Typesetting a Row Vectortypesetting column vectorcolumn and row vectors with builtin math modeIs there a...

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

Does an object always see its latest internal state irrespective of thread?

Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?

Character reincarnated...as a snail

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

Theorems that impeded progress

meaning of に in 本当に?

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

Client team has low performances and low technical skills: we always fix their work and now they stop collaborate with us. How to solve?

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?

Why is 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there's 300k+ births a month?

Java Casting: Java 11 throws LambdaConversionException while 1.8 does not

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

What does the "remote control" for a QF-4 look like?

What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?

Perform and show arithmetic with LuaLaTeX

NMaximize is not converging to a solution

Can you really stack all of this on an Opportunity Attack?

Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)

Book with a girl whose grandma is a phoenix, cover depicts the emerald/green-eyed blonde girl

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?



Typesetting a Row Vector


typesetting column vectorcolumn and row vectors with builtin math modeIs there a shorthand for matrices that doesn't use an environmenttypesetting column vectorHorizontal line representing row vector in matrixTypesetting a Row Vector - Vol 2Bold bracket row vector/matrixMulticolumn vectorAlignment of labeled vector with other vectosTypesetting inline row vectorRow vector problemHow to write the following vectorRow vector bracket size with double spacing













16















In the question typesetting a column vector, a very nice solution was given for typesetting a column vector with an arbitrary number of rows. I am attempting to modify the code to produce row vectors instead of column vectors. I made the "obvious" change, i.e., substituting the & for the \ as indicated by the snippet below:




newcountcolveccount
newcommand*colvec[1]{
globalcolveccount#1
begin{pmatrix}
colvecnext
}
defcolvecnext#1{
#1
globaladvancecolveccount-1
ifnumcolveccount>0
&
expandaftercolvecnext
else
end{pmatrix}
fi
}

My modification however fails to compile and the errors, of course, are not very helpful. So my question is, How can I modify the colvec and colvecnext macros to produce row vectors?








share|improve this question





























    16















    In the question typesetting a column vector, a very nice solution was given for typesetting a column vector with an arbitrary number of rows. I am attempting to modify the code to produce row vectors instead of column vectors. I made the "obvious" change, i.e., substituting the & for the \ as indicated by the snippet below:




    newcountcolveccount
    newcommand*colvec[1]{
    globalcolveccount#1
    begin{pmatrix}
    colvecnext
    }
    defcolvecnext#1{
    #1
    globaladvancecolveccount-1
    ifnumcolveccount>0
    &
    expandaftercolvecnext
    else
    end{pmatrix}
    fi
    }

    My modification however fails to compile and the errors, of course, are not very helpful. So my question is, How can I modify the colvec and colvecnext macros to produce row vectors?








    share|improve this question



























      16












      16








      16


      3






      In the question typesetting a column vector, a very nice solution was given for typesetting a column vector with an arbitrary number of rows. I am attempting to modify the code to produce row vectors instead of column vectors. I made the "obvious" change, i.e., substituting the & for the \ as indicated by the snippet below:




      newcountcolveccount
      newcommand*colvec[1]{
      globalcolveccount#1
      begin{pmatrix}
      colvecnext
      }
      defcolvecnext#1{
      #1
      globaladvancecolveccount-1
      ifnumcolveccount>0
      &
      expandaftercolvecnext
      else
      end{pmatrix}
      fi
      }

      My modification however fails to compile and the errors, of course, are not very helpful. So my question is, How can I modify the colvec and colvecnext macros to produce row vectors?








      share|improve this question
















      In the question typesetting a column vector, a very nice solution was given for typesetting a column vector with an arbitrary number of rows. I am attempting to modify the code to produce row vectors instead of column vectors. I made the "obvious" change, i.e., substituting the & for the \ as indicated by the snippet below:




      newcountcolveccount
      newcommand*colvec[1]{
      globalcolveccount#1
      begin{pmatrix}
      colvecnext
      }
      defcolvecnext#1{
      #1
      globaladvancecolveccount-1
      ifnumcolveccount>0
      &
      expandaftercolvecnext
      else
      end{pmatrix}
      fi
      }

      My modification however fails to compile and the errors, of course, are not very helpful. So my question is, How can I modify the colvec and colvecnext macros to produce row vectors?





      math-mode matrices vector






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:35









      Community

      1




      1










      asked Dec 21 '11 at 21:17









      3Sphere3Sphere

      1,39131827




      1,39131827






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          20














          You have to collect the row beforehand, as doing it inside an array environment is quite difficult, as TeX ends a cell as soon as it sees an &. I prefer to do in with a token register and the count255 scratch counter.



          We collect two arguments: the first is the number of entries, the second the first entry, in order to initialize the token register with it. We set the counter to the number of requested element (since we have already collected one, we step it down immediately).



