Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one geodesic. The 2019 Stack Overflow...
60's-70's movie: home appliances revolting against the owners
ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?
Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?
Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit
Why did Peik Lin say, "I'm not an animal"?
Circular reasoning in L'Hopital's rule
Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?
What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?
Make it rain characters
For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?
Can the DM override racial traits?
What information about me do stores get via my credit card?
How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?
Was credit for the black hole image misappropriated?
Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?
How to handle characters who are more educated than the author?
Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?
Variable with quotation marks "$()"
Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?
Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?
Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?
Why are PDP-7-style microprogrammed instructions out of vogue?
Does Parliament hold absolute power in the UK?
Define a list range inside a list
Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one geodesic.
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraWhy are we interested in closed geodesics?Existence of geodesic on a compact Riemannian manifoldCompleteness of a Riemannian manifold with boundaryTotally geodesic hypersurface in compact hyperbolic manifoldTriangle equality in a Riemannian manifold implies “geodesic colinearity”?Example for conjugate points with only one connecting geodesicExample for infinitely many points with more than one minimizing geodesic to a point?Examples of compact negatively curved constant curvature manifoldCompact totally geodesic submanifolds in manifold with positive sectional curvatureClosed geodesic on a non-simply connected Riemannian manifold
$begingroup$
The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.
Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2
If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?
And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?
1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.
2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.
differential-geometry examples-counterexamples geodesic
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.
Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2
If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?
And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?
1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.
2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.
differential-geometry examples-counterexamples geodesic
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.
Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2
If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?
And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?
1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.
2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.
differential-geometry examples-counterexamples geodesic
$endgroup$
The Lyusternik-Fet theorem states that every compact Riemannian manifold has at least one closed geodesic.
Are there any easy-to-construct1 examples of compact Riemannian manifolds for which it is easy to see they only have one closed geodesic?2
If there aren't any such examples, are there any easy-to-construct examples that only have one closed geodesic but where proving this might be difficult?
And if there aren't any examples of this, are there any examples at all of compact manifolds with only one closed geodesic?
1 Of course, the $1$-sphere $S^1$ contains just one closed geodesic, but I'm interested in examples besides this one.
2 By the theorem of the three geodesics, this example cannot be a topological sphere.
differential-geometry examples-counterexamples geodesic
differential-geometry examples-counterexamples geodesic
edited 52 mins ago
Peter Kagey
asked 1 hour ago
Peter KageyPeter Kagey
1,57072053
1,57072053
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:
Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.
See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.
This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.
EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
$endgroup$
– Peter Kagey
49 mins ago
$begingroup$
Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
48 mins ago
$begingroup$
It's a nice example; you should leave it.
$endgroup$
– Peter Kagey
47 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3185649%2fexample-of-compact-riemannian-manifold-with-only-one-geodesic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:
Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.
See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.
This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:
Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.
See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.
This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:
Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.
See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.
This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.
$endgroup$
First of all, you have to exclude constant maps $S^1to M$ from consideration: They are all closed geodesics. Secondly, you have to talk about geometrically distinct closed geodesics: Geodesics which have the same image are regarded as "the same". Then, it is a notorious conjecture/open problem:
Conjecture. Every compact Riemannian manifold of dimension $n >1$ contains infinitely many geometrically distinct nonconstant geodesics.
See for instance this survey article by Burns and Matveev.
This is even unknown if $M$ is diffeomorphic to the sphere $S^n$, $nge 3$.
edited 25 mins ago
answered 44 mins ago
Moishe KohanMoishe Kohan
48.6k344110
48.6k344110
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.
EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
$endgroup$
– Peter Kagey
49 mins ago
$begingroup$
Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
48 mins ago
$begingroup$
It's a nice example; you should leave it.
$endgroup$
– Peter Kagey
47 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.
EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
$endgroup$
– Peter Kagey
49 mins ago
$begingroup$
Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
48 mins ago
$begingroup$
It's a nice example; you should leave it.
$endgroup$
– Peter Kagey
47 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.
EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.
$endgroup$
If you analyze the geodesics using Clairaut's relation, you'll find that the only closed geodesic on a hyperboloid of one sheet is the central circle. Indeed, the same holds for a concave surface of revolution of the same "shape" as the hyperboloid of one sheet.
EDIT: Apologies for missing the crucial compactness hypothesis.
edited 47 mins ago
answered 51 mins ago
Ted ShifrinTed Shifrin
65k44792
65k44792
$begingroup$
Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
$endgroup$
– Peter Kagey
49 mins ago
$begingroup$
Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
48 mins ago
$begingroup$
It's a nice example; you should leave it.
$endgroup$
– Peter Kagey
47 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
$endgroup$
– Peter Kagey
49 mins ago
$begingroup$
Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
48 mins ago
$begingroup$
It's a nice example; you should leave it.
$endgroup$
– Peter Kagey
47 mins ago
$begingroup$
Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
$endgroup$
– Peter Kagey
49 mins ago
$begingroup$
Lovely example, but a hyperboloid isn't compact, right?
$endgroup$
– Peter Kagey
49 mins ago
$begingroup$
Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
48 mins ago
$begingroup$
Oops. Sloppy reading. I'll delete.
$endgroup$
– Ted Shifrin
48 mins ago
$begingroup$
It's a nice example; you should leave it.
$endgroup$
– Peter Kagey
47 mins ago
$begingroup$
It's a nice example; you should leave it.
$endgroup$
– Peter Kagey
47 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3185649%2fexample-of-compact-riemannian-manifold-with-only-one-geodesic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown