2019 Stack Overflow Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection2015 Moderator Election Q&A -...

Equivalent of "illegal" for violating civil law

Midterm in Mathematics Courses

How big is a framed opening for a door relative to the finished door opening width?

Article. The word "Respect"

Why didn't the 2019 Oscars have a host?

What is the wife of a henpecked husband called?

What's after EXPSPACE?

Taking headphones when quitting job

Why is it that Bernie Sanders is always called a "socialist"?

Does it take energy to move something in a circle?

Which RAF squadrons and aircraft types took part in the bombing of Berlin on the 25th of August 1940?

Can a player sacrifice a creature after declaring that creature as blocker while taking lethal damage?

Find the smallest value of the function

How are the system health extended events files rolling over?

Is there a way to store 9th-level spells in a Glyph of Warding or similar method?

Possible issue with my W4 and tax return

Prevent Nautilus / Nemo from creating .Trash-1000 folder in mounted devices

Memory usage: #define vs. static const for uint8_t

What makes papers publishable in top-tier journals?

A starship is travelling at 0.9c and collides with a small rock. Will it leave a clean hole through, or will more happen?

I have trouble understanding this fallacy: "If A, then B. Therefore if not-B, then not-A."

Will rerolling initiative each round stop meta-gaming about initiative?

Coworker asking me to not bring cakes due to self control issue. What should I do?

What species should be used for storage of human minds?



2019 Stack Overflow Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection


2015 Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection2017 Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection2016 Stack Overflow Moderator Election Q&A - Question CollectionFall 2015 Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection2018 Moderator Election Q&A - Question CollectionIs anything spam anymore?Recourse for inappropriate Stack Overflow chat conversationRequest for reopening the room “Android Era with Kotlin and Java”Request for community attention on a moderator's behavior2015 Community Moderator Election2015 Moderator Election Q&A - Question CollectionAutumn 2015 Community Moderator ElectionFall 2015 Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection2016 Stack Overflow Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection2016 Community Moderator Election2017 Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection2017 Community Moderator Election2018 Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection2018 Community Moderator Election













25















Stack Overflow is scheduled for its eleventh election next week, March 4th. In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary.



As we've been doing in previous years, we're collecting questions one week in advance.



Here's how it'll work:




  • Until the nomination phase, (so, until Monday, March 4th at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 3:00 pm EST on the same day, give or take some time to arrive), this question will be open to collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer.


  • We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction.


  • If your question contains a link, please use the syntax of [text](link), as that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire.


  • This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community and issues that you are running into at currently.


  • Feel free to peruse the questionnaires from previous years: 2015, 2015 round two, 2016, 2017, 2018


  • At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community provided in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions.


  • Once questions have been selected, a new question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total.


  • This is not the only option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A.



If you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post as a comment here.









share


















  • 6





    Good luck to the future candidates!

    – Bhargav Rao
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Are we adding mods to the diamond force, or covering for mods that have left or will leave their positions?

    – yivi
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    2 positions so probably just adding. 3 usually means a retirement

    – Machavity
    2 hours ago






  • 4





    They never announce that until after the fact, @yivi.

    – Josh Caswell
    2 hours ago
















25















Stack Overflow is scheduled for its eleventh election next week, March 4th. In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary.



As we've been doing in previous years, we're collecting questions one week in advance.



Here's how it'll work:




  • Until the nomination phase, (so, until Monday, March 4th at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 3:00 pm EST on the same day, give or take some time to arrive), this question will be open to collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer.


  • We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction.


  • If your question contains a link, please use the syntax of [text](link), as that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire.


  • This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community and issues that you are running into at currently.


  • Feel free to peruse the questionnaires from previous years: 2015, 2015 round two, 2016, 2017, 2018


  • At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community provided in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions.


  • Once questions have been selected, a new question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total.


  • This is not the only option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A.



If you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post as a comment here.









share


















  • 6





    Good luck to the future candidates!

    – Bhargav Rao
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Are we adding mods to the diamond force, or covering for mods that have left or will leave their positions?

    – yivi
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    2 positions so probably just adding. 3 usually means a retirement

    – Machavity
    2 hours ago






  • 4





    They never announce that until after the fact, @yivi.

    – Josh Caswell
    2 hours ago














25












25








25








Stack Overflow is scheduled for its eleventh election next week, March 4th. In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary.



As we've been doing in previous years, we're collecting questions one week in advance.



Here's how it'll work:




  • Until the nomination phase, (so, until Monday, March 4th at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 3:00 pm EST on the same day, give or take some time to arrive), this question will be open to collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer.


  • We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction.


  • If your question contains a link, please use the syntax of [text](link), as that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire.


  • This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community and issues that you are running into at currently.


  • Feel free to peruse the questionnaires from previous years: 2015, 2015 round two, 2016, 2017, 2018


  • At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community provided in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions.


  • Once questions have been selected, a new question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total.


  • This is not the only option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A.



If you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post as a comment here.









share














Stack Overflow is scheduled for its eleventh election next week, March 4th. In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary.



As we've been doing in previous years, we're collecting questions one week in advance.



Here's how it'll work:




  • Until the nomination phase, (so, until Monday, March 4th at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 3:00 pm EST on the same day, give or take some time to arrive), this question will be open to collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer.


  • We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction.


  • If your question contains a link, please use the syntax of [text](link), as that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire.


  • This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community and issues that you are running into at currently.


  • Feel free to peruse the questionnaires from previous years: 2015, 2015 round two, 2016, 2017, 2018


  • At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community provided in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions.


  • Once questions have been selected, a new question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total.


  • This is not the only option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A.



If you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post as a comment here.







discussion featured election





share












share










share



share










asked 2 hours ago









Grace NoteGrace Note

2,360165657




2,360165657








  • 6





    Good luck to the future candidates!

    – Bhargav Rao
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Are we adding mods to the diamond force, or covering for mods that have left or will leave their positions?

    – yivi
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    2 positions so probably just adding. 3 usually means a retirement

    – Machavity
    2 hours ago






  • 4





    They never announce that until after the fact, @yivi.

    – Josh Caswell
    2 hours ago














  • 6





    Good luck to the future candidates!

    – Bhargav Rao
    2 hours ago






  • 1





    Are we adding mods to the diamond force, or covering for mods that have left or will leave their positions?

    – yivi
    2 hours ago






  • 2





    2 positions so probably just adding. 3 usually means a retirement

    – Machavity
    2 hours ago






  • 4





    They never announce that until after the fact, @yivi.

    – Josh Caswell
    2 hours ago








6




6





Good luck to the future candidates!

– Bhargav Rao
2 hours ago





Good luck to the future candidates!

– Bhargav Rao
2 hours ago




1




1





Are we adding mods to the diamond force, or covering for mods that have left or will leave their positions?

– yivi
2 hours ago





Are we adding mods to the diamond force, or covering for mods that have left or will leave their positions?

– yivi
2 hours ago




2




2





2 positions so probably just adding. 3 usually means a retirement

– Machavity
2 hours ago





2 positions so probably just adding. 3 usually means a retirement

– Machavity
2 hours ago




4




4





They never announce that until after the fact, @yivi.

– Josh Caswell
2 hours ago





They never announce that until after the fact, @yivi.

– Josh Caswell
2 hours ago










11 Answers
11






active

oldest

votes


















18















There is a high rep user who is very active on the site. However they frequently use strong language in their comments. When you warned them, they replied stating that the questions are of low quality which is why they left those comments, and also they threaten to quit the site. After the warning, you realize that they still haven't stopped leaving similar comments. What steps will you take in order to bring the user on track? What if the comments were on meta instead of main?






share



















  • 11





    That Won't happen again ...

    – rene
    2 hours ago






  • 6





    Wait a minute...

    – Will
    1 hour ago



















13














A new, low-rep user on meta asks a non-duplicate non-trivial on-topic question. For unclear reasons the question is met with down votes and a pile-on of comments from several commenters. The question gets closed, some comments get flagged.



You have a pretty good idea of what an answer to said question would look like.



What are your steps to turn this situation around while making sure all involved parties can walk away from this encounter unharmed?





share


























  • what an answer to said question would look like — isn't it assumed that moderators don't usually have domain experience for any given question? Why is it important that the moderator have it in this case?

    – Shepmaster
    1 hour ago











  • @Shepmaster A mod is going to have some domain knowledge somewhere (they had to have asked a LOT of questions or answered questions somewhere). This question supposes that to be the case. To put this a different way If I can answer a Q as a mod, should I after it's been moderated by others?

    – Machavity
    1 hour ago






  • 6





    @Shepmaster I'd fully expect a mod to have domain knowledge about the issues discussed on meta, even if they don't post here often. How are they going to moderate if they don't know the rules and norms of the community?

    – Stephen Kennedy
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    @StephenKennedy yep, that's what I completely skimmed over: on meta. Thanks!

    – Shepmaster
    1 hour ago



















12














Here is a set of general questions, gathered as very common questions asked every election. As mentioned in the instructions, the first two questions are guaranteed to show up in the Q&A, while the others are if there aren't enough questions (or, if you like one enough, you may split it off as a separate answer for review within the community's 8).