          Then we start the recursion; the macro rowvectnexta examines the value of the counter; if it's still greater than 0, it calls rowvecnextb that gathers another argument, stores it into the token register (adding an &) and steps down the counter; otherwise it builds the pmatrix by releasing the contents of the register.



          newtoksrowvectoks
          newcommand{rowvec}[2]{%
          rowvectoks={#2}count255=#1relax
          advancecount255 by -1
          rowvecnexta}
          newcommand{rowvecnexta}{%
          ifnumcount255>0
          expandafterrowvecnextb
          else
          begin{pmatrix}therowvectoksend{pmatrix}
          fi}
          newcommandrowvecnextb[1]{%
          rowvectoks=expandafter{therowvectoks&#1}%
          advancecount255 by -1
          rowvecnexta}


          It shouldn't be a big limitation the fact that you need at least one element:



          rowvec{1}{a}
          rowvec{2}{a}{b}
          rowvec{3}{a}{b}{c}


          Notice: usepackage{amsmath} is required. So a minimal example might be the following.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}

          newtoksrowvectoks
          newcommand{rowvec}[2]{%
          rowvectoks={#2}count255=#1relax
          advancecount255 by -1
          rowvecnexta}
          newcommand{rowvecnexta}{%
          ifnumcount255>0
          expandafterrowvecnextb
          else
          begin{pmatrix}therowvectoksend{pmatrix}
          fi}
          newcommandrowvecnextb[1]{%
          rowvectoks=expandafter{therowvectoks&#1}%
          advancecount255 by -1
          rowvecnexta}

          begin{document}

          $rowvec{1}{a}$
          $rowvec{2}{a}{b}$
          $rowvec{3}{a}{b}{c}$

          end{document}




          A completely different solution that can be generalized to column vectors uses xparse and LaTeX3.



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{amsmath}
          usepackage{xparse}
          ExplSyntaxOn
          NewDocumentCommand{Rowvec}{ O{,} m }
          {
          vector_main:nnnn { p } { & } { #1 } { #2 }
          }
          NewDocumentCommand{Colvec}{ O{,} m }
          {
          vector_main:nnnn { p } { \ } { #1 } { #2 }
          }

          seq_new:N l__vector_arg_seq
          cs_new_protected:Npn vector_main:nnnn #1 #2 #3 #4
          {
          seq_set_split:Nnn l__vector_arg_seq { #3 } { #4 }
          begin{#1matrix}
          seq_use:Nnnn l__vector_arg_seq { #2 } { #2 } { #2 }
          end{#1matrix}
          }
          ExplSyntaxOff

          begin{document}

          $Rowvec{a}Rowvec{a,b}Rowvec[;]{a;b;c}$

          $Colvec{a}Colvec{a,b}Colvec[;]{a;b;c}$

          end{document}


          The optional argument is the delimiter to be used to separate entries in the list given as argument.



          It's sufficient to change { p } into { b } in the two main definitions to get brackets instead of parentheses.



          enter image description here



          Note: this requires expl3 dated September 2012 or later.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Thank you! Your solution works beautifully. Considering the necessary steps, my modification attempt was naively futile.

            – 3Sphere
            Dec 21 '11 at 22:05






          • 3





            I'll expand the answer: the TV was broadcasting Beethoven's Ninth from the new theater in Florence, so my main attention was to it. :)

            – egreg
            Dec 21 '11 at 22:15






          • 1





            I suggest adding this to mathtools package.

            – azetina
            Nov 12 '13 at 19:55



















          2














          I would like to suggest a dirty solution, which I use:



          newcommand*{rowvec}[1]{left( #1right)}


          The advantage is that its usage is simple: rowvec{a,b,c,d,e}. I can easily imagine that it is not robust... For me it works.






          share|improve this answer































            2














            This is an old question... but as it surfaced again let me point out that one can do these things without token register or macro storage or count registers.



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{amsmath}
            makeatletter
            % USAGE Matrix { a,..,z; A,.., Z ; ... ; aA, ..., zZ}
            % NO semi-colon for the last row.
            newcommand{Matrix}[1]
            {begin{pmatrix}
            Matrix@r #1;@bye;Matrix@r
            end{pmatrix}}

            defMatrix@r #1;{@bye #1Matrix@z@byeMatrix@s #1,@bye, }%
            defMatrix@s #1,{#1Matrix@t }%
            defMatrix@t #1,{@bye #1Matrix@y@bye@firstofone {&#1}Matrix@t}%
            defMatrix@y #1Matrix@t{\ Matrix@r }%
            defMatrix@z #1Matrix@r {}
            def@bye #1@bye {}% (the idea of @bye is from xint code)

            makeatother

            begin{document}thispagestyle{empty}


            [ Matrix { a, b , c , d ; e ,f , 3, 5; 8, -1, x, y }]

