Why is there so little support for joining EFTA in the British parliament? Announcing the...

How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics

Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions

What was the last profitable war?

Is it OK to use the testing sample to compare algorithms?

Is the Mordenkainens' Sword spell underpowered?

Any stored/leased 737s that could substitute for grounded MAXs?

What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思?

Short story about astronauts fertilizing soil with their own bodies

Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?

Does the main washing effect of soap come from foam?

By what mechanism was the 2017 UK General Election called?

When does a function NOT have an antiderivative?

.bashrc alias for a command with fixed second parameter

Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?

How to ask rejected full-time candidates to apply to teach individual courses?

Why can't fire hurt Daenerys but it did to Jon Snow in season 1?

Are there any irrational/transcendental numbers for which the distribution of decimal digits is not uniform?

systemd and copy (/bin/cp): no such file or directory

Keep at all times, the minus sign above aligned with minus sign below

Why is there so little support for joining EFTA in the British parliament?

Why did Bronn offer to be Tyrion Lannister's champion in trial by combat?

Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell

Why does BitLocker not use RSA?

Table formatting with tabularx?



Why is there so little support for joining EFTA in the British parliament?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Does the new EU-Swiss draft deal contain explicit provisions on immigration quotas?Is there a clear statement from the DUP on their position on the post-Brexit border with Ireland?Why is it impossible to leave the Single Market without a hard Irish border?What is the UK government hoping to gain by the continued prevarication on brexit negotiations?Is the UK asking for increased influence over the EU post-Brexit?Could a post-no-deal-Brexit UK urgently join EFTA and access the ESM that way?The thinking behind regulatory alignment for goodsWhy doesn't the UK hold a second Brexit referendum to clarify what the public wants from Brexit?Can the UK deal selectively with Ireland post-Brexit without falling afoul of WTO rules?How do Brexiteers interpret Trump's insistence on a wall?Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?












1















What are disadvantages of joining European Free Trade Association
(EFTA) and negotiating deals similar to the ones between the EU and Switzerland?



It would eliminate the need for a hard border in Northern Ireland (important for supporters of a soft Brexit), let the UK negotiate its own trade agreements and give it control over freedom of movement by making it subject to bilateral agreements (important for supporters of a hard Brexit).



Yet, the indicative votes have shown that this the least supported option in the British parliament. I understand why remainers oppose it, but why is it also opposed by so many Brexiteers?










share|improve this question





























    1















    What are disadvantages of joining European Free Trade Association
    (EFTA) and negotiating deals similar to the ones between the EU and Switzerland?



    It would eliminate the need for a hard border in Northern Ireland (important for supporters of a soft Brexit), let the UK negotiate its own trade agreements and give it control over freedom of movement by making it subject to bilateral agreements (important for supporters of a hard Brexit).



    Yet, the indicative votes have shown that this the least supported option in the British parliament. I understand why remainers oppose it, but why is it also opposed by so many Brexiteers?










    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1








      What are disadvantages of joining European Free Trade Association
      (EFTA) and negotiating deals similar to the ones between the EU and Switzerland?



      It would eliminate the need for a hard border in Northern Ireland (important for supporters of a soft Brexit), let the UK negotiate its own trade agreements and give it control over freedom of movement by making it subject to bilateral agreements (important for supporters of a hard Brexit).



      Yet, the indicative votes have shown that this the least supported option in the British parliament. I understand why remainers oppose it, but why is it also opposed by so many Brexiteers?










      share|improve this question
















      What are disadvantages of joining European Free Trade Association
      (EFTA) and negotiating deals similar to the ones between the EU and Switzerland?



      It would eliminate the need for a hard border in Northern Ireland (important for supporters of a soft Brexit), let the UK negotiate its own trade agreements and give it control over freedom of movement by making it subject to bilateral agreements (important for supporters of a hard Brexit).



      Yet, the indicative votes have shown that this the least supported option in the British parliament. I understand why remainers oppose it, but why is it also opposed by so many Brexiteers?







      united-kingdom european-union brexit efta






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 1 hour ago









      Brythan

      70.9k8150239




      70.9k8150239










      asked 3 hours ago









      michaumichau

      1757




      1757






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          According to the slides by Michel Barnier (also printed below), the 'Switzerland option' has certain requirements that may not fit with UK red lines.



          I will quote the point from the slide, which are possible UK red lines, and say how these could be overcome to make the Switzerland option work.




          • No free movement. To overcome this, the UK must give in that it cannot block free movement of people. In the Swiss case that's covered by this agreement.


          • No substantial financial contribution. To overcome this, the UK would have to contribute to the EU budget. Consider this article on the website of the Swiss confederation.