  • How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?

  • How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been?





  • In your opinion, what do moderators do?

  • A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different light. How do you feel about that?

  • In what way do you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep?





share































    8














    Write a Haiku poem that catches the essence of why you think it will be fun to handle 400 flags every day.





    share


























    • 100 x day is probably already a good deed, but lets push it some

      – Petter Friberg
      2 hours ago






    • 4





      Flags are coming in, Brad Larson is not here now, Time to earn that hat

      – Machavity
      2 hours ago






    • 4





      All the flags are gone / cleaning up the site is hard / but I love it so

      – Wai Ha Lee
      2 hours ago






    • 11





      This looks like a joke at first, but it's actually a deceptively good question. Forces a short answer to a very important part of moderation here.

      – Undo
      2 hours ago








    • 1





      @Undo When we're limited to 8 community questions, I'd rather not have this can-a-fish-climb-a-tree test as one of them. It'd be much better if it were just "describe succinctly why you think running for mod is a good idea" rather than assuming candidates 1) are good at writing poetry, or 2) doing this because it's fun.

      – TylerH
      40 mins ago








    • 2





      You don't need to be good at writing poetry to write a Haiku @tyler... Also, a candidate can clearly start with "I am not good at poetry, so I will write down a paragraph about why I will not burn out while handling 400 flags per day:"

      – Bhargav Rao
      23 mins ago











    • @BhargavRao That just underscores the uselessness of posting this as one of the very limited number of questions to be presented to candidates.

      – TylerH
      52 secs ago



















    7














    An established user (>6 years tenure, >10k reputation) has a tendency to ask mediocre, at best, questions as of late. Their old questions/answers keeps their reputation up by a few upvotes a week; what would you do with their newest, not up to standard questions? The question ban won't kick in, what'd be your warning message, if any?





    share



















    • 1





      Can you clarify what you mean by mediocre questions here? AFAIK there's no problem with 'mediocre' questions... what matters is whether they're on-topic. Why would a moderator need to do anything here? Not all questions can be great.

      – TylerH
      57 mins ago













    • @TylerH The alleged problem emerges when that user can continue asking poor questions, whereas a newer user would have been question banned. It can be perceived as having double standards in favor of users who have collected a lot of reputation over time, usually in the days when the bar of quality was indeed lower.

      – E_net4
      45 mins ago






    • 1





      @E_net4 OK, well Adriaan didn't say "poor" questions. He said "mediocre". A mediocre question should have no problems... but should not be particularly interesting or remarkably well-researched, either. Again, clarification on that is needed, because there's no inherent problem with mediocre questions. Even if he meant "poor", instead, clarification is still needed. What about it is poor? The effort by the OP? The spelling and grammar? Or something worse like the lack of an MCVE or the fact that it's POB/Too Broad/a dupe?

      – TylerH
      42 mins ago













    • @TylerH It is known that some people uphold higher expectations from established users, so the phrasing here doesn't seem surprising to me. That is a fair distinction nonetheless.

      – E_net4
      38 mins ago



















    7














    A chat room has taken to an undesirable topic. It's not clear that ban-hammers need to fly, but the conversation cannot continue as it is (it's just not something Stack Overflow chat was meant to discuss). A new user has entered the room and begins mass-flagging anything they consider bad and demanding the conversation stop by threatening more flags. Regulars in the room counter-flag the new user's threats. How would you handle this?





    share


























    • Just curious: Is this scenario purely hypothetical, or has it been known to happen before?

      – Stephen Kennedy
      46 mins ago






    • 1





      @StephenKennedy Maybe not that extreme but this might give background

      – rene
      37 mins ago






    • 1





      @StephenKennedy I loosely based it on this incident (I added a lot more drama to this Q), but there have been other incidents where chat got out of hand and moderators (or CMs) were needed.It's a roundabout way about asking what a potential mod would do with an unruly chat room.

      – Machavity
      17 mins ago





















    1














    Moderators are not selected because they are domain experts in certain tags, but it so happens that you are an expert in one such tag. You see that several members of the community have elected to close a question as a duplicate, but you see that the duplicates don't actually answer the question as stated, nor do they provide a useful signpost for the asker. How do you proceed?





    share































      1














      If you're active on Meta, can you point to some of your questions or answers which have been received poorly, and what information you've gleaned as a result of those discussions?





      share































        0














        How effective are you with the tools you have at your disposal right now?



        Please tell us: how many close votes and delete votes did you cast in the first two months of 2019? How many helpful flags did you raise, and how many reviews did you complete in each queue? What is your median for all of the above?





        share


























        • How would one find this information out? As far as I can tell I'd need to figure out how many pages to go back before I'm one year in the past, then multiply by the number of items per page.

          – Wai Ha Lee
          1 hour ago











        • @WaiHaLee This year started just about 8 weeks ago, so not too much work. I'll clarify.

          – Baum mit Augen
          1 hour ago






        • 1





          @JoshCaswell Oops, misread. Some totals are presented, but some actions on deleted items are not visible for example. I'm asking for a clearer, more detailed breakdown.

          – Baum mit Augen
          1 hour ago








        • 1





          How about "In January and February 2019, ....."? By the time the nominations are open it'll be March and it'll be the same 59 day period for every user.

          – Wai Ha Lee
          1 hour ago






        • 1





          @WaiHaLee Fine with me.

          – Baum mit Augen
          1 hour ago











        • FWIW candidates already have a link to the reviews tab of their profile in the nomination user card, so we can already see how many reviews they've done in each queue. Them answering this question would save us one click per candidate each.

          – TylerH
          56 mins ago













        • @TylerH That was Josh's point as well, which he deleted for some reason. Quoting myself for reference: "Some totals are presented, but some actions on deleted items are not visible for example. I'm asking for a clearer, more detailed breakdown."

          – Baum mit Augen
          54 mins ago











        • Won't we get most of this information from the context of the "Moderation score"?

          – Makoto
          13 mins ago






        • 1





          @TylerH - not all reviews show (for me, at least) in the 'all actions/reviews', such as those in the Low Quality Posts queue.

          – Wai Ha Lee
          13 mins ago











        • @Makoto Not really. That a) just counts rep and badges, thus missing several of the items I ask about and b) does not discern between recent activity and a candidates action of, say, years. For example, I still have 40/40 mod score, but this question would easliy expose my lack of commitment in recent times.

          – Baum mit Augen
          11 mins ago













        • Sure, but I'm confused as to the value of it. Are you looking for someone who can handle flags, or is a robot? Help me paint a picture here.

          – Makoto
          9 mins ago











        • @Makoto I'm looking for someone who is actually going to handle flags. Thus, I want to see they are using the tools they currently have available to at least a large extend. A lot of people could be good mods in the sense that they are able to correctly judge a flag, but well... If every single elected mod actually put in their 30 min a day, we probably would not be having an election right now.

          – Baum mit Augen
          7 mins ago













        • Now whether the extra information that would come from this is worth one of the eight slots is a matter of opinion, of course. Votes will tell.

          – Baum mit Augen
          4 mins ago













        • I'm not trying to be facetious, but I do maintain that we'll establish a decent amount from the "Moderator score" metric that comes out with candidates. I've found in the past that said score can leave a bad taste in my mouth with someone who does get elected but doesn't feel like a good moderator. I won't disagree that handling flags is important, but at the same time, I'm not convinced that numbers alone would tell us anything meaningful about how they handle those flags.

          – Makoto
          3 mins ago



















        -2














        In your own words, what role do diamond moderators play with the Welcoming drive, and what can be done to make that role more valuable for beginners and veterans alike?





        share































          -7














          Consider the case,
          where a user flags an answer that appears to be spam,
          because the post doesn't disclose the author's affiliation with a recommended non-free product.



          The answer is a few years old and the author hasn't posted any similar answers (i.e. spam) since then.



          The answered question itself appears to be off-topic (asking for an off-site resource).



          How do you act on the flag, the answer, and the question?





          share































            11 Answers
            11






            active

            oldest

            votes








            11 Answers
            11






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            18















            There is a high rep user who is very active on the site. However they frequently use strong language in their comments. When you warned them, they replied stating that the questions are of low quality which is why they left those comments, and also they threaten to quit the site. After the warning, you realize that they still haven't stopped leaving similar comments. What steps will you take in order to bring the user on track? What if the comments were on meta instead of main?






            share



















            • 11





              That Won't happen again ...

              – rene
              2 hours ago






            • 6





              Wait a minute...

              – Will
              1 hour ago
















            18















            There is a high rep user who is very active on the site. However they frequently use strong language in their comments. When you warned them, they replied stating that the questions are of low quality which is why they left those comments, and also they threaten to quit the site. After the warning, you realize that they still haven't stopped leaving similar comments. What steps will you take in order to bring the user on track? What if the comments were on meta instead of main?






            share



















            • 11





              That Won't happen again ...

              – rene
              2 hours ago






            • 6





              Wait a minute...