            [ Matrix { abc , mathrm{XYZ}; 7, 913; alpha, beta }]

            end{document}



            matrices







            share|improve this answer































              0














              This is an extension to row vectors of my suggestion for column vectors, see here. The idea is to use a similar plain TeX mechanism, and separate the entries with a pipe. Again, the interface with parentheses is the same as used by PSTricks.
              The code is:



              defcoords(#1,#2){!left({textstyle#1coords@i#2,,}right)}
              defcoords@i#1,{if,#1,else|{#1}expandaftercoords@ifi}


              and a MWE would be:



              documentclass[margin=2pt]{standalone}

              makeatletter
              defcoords(#1,#2){!left({textstyle#1coords@i#2,,}right)}
              defcoords@i#1,{if,#1,else|{#1}expandaftercoords@ifi}
              makeatother

              begin{document}
              $Pcoords(-3,+4,frac51)$
              end{document}


              example for the use of coords macro



              Because the macros make use of the @i notation the code will have to be placed inside at makeatletter - makeatother wrapping before document begins.






              share|improve this answer
























                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "85"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39051%2ftypesetting-a-row-vector%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes








                4 Answers
                4






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                20














                You have to collect the row beforehand, as doing it inside an array environment is quite difficult, as TeX ends a cell as soon as it sees an &. I prefer to do in with a token register and the count255 scratch counter.



                We collect two arguments: the first is the number of entries, the second the first entry, in order to initialize the token register with it. We set the counter to the number of requested element (since we have already collected one, we step it down immediately).



                Then we start the recursion; the macro rowvectnexta examines the value of the counter; if it's still greater than 0, it calls rowvecnextb that gathers another argument, stores it into the token register (adding an &) and steps down the counter; otherwise it builds the pmatrix by releasing the contents of the register.



                newtoksrowvectoks
                newcommand{rowvec}[2]{%
                rowvectoks={#2}count255=#1relax
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}
                newcommand{rowvecnexta}{%
                ifnumcount255>0
                expandafterrowvecnextb
                else
                begin{pmatrix}therowvectoksend{pmatrix}
                fi}
                newcommandrowvecnextb[1]{%
                rowvectoks=expandafter{therowvectoks&#1}%
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}


                It shouldn't be a big limitation the fact that you need at least one element:



                rowvec{1}{a}
                rowvec{2}{a}{b}
                rowvec{3}{a}{b}{c}


                Notice: usepackage{amsmath} is required. So a minimal example might be the following.



                documentclass{article}
                usepackage{amsmath}

                newtoksrowvectoks
                newcommand{rowvec}[2]{%
                rowvectoks={#2}count255=#1relax
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}
                newcommand{rowvecnexta}{%
                ifnumcount255>0
                expandafterrowvecnextb
                else
                begin{pmatrix}therowvectoksend{pmatrix}
                fi}
                newcommandrowvecnextb[1]{%
                rowvectoks=expandafter{therowvectoks&#1}%
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}

                begin{document}

                $rowvec{1}{a}$
                $rowvec{2}{a}{b}$
                $rowvec{3}{a}{b}{c}$

                end{document}




                A completely different solution that can be generalized to column vectors uses xparse and LaTeX3.



                documentclass{article}
                usepackage{amsmath}
                usepackage{xparse}
                ExplSyntaxOn
                NewDocumentCommand{Rowvec}{ O{,} m }
                {
                vector_main:nnnn { p } { & } { #1 } { #2 }
                }
                NewDocumentCommand{Colvec}{ O{,} m }
                {
                vector_main:nnnn { p } { \ } { #1 } { #2 }
                }

                seq_new:N l__vector_arg_seq
                cs_new_protected:Npn vector_main:nnnn #1 #2 #3 #4
                {
                seq_set_split:Nnn l__vector_arg_seq { #3 } { #4 }
                begin{#1matrix}
                seq_use:Nnnn l__vector_arg_seq { #2 } { #2 } { #2 }
                end{#1matrix}
                }
                ExplSyntaxOff

                begin{document}

                $Rowvec{a}Rowvec{a,b}Rowvec[;]{a;b;c}$

                $Colvec{a}Colvec{a,b}Colvec[;]{a;b;c}$

                end{document}


                The optional argument is the delimiter to be used to separate entries in the list given as argument.



                It's sufficient to change { p } into { b } in the two main definitions to get brackets instead of parentheses.



                enter image description here



                Note: this requires expl3 dated September 2012 or later.






                share|improve this answer


























                • Thank you! Your solution works beautifully. Considering the necessary steps, my modification attempt was naively futile.