          • Regulatory autonomy. To overcome this, the UK has to implement some EU laws to have and maintain EU market access. For the Swiss case, consider this page by fullfact.org.



          Slide about UK options






          share|improve this answer


























          • The freedom of movement issue is not entirely correct; the Swiss have exceptions allowing them to impose quotas sem.admin.ch/sem/en/home/themen/fza_schweiz-eu-efta.html which led to a big fight with the EU. thelocal.ch/20181213/…

            – Fizz
            1 hour ago













          • @Fizz but it's free movement of people for citizens of most EU countries, right? The link in my answer only mentions quotas for Croatian, Romanian and Bulgarian citizens and only for a limited time period (which is almost over for Romania and Bulgaria and over for Croatia next July of year). Or is there some more recent development?

            – JJJ
            1 hour ago











          • @Brythan it's phrased a bit poorly in the slide. The thing is, if the UK has red line "we want no financial contribution" then they cannot have the Swiss option. The alternative being that they do contribute to the EU budget.

            – JJJ
            1 hour ago













          • The fights seems centered on on the Swiss preemption clauses on jobs. But no Swiss job -> no right to reside in Swiss; you can temporarily visit of course.

            – Fizz
            1 hour ago











          • @Fizz interesting, perhaps more suitable for a different question. I think it's too nuanced to fully explain here. Also, I'm not sure how it's different from being an EU member. If you have no job as an EU citizen in another EU country they can send you back after a certain period as well. See here.

            – JJJ
            1 hour ago



















          0














          Probably because the "Swiss model" is in flux. DW said




          After four years of hard-fought negotiations, Switzerland has shrugged off a deadline for a treaty with the EU. It is concerned that freedom of movement requirements will flood the wealthy country with low-wage labor.




          Also FT said




          Swiss politicians resent what they regard as “blackmail” by Brussels [...]




          Also the EU has granted the Swiss an extension of sorts to figure it out. That sounds somewhat familiar...



          In the recent past, the Swiss were able impose some temporary immigration quotas on some EU countries (mostly newly admitted members); a few of these quotas are still in place. However it seems the new (draft) deal EU-Swiss doesn't allow for that. There's still some wiggle room in it for Swiss preemption for "at risk" jobs, itself a hard-fought issue in the negotiations. But this must look like a rather weaksauce solution in the UK given the hardline "take back control of our borders" stance.



          Also DW suggested a mutual wait-game of the Swiss and the UK:




          the Commission wary of going easy on the Swiss for fear of providing ammunition to Brexiteers. Meanwhile, many Swiss are happy to wait and see what sort of deal the British can extract for themselves out of the EU.







          share|improve this answer


























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "475"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40895%2fwhy-is-there-so-little-support-for-joining-efta-in-the-british-parliament%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            According to the slides by Michel Barnier (also printed below), the 'Switzerland option' has certain requirements that may not fit with UK red lines.



            I will quote the point from the slide, which are possible UK red lines, and say how these could be overcome to make the Switzerland option work.




            • No free movement. To overcome this, the UK must give in that it cannot block free movement of people. In the Swiss case that's covered by this agreement.


            • No substantial financial contribution. To overcome this, the UK would have to contribute to the EU budget. Consider this article on the website of the Swiss confederation.


            • Regulatory autonomy. To overcome this, the UK has to implement some EU laws to have and maintain EU market access. For the Swiss case, consider this page by fullfact.org.



            Slide about UK options






            share|improve this answer


























            • The freedom of movement issue is not entirely correct; the Swiss have exceptions allowing them to impose quotas sem.admin.ch/sem/en/home/themen/fza_schweiz-eu-efta.html which led to a big fight with the EU. thelocal.ch/20181213/…

              – Fizz
              1 hour ago













            • @Fizz but it's free movement of people for citizens of most EU countries, right? The link in my answer only mentions quotas for Croatian, Romanian and Bulgarian citizens and only for a limited time period (which is almost over for Romania and Bulgaria and over for Croatia next July of year). Or is there some more recent development?

              – JJJ
              1 hour ago











            • @Brythan it's phrased a bit poorly in the slide. The thing is, if the UK has red line "we want no financial contribution" then they cannot have the Swiss option. The alternative being that they do contribute to the EU budget.

              – JJJ
              1 hour ago













            • The fights seems centered on on the Swiss preemption clauses on jobs. But no Swiss job -> no right to reside in Swiss; you can temporarily visit of course.

              – Fizz
              1 hour ago











            • @Fizz interesting, perhaps more suitable for a different question. I think it's too nuanced to fully explain here. Also, I'm not sure how it's different from being an EU member. If you have no job as an EU citizen in another EU country they can send you back after a certain period as well. See here.

