, get to the recipe". But maybe I'm not typical or not your target audience.






                                      share|improve this answer













                                      What sort of creativity would you like to add?



                                      Yes, most reference-style cookbooks are pretty straightforward: Here are the ingredients, here's how to put them together, cook for this long, etc.



                                      I suppose you could add rambling discussions on your philosophy of life or your difficult childhood, but I suspect most readers would find something like that distracting and annoying.



                                      More seriously, you certainly could add discussion of cooking techniques, helpful hints, etc. Maybe you could think of hopefully-interesting things to say about each dish? I'm not sure what that would be. Lots of cookbooks say things like, "goes well with a red wine" or "people with high cholesterol might want to substitute ..." and that sort of thing, but that doesn't sound all that creative either. ChrisSunami mentioned saying something about the history of the dish. I suppose it might be amusing to read, "this recipe goes back to the 1500s" or "this was served at the first White House dinner with Thomas Jefferson" or that sort of tidbit.



                                      I'm very much an amateur at cooking myself. When I read a recipe, I'm looking for the hard facts: here are the ingredients and here's how to make the dish. If the cookbook writer included a lot of discussion about his life or philosophy of cooking or whatever, I suspect I'd just skim over it. Maybe you could make it interesting enough that people would really want to read it.



                                      Every now and then I see a cookbook that includes rambling philosophical discussions, and my thought is usually, "yeah, whatever, get to the recipe". But maybe I'm not typical or not your target audience.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered 22 mins ago









                                      JayJay

                                      19.3k1652




                                      19.3k1652






























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded




















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f42760%2finjecting-creativity-into-a-cookbook%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Paper upload error, “Upload failed: The top margin is 0.715 in on page 3, which is below the required...

                                          Emraan Hashmi Filmografia | Linki zewnętrzne | Menu nawigacyjneGulshan GroverGulshan...

                                          How can I write this formula?newline and italics added with leqWhy does widehat behave differently if I...