                  – 3Sphere
                  Dec 21 '11 at 22:05






                • 3





                  I'll expand the answer: the TV was broadcasting Beethoven's Ninth from the new theater in Florence, so my main attention was to it. :)

                  – egreg
                  Dec 21 '11 at 22:15






                • 1





                  I suggest adding this to mathtools package.

                  – azetina
                  Nov 12 '13 at 19:55
















                20














                You have to collect the row beforehand, as doing it inside an array environment is quite difficult, as TeX ends a cell as soon as it sees an &. I prefer to do in with a token register and the count255 scratch counter.



                We collect two arguments: the first is the number of entries, the second the first entry, in order to initialize the token register with it. We set the counter to the number of requested element (since we have already collected one, we step it down immediately).



                Then we start the recursion; the macro rowvectnexta examines the value of the counter; if it's still greater than 0, it calls rowvecnextb that gathers another argument, stores it into the token register (adding an &) and steps down the counter; otherwise it builds the pmatrix by releasing the contents of the register.



                newtoksrowvectoks
                newcommand{rowvec}[2]{%
                rowvectoks={#2}count255=#1relax
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}
                newcommand{rowvecnexta}{%
                ifnumcount255>0
                expandafterrowvecnextb
                else
                begin{pmatrix}therowvectoksend{pmatrix}
                fi}
                newcommandrowvecnextb[1]{%
                rowvectoks=expandafter{therowvectoks&#1}%
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}


                It shouldn't be a big limitation the fact that you need at least one element:



                rowvec{1}{a}
                rowvec{2}{a}{b}
                rowvec{3}{a}{b}{c}


                Notice: usepackage{amsmath} is required. So a minimal example might be the following.



                documentclass{article}
                usepackage{amsmath}

                newtoksrowvectoks
                newcommand{rowvec}[2]{%
                rowvectoks={#2}count255=#1relax
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}
                newcommand{rowvecnexta}{%
                ifnumcount255>0
                expandafterrowvecnextb
                else
                begin{pmatrix}therowvectoksend{pmatrix}
                fi}
                newcommandrowvecnextb[1]{%
                rowvectoks=expandafter{therowvectoks&#1}%
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}

                begin{document}

                $rowvec{1}{a}$
                $rowvec{2}{a}{b}$
                $rowvec{3}{a}{b}{c}$

                end{document}




                A completely different solution that can be generalized to column vectors uses xparse and LaTeX3.



                documentclass{article}
                usepackage{amsmath}
                usepackage{xparse}
                ExplSyntaxOn
                NewDocumentCommand{Rowvec}{ O{,} m }
                {
                vector_main:nnnn { p } { & } { #1 } { #2 }
                }
                NewDocumentCommand{Colvec}{ O{,} m }
                {
                vector_main:nnnn { p } { \ } { #1 } { #2 }
                }

                seq_new:N l__vector_arg_seq
                cs_new_protected:Npn vector_main:nnnn #1 #2 #3 #4
                {
                seq_set_split:Nnn l__vector_arg_seq { #3 } { #4 }
                begin{#1matrix}
                seq_use:Nnnn l__vector_arg_seq { #2 } { #2 } { #2 }
                end{#1matrix}
                }
                ExplSyntaxOff

                begin{document}

                $Rowvec{a}Rowvec{a,b}Rowvec[;]{a;b;c}$

                $Colvec{a}Colvec{a,b}Colvec[;]{a;b;c}$

                end{document}


                The optional argument is the delimiter to be used to separate entries in the list given as argument.



                It's sufficient to change { p } into { b } in the two main definitions to get brackets instead of parentheses.



                enter image description here



                Note: this requires expl3 dated September 2012 or later.






                share|improve this answer


























                • Thank you! Your solution works beautifully. Considering the necessary steps, my modification attempt was naively futile.

                  – 3Sphere
                  Dec 21 '11 at 22:05






                • 3





                  I'll expand the answer: the TV was broadcasting Beethoven's Ninth from the new theater in Florence, so my main attention was to it. :)

                  – egreg
                  Dec 21 '11 at 22:15






                • 1





                  I suggest adding this to mathtools package.

                  – azetina
                  Nov 12 '13 at 19:55














                20












                20








                20







                You have to collect the row beforehand, as doing it inside an array environment is quite difficult, as TeX ends a cell as soon as it sees an &. I prefer to do in with a token register and the count255 scratch counter.



                We collect two arguments: the first is the number of entries, the second the first entry, in order to initialize the token register with it. We set the counter to the number of requested element (since we have already collected one, we step it down immediately).