              – JJJ
              1 hour ago
















            2














            According to the slides by Michel Barnier (also printed below), the 'Switzerland option' has certain requirements that may not fit with UK red lines.



            I will quote the point from the slide, which are possible UK red lines, and say how these could be overcome to make the Switzerland option work.




            • No free movement. To overcome this, the UK must give in that it cannot block free movement of people. In the Swiss case that's covered by this agreement.


            • No substantial financial contribution. To overcome this, the UK would have to contribute to the EU budget. Consider this article on the website of the Swiss confederation.


            • Regulatory autonomy. To overcome this, the UK has to implement some EU laws to have and maintain EU market access. For the Swiss case, consider this page by fullfact.org.



            Slide about UK options






            share|improve this answer


























            • The freedom of movement issue is not entirely correct; the Swiss have exceptions allowing them to impose quotas sem.admin.ch/sem/en/home/themen/fza_schweiz-eu-efta.html which led to a big fight with the EU. thelocal.ch/20181213/…

              – Fizz
              1 hour ago













            • @Fizz but it's free movement of people for citizens of most EU countries, right? The link in my answer only mentions quotas for Croatian, Romanian and Bulgarian citizens and only for a limited time period (which is almost over for Romania and Bulgaria and over for Croatia next July of year). Or is there some more recent development?

              – JJJ
              1 hour ago











            • @Brythan it's phrased a bit poorly in the slide. The thing is, if the UK has red line "we want no financial contribution" then they cannot have the Swiss option. The alternative being that they do contribute to the EU budget.

              – JJJ
              1 hour ago













            • The fights seems centered on on the Swiss preemption clauses on jobs. But no Swiss job -> no right to reside in Swiss; you can temporarily visit of course.

              – Fizz
              1 hour ago











            • @Fizz interesting, perhaps more suitable for a different question. I think it's too nuanced to fully explain here. Also, I'm not sure how it's different from being an EU member. If you have no job as an EU citizen in another EU country they can send you back after a certain period as well. See here.

              – JJJ
              1 hour ago














            2












            2








            2







            According to the slides by Michel Barnier (also printed below), the 'Switzerland option' has certain requirements that may not fit with UK red lines.



            I will quote the point from the slide, which are possible UK red lines, and say how these could be overcome to make the Switzerland option work.




            • No free movement. To overcome this, the UK must give in that it cannot block free movement of people. In the Swiss case that's covered by this agreement.


            • No substantial financial contribution. To overcome this, the UK would have to contribute to the EU budget. Consider this article on the website of the Swiss confederation.


            • Regulatory autonomy. To overcome this, the UK has to implement some EU laws to have and maintain EU market access. For the Swiss case, consider this page by fullfact.org.



            Slide about UK options






            share|improve this answer















            According to the slides by Michel Barnier (also printed below), the 'Switzerland option' has certain requirements that may not fit with UK red lines.



            I will quote the point from the slide, which are possible UK red lines, and say how these could be overcome to make the Switzerland option work.




            • No free movement. To overcome this, the UK must give in that it cannot block free movement of people. In the Swiss case that's covered by this agreement.


            • No substantial financial contribution. To overcome this, the UK would have to contribute to the EU budget. Consider this article on the website of the Swiss confederation.


            • Regulatory autonomy. To overcome this, the UK has to implement some EU laws to have and maintain EU market access. For the Swiss case, consider this page by fullfact.org.



            Slide about UK options







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 1 hour ago

























            answered 2 hours ago









            JJJJJJ

            7,30622661




            7,30622661













            • The freedom of movement issue is not entirely correct; the Swiss have exceptions allowing them to impose quotas sem.admin.ch/sem/en/home/themen/fza_schweiz-eu-efta.html which led to a big fight with the EU. thelocal.ch/20181213/…

              – Fizz
              1 hour ago













            • @Fizz but it's free movement of people for citizens of most EU countries, right? The link in my answer only mentions quotas for Croatian, Romanian and Bulgarian citizens and only for a limited time period (which is almost over for Romania and Bulgaria and over for Croatia next July of year). Or is there some more recent development?

              – JJJ
              1 hour ago











            • @Brythan it's phrased a bit poorly in the slide. The thing is, if the UK has red line "we want no financial contribution" then they cannot have the Swiss option. The alternative being that they do contribute to the EU budget.

              – JJJ
              1 hour ago













            • The fights seems centered on on the Swiss preemption clauses on jobs. But no Swiss job -> no right to reside in Swiss; you can temporarily visit of course.