              – Will
              1 hour ago














            18












            18








            18








            There is a high rep user who is very active on the site. However they frequently use strong language in their comments. When you warned them, they replied stating that the questions are of low quality which is why they left those comments, and also they threaten to quit the site. After the warning, you realize that they still haven't stopped leaving similar comments. What steps will you take in order to bring the user on track? What if the comments were on meta instead of main?






            share














            There is a high rep user who is very active on the site. However they frequently use strong language in their comments. When you warned them, they replied stating that the questions are of low quality which is why they left those comments, and also they threaten to quit the site. After the warning, you realize that they still haven't stopped leaving similar comments. What steps will you take in order to bring the user on track? What if the comments were on meta instead of main?







            share











            share


            share










            answered 2 hours ago









            Bhargav RaoBhargav Rao

            30.5k7117147




            30.5k7117147








            • 11





              That Won't happen again ...

              – rene
              2 hours ago






            • 6





              Wait a minute...

              – Will
              1 hour ago














            • 11





              That Won't happen again ...

              – rene
              2 hours ago






            • 6





              Wait a minute...

              – Will
              1 hour ago








            11




            11





            That Won't happen again ...

            – rene
            2 hours ago





            That Won't happen again ...

            – rene
            2 hours ago




            6




            6





            Wait a minute...

            – Will
            1 hour ago





            Wait a minute...

            – Will
            1 hour ago











            13














            A new, low-rep user on meta asks a non-duplicate non-trivial on-topic question. For unclear reasons the question is met with down votes and a pile-on of comments from several commenters. The question gets closed, some comments get flagged.



            You have a pretty good idea of what an answer to said question would look like.



            What are your steps to turn this situation around while making sure all involved parties can walk away from this encounter unharmed?





            share


























            • what an answer to said question would look like — isn't it assumed that moderators don't usually have domain experience for any given question? Why is it important that the moderator have it in this case?

              – Shepmaster
              1 hour ago











            • @Shepmaster A mod is going to have some domain knowledge somewhere (they had to have asked a LOT of questions or answered questions somewhere). This question supposes that to be the case. To put this a different way If I can answer a Q as a mod, should I after it's been moderated by others?

              – Machavity
              1 hour ago






            • 6





              @Shepmaster I'd fully expect a mod to have domain knowledge about the issues discussed on meta, even if they don't post here often. How are they going to moderate if they don't know the rules and norms of the community?

              – Stephen Kennedy
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              @StephenKennedy yep, that's what I completely skimmed over: on meta. Thanks!

              – Shepmaster
              1 hour ago
















            13














            A new, low-rep user on meta asks a non-duplicate non-trivial on-topic question. For unclear reasons the question is met with down votes and a pile-on of comments from several commenters. The question gets closed, some comments get flagged.



            You have a pretty good idea of what an answer to said question would look like.



            What are your steps to turn this situation around while making sure all involved parties can walk away from this encounter unharmed?





            share


























            • what an answer to said question would look like — isn't it assumed that moderators don't usually have domain experience for any given question? Why is it important that the moderator have it in this case?

              – Shepmaster
              1 hour ago











            • @Shepmaster A mod is going to have some domain knowledge somewhere (they had to have asked a LOT of questions or answered questions somewhere). This question supposes that to be the case. To put this a different way If I can answer a Q as a mod, should I after it's been moderated by others?

              – Machavity
              1 hour ago






            • 6





              @Shepmaster I'd fully expect a mod to have domain knowledge about the issues discussed on meta, even if they don't post here often. How are they going to moderate if they don't know the rules and norms of the community?

              – Stephen Kennedy
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              @StephenKennedy yep, that's what I completely skimmed over: on meta. Thanks!

              – Shepmaster
              1 hour ago














            13












            13








            13







            A new, low-rep user on meta asks a non-duplicate non-trivial on-topic question. For unclear reasons the question is met with down votes and a pile-on of comments from several commenters. The question gets closed, some comments get flagged.



            You have a pretty good idea of what an answer to said question would look like.



            What are your steps to turn this situation around while making sure all involved parties can walk away from this encounter unharmed?





            share















            A new, low-rep user on meta asks a non-duplicate non-trivial on-topic question. For unclear reasons the question is met with down votes and a pile-on of comments from several commenters. The question gets closed, some comments get flagged.



            You have a pretty good idea of what an answer to said question would look like.



            What are your steps to turn this situation around while making sure all involved parties can walk away from this encounter unharmed?






            share













            share


            share








            edited 1 hour ago









            Shepmaster

            156k1316




            156k1316










            answered 1 hour ago









            renerene

            33.6k38326438




            33.6k38326438













            • what an answer to said question would look like — isn't it assumed that moderators don't usually have domain experience for any given question? Why is it important that the moderator have it in this case?

              – Shepmaster
              1 hour ago











            • @Shepmaster A mod is going to have some domain knowledge somewhere (they had to have asked a LOT of questions or answered questions somewhere). This question supposes that to be the case. To put this a different way If I can answer a Q as a mod, should I after it's been moderated by others?

              – Machavity
              1 hour ago






            • 6





              @Shepmaster I'd fully expect a mod to have domain knowledge about the issues discussed on meta, even if they don't post here often. How are they going to moderate if they don't know the rules and norms of the community?

              – Stephen Kennedy
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              @StephenKennedy yep, that's what I completely skimmed over: on meta. Thanks!

              – Shepmaster
              1 hour ago



















            • what an answer to said question would look like — isn't it assumed that moderators don't usually have domain experience for any given question? Why is it important that the moderator have it in this case?

              – Shepmaster
              1 hour ago











            • @Shepmaster A mod is going to have some domain knowledge somewhere (they had to have asked a LOT of questions or answered questions somewhere). This question supposes that to be the case. To put this a different way If I can answer a Q as a mod, should I after it's been moderated by others?

              – Machavity
              1 hour ago






            • 6





              @Shepmaster I'd fully expect a mod to have domain knowledge about the issues discussed on meta, even if they don't post here often. How are they going to moderate if they don't know the rules and norms of the community?

              – Stephen Kennedy
              1 hour ago






            • 1





              @StephenKennedy yep, that's what I completely skimmed over: on meta. Thanks!

              – Shepmaster
              1 hour ago

















            what an answer to said question would look like — isn't it assumed that moderators don't usually have domain experience for any given question? Why is it important that the moderator have it in this case?

            – Shepmaster
            1 hour ago





            what an answer to said question would look like — isn't it assumed that moderators don't usually have domain experience for any given question? Why is it important that the moderator have it in this case?

            – Shepmaster
            1 hour ago













            @Shepmaster A mod is going to have some domain knowledge somewhere (they had to have asked a LOT of questions or answered questions somewhere). This question supposes that to be the case. To put this a different way If I can answer a Q as a mod, should I after it's been moderated by others?

            – Machavity
            1 hour ago





            @Shepmaster A mod is going to have some domain knowledge somewhere (they had to have asked a LOT of questions or answered questions somewhere). This question supposes that to be the case. To put this a different way If I can answer a Q as a mod, should I after it's been moderated by others?

            – Machavity
            1 hour ago




            6




            6





            @Shepmaster I'd fully expect a mod to have domain knowledge about the issues discussed on meta, even if they don't post here often. How are they going to moderate if they don't know the rules and norms of the community?

            – Stephen Kennedy
            1 hour ago





            @Shepmaster I'd fully expect a mod to have domain knowledge about the issues discussed on meta, even if they don't post here often. How are they going to moderate if they don't know the rules and norms of the community?

            – Stephen Kennedy
            1 hour ago




            1




            1





            @StephenKennedy yep, that's what I completely skimmed over: on meta. Thanks!

            – Shepmaster
            1 hour ago





            @StephenKennedy yep, that's what I completely skimmed over: on meta. Thanks!

            – Shepmaster
            1 hour ago











            12














            Here is a set of general questions, gathered as very common questions asked every election. As mentioned in the instructions, the first two questions are guaranteed to show up in the Q&A, while the others are if there aren't enough questions (or, if you like one enough, you may split it off as a separate answer for review within the community's 8).




            • How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?

            • How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been?





            • In your opinion, what do moderators do?

            • A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different light. How do you feel about that?

            • In what way do you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep?





            share




























              12














              Here is a set of general questions, gathered as very common questions asked every election. As mentioned in the instructions, the first two questions are guaranteed to show up in the Q&A, while the others are if there aren't enough questions (or, if you like one enough, you may split it off as a separate answer for review within the community's 8).




              • How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?

              • How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been?





              • In your opinion, what do moderators do?

              • A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different light. How do you feel about that?

              • In what way do you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep?





              share


























                12












                12








                12







                Here is a set of general questions, gathered as very common questions asked every election. As mentioned in the instructions, the first two questions are guaranteed to show up in the Q&A, while the others are if there aren't enough questions (or, if you like one enough, you may split it off as a separate answer for review within the community's 8).




                • How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?

                • How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been?





                • In your opinion, what do moderators do?

                • A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different light. How do you feel about that?

                • In what way do you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep?





                share













                Here is a set of general questions, gathered as very common questions asked every election. As mentioned in the instructions, the first two questions are guaranteed to show up in the Q&A, while the others are if there aren't enough questions (or, if you like one enough, you may split it off as a separate answer for review within the community's 8).




                • How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?

                • How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been?





                • In your opinion, what do moderators do?

                • A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different light. How do you feel about that?