                Then we start the recursion; the macro rowvectnexta examines the value of the counter; if it's still greater than 0, it calls rowvecnextb that gathers another argument, stores it into the token register (adding an &) and steps down the counter; otherwise it builds the pmatrix by releasing the contents of the register.



                newtoksrowvectoks
                newcommand{rowvec}[2]{%
                rowvectoks={#2}count255=#1relax
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}
                newcommand{rowvecnexta}{%
                ifnumcount255>0
                expandafterrowvecnextb
                else
                begin{pmatrix}therowvectoksend{pmatrix}
                fi}
                newcommandrowvecnextb[1]{%
                rowvectoks=expandafter{therowvectoks&#1}%
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}


                It shouldn't be a big limitation the fact that you need at least one element:



                rowvec{1}{a}
                rowvec{2}{a}{b}
                rowvec{3}{a}{b}{c}


                Notice: usepackage{amsmath} is required. So a minimal example might be the following.



                documentclass{article}
                usepackage{amsmath}

                newtoksrowvectoks
                newcommand{rowvec}[2]{%
                rowvectoks={#2}count255=#1relax
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}
                newcommand{rowvecnexta}{%
                ifnumcount255>0
                expandafterrowvecnextb
                else
                begin{pmatrix}therowvectoksend{pmatrix}
                fi}
                newcommandrowvecnextb[1]{%
                rowvectoks=expandafter{therowvectoks&#1}%
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}

                begin{document}

                $rowvec{1}{a}$
                $rowvec{2}{a}{b}$
                $rowvec{3}{a}{b}{c}$

                end{document}




                A completely different solution that can be generalized to column vectors uses xparse and LaTeX3.



                documentclass{article}
                usepackage{amsmath}
                usepackage{xparse}
                ExplSyntaxOn
                NewDocumentCommand{Rowvec}{ O{,} m }
                {
                vector_main:nnnn { p } { & } { #1 } { #2 }
                }
                NewDocumentCommand{Colvec}{ O{,} m }
                {
                vector_main:nnnn { p } { \ } { #1 } { #2 }
                }

                seq_new:N l__vector_arg_seq
                cs_new_protected:Npn vector_main:nnnn #1 #2 #3 #4
                {
                seq_set_split:Nnn l__vector_arg_seq { #3 } { #4 }
                begin{#1matrix}
                seq_use:Nnnn l__vector_arg_seq { #2 } { #2 } { #2 }
                end{#1matrix}
                }
                ExplSyntaxOff

                begin{document}

                $Rowvec{a}Rowvec{a,b}Rowvec[;]{a;b;c}$

                $Colvec{a}Colvec{a,b}Colvec[;]{a;b;c}$

                end{document}


                The optional argument is the delimiter to be used to separate entries in the list given as argument.



                It's sufficient to change { p } into { b } in the two main definitions to get brackets instead of parentheses.



                enter image description here



                Note: this requires expl3 dated September 2012 or later.






                share|improve this answer















                You have to collect the row beforehand, as doing it inside an array environment is quite difficult, as TeX ends a cell as soon as it sees an &. I prefer to do in with a token register and the count255 scratch counter.



                We collect two arguments: the first is the number of entries, the second the first entry, in order to initialize the token register with it. We set the counter to the number of requested element (since we have already collected one, we step it down immediately).



                Then we start the recursion; the macro rowvectnexta examines the value of the counter; if it's still greater than 0, it calls rowvecnextb that gathers another argument, stores it into the token register (adding an &) and steps down the counter; otherwise it builds the pmatrix by releasing the contents of the register.



                newtoksrowvectoks
                newcommand{rowvec}[2]{%
                rowvectoks={#2}count255=#1relax
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}
                newcommand{rowvecnexta}{%
                ifnumcount255>0
                expandafterrowvecnextb
                else
                begin{pmatrix}therowvectoksend{pmatrix}
                fi}
                newcommandrowvecnextb[1]{%
                rowvectoks=expandafter{therowvectoks&#1}%
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}


                It shouldn't be a big limitation the fact that you need at least one element:



                rowvec{1}{a}
                rowvec{2}{a}{b}
                rowvec{3}{a}{b}{c}


                Notice: usepackage{amsmath} is required. So a minimal example might be the following.



                documentclass{article}
                usepackage{amsmath}

                newtoksrowvectoks
                newcommand{rowvec}[2]{%
                rowvectoks={#2}count255=#1relax
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}
                newcommand{rowvecnexta}{%
                ifnumcount255>0
                expandafterrowvecnextb
                else
                begin{pmatrix}therowvectoksend{pmatrix}
                fi}
                newcommandrowvecnextb[1]{%
                rowvectoks=expandafter{therowvectoks&#1}%
                advancecount255 by -1
                rowvecnexta}

                begin{document}

                $rowvec{1}{a}$
                $rowvec{2}{a}{b}$
                $rowvec{3}{a}{b}{c}$

                end{document}




                A completely different solution that can be generalized to column vectors uses xparse and LaTeX3.