              – Fizz
              1 hour ago











            • @Fizz interesting, perhaps more suitable for a different question. I think it's too nuanced to fully explain here. Also, I'm not sure how it's different from being an EU member. If you have no job as an EU citizen in another EU country they can send you back after a certain period as well. See here.

              – JJJ
              1 hour ago



















            • The freedom of movement issue is not entirely correct; the Swiss have exceptions allowing them to impose quotas sem.admin.ch/sem/en/home/themen/fza_schweiz-eu-efta.html which led to a big fight with the EU. thelocal.ch/20181213/…

              – Fizz
              1 hour ago













            • @Fizz but it's free movement of people for citizens of most EU countries, right? The link in my answer only mentions quotas for Croatian, Romanian and Bulgarian citizens and only for a limited time period (which is almost over for Romania and Bulgaria and over for Croatia next July of year). Or is there some more recent development?

              – JJJ
              1 hour ago











            • @Brythan it's phrased a bit poorly in the slide. The thing is, if the UK has red line "we want no financial contribution" then they cannot have the Swiss option. The alternative being that they do contribute to the EU budget.

              – JJJ
              1 hour ago













            • The fights seems centered on on the Swiss preemption clauses on jobs. But no Swiss job -> no right to reside in Swiss; you can temporarily visit of course.

              – Fizz
              1 hour ago











            • @Fizz interesting, perhaps more suitable for a different question. I think it's too nuanced to fully explain here. Also, I'm not sure how it's different from being an EU member. If you have no job as an EU citizen in another EU country they can send you back after a certain period as well. See here.

              – JJJ
              1 hour ago

















            The freedom of movement issue is not entirely correct; the Swiss have exceptions allowing them to impose quotas sem.admin.ch/sem/en/home/themen/fza_schweiz-eu-efta.html which led to a big fight with the EU. thelocal.ch/20181213/…

            – Fizz
            1 hour ago







            The freedom of movement issue is not entirely correct; the Swiss have exceptions allowing them to impose quotas sem.admin.ch/sem/en/home/themen/fza_schweiz-eu-efta.html which led to a big fight with the EU. thelocal.ch/20181213/…

            – Fizz
            1 hour ago















            @Fizz but it's free movement of people for citizens of most EU countries, right? The link in my answer only mentions quotas for Croatian, Romanian and Bulgarian citizens and only for a limited time period (which is almost over for Romania and Bulgaria and over for Croatia next July of year). Or is there some more recent development?

            – JJJ
            1 hour ago





            @Fizz but it's free movement of people for citizens of most EU countries, right? The link in my answer only mentions quotas for Croatian, Romanian and Bulgarian citizens and only for a limited time period (which is almost over for Romania and Bulgaria and over for Croatia next July of year). Or is there some more recent development?

            – JJJ
            1 hour ago













            @Brythan it's phrased a bit poorly in the slide. The thing is, if the UK has red line "we want no financial contribution" then they cannot have the Swiss option. The alternative being that they do contribute to the EU budget.

            – JJJ
            1 hour ago







            @Brythan it's phrased a bit poorly in the slide. The thing is, if the UK has red line "we want no financial contribution" then they cannot have the Swiss option. The alternative being that they do contribute to the EU budget.

            – JJJ
            1 hour ago















            The fights seems centered on on the Swiss preemption clauses on jobs. But no Swiss job -> no right to reside in Swiss; you can temporarily visit of course.

            – Fizz
            1 hour ago





            The fights seems centered on on the Swiss preemption clauses on jobs. But no Swiss job -> no right to reside in Swiss; you can temporarily visit of course.

            – Fizz
            1 hour ago













            @Fizz interesting, perhaps more suitable for a different question. I think it's too nuanced to fully explain here. Also, I'm not sure how it's different from being an EU member. If you have no job as an EU citizen in another EU country they can send you back after a certain period as well. See here.

            – JJJ
            1 hour ago





            @Fizz interesting, perhaps more suitable for a different question. I think it's too nuanced to fully explain here. Also, I'm not sure how it's different from being an EU member. If you have no job as an EU citizen in another EU country they can send you back after a certain period as well. See here.

            – JJJ
            1 hour ago











            0














            Probably because the "Swiss model" is in flux. DW said




            After four years of hard-fought negotiations, Switzerland has shrugged off a deadline for a treaty with the EU. It is concerned that freedom of movement requirements will flood the wealthy country with low-wage labor.




            Also FT said




            Swiss politicians resent what they regard as “blackmail” by Brussels [...]




            Also the EU has granted the Swiss an extension of sorts to figure it out. That sounds somewhat familiar...



