SWI Prolog documentation generator tags environment: tag not allowedEnumerate and itemize undefined +...

Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?

How to get directions in deep space?

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

Given this phrasing in the lease, when should I pay my rent?

Deciphering cause of death?

When and why was runway 07/25 at Kai Tak removed?

Should I warn a new PhD Student?

"Oh no!" in Latin

Check if object is null and return null

If the only attacker is removed from combat, is a creature still counted as having attacked this turn?

Do you waste sorcery points if you try to apply metamagic to a spell from a scroll but fail to cast it?

If Captain Marvel (MCU) were to have a child with a human male, would the child be human or Kree?

ContourPlot — How do I color by contour curvature?

Sigmoid with a slope but no asymptotes?

What is the meaning of "You've never met a graph you didn't like?"

Why is the principal energy of an electron lower for excited electrons in a higher energy state?

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

SOQL query causes internal Salesforce error

How would a solely written language work mechanically

What is this high flying aircraft over Pennsylvania?

Sound waves in different octaves

Is there anyway, I can have two passwords for my wi-fi

How do I prevent inappropriate ads from appearing in my game?

Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?



SWI Prolog documentation generator tags environment: tag not allowed


Enumerate and itemize undefined + captions not workingLaTeX Error: File subfigure.sty not foundarray environment with tags/labels! Package amsmath Error: tag not allowed hereError message while compiling labeled equation in align in newenvironment. It says some other labels will be lostWhat does this input encoding error mean?Does amsmath treat double dollars and `[' `]' delimiters differently?Can't generate png with Error: Erroneous nesting of equation structuresEquations not properly centered when using tag in gather* environmentTrouble with displayquote and page numbers for citations













0















I'm trying to generate documentation using SWI Prolog PlDoc package, but I'm running into a problem with the environment defined in pldoc.sty:



newcommand{tag}[1]{%
item[#1]}
...
% begin{tags} ... end{tags}

newenvironment{tags}%
{begin{quote}begin{description}%
setlength{itemsep}{0pt}%
footnotesize}%
{end{description}end{quote}}


This is used in the generated TeX file as follows:



subsection{automata.pl: High-level predicates for dealing with regular expressions}

label{sec:automata}

begin{tags}
tag{See also}
url{https://github.com/wvxvw/intro-to-automata-theory}
tag{To be done}
Add predref{match_suffix_regex}{3}, predref{match_all_regex}{3}, predref{find_regex}{3}
end{tags}


Which I insert into a larger document as follows:



documentclass[11pt]{article}
...
usepackage{amsmath}
...
usepackage{pldoc}
...
begin{document}
...
section{Appendix A}
label{sec:orgheadline18}
input{automata-doc}
end{document}


When I try to generate PDF using latexmk with pdflatex I receive the following error:



! Package amsmath Error: tag not allowed here.

See the amsmath package documentation for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...

l.253 tag
{See also}


However, when I generate standalone documentation (which does not use amsmath package), this error doesn't happen. My guess is that amsmath is messing things up, but I don't know how to prevent it from interfering.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    tag is an important command in amsmath -- the definition in your .sty file clashes here. Since I've no access to pldoc.sty I can't test, but I suggest to copy the tag definition from pldoc.sty and rename it pltag, as well replacing any tag{...} in your real document with pltag{...} accordingly.

    – user31729
    Sep 20 '15 at 21:22













  • @ChristianHupfer technically, the .sty isn't my. Should I write to the maintainer to alert them to the problem, or is this something that I can remedy locally (without having to modify the said .sty)?

    – wvxvw
    Sep 20 '15 at 21:23






  • 1





    You should not modify the .sty at all. Writing to the maintainer is certainly a good idea

    – user31729
    Sep 20 '15 at 21:24











  • Note that LaTeX must have given earlier errors. It will have told you that tag was not available to be created as a new command, for example. You ignore such errors at your peril!

    – cfr
    Sep 20 '15 at 23:27








  • 1





    Well, a publisher might if they don't want you using those package anyway. That way, you don't have to change the source much in order to produce the output they want. Same way different classes all define section{}. That's not coincidence either! But since this package isn't part of TeX Live and I have no idea what it is for or where to find it, I can't say whether this has any relevance or not ;).

    – cfr
    Sep 21 '15 at 1:18
















0















I'm trying to generate documentation using SWI Prolog PlDoc package, but I'm running into a problem with the environment defined in pldoc.sty:



newcommand{tag}[1]{%
item[#1]}
...
% begin{tags} ... end{tags}

newenvironment{tags}%
{begin{quote}begin{description}%
setlength{itemsep}{0pt}%
footnotesize}%
{end{description}end{quote}}


This is used in the generated TeX file as follows:



subsection{automata.pl: High-level predicates for dealing with regular expressions}

label{sec:automata}

begin{tags}
tag{See also}
url{https://github.com/wvxvw/intro-to-automata-theory}
tag{To be done}
Add predref{match_suffix_regex}{3}, predref{match_all_regex}{3}, predref{find_regex}{3}
end{tags}


Which I insert into a larger document as follows:



documentclass[11pt]{article}
...
usepackage{amsmath}
...
usepackage{pldoc}
...
begin{document}
...
section{Appendix A}
label{sec:orgheadline18}
input{automata-doc}
end{document}


When I try to generate PDF using latexmk with pdflatex I receive the following error:



! Package amsmath Error: tag not allowed here.

See the amsmath package documentation for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...

l.253 tag
{See also}


However, when I generate standalone documentation (which does not use amsmath package), this error doesn't happen. My guess is that amsmath is messing things up, but I don't know how to prevent it from interfering.










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    tag is an important command in amsmath -- the definition in your .sty file clashes here. Since I've no access to pldoc.sty I can't test, but I suggest to copy the tag definition from pldoc.sty and rename it pltag, as well replacing any tag{...} in your real document with pltag{...} accordingly.

    – user31729
    Sep 20 '15 at 21:22













  • @ChristianHupfer technically, the .sty isn't my. Should I write to the maintainer to alert them to the problem, or is this something that I can remedy locally (without having to modify the said .sty)?

    – wvxvw
    Sep 20 '15 at 21:23






  • 1





    You should not modify the .sty at all. Writing to the maintainer is certainly a good idea

    – user31729
    Sep 20 '15 at 21:24











  • Note that LaTeX must have given earlier errors. It will have told you that tag was not available to be created as a new command, for example. You ignore such errors at your peril!

    – cfr
    Sep 20 '15 at 23:27








  • 1





    Well, a publisher might if they don't want you using those package anyway. That way, you don't have to change the source much in order to produce the output they want. Same way different classes all define section{}. That's not coincidence either! But since this package isn't part of TeX Live and I have no idea what it is for or where to find it, I can't say whether this has any relevance or not ;).

    – cfr
    Sep 21 '15 at 1:18














0












0








0








I'm trying to generate documentation using SWI Prolog PlDoc package, but I'm running into a problem with the environment defined in pldoc.sty:



newcommand{tag}[1]{%
item[#1]}
...
% begin{tags} ... end{tags}

newenvironment{tags}%
{begin{quote}begin{description}%
setlength{itemsep}{0pt}%
footnotesize}%
{end{description}end{quote}}


This is used in the generated TeX file as follows:



subsection{automata.pl: High-level predicates for dealing with regular expressions}

label{sec:automata}

begin{tags}
tag{See also}
url{https://github.com/wvxvw/intro-to-automata-theory}
tag{To be done}
Add predref{match_suffix_regex}{3}, predref{match_all_regex}{3}, predref{find_regex}{3}
end{tags}


Which I insert into a larger document as follows:



documentclass[11pt]{article}
...
usepackage{amsmath}
...
usepackage{pldoc}
...
begin{document}
...
section{Appendix A}
label{sec:orgheadline18}
input{automata-doc}
end{document}


When I try to generate PDF using latexmk with pdflatex I receive the following error:



! Package amsmath Error: tag not allowed here.

See the amsmath package documentation for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...

l.253 tag
{See also}


However, when I generate standalone documentation (which does not use amsmath package), this error doesn't happen. My guess is that amsmath is messing things up, but I don't know how to prevent it from interfering.










share|improve this question
















I'm trying to generate documentation using SWI Prolog PlDoc package, but I'm running into a problem with the environment defined in pldoc.sty:



newcommand{tag}[1]{%
item[#1]}
...
% begin{tags} ... end{tags}

newenvironment{tags}%
{begin{quote}begin{description}%
setlength{itemsep}{0pt}%
footnotesize}%
{end{description}end{quote}}


This is used in the generated TeX file as follows:



subsection{automata.pl: High-level predicates for dealing with regular expressions}

label{sec:automata}

begin{tags}
tag{See also}
url{https://github.com/wvxvw/intro-to-automata-theory}
tag{To be done}
Add predref{match_suffix_regex}{3}, predref{match_all_regex}{3}, predref{find_regex}{3}
end{tags}


Which I insert into a larger document as follows:



documentclass[11pt]{article}
...
usepackage{amsmath}
...
usepackage{pldoc}
...
begin{document}
...
section{Appendix A}
label{sec:orgheadline18}
input{automata-doc}
end{document}


When I try to generate PDF using latexmk with pdflatex I receive the following error:



! Package amsmath Error: tag not allowed here.