                documentclass{article}
                usepackage{amsmath}
                usepackage{xparse}
                ExplSyntaxOn
                NewDocumentCommand{Rowvec}{ O{,} m }
                {
                vector_main:nnnn { p } { & } { #1 } { #2 }
                }
                NewDocumentCommand{Colvec}{ O{,} m }
                {
                vector_main:nnnn { p } { \ } { #1 } { #2 }
                }

                seq_new:N l__vector_arg_seq
                cs_new_protected:Npn vector_main:nnnn #1 #2 #3 #4
                {
                seq_set_split:Nnn l__vector_arg_seq { #3 } { #4 }
                begin{#1matrix}
                seq_use:Nnnn l__vector_arg_seq { #2 } { #2 } { #2 }
                end{#1matrix}
                }
                ExplSyntaxOff

                begin{document}

                $Rowvec{a}Rowvec{a,b}Rowvec[;]{a;b;c}$

                $Colvec{a}Colvec{a,b}Colvec[;]{a;b;c}$

                end{document}


                The optional argument is the delimiter to be used to separate entries in the list given as argument.



                It's sufficient to change { p } into { b } in the two main definitions to get brackets instead of parentheses.



                enter image description here



                Note: this requires expl3 dated September 2012 or later.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Sep 30 '12 at 16:23

























                answered Dec 21 '11 at 21:47









                egregegreg

                732k8919303253




                732k8919303253













                • Thank you! Your solution works beautifully. Considering the necessary steps, my modification attempt was naively futile.

                  – 3Sphere
                  Dec 21 '11 at 22:05






                • 3





                  I'll expand the answer: the TV was broadcasting Beethoven's Ninth from the new theater in Florence, so my main attention was to it. :)

                  – egreg
                  Dec 21 '11 at 22:15






                • 1





                  I suggest adding this to mathtools package.

                  – azetina
                  Nov 12 '13 at 19:55



















                • Thank you! Your solution works beautifully. Considering the necessary steps, my modification attempt was naively futile.

                  – 3Sphere
                  Dec 21 '11 at 22:05






                • 3





                  I'll expand the answer: the TV was broadcasting Beethoven's Ninth from the new theater in Florence, so my main attention was to it. :)

                  – egreg
                  Dec 21 '11 at 22:15






                • 1





                  I suggest adding this to mathtools package.

                  – azetina
                  Nov 12 '13 at 19:55

















                Thank you! Your solution works beautifully. Considering the necessary steps, my modification attempt was naively futile.

                – 3Sphere
                Dec 21 '11 at 22:05





                Thank you! Your solution works beautifully. Considering the necessary steps, my modification attempt was naively futile.

                – 3Sphere
                Dec 21 '11 at 22:05




                3




                3





                I'll expand the answer: the TV was broadcasting Beethoven's Ninth from the new theater in Florence, so my main attention was to it. :)

                – egreg
                Dec 21 '11 at 22:15





                I'll expand the answer: the TV was broadcasting Beethoven's Ninth from the new theater in Florence, so my main attention was to it. :)

                – egreg
                Dec 21 '11 at 22:15




                1




                1





                I suggest adding this to mathtools package.

                – azetina
                Nov 12 '13 at 19:55





                I suggest adding this to mathtools package.

                – azetina
                Nov 12 '13 at 19:55











                2














                I would like to suggest a dirty solution, which I use:



                newcommand*{rowvec}[1]{left( #1right)}


                The advantage is that its usage is simple: rowvec{a,b,c,d,e}. I can easily imagine that it is not robust... For me it works.






                share|improve this answer




























                  2














                  I would like to suggest a dirty solution, which I use:



                  newcommand*{rowvec}[1]{left( #1right)}


                  The advantage is that its usage is simple: rowvec{a,b,c,d,e}. I can easily imagine that it is not robust... For me it works.






                  share|improve this answer


























                    2












                    2








                    2







                    I would like to suggest a dirty solution, which I use:



                    newcommand*{rowvec}[1]{left( #1right)}


                    The advantage is that its usage is simple: rowvec{a,b,c,d,e}. I can easily imagine that it is not robust... For me it works.






                    share|improve this answer













                    I would like to suggest a dirty solution, which I use:



                    newcommand*{rowvec}[1]{left( #1right)}


                    The advantage is that its usage is simple: rowvec{a,b,c,d,e}. I can easily imagine that it is not robust... For me it works.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Nov 12 '13 at 19:45









                    DrorDror

                    11.2k1973150




                    11.2k1973150























                        2














                        This is an old question... but as it surfaced again let me point out that one can do these things without token register or macro storage or count registers.