            In the recent past, the Swiss were able impose some temporary immigration quotas on some EU countries (mostly newly admitted members); a few of these quotas are still in place. However it seems the new (draft) deal EU-Swiss doesn't allow for that. There's still some wiggle room in it for Swiss preemption for "at risk" jobs, itself a hard-fought issue in the negotiations. But this must look like a rather weaksauce solution in the UK given the hardline "take back control of our borders" stance.



            Also DW suggested a mutual wait-game of the Swiss and the UK:




            the Commission wary of going easy on the Swiss for fear of providing ammunition to Brexiteers. Meanwhile, many Swiss are happy to wait and see what sort of deal the British can extract for themselves out of the EU.







            share|improve this answer






























              0














              Probably because the "Swiss model" is in flux. DW said




              After four years of hard-fought negotiations, Switzerland has shrugged off a deadline for a treaty with the EU. It is concerned that freedom of movement requirements will flood the wealthy country with low-wage labor.




              Also FT said




              Swiss politicians resent what they regard as “blackmail” by Brussels [...]




              Also the EU has granted the Swiss an extension of sorts to figure it out. That sounds somewhat familiar...



              In the recent past, the Swiss were able impose some temporary immigration quotas on some EU countries (mostly newly admitted members); a few of these quotas are still in place. However it seems the new (draft) deal EU-Swiss doesn't allow for that. There's still some wiggle room in it for Swiss preemption for "at risk" jobs, itself a hard-fought issue in the negotiations. But this must look like a rather weaksauce solution in the UK given the hardline "take back control of our borders" stance.



              Also DW suggested a mutual wait-game of the Swiss and the UK:




              the Commission wary of going easy on the Swiss for fear of providing ammunition to Brexiteers. Meanwhile, many Swiss are happy to wait and see what sort of deal the British can extract for themselves out of the EU.







              share|improve this answer




























                0












                0








                0







                Probably because the "Swiss model" is in flux. DW said




                After four years of hard-fought negotiations, Switzerland has shrugged off a deadline for a treaty with the EU. It is concerned that freedom of movement requirements will flood the wealthy country with low-wage labor.




                Also FT said




                Swiss politicians resent what they regard as “blackmail” by Brussels [...]




                Also the EU has granted the Swiss an extension of sorts to figure it out. That sounds somewhat familiar...



                In the recent past, the Swiss were able impose some temporary immigration quotas on some EU countries (mostly newly admitted members); a few of these quotas are still in place. However it seems the new (draft) deal EU-Swiss doesn't allow for that. There's still some wiggle room in it for Swiss preemption for "at risk" jobs, itself a hard-fought issue in the negotiations. But this must look like a rather weaksauce solution in the UK given the hardline "take back control of our borders" stance.



                Also DW suggested a mutual wait-game of the Swiss and the UK:




                the Commission wary of going easy on the Swiss for fear of providing ammunition to Brexiteers. Meanwhile, many Swiss are happy to wait and see what sort of deal the British can extract for themselves out of the EU.







                share|improve this answer















                Probably because the "Swiss model" is in flux. DW said




                After four years of hard-fought negotiations, Switzerland has shrugged off a deadline for a treaty with the EU. It is concerned that freedom of movement requirements will flood the wealthy country with low-wage labor.




                Also FT said




                Swiss politicians resent what they regard as “blackmail” by Brussels [...]




                Also the EU has granted the Swiss an extension of sorts to figure it out. That sounds somewhat familiar...



                In the recent past, the Swiss were able impose some temporary immigration quotas on some EU countries (mostly newly admitted members); a few of these quotas are still in place. However it seems the new (draft) deal EU-Swiss doesn't allow for that. There's still some wiggle room in it for Swiss preemption for "at risk" jobs, itself a hard-fought issue in the negotiations. But this must look like a rather weaksauce solution in the UK given the hardline "take back control of our borders" stance.



                Also DW suggested a mutual wait-game of the Swiss and the UK:




                the Commission wary of going easy on the Swiss for fear of providing ammunition to Brexiteers. Meanwhile, many Swiss are happy to wait and see what sort of deal the British can extract for themselves out of the EU.








                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 8 mins ago

























                answered 23 mins ago









                FizzFizz

                16.2k241105




                16.2k241105






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f40895%2fwhy-is-there-so-little-support-for-joining-efta-in-the-british-parliament%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    IEEEtran - How to include ORCID in TeX/PDF with PdfLatexIs there a standard way to include ORCID in TeX /...

                    Cicindela nigrior Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneCicindela varians unicolorManual for the Identification of the...

                    Glossaries-extra: Adding glossaries package to “Clas­sicTh­e­sis” template by Dr. André Miede v. 4.6 ...