See the amsmath package documentation for explanation.
Type H <return> for immediate help.
...

l.253 tag
{See also}


However, when I generate standalone documentation (which does not use amsmath package), this error doesn't happen. My guess is that amsmath is messing things up, but I don't know how to prevent it from interfering.







errors amsmath






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 20 '15 at 21:25







user31729

















asked Sep 20 '15 at 21:15









wvxvwwvxvw

3791412




3791412








  • 1





    tag is an important command in amsmath -- the definition in your .sty file clashes here. Since I've no access to pldoc.sty I can't test, but I suggest to copy the tag definition from pldoc.sty and rename it pltag, as well replacing any tag{...} in your real document with pltag{...} accordingly.

    – user31729
    Sep 20 '15 at 21:22













  • @ChristianHupfer technically, the .sty isn't my. Should I write to the maintainer to alert them to the problem, or is this something that I can remedy locally (without having to modify the said .sty)?

    – wvxvw
    Sep 20 '15 at 21:23






  • 1





    You should not modify the .sty at all. Writing to the maintainer is certainly a good idea

    – user31729
    Sep 20 '15 at 21:24











  • Note that LaTeX must have given earlier errors. It will have told you that tag was not available to be created as a new command, for example. You ignore such errors at your peril!

    – cfr
    Sep 20 '15 at 23:27








  • 1





    Well, a publisher might if they don't want you using those package anyway. That way, you don't have to change the source much in order to produce the output they want. Same way different classes all define section{}. That's not coincidence either! But since this package isn't part of TeX Live and I have no idea what it is for or where to find it, I can't say whether this has any relevance or not ;).

    – cfr
    Sep 21 '15 at 1:18














  • 1





    tag is an important command in amsmath -- the definition in your .sty file clashes here. Since I've no access to pldoc.sty I can't test, but I suggest to copy the tag definition from pldoc.sty and rename it pltag, as well replacing any tag{...} in your real document with pltag{...} accordingly.

    – user31729
    Sep 20 '15 at 21:22













  • @ChristianHupfer technically, the .sty isn't my. Should I write to the maintainer to alert them to the problem, or is this something that I can remedy locally (without having to modify the said .sty)?

    – wvxvw
    Sep 20 '15 at 21:23






  • 1





    You should not modify the .sty at all. Writing to the maintainer is certainly a good idea

    – user31729
    Sep 20 '15 at 21:24











  • Note that LaTeX must have given earlier errors. It will have told you that tag was not available to be created as a new command, for example. You ignore such errors at your peril!

    – cfr
    Sep 20 '15 at 23:27








  • 1





    Well, a publisher might if they don't want you using those package anyway. That way, you don't have to change the source much in order to produce the output they want. Same way different classes all define section{}. That's not coincidence either! But since this package isn't part of TeX Live and I have no idea what it is for or where to find it, I can't say whether this has any relevance or not ;).

    – cfr
    Sep 21 '15 at 1:18








1




1





tag is an important command in amsmath -- the definition in your .sty file clashes here. Since I've no access to pldoc.sty I can't test, but I suggest to copy the tag definition from pldoc.sty and rename it pltag, as well replacing any tag{...} in your real document with pltag{...} accordingly.

– user31729
Sep 20 '15 at 21:22







tag is an important command in amsmath -- the definition in your .sty file clashes here. Since I've no access to pldoc.sty I can't test, but I suggest to copy the tag definition from pldoc.sty and rename it pltag, as well replacing any tag{...} in your real document with pltag{...} accordingly.

– user31729
Sep 20 '15 at 21:22















@ChristianHupfer technically, the .sty isn't my. Should I write to the maintainer to alert them to the problem, or is this something that I can remedy locally (without having to modify the said .sty)?

– wvxvw
Sep 20 '15 at 21:23





@ChristianHupfer technically, the .sty isn't my. Should I write to the maintainer to alert them to the problem, or is this something that I can remedy locally (without having to modify the said .sty)?

– wvxvw
Sep 20 '15 at 21:23




1




1





You should not modify the .sty at all. Writing to the maintainer is certainly a good idea

– user31729
Sep 20 '15 at 21:24





You should not modify the .sty at all. Writing to the maintainer is certainly a good idea

– user31729
Sep 20 '15 at 21:24













Note that LaTeX must have given earlier errors. It will have told you that tag was not available to be created as a new command, for example. You ignore such errors at your peril!

– cfr
Sep 20 '15 at 23:27







Note that LaTeX must have given earlier errors. It will have told you that tag was not available to be created as a new command, for example. You ignore such errors at your peril!