                        documentclass{article}
                        usepackage{amsmath}
                        makeatletter
                        % USAGE Matrix { a,..,z; A,.., Z ; ... ; aA, ..., zZ}
                        % NO semi-colon for the last row.
                        newcommand{Matrix}[1]
                        {begin{pmatrix}
                        Matrix@r #1;@bye;Matrix@r
                        end{pmatrix}}

                        defMatrix@r #1;{@bye #1Matrix@z@byeMatrix@s #1,@bye, }%
                        defMatrix@s #1,{#1Matrix@t }%
                        defMatrix@t #1,{@bye #1Matrix@y@bye@firstofone {&#1}Matrix@t}%
                        defMatrix@y #1Matrix@t{\ Matrix@r }%
                        defMatrix@z #1Matrix@r {}
                        def@bye #1@bye {}% (the idea of @bye is from xint code)

                        makeatother

                        begin{document}thispagestyle{empty}


                        [ Matrix { a, b , c , d ; e ,f , 3, 5; 8, -1, x, y }]

                        [ Matrix { abc , mathrm{XYZ}; 7, 913; alpha, beta }]

                        end{document}



                        matrices







                        share|improve this answer




























                          2














                          This is an old question... but as it surfaced again let me point out that one can do these things without token register or macro storage or count registers.



                          documentclass{article}
                          usepackage{amsmath}
                          makeatletter
                          % USAGE Matrix { a,..,z; A,.., Z ; ... ; aA, ..., zZ}
                          % NO semi-colon for the last row.
                          newcommand{Matrix}[1]
                          {begin{pmatrix}
                          Matrix@r #1;@bye;Matrix@r
                          end{pmatrix}}

                          defMatrix@r #1;{@bye #1Matrix@z@byeMatrix@s #1,@bye, }%
                          defMatrix@s #1,{#1Matrix@t }%
                          defMatrix@t #1,{@bye #1Matrix@y@bye@firstofone {&#1}Matrix@t}%
                          defMatrix@y #1Matrix@t{\ Matrix@r }%
                          defMatrix@z #1Matrix@r {}
                          def@bye #1@bye {}% (the idea of @bye is from xint code)

                          makeatother

                          begin{document}thispagestyle{empty}


                          [ Matrix { a, b , c , d ; e ,f , 3, 5; 8, -1, x, y }]

                          [ Matrix { abc , mathrm{XYZ}; 7, 913; alpha, beta }]

                          end{document}



                          matrices







                          share|improve this answer


























                            2












                            2








                            2







                            This is an old question... but as it surfaced again let me point out that one can do these things without token register or macro storage or count registers.



                            documentclass{article}
                            usepackage{amsmath}
                            makeatletter
                            % USAGE Matrix { a,..,z; A,.., Z ; ... ; aA, ..., zZ}
                            % NO semi-colon for the last row.
                            newcommand{Matrix}[1]
                            {begin{pmatrix}
                            Matrix@r #1;@bye;Matrix@r
                            end{pmatrix}}

                            defMatrix@r #1;{@bye #1Matrix@z@byeMatrix@s #1,@bye, }%
                            defMatrix@s #1,{#1Matrix@t }%
                            defMatrix@t #1,{@bye #1Matrix@y@bye@firstofone {&#1}Matrix@t}%
                            defMatrix@y #1Matrix@t{\ Matrix@r }%
                            defMatrix@z #1Matrix@r {}
                            def@bye #1@bye {}% (the idea of @bye is from xint code)

                            makeatother

                            begin{document}thispagestyle{empty}


                            [ Matrix { a, b , c , d ; e ,f , 3, 5; 8, -1, x, y }]

                            [ Matrix { abc , mathrm{XYZ}; 7, 913; alpha, beta }]

                            end{document}



                            matrices







                            share|improve this answer













                            This is an old question... but as it surfaced again let me point out that one can do these things without token register or macro storage or count registers.



                            documentclass{article}
                            usepackage{amsmath}
                            makeatletter
                            % USAGE Matrix { a,..,z; A,.., Z ; ... ; aA, ..., zZ}
                            % NO semi-colon for the last row.
                            newcommand{Matrix}[1]
                            {begin{pmatrix}
                            Matrix@r #1;@bye;Matrix@r
                            end{pmatrix}}

                            defMatrix@r #1;{@bye #1Matrix@z@byeMatrix@s #1,@bye, }%
                            defMatrix@s #1,{#1Matrix@t }%
                            defMatrix@t #1,{@bye #1Matrix@y@bye@firstofone {&#1}Matrix@t}%
                            defMatrix@y #1Matrix@t{\ Matrix@r }%
                            defMatrix@z #1Matrix@r {}
                            def@bye #1@bye {}% (the idea of @bye is from xint code)