                • In what way do you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep?






                share











                share


                share










                answered 2 hours ago









                Grace NoteGrace Note

                2,360165657




                2,360165657























                    8














                    Write a Haiku poem that catches the essence of why you think it will be fun to handle 400 flags every day.





                    share


























                    • 100 x day is probably already a good deed, but lets push it some

                      – Petter Friberg
                      2 hours ago






                    • 4





                      Flags are coming in, Brad Larson is not here now, Time to earn that hat

                      – Machavity
                      2 hours ago






                    • 4





                      All the flags are gone / cleaning up the site is hard / but I love it so

                      – Wai Ha Lee
                      2 hours ago






                    • 11





                      This looks like a joke at first, but it's actually a deceptively good question. Forces a short answer to a very important part of moderation here.

                      – Undo
                      2 hours ago








                    • 1





                      @Undo When we're limited to 8 community questions, I'd rather not have this can-a-fish-climb-a-tree test as one of them. It'd be much better if it were just "describe succinctly why you think running for mod is a good idea" rather than assuming candidates 1) are good at writing poetry, or 2) doing this because it's fun.

                      – TylerH
                      40 mins ago








                    • 2





                      You don't need to be good at writing poetry to write a Haiku @tyler... Also, a candidate can clearly start with "I am not good at poetry, so I will write down a paragraph about why I will not burn out while handling 400 flags per day:"

                      – Bhargav Rao
                      23 mins ago











                    • @BhargavRao That just underscores the uselessness of posting this as one of the very limited number of questions to be presented to candidates.

                      – TylerH
                      52 secs ago
















                    8














                    Write a Haiku poem that catches the essence of why you think it will be fun to handle 400 flags every day.





                    share


























                    • 100 x day is probably already a good deed, but lets push it some

                      – Petter Friberg
                      2 hours ago






                    • 4





                      Flags are coming in, Brad Larson is not here now, Time to earn that hat

                      – Machavity
                      2 hours ago






                    • 4





                      All the flags are gone / cleaning up the site is hard / but I love it so

                      – Wai Ha Lee
                      2 hours ago






                    • 11





                      This looks like a joke at first, but it's actually a deceptively good question. Forces a short answer to a very important part of moderation here.

                      – Undo
                      2 hours ago








                    • 1





                      @Undo When we're limited to 8 community questions, I'd rather not have this can-a-fish-climb-a-tree test as one of them. It'd be much better if it were just "describe succinctly why you think running for mod is a good idea" rather than assuming candidates 1) are good at writing poetry, or 2) doing this because it's fun.

                      – TylerH
                      40 mins ago








                    • 2





                      You don't need to be good at writing poetry to write a Haiku @tyler... Also, a candidate can clearly start with "I am not good at poetry, so I will write down a paragraph about why I will not burn out while handling 400 flags per day:"

                      – Bhargav Rao
                      23 mins ago











                    • @BhargavRao That just underscores the uselessness of posting this as one of the very limited number of questions to be presented to candidates.

                      – TylerH
                      52 secs ago














                    8












                    8








                    8







                    Write a Haiku poem that catches the essence of why you think it will be fun to handle 400 flags every day.





                    share















                    Write a Haiku poem that catches the essence of why you think it will be fun to handle 400 flags every day.






                    share













                    share


                    share








                    edited 2 hours ago









                    Wai Ha Lee

                    5,9311829




                    5,9311829










                    answered 2 hours ago









                    Petter FribergPetter Friberg

                    16.1k33162




                    16.1k33162













                    • 100 x day is probably already a good deed, but lets push it some

                      – Petter Friberg
                      2 hours ago






                    • 4





                      Flags are coming in, Brad Larson is not here now, Time to earn that hat

                      – Machavity
                      2 hours ago






                    • 4





                      All the flags are gone / cleaning up the site is hard / but I love it so

                      – Wai Ha Lee
                      2 hours ago






                    • 11





                      This looks like a joke at first, but it's actually a deceptively good question. Forces a short answer to a very important part of moderation here.

                      – Undo
                      2 hours ago








                    • 1





                      @Undo When we're limited to 8 community questions, I'd rather not have this can-a-fish-climb-a-tree test as one of them. It'd be much better if it were just "describe succinctly why you think running for mod is a good idea" rather than assuming candidates 1) are good at writing poetry, or 2) doing this because it's fun.

                      – TylerH
                      40 mins ago








                    • 2





                      You don't need to be good at writing poetry to write a Haiku @tyler... Also, a candidate can clearly start with "I am not good at poetry, so I will write down a paragraph about why I will not burn out while handling 400 flags per day:"

                      – Bhargav Rao
                      23 mins ago











                    • @BhargavRao That just underscores the uselessness of posting this as one of the very limited number of questions to be presented to candidates.

                      – TylerH
                      52 secs ago



















                    • 100 x day is probably already a good deed, but lets push it some

                      – Petter Friberg
                      2 hours ago






                    • 4





                      Flags are coming in, Brad Larson is not here now, Time to earn that hat

                      – Machavity
                      2 hours ago






                    • 4





                      All the flags are gone / cleaning up the site is hard / but I love it so

                      – Wai Ha Lee
                      2 hours ago






                    • 11





                      This looks like a joke at first, but it's actually a deceptively good question. Forces a short answer to a very important part of moderation here.

                      – Undo
                      2 hours ago








                    • 1





                      @Undo When we're limited to 8 community questions, I'd rather not have this can-a-fish-climb-a-tree test as one of them. It'd be much better if it were just "describe succinctly why you think running for mod is a good idea" rather than assuming candidates 1) are good at writing poetry, or 2) doing this because it's fun.

                      – TylerH
                      40 mins ago








                    • 2





                      You don't need to be good at writing poetry to write a Haiku @tyler... Also, a candidate can clearly start with "I am not good at poetry, so I will write down a paragraph about why I will not burn out while handling 400 flags per day:"

                      – Bhargav Rao
                      23 mins ago











                    • @BhargavRao That just underscores the uselessness of posting this as one of the very limited number of questions to be presented to candidates.

                      – TylerH
                      52 secs ago

















                    100 x day is probably already a good deed, but lets push it some

                    – Petter Friberg
                    2 hours ago





                    100 x day is probably already a good deed, but lets push it some

                    – Petter Friberg
                    2 hours ago




                    4




                    4





                    Flags are coming in, Brad Larson is not here now, Time to earn that hat

                    – Machavity
                    2 hours ago





                    Flags are coming in, Brad Larson is not here now, Time to earn that hat

                    – Machavity
                    2 hours ago




                    4




                    4





                    All the flags are gone / cleaning up the site is hard / but I love it so

                    – Wai Ha Lee
                    2 hours ago





                    All the flags are gone / cleaning up the site is hard / but I love it so

                    – Wai Ha Lee
                    2 hours ago




                    11




                    11





                    This looks like a joke at first, but it's actually a deceptively good question. Forces a short answer to a very important part of moderation here.

                    – Undo
                    2 hours ago







                    This looks like a joke at first, but it's actually a deceptively good question. Forces a short answer to a very important part of moderation here.

                    – Undo
                    2 hours ago






                    1




                    1





                    @Undo When we're limited to 8 community questions, I'd rather not have this can-a-fish-climb-a-tree test as one of them. It'd be much better if it were just "describe succinctly why you think running for mod is a good idea" rather than assuming candidates 1) are good at writing poetry, or 2) doing this because it's fun.

                    – TylerH
                    40 mins ago







                    @Undo When we're limited to 8 community questions, I'd rather not have this can-a-fish-climb-a-tree test as one of them. It'd be much better if it were just "describe succinctly why you think running for mod is a good idea" rather than assuming candidates 1) are good at writing poetry, or 2) doing this because it's fun.

                    – TylerH
                    40 mins ago






                    2




                    2





                    You don't need to be good at writing poetry to write a Haiku @tyler... Also, a candidate can clearly start with "I am not good at poetry, so I will write down a paragraph about why I will not burn out while handling 400 flags per day:"

                    – Bhargav Rao
                    23 mins ago





                    You don't need to be good at writing poetry to write a Haiku @tyler... Also, a candidate can clearly start with "I am not good at poetry, so I will write down a paragraph about why I will not burn out while handling 400 flags per day:"

                    – Bhargav Rao
                    23 mins ago













                    @BhargavRao That just underscores the uselessness of posting this as one of the very limited number of questions to be presented to candidates.

                    – TylerH
                    52 secs ago





                    @BhargavRao That just underscores the uselessness of posting this as one of the very limited number of questions to be presented to candidates.

                    – TylerH
                    52 secs ago











                    7














                    An established user (>6 years tenure, >10k reputation) has a tendency to ask mediocre, at best, questions as of late. Their old questions/answers keeps their reputation up by a few upvotes a week; what would you do with their newest, not up to standard questions? The question ban won't kick in, what'd be your warning message, if any?





                    share



















                    • 1





                      Can you clarify what you mean by mediocre questions here? AFAIK there's no problem with 'mediocre' questions... what matters is whether they're on-topic. Why would a moderator need to do anything here? Not all questions can be great.