– cfr
Sep 20 '15 at 23:27






1




1





Well, a publisher might if they don't want you using those package anyway. That way, you don't have to change the source much in order to produce the output they want. Same way different classes all define section{}. That's not coincidence either! But since this package isn't part of TeX Live and I have no idea what it is for or where to find it, I can't say whether this has any relevance or not ;).

– cfr
Sep 21 '15 at 1:18





Well, a publisher might if they don't want you using those package anyway. That way, you don't have to change the source much in order to produce the output they want. Same way different classes all define section{}. That's not coincidence either! But since this package isn't part of TeX Live and I have no idea what it is for or where to find it, I can't say whether this has any relevance or not ;).

– cfr
Sep 21 '15 at 1:18










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














It appears that the maintainer isn't willing to change the STY provided with the documentation generator: https://github.com/SWI-Prolog/packages-pldoc/issues/11



I lack the knowledge to try to patch this myself, so, the only way I found around the problem was to generate the code documentation and the rest of the article separately and then join the two resulting PDFs following these (or similar) instructions: https://askubuntu.com/a/18691/638782






share|improve this answer

































    0














    I had the same problem and I modified the Prolog and LaTeX code to
    get things right. You can find the modified files and some instructions on GitHub in the repository AltPldoc.
    https://github.com/francomorando/AltPldoc






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Franco Morando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "85"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f268597%2fswi-prolog-documentation-generator-tags-environment-tag-not-allowed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0














      It appears that the maintainer isn't willing to change the STY provided with the documentation generator: https://github.com/SWI-Prolog/packages-pldoc/issues/11



      I lack the knowledge to try to patch this myself, so, the only way I found around the problem was to generate the code documentation and the rest of the article separately and then join the two resulting PDFs following these (or similar) instructions: https://askubuntu.com/a/18691/638782






      share|improve this answer






























        0














        It appears that the maintainer isn't willing to change the STY provided with the documentation generator: https://github.com/SWI-Prolog/packages-pldoc/issues/11



        I lack the knowledge to try to patch this myself, so, the only way I found around the problem was to generate the code documentation and the rest of the article separately and then join the two resulting PDFs following these (or similar) instructions: https://askubuntu.com/a/18691/638782






        share|improve this answer




























          0












          0








          0







          It appears that the maintainer isn't willing to change the STY provided with the documentation generator: https://github.com/SWI-Prolog/packages-pldoc/issues/11



          I lack the knowledge to try to patch this myself, so, the only way I found around the problem was to generate the code documentation and the rest of the article separately and then join the two resulting PDFs following these (or similar) instructions: https://askubuntu.com/a/18691/638782






          share|improve this answer















          It appears that the maintainer isn't willing to change the STY provided with the documentation generator: https://github.com/SWI-Prolog/packages-pldoc/issues/11



          I lack the knowledge to try to patch this myself, so, the only way I found around the problem was to generate the code documentation and the rest of the article separately and then join the two resulting PDFs following these (or similar) instructions: https://askubuntu.com/a/18691/638782







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:23









          Community

          1




          1










          answered Feb 5 '17 at 16:27









          wvxvwwvxvw

          3791412




          3791412























              0














              I had the same problem and I modified the Prolog and LaTeX code to
              get things right. You can find the modified files and some instructions on GitHub in the repository AltPldoc.
              https://github.com/francomorando/AltPldoc






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Franco Morando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                0














                I had the same problem and I modified the Prolog and LaTeX code to
                get things right. You can find the modified files and some instructions on GitHub in the repository AltPldoc.
                https://github.com/francomorando/AltPldoc






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Franco Morando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  I had the same problem and I modified the Prolog and LaTeX code to
                  get things right. You can find the modified files and some instructions on GitHub in the repository AltPldoc.
                  https://github.com/francomorando/AltPldoc






                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Franco Morando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.










                  I had the same problem and I modified the Prolog and LaTeX code to
                  get things right. You can find the modified files and some instructions on GitHub in the repository AltPldoc.
                  https://github.com/francomorando/AltPldoc







                  share|improve this answer








                  New contributor




                  Franco Morando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer






                  New contributor




                  Franco Morando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 12 mins ago









                  Franco MorandoFranco Morando

                  1




                  1




                  New contributor




                  Franco Morando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Franco Morando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Franco Morando is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f268597%2fswi-prolog-documentation-generator-tags-environment-tag-not-allowed%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Can't compile dgruyter and caption packagesLaTeX templates/packages for writing a patent specificationLatex...

                      Schneeberg (Smreczany) Bibliografia | Menu...

                      Hans Bellmer Spis treści Życiorys | Upamiętnienie | Przypisy | Bibliografia | Linki zewnętrzne |...