                            makeatother

                            begin{document}thispagestyle{empty}


                            [ Matrix { a, b , c , d ; e ,f , 3, 5; 8, -1, x, y }]

                            [ Matrix { abc , mathrm{XYZ}; 7, 913; alpha, beta }]

                            end{document}



                            matrices








                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Nov 12 '13 at 21:29







                            user4686






























                                0














                                This is an extension to row vectors of my suggestion for column vectors, see here. The idea is to use a similar plain TeX mechanism, and separate the entries with a pipe. Again, the interface with parentheses is the same as used by PSTricks.
                                The code is:



                                defcoords(#1,#2){!left({textstyle#1coords@i#2,,}right)}
                                defcoords@i#1,{if,#1,else|{#1}expandaftercoords@ifi}


                                and a MWE would be:



                                documentclass[margin=2pt]{standalone}

                                makeatletter
                                defcoords(#1,#2){!left({textstyle#1coords@i#2,,}right)}
                                defcoords@i#1,{if,#1,else|{#1}expandaftercoords@ifi}
                                makeatother

                                begin{document}
                                $Pcoords(-3,+4,frac51)$
                                end{document}


                                example for the use of coords macro



                                Because the macros make use of the @i notation the code will have to be placed inside at makeatletter - makeatother wrapping before document begins.






                                share|improve this answer




























                                  0














                                  This is an extension to row vectors of my suggestion for column vectors, see here. The idea is to use a similar plain TeX mechanism, and separate the entries with a pipe. Again, the interface with parentheses is the same as used by PSTricks.
                                  The code is:



                                  defcoords(#1,#2){!left({textstyle#1coords@i#2,,}right)}
                                  defcoords@i#1,{if,#1,else|{#1}expandaftercoords@ifi}


                                  and a MWE would be:



                                  documentclass[margin=2pt]{standalone}

                                  makeatletter
                                  defcoords(#1,#2){!left({textstyle#1coords@i#2,,}right)}
                                  defcoords@i#1,{if,#1,else|{#1}expandaftercoords@ifi}
                                  makeatother

                                  begin{document}
                                  $Pcoords(-3,+4,frac51)$
                                  end{document}


                                  example for the use of coords macro



                                  Because the macros make use of the @i notation the code will have to be placed inside at makeatletter - makeatother wrapping before document begins.






                                  share|improve this answer


























                                    0












                                    0








                                    0







                                    This is an extension to row vectors of my suggestion for column vectors, see here. The idea is to use a similar plain TeX mechanism, and separate the entries with a pipe. Again, the interface with parentheses is the same as used by PSTricks.
                                    The code is:



                                    defcoords(#1,#2){!left({textstyle#1coords@i#2,,}right)}
                                    defcoords@i#1,{if,#1,else|{#1}expandaftercoords@ifi}


                                    and a MWE would be:



                                    documentclass[margin=2pt]{standalone}

                                    makeatletter
                                    defcoords(#1,#2){!left({textstyle#1coords@i#2,,}right)}
                                    defcoords@i#1,{if,#1,else|{#1}expandaftercoords@ifi}
                                    makeatother

                                    begin{document}
                                    $Pcoords(-3,+4,frac51)$
                                    end{document}


                                    example for the use of coords macro



                                    Because the macros make use of the @i notation the code will have to be placed inside at makeatletter - makeatother wrapping before document begins.






                                    share|improve this answer













                                    This is an extension to row vectors of my suggestion for column vectors, see here. The idea is to use a similar plain TeX mechanism, and separate the entries with a pipe. Again, the interface with parentheses is the same as used by PSTricks.
                                    The code is:



                                    defcoords(#1,#2){!left({textstyle#1coords@i#2,,}right)}
                                    defcoords@i#1,{if,#1,else|{#1}expandaftercoords@ifi}


                                    and a MWE would be:



                                    documentclass[margin=2pt]{standalone}

                                    makeatletter
                                    defcoords(#1,#2){!left({textstyle#1coords@i#2,,}right)}
                                    defcoords@i#1,{if,#1,else|{#1}expandaftercoords@ifi}
                                    makeatother

                                    begin{document}
                                    $Pcoords(-3,+4,frac51)$
                                    end{document}


                                    example for the use of coords macro



                                    Because the macros make use of the @i notation the code will have to be placed inside at makeatletter - makeatother wrapping before document begins.







                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered 9 hours ago









                                    fborchersfborchers

                                    839




                                    839






























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39051%2ftypesetting-a-row-vector%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        Paper upload error, “Upload failed: The top margin is 0.715 in on page 3, which is below the required...

                                        Emraan Hashmi Filmografia | Linki zewnętrzne | Menu nawigacyjneGulshan GroverGulshan...

                                        How can I write this formula?newline and italics added with leqWhy does widehat behave differently if I...