                      – TylerH
                      57 mins ago













                    • @TylerH The alleged problem emerges when that user can continue asking poor questions, whereas a newer user would have been question banned. It can be perceived as having double standards in favor of users who have collected a lot of reputation over time, usually in the days when the bar of quality was indeed lower.

                      – E_net4
                      45 mins ago






                    • 1





                      @E_net4 OK, well Adriaan didn't say "poor" questions. He said "mediocre". A mediocre question should have no problems... but should not be particularly interesting or remarkably well-researched, either. Again, clarification on that is needed, because there's no inherent problem with mediocre questions. Even if he meant "poor", instead, clarification is still needed. What about it is poor? The effort by the OP? The spelling and grammar? Or something worse like the lack of an MCVE or the fact that it's POB/Too Broad/a dupe?

                      – TylerH
                      42 mins ago













                    • @TylerH It is known that some people uphold higher expectations from established users, so the phrasing here doesn't seem surprising to me. That is a fair distinction nonetheless.

                      – E_net4
                      38 mins ago
















                    7














                    An established user (>6 years tenure, >10k reputation) has a tendency to ask mediocre, at best, questions as of late. Their old questions/answers keeps their reputation up by a few upvotes a week; what would you do with their newest, not up to standard questions? The question ban won't kick in, what'd be your warning message, if any?





                    share



















                    • 1





                      Can you clarify what you mean by mediocre questions here? AFAIK there's no problem with 'mediocre' questions... what matters is whether they're on-topic. Why would a moderator need to do anything here? Not all questions can be great.

                      – TylerH
                      57 mins ago













                    • @TylerH The alleged problem emerges when that user can continue asking poor questions, whereas a newer user would have been question banned. It can be perceived as having double standards in favor of users who have collected a lot of reputation over time, usually in the days when the bar of quality was indeed lower.

                      – E_net4
                      45 mins ago






                    • 1





                      @E_net4 OK, well Adriaan didn't say "poor" questions. He said "mediocre". A mediocre question should have no problems... but should not be particularly interesting or remarkably well-researched, either. Again, clarification on that is needed, because there's no inherent problem with mediocre questions. Even if he meant "poor", instead, clarification is still needed. What about it is poor? The effort by the OP? The spelling and grammar? Or something worse like the lack of an MCVE or the fact that it's POB/Too Broad/a dupe?

                      – TylerH
                      42 mins ago













                    • @TylerH It is known that some people uphold higher expectations from established users, so the phrasing here doesn't seem surprising to me. That is a fair distinction nonetheless.

                      – E_net4
                      38 mins ago














                    7












                    7








                    7







                    An established user (>6 years tenure, >10k reputation) has a tendency to ask mediocre, at best, questions as of late. Their old questions/answers keeps their reputation up by a few upvotes a week; what would you do with their newest, not up to standard questions? The question ban won't kick in, what'd be your warning message, if any?





                    share













                    An established user (>6 years tenure, >10k reputation) has a tendency to ask mediocre, at best, questions as of late. Their old questions/answers keeps their reputation up by a few upvotes a week; what would you do with their newest, not up to standard questions? The question ban won't kick in, what'd be your warning message, if any?






                    share











                    share


                    share










                    answered 2 hours ago









                    AdriaanAdriaan

                    12.8k31739




                    12.8k31739








                    • 1





                      Can you clarify what you mean by mediocre questions here? AFAIK there's no problem with 'mediocre' questions... what matters is whether they're on-topic. Why would a moderator need to do anything here? Not all questions can be great.

                      – TylerH
                      57 mins ago













                    • @TylerH The alleged problem emerges when that user can continue asking poor questions, whereas a newer user would have been question banned. It can be perceived as having double standards in favor of users who have collected a lot of reputation over time, usually in the days when the bar of quality was indeed lower.

                      – E_net4
                      45 mins ago






                    • 1





                      @E_net4 OK, well Adriaan didn't say "poor" questions. He said "mediocre". A mediocre question should have no problems... but should not be particularly interesting or remarkably well-researched, either. Again, clarification on that is needed, because there's no inherent problem with mediocre questions. Even if he meant "poor", instead, clarification is still needed. What about it is poor? The effort by the OP? The spelling and grammar? Or something worse like the lack of an MCVE or the fact that it's POB/Too Broad/a dupe?

                      – TylerH
                      42 mins ago













                    • @TylerH It is known that some people uphold higher expectations from established users, so the phrasing here doesn't seem surprising to me. That is a fair distinction nonetheless.

                      – E_net4
                      38 mins ago














                    • 1





                      Can you clarify what you mean by mediocre questions here? AFAIK there's no problem with 'mediocre' questions... what matters is whether they're on-topic. Why would a moderator need to do anything here? Not all questions can be great.

                      – TylerH
                      57 mins ago













                    • @TylerH The alleged problem emerges when that user can continue asking poor questions, whereas a newer user would have been question banned. It can be perceived as having double standards in favor of users who have collected a lot of reputation over time, usually in the days when the bar of quality was indeed lower.

                      – E_net4
                      45 mins ago






                    • 1





                      @E_net4 OK, well Adriaan didn't say "poor" questions. He said "mediocre". A mediocre question should have no problems... but should not be particularly interesting or remarkably well-researched, either. Again, clarification on that is needed, because there's no inherent problem with mediocre questions. Even if he meant "poor", instead, clarification is still needed. What about it is poor? The effort by the OP? The spelling and grammar? Or something worse like the lack of an MCVE or the fact that it's POB/Too Broad/a dupe?

                      – TylerH
                      42 mins ago













                    • @TylerH It is known that some people uphold higher expectations from established users, so the phrasing here doesn't seem surprising to me. That is a fair distinction nonetheless.

                      – E_net4
                      38 mins ago








                    1




                    1





                    Can you clarify what you mean by mediocre questions here? AFAIK there's no problem with 'mediocre' questions... what matters is whether they're on-topic. Why would a moderator need to do anything here? Not all questions can be great.

                    – TylerH
                    57 mins ago







                    Can you clarify what you mean by mediocre questions here? AFAIK there's no problem with 'mediocre' questions... what matters is whether they're on-topic. Why would a moderator need to do anything here? Not all questions can be great.

                    – TylerH
                    57 mins ago















                    @TylerH The alleged problem emerges when that user can continue asking poor questions, whereas a newer user would have been question banned. It can be perceived as having double standards in favor of users who have collected a lot of reputation over time, usually in the days when the bar of quality was indeed lower.

                    – E_net4
                    45 mins ago





                    @TylerH The alleged problem emerges when that user can continue asking poor questions, whereas a newer user would have been question banned. It can be perceived as having double standards in favor of users who have collected a lot of reputation over time, usually in the days when the bar of quality was indeed lower.

                    – E_net4
                    45 mins ago




                    1




                    1





                    @E_net4 OK, well Adriaan didn't say "poor" questions. He said "mediocre". A mediocre question should have no problems... but should not be particularly interesting or remarkably well-researched, either. Again, clarification on that is needed, because there's no inherent problem with mediocre questions. Even if he meant "poor", instead, clarification is still needed. What about it is poor? The effort by the OP? The spelling and grammar? Or something worse like the lack of an MCVE or the fact that it's POB/Too Broad/a dupe?

                    – TylerH
                    42 mins ago







                    @E_net4 OK, well Adriaan didn't say "poor" questions. He said "mediocre". A mediocre question should have no problems... but should not be particularly interesting or remarkably well-researched, either. Again, clarification on that is needed, because there's no inherent problem with mediocre questions. Even if he meant "poor", instead, clarification is still needed. What about it is poor? The effort by the OP? The spelling and grammar? Or something worse like the lack of an MCVE or the fact that it's POB/Too Broad/a dupe?

                    – TylerH
                    42 mins ago















                    @TylerH It is known that some people uphold higher expectations from established users, so the phrasing here doesn't seem surprising to me. That is a fair distinction nonetheless.

                    – E_net4
                    38 mins ago





                    @TylerH It is known that some people uphold higher expectations from established users, so the phrasing here doesn't seem surprising to me. That is a fair distinction nonetheless.

                    – E_net4
                    38 mins ago











                    7














                    A chat room has taken to an undesirable topic. It's not clear that ban-hammers need to fly, but the conversation cannot continue as it is (it's just not something Stack Overflow chat was meant to discuss). A new user has entered the room and begins mass-flagging anything they consider bad and demanding the conversation stop by threatening more flags. Regulars in the room counter-flag the new user's threats. How would you handle this?





                    share


























                    • Just curious: Is this scenario purely hypothetical, or has it been known to happen before?

                      – Stephen Kennedy
                      46 mins ago






                    • 1





                      @StephenKennedy Maybe not that extreme but this might give background

                      – rene
                      37 mins ago






                    • 1





                      @StephenKennedy I loosely based it on this incident (I added a lot more drama to this Q), but there have been other incidents where chat got out of hand and moderators (or CMs) were needed.It's a roundabout way about asking what a potential mod would do with an unruly chat room.

                      – Machavity
                      17 mins ago


















                    7














                    A chat room has taken to an undesirable topic. It's not clear that ban-hammers need to fly, but the conversation cannot continue as it is (it's just not something Stack Overflow chat was meant to discuss). A new user has entered the room and begins mass-flagging anything they consider bad and demanding the conversation stop by threatening more flags. Regulars in the room counter-flag the new user's threats. How would you handle this?





                    share


























                    • Just curious: Is this scenario purely hypothetical, or has it been known to happen before?

                      – Stephen Kennedy
                      46 mins ago






                    • 1





                      @StephenKennedy Maybe not that extreme but this might give background

                      – rene
                      37 mins ago






                    • 1





                      @StephenKennedy I loosely based it on this incident (I added a lot more drama to this Q), but there have been other incidents where chat got out of hand and moderators (or CMs) were needed.It's a roundabout way about asking what a potential mod would do with an unruly chat room.

                      – Machavity
                      17 mins ago
















                    7












                    7








                    7







                    A chat room has taken to an undesirable topic. It's not clear that ban-hammers need to fly, but the conversation cannot continue as it is (it's just not something Stack Overflow chat was meant to discuss). A new user has entered the room and begins mass-flagging anything they consider bad and demanding the conversation stop by threatening more flags. Regulars in the room counter-flag the new user's threats. How would you handle this?





                    share















                    A chat room has taken to an undesirable topic. It's not clear that ban-hammers need to fly, but the conversation cannot continue as it is (it's just not something Stack Overflow chat was meant to discuss). A new user has entered the room and begins mass-flagging anything they consider bad and demanding the conversation stop by threatening more flags. Regulars in the room counter-flag the new user's threats. How would you handle this?






                    share













                    share


                    share








                    edited 9 mins ago

























                    answered 2 hours ago









                    MachavityMachavity

                    24.4k1188165




                    24.4k1188165













                    • Just curious: Is this scenario purely hypothetical, or has it been known to happen before?

                      – Stephen Kennedy
                      46 mins ago






                    • 1





                      @StephenKennedy Maybe not that extreme but this might give background

                      – rene
                      37 mins ago






                    • 1





                      @StephenKennedy I loosely based it on this incident (I added a lot more drama to this Q), but there have been other incidents where chat got out of hand and moderators (or CMs) were needed.It's a roundabout way about asking what a potential mod would do with an unruly chat room.

                      – Machavity
                      17 mins ago





















                    • Just curious: Is this scenario purely hypothetical, or has it been known to happen before?

                      – Stephen Kennedy
                      46 mins ago






                    • 1





                      @StephenKennedy Maybe not that extreme but this might give background

                      – rene
                      37 mins ago






                    • 1





                      @StephenKennedy I loosely based it on this incident (I added a lot more drama to this Q), but there have been other incidents where chat got out of hand and moderators (or CMs) were needed.It's a roundabout way about asking what a potential mod would do with an unruly chat room.

                      – Machavity
                      17 mins ago



















                    Just curious: Is this scenario purely hypothetical, or has it been known to happen before?

                    – Stephen Kennedy
                    46 mins ago





                    Just curious: Is this scenario purely hypothetical, or has it been known to happen before?

                    – Stephen Kennedy
                    46 mins ago




                    1




                    1





                    @StephenKennedy Maybe not that extreme but this might give background

                    – rene
                    37 mins ago





                    @StephenKennedy Maybe not that extreme but this might give background

                    – rene
                    37 mins ago




                    1




                    1





                    @StephenKennedy I loosely based it on this incident (I added a lot more drama to this Q), but there have been other incidents where chat got out of hand and moderators (or CMs) were needed.It's a roundabout way about asking what a potential mod would do with an unruly chat room.

                    – Machavity
                    17 mins ago







                    @StephenKennedy I loosely based it on this incident (I added a lot more drama to this Q), but there have been other incidents where chat got out of hand and moderators (or CMs) were needed.It's a roundabout way about asking what a potential mod would do with an unruly chat room.

                    – Machavity
                    17 mins ago













                    1














                    Moderators are not selected because they are domain experts in certain tags, but it so happens that you are an expert in one such tag. You see that several members of the community have elected to close a question as a duplicate, but you see that the duplicates don't actually answer the question as stated, nor do they provide a useful signpost for the asker. How do you proceed?





                    share




























                      1














                      Moderators are not selected because they are domain experts in certain tags, but it so happens that you are an expert in one such tag. You see that several members of the community have elected to close a question as a duplicate, but you see that the duplicates don't actually answer the question as stated, nor do they provide a useful signpost for the asker. How do you proceed?





                      share


























                        1












                        1








                        1







                        Moderators are not selected because they are domain experts in certain tags, but it so happens that you are an expert in one such tag. You see that several members of the community have elected to close a question as a duplicate, but you see that the duplicates don't actually answer the question as stated, nor do they provide a useful signpost for the asker. How do you proceed?





                        share













                        Moderators are not selected because they are domain experts in certain tags, but it so happens that you are an expert in one such tag. You see that several members of the community have elected to close a question as a duplicate, but you see that the duplicates don't actually answer the question as stated, nor do they provide a useful signpost for the asker. How do you proceed?






                        share











                        share


                        share










                        answered 17 mins ago









                        MakotoMakoto

                        82.2k76482750




                        82.2k76482750























                            1














                            If you're active on Meta, can you point to some of your questions or answers which have been received poorly, and what information you've gleaned as a result of those discussions?





                            share




























                              1














                              If you're active on Meta, can you point to some of your questions or answers which have been received poorly, and what information you've gleaned as a result of those discussions?





                              share


























                                1












                                1








                                1







                                If you're active on Meta, can you point to some of your questions or answers which have been received poorly, and what information you've gleaned as a result of those discussions?





                                share













                                If you're active on Meta, can you point to some of your questions or answers which have been received poorly, and what information you've gleaned as a result of those discussions?






                                share











                                share


                                share










                                answered 15 mins ago









                                MakotoMakoto

                                82.2k76482750




                                82.2k76482750























                                    0














                                    How effective are you with the tools you have at your disposal right now?



                                    Please tell us: how many close votes and delete votes did you cast in the first two months of 2019? How many helpful flags did you raise, and how many reviews did you complete in each queue? What is your median for all of the above?





                                    share


























                                    • How would one find this information out? As far as I can tell I'd need to figure out how many pages to go back before I'm one year in the past, then multiply by the number of items per page.

                                      – Wai Ha Lee
                                      1 hour ago











                                    • @WaiHaLee This year started just about 8 weeks ago, so not too much work. I'll clarify.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      1 hour ago






                                    • 1





                                      @JoshCaswell Oops, misread. Some totals are presented, but some actions on deleted items are not visible for example. I'm asking for a clearer, more detailed breakdown.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      1 hour ago








                                    • 1





                                      How about "In January and February 2019, ....."? By the time the nominations are open it'll be March and it'll be the same 59 day period for every user.

                                      – Wai Ha Lee
                                      1 hour ago






                                    • 1





                                      @WaiHaLee Fine with me.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      1 hour ago











                                    • FWIW candidates already have a link to the reviews tab of their profile in the nomination user card, so we can already see how many reviews they've done in each queue. Them answering this question would save us one click per candidate each.

                                      – TylerH
                                      56 mins ago













                                    • @TylerH That was Josh's point as well, which he deleted for some reason. Quoting myself for reference: "Some totals are presented, but some actions on deleted items are not visible for example. I'm asking for a clearer, more detailed breakdown."

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      54 mins ago











                                    • Won't we get most of this information from the context of the "Moderation score"?

                                      – Makoto
                                      13 mins ago






                                    • 1





                                      @TylerH - not all reviews show (for me, at least) in the 'all actions/reviews', such as those in the Low Quality Posts queue.

                                      – Wai Ha Lee
                                      13 mins ago











                                    • @Makoto Not really. That a) just counts rep and badges, thus missing several of the items I ask about and b) does not discern between recent activity and a candidates action of, say, years. For example, I still have 40/40 mod score, but this question would easliy expose my lack of commitment in recent times.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      11 mins ago













                                    • Sure, but I'm confused as to the value of it. Are you looking for someone who can handle flags, or is a robot? Help me paint a picture here.

                                      – Makoto
                                      9 mins ago











                                    • @Makoto I'm looking for someone who is actually going to handle flags. Thus, I want to see they are using the tools they currently have available to at least a large extend. A lot of people could be good mods in the sense that they are able to correctly judge a flag, but well... If every single elected mod actually put in their 30 min a day, we probably would not be having an election right now.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      7 mins ago













                                    • Now whether the extra information that would come from this is worth one of the eight slots is a matter of opinion, of course. Votes will tell.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      4 mins ago













                                    • I'm not trying to be facetious, but I do maintain that we'll establish a decent amount from the "Moderator score" metric that comes out with candidates. I've found in the past that said score can leave a bad taste in my mouth with someone who does get elected but doesn't feel like a good moderator. I won't disagree that handling flags is important, but at the same time, I'm not convinced that numbers alone would tell us anything meaningful about how they handle those flags.

                                      – Makoto
                                      3 mins ago
















                                    0














                                    How effective are you with the tools you have at your disposal right now?



                                    Please tell us: how many close votes and delete votes did you cast in the first two months of 2019? How many helpful flags did you raise, and how many reviews did you complete in each queue? What is your median for all of the above?





                                    share


























                                    • How would one find this information out? As far as I can tell I'd need to figure out how many pages to go back before I'm one year in the past, then multiply by the number of items per page.

                                      – Wai Ha Lee
                                      1 hour ago











                                    • @WaiHaLee This year started just about 8 weeks ago, so not too much work. I'll clarify.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      1 hour ago






                                    • 1





                                      @JoshCaswell Oops, misread. Some totals are presented, but some actions on deleted items are not visible for example. I'm asking for a clearer, more detailed breakdown.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      1 hour ago








                                    • 1





                                      How about "In January and February 2019, ....."? By the time the nominations are open it'll be March and it'll be the same 59 day period for every user.

                                      – Wai Ha Lee
                                      1 hour ago






                                    • 1





                                      @WaiHaLee Fine with me.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      1 hour ago











                                    • FWIW candidates already have a link to the reviews tab of their profile in the nomination user card, so we can already see how many reviews they've done in each queue. Them answering this question would save us one click per candidate each.

                                      – TylerH
                                      56 mins ago













                                    • @TylerH That was Josh's point as well, which he deleted for some reason. Quoting myself for reference: "Some totals are presented, but some actions on deleted items are not visible for example. I'm asking for a clearer, more detailed breakdown."

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      54 mins ago











                                    • Won't we get most of this information from the context of the "Moderation score"?

                                      – Makoto
                                      13 mins ago






                                    • 1





                                      @TylerH - not all reviews show (for me, at least) in the 'all actions/reviews', such as those in the Low Quality Posts queue.

                                      – Wai Ha Lee
                                      13 mins ago











                                    • @Makoto Not really. That a) just counts rep and badges, thus missing several of the items I ask about and b) does not discern between recent activity and a candidates action of, say, years. For example, I still have 40/40 mod score, but this question would easliy expose my lack of commitment in recent times.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      11 mins ago













                                    • Sure, but I'm confused as to the value of it. Are you looking for someone who can handle flags, or is a robot? Help me paint a picture here.

                                      – Makoto
                                      9 mins ago











                                    • @Makoto I'm looking for someone who is actually going to handle flags. Thus, I want to see they are using the tools they currently have available to at least a large extend. A lot of people could be good mods in the sense that they are able to correctly judge a flag, but well... If every single elected mod actually put in their 30 min a day, we probably would not be having an election right now.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      7 mins ago













                                    • Now whether the extra information that would come from this is worth one of the eight slots is a matter of opinion, of course. Votes will tell.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      4 mins ago













                                    • I'm not trying to be facetious, but I do maintain that we'll establish a decent amount from the "Moderator score" metric that comes out with candidates. I've found in the past that said score can leave a bad taste in my mouth with someone who does get elected but doesn't feel like a good moderator. I won't disagree that handling flags is important, but at the same time, I'm not convinced that numbers alone would tell us anything meaningful about how they handle those flags.

                                      – Makoto
                                      3 mins ago














                                    0












                                    0








                                    0







                                    How effective are you with the tools you have at your disposal right now?



                                    Please tell us: how many close votes and delete votes did you cast in the first two months of 2019? How many helpful flags did you raise, and how many reviews did you complete in each queue? What is your median for all of the above?





                                    share















                                    How effective are you with the tools you have at your disposal right now?



                                    Please tell us: how many close votes and delete votes did you cast in the first two months of 2019? How many helpful flags did you raise, and how many reviews did you complete in each queue? What is your median for all of the above?






                                    share













                                    share


                                    share








                                    edited 1 hour ago

























                                    answered 1 hour ago









                                    Baum mit AugenBaum mit Augen

                                    41.3k31825




                                    41.3k31825













                                    • How would one find this information out? As far as I can tell I'd need to figure out how many pages to go back before I'm one year in the past, then multiply by the number of items per page.

                                      – Wai Ha Lee
                                      1 hour ago











                                    • @WaiHaLee This year started just about 8 weeks ago, so not too much work. I'll clarify.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      1 hour ago






                                    • 1





                                      @JoshCaswell Oops, misread. Some totals are presented, but some actions on deleted items are not visible for example. I'm asking for a clearer, more detailed breakdown.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      1 hour ago








                                    • 1





                                      How about "In January and February 2019, ....."? By the time the nominations are open it'll be March and it'll be the same 59 day period for every user.

                                      – Wai Ha Lee
                                      1 hour ago






                                    • 1





                                      @WaiHaLee Fine with me.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      1 hour ago











                                    • FWIW candidates already have a link to the reviews tab of their profile in the nomination user card, so we can already see how many reviews they've done in each queue. Them answering this question would save us one click per candidate each.

                                      – TylerH
                                      56 mins ago













                                    • @TylerH That was Josh's point as well, which he deleted for some reason. Quoting myself for reference: "Some totals are presented, but some actions on deleted items are not visible for example. I'm asking for a clearer, more detailed breakdown."

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      54 mins ago











                                    • Won't we get most of this information from the context of the "Moderation score"?

                                      – Makoto
                                      13 mins ago






                                    • 1





                                      @TylerH - not all reviews show (for me, at least) in the 'all actions/reviews', such as those in the Low Quality Posts queue.

                                      – Wai Ha Lee
                                      13 mins ago











                                    • @Makoto Not really. That a) just counts rep and badges, thus missing several of the items I ask about and b) does not discern between recent activity and a candidates action of, say, years. For example, I still have 40/40 mod score, but this question would easliy expose my lack of commitment in recent times.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      11 mins ago













                                    • Sure, but I'm confused as to the value of it. Are you looking for someone who can handle flags, or is a robot? Help me paint a picture here.

                                      – Makoto
                                      9 mins ago











                                    • @Makoto I'm looking for someone who is actually going to handle flags. Thus, I want to see they are using the tools they currently have available to at least a large extend. A lot of people could be good mods in the sense that they are able to correctly judge a flag, but well... If every single elected mod actually put in their 30 min a day, we probably would not be having an election right now.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      7 mins ago













                                    • Now whether the extra information that would come from this is worth one of the eight slots is a matter of opinion, of course. Votes will tell.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      4 mins ago













                                    • I'm not trying to be facetious, but I do maintain that we'll establish a decent amount from the "Moderator score" metric that comes out with candidates. I've found in the past that said score can leave a bad taste in my mouth with someone who does get elected but doesn't feel like a good moderator. I won't disagree that handling flags is important, but at the same time, I'm not convinced that numbers alone would tell us anything meaningful about how they handle those flags.

                                      – Makoto
                                      3 mins ago



















                                    • How would one find this information out? As far as I can tell I'd need to figure out how many pages to go back before I'm one year in the past, then multiply by the number of items per page.

                                      – Wai Ha Lee
                                      1 hour ago











                                    • @WaiHaLee This year started just about 8 weeks ago, so not too much work. I'll clarify.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      1 hour ago






                                    • 1





                                      @JoshCaswell Oops, misread. Some totals are presented, but some actions on deleted items are not visible for example. I'm asking for a clearer, more detailed breakdown.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      1 hour ago








                                    • 1





                                      How about "In January and February 2019, ....."? By the time the nominations are open it'll be March and it'll be the same 59 day period for every user.

                                      – Wai Ha Lee
                                      1 hour ago






                                    • 1





                                      @WaiHaLee Fine with me.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      1 hour ago











                                    • FWIW candidates already have a link to the reviews tab of their profile in the nomination user card, so we can already see how many reviews they've done in each queue. Them answering this question would save us one click per candidate each.

                                      – TylerH
                                      56 mins ago













                                    • @TylerH That was Josh's point as well, which he deleted for some reason. Quoting myself for reference: "Some totals are presented, but some actions on deleted items are not visible for example. I'm asking for a clearer, more detailed breakdown."

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      54 mins ago











                                    • Won't we get most of this information from the context of the "Moderation score"?

                                      – Makoto
                                      13 mins ago






                                    • 1





                                      @TylerH - not all reviews show (for me, at least) in the 'all actions/reviews', such as those in the Low Quality Posts queue.

                                      – Wai Ha Lee
                                      13 mins ago











                                    • @Makoto Not really. That a) just counts rep and badges, thus missing several of the items I ask about and b) does not discern between recent activity and a candidates action of, say, years. For example, I still have 40/40 mod score, but this question would easliy expose my lack of commitment in recent times.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      11 mins ago













                                    • Sure, but I'm confused as to the value of it. Are you looking for someone who can handle flags, or is a robot? Help me paint a picture here.

                                      – Makoto
                                      9 mins ago











                                    • @Makoto I'm looking for someone who is actually going to handle flags. Thus, I want to see they are using the tools they currently have available to at least a large extend. A lot of people could be good mods in the sense that they are able to correctly judge a flag, but well... If every single elected mod actually put in their 30 min a day, we probably would not be having an election right now.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      7 mins ago













                                    • Now whether the extra information that would come from this is worth one of the eight slots is a matter of opinion, of course. Votes will tell.

                                      – Baum mit Augen
                                      4 mins ago













                                    • I'm not trying to be facetious, but I do maintain that we'll establish a decent amount from the "Moderator score" metric that comes out with candidates. I've found in the past that said score can leave a bad taste in my mouth with someone who does get elected but doesn't feel like a good moderator. I won't disagree that handling flags is important, but at the same time, I'm not convinced that numbers alone would tell us anything meaningful about how they handle those flags.

                                      – Makoto
                                      3 mins ago

















                                    How would one find this information out? As far as I can tell I'd need to figure out how many pages to go back before I'm one year in the past, then multiply by the number of items per page.

                                    – Wai Ha Lee
                                    1 hour ago





                                    How would one find this information out? As far as I can tell I'd need to figure out how many pages to go back before I'm one year in the past, then multiply by the number of items per page.

                                    – Wai Ha Lee
                                    1 hour ago













                                    @WaiHaLee This year started just about 8 weeks ago, so not too much work. I'll clarify.

                                    – Baum mit Augen
                                    1 hour ago





                                    @WaiHaLee This year started just about 8 weeks ago, so not too much work. I'll clarify.

                                    – Baum mit Augen
                                    1 hour ago




                                    1




                                    1





                                    @JoshCaswell Oops, misread. Some totals are presented, but some actions on deleted items are not visible for example. I'm asking for a clearer, more detailed breakdown.

                                    – Baum mit Augen
                                    1 hour ago







                                    @JoshCaswell Oops, misread. Some totals are presented, but some actions on deleted items are not visible for example. I'm asking for a clearer, more detailed breakdown.

                                    – Baum mit Augen
                                    1 hour ago






                                    1




                                    1





                                    How about "In January and February 2019, ....."? By the time the nominations are open it'll be March and it'll be the same 59 day period for every user.

                                    – Wai Ha Lee
                                    1 hour ago





                                    How about "In January and February 2019, ....."? By the time the nominations are open it'll be March and it'll be the same 59 day period for every user.

                                    – Wai Ha Lee
                                    1 hour ago




                                    1




                                    1





                                    @WaiHaLee Fine with me.

                                    – Baum mit Augen
                                    1 hour ago





                                    @WaiHaLee Fine with me.

                                    – Baum mit Augen
                                    1 hour ago













                                    FWIW candidates already have a link to the reviews tab of their profile in the nomination user card, so we can already see how many reviews they've done in each queue. Them answering this question would save us one click per candidate each.

                                    – TylerH
                                    56 mins ago







                                    FWIW candidates already have a link to the reviews tab of their profile in the nomination user card, so we can already see how many reviews they've done in each queue. Them answering this question would save us one click per candidate each.

                                    – TylerH
                                    56 mins ago















                                    @TylerH That was Josh's point as well, which he deleted for some reason. Quoting myself for reference: "Some totals are presented, but some actions on deleted items are not visible for example. I'm asking for a clearer, more detailed breakdown."

                                    – Baum mit Augen
                                    54 mins ago





                                    @TylerH That was Josh's point as well, which he deleted for some reason. Quoting myself for reference: "Some totals are presented, but some actions on deleted items are not visible for example. I'm asking for a clearer, more detailed breakdown."

                                    – Baum mit Augen
                                    54 mins ago













                                    Won't we get most of this information from the context of the "Moderation score"?

                                    – Makoto
                                    13 mins ago





                                    Won't we get most of this information from the context of the "Moderation score"?

                                    – Makoto
                                    13 mins ago




                                    1




                                    1





                                    @TylerH - not all reviews show (for me, at least) in the 'all actions/reviews', such as those in the Low Quality Posts queue.

                                    – Wai Ha Lee
                                    13 mins ago





                                    @TylerH - not all reviews show (for me, at least) in the 'all actions/reviews', such as those in the Low Quality Posts queue.

                                    – Wai Ha Lee
                                    13 mins ago













                                    @Makoto Not really. That a) just counts rep and badges, thus missing several of the items I ask about and b) does not discern between recent activity and a candidates action of, say, years. For example, I still have 40/40 mod score, but this question would easliy expose my lack of commitment in recent times.

                                    – Baum mit Augen
                                    11 mins ago







                                    @Makoto Not really. That a) just counts rep and badges, thus missing several of the items I ask about and b) does not discern between recent activity and a candidates action of, say, years. For example, I still have 40/40 mod score, but this question would easliy expose my lack of commitment in recent times.

                                    – Baum mit Augen
                                    11 mins ago















                                    Sure, but I'm confused as to the value of it. Are you looking for someone who can handle flags, or is a robot? Help me paint a picture here.

                                    – Makoto
                                    9 mins ago





                                    Sure, but I'm confused as to the value of it. Are you looking for someone who can handle flags, or is a robot? Help me paint a picture here.

                                    – Makoto
                                    9 mins ago













                                    @Makoto I'm looking for someone who is actually going to handle flags. Thus, I want to see they are using the tools they currently have available to at least a large extend. A lot of people could be good mods in the sense that they are able to correctly judge a flag, but well... If every single elected mod actually put in their 30 min a day, we probably would not be having an election right now.

                                    – Baum mit Augen
                                    7 mins ago







                                    @Makoto I'm looking for someone who is actually going to handle flags. Thus, I want to see they are using the tools they currently have available to at least a large extend. A lot of people could be good mods in the sense that they are able to correctly judge a flag, but well... If every single elected mod actually put in their 30 min a day, we probably would not be having an election right now.

                                    – Baum mit Augen
                                    7 mins ago















                                    Now whether the extra information that would come from this is worth one of the eight slots is a matter of opinion, of course. Votes will tell.

                                    – Baum mit Augen
                                    4 mins ago







                                    Now whether the extra information that would come from this is worth one of the eight slots is a matter of opinion, of course. Votes will tell.

                                    – Baum mit Augen
                                    4 mins ago















                                    I'm not trying to be facetious, but I do maintain that we'll establish a decent amount from the "Moderator score" metric that comes out with candidates. I've found in the past that said score can leave a bad taste in my mouth with someone who does get elected but doesn't feel like a good moderator. I won't disagree that handling flags is important, but at the same time, I'm not convinced that numbers alone would tell us anything meaningful about how they handle those flags.

                                    – Makoto
                                    3 mins ago





                                    I'm not trying to be facetious, but I do maintain that we'll establish a decent amount from the "Moderator score" metric that comes out with candidates. I've found in the past that said score can leave a bad taste in my mouth with someone who does get elected but doesn't feel like a good moderator. I won't disagree that handling flags is important, but at the same time, I'm not convinced that numbers alone would tell us anything meaningful about how they handle those flags.

                                    – Makoto
                                    3 mins ago











                                    -2














                                    In your own words, what role do diamond moderators play with the Welcoming drive, and what can be done to make that role more valuable for beginners and veterans alike?





                                    share




























                                      -2














                                      In your own words, what role do diamond moderators play with the Welcoming drive, and what can be done to make that role more valuable for beginners and veterans alike?





                                      share


























                                        -2












                                        -2








                                        -2







                                        In your own words, what role do diamond moderators play with the Welcoming drive, and what can be done to make that role more valuable for beginners and veterans alike?





                                        share













                                        In your own words, what role do diamond moderators play with the Welcoming drive, and what can be done to make that role more valuable for beginners and veterans alike?






                                        share











                                        share


                                        share










                                        answered 12 mins ago









                                        MakotoMakoto

                                        82.2k76482750




                                        82.2k76482750























                                            -7














                                            Consider the case,
                                            where a user flags an answer that appears to be spam,
                                            because the post doesn't disclose the author's affiliation with a recommended non-free product.



                                            The answer is a few years old and the author hasn't posted any similar answers (i.e. spam) since then.



                                            The answered question itself appears to be off-topic (asking for an off-site resource).



                                            How do you act on the flag, the answer, and the question?





                                            share




























                                              -7














                                              Consider the case,
                                              where a user flags an answer that appears to be spam,
                                              because the post doesn't disclose the author's affiliation with a recommended non-free product.



                                              The answer is a few years old and the author hasn't posted any similar answers (i.e. spam) since then.



                                              The answered question itself appears to be off-topic (asking for an off-site resource).



                                              How do you act on the flag, the answer, and the question?





                                              share


























                                                -7












                                                -7








                                                -7







                                                Consider the case,
                                                where a user flags an answer that appears to be spam,
                                                because the post doesn't disclose the author's affiliation with a recommended non-free product.



                                                The answer is a few years old and the author hasn't posted any similar answers (i.e. spam) since then.



                                                The answered question itself appears to be off-topic (asking for an off-site resource).



                                                How do you act on the flag, the answer, and the question?





                                                share













                                                Consider the case,
                                                where a user flags an answer that appears to be spam,
                                                because the post doesn't disclose the author's affiliation with a recommended non-free product.



                                                The answer is a few years old and the author hasn't posted any similar answers (i.e. spam) since then.



                                                The answered question itself appears to be off-topic (asking for an off-site resource).



                                                How do you act on the flag, the answer, and the question?






                                                share











                                                share


                                                share










                                                answered 2 hours ago









                                                honkhonk

                                                4,86742942




                                                4,86742942















                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    IEEEtran - How to include ORCID in TeX/PDF with PdfLatexIs there a standard way to include ORCID in TeX /...

                                                    Cicindela nigrior Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneCicindela varians unicolorManual for the Identification of the...

                                                    Glossaries-extra: Adding glossaries package to “Clas­sicTh­e­sis” template by Dr. André Miede v. 4.6 ...