What does the Rambam mean when he says that the planets have souls?Parashat Shemini + ParaDoes Rambam take...

How to color a curve

Can a significant change in incentives void an employment contract?

On a tidally locked planet, would time be quantized?

Journal losing indexing services

Customize circled numbers

Proof of Lemma: Every nonzero integer can be written as a product of primes

My friend sent me a screenshot of a transaction hash, but when I search for it I find divergent data. What happened?

Can the Supreme Court overturn an impeachment?

Fly on a jet pack vs fly with a jet pack?

Is camera lens focus an exact point or a range?

Bob has never been a M before

Is it improper etiquette to ask your opponent what his/her rating is before the game?

Should I stop contributing to retirement accounts?

What does this horizontal bar at the first measure mean?

Can I sign legal documents with a smiley face?

Transformation of random variables and joint distributions

Does the Mind Blank spell prevent the target from being frightened?

Will adding a BY-SA image to a blog post make the entire post BY-SA?

How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?

Drawing ramified coverings with tikz

Should I install hardwood flooring or cabinets first?

Has Darkwing Duck ever met Scrooge McDuck?

Visiting the UK as unmarried couple

What is this type of notehead called?



What does the Rambam mean when he says that the planets have souls?



Parashat Shemini + ParaDoes Rambam take the 6 days of creation literally?What does the Rambam mean by בשרו חם?How does Rambam explain the use of magic in Tanakh?What does the Rambam say about ghosts?If G-d does not lack anything what is meant when it says that he desires prayers of the righteous?What does Hashem Echad mean?Rambam on the relationship between oneness and incorporealityWhat are some of the more 'controversial' statements that are found in Moreh Nevuchim (Rambam)?What does the Rambam mean by “velo yishtomem”?The Tanya says that a tzaddik is one that got rid of his "animal soul? This seemingly contradicts the Rambam












3















Rambam states in Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah, Chapter 3, Section 9 that each of the planets have a soul, knowledge, and intellect.




כל הכוכבים והגלגלים כולן בעלי נפש ודעה והשכל הם והם חיים ועומדים ומכירין את מי שאמר והיה העולם



All of the stars and spheres possess a soul, knowledge, and intellect. They are alive and stand in recognition of the One who spoke and [thus brought] the world into being.




What are we to understand from this? It's a rather strange concept indeed when you get to thinking about it.










share|improve this question























  • I'm not sure what you find confusing

    – Double AA
    1 hour ago











  • @DoubleAA Sounds like the Rambam is saying planets have conscientiousness.

    – ezra
    26 mins ago
















3















Rambam states in Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah, Chapter 3, Section 9 that each of the planets have a soul, knowledge, and intellect.




כל הכוכבים והגלגלים כולן בעלי נפש ודעה והשכל הם והם חיים ועומדים ומכירין את מי שאמר והיה העולם



All of the stars and spheres possess a soul, knowledge, and intellect. They are alive and stand in recognition of the One who spoke and [thus brought] the world into being.




What are we to understand from this? It's a rather strange concept indeed when you get to thinking about it.










share|improve this question























  • I'm not sure what you find confusing

    – Double AA
    1 hour ago











  • @DoubleAA Sounds like the Rambam is saying planets have conscientiousness.

    – ezra
    26 mins ago














3












3








3








Rambam states in Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah, Chapter 3, Section 9 that each of the planets have a soul, knowledge, and intellect.




כל הכוכבים והגלגלים כולן בעלי נפש ודעה והשכל הם והם חיים ועומדים ומכירין את מי שאמר והיה העולם



All of the stars and spheres possess a soul, knowledge, and intellect. They are alive and stand in recognition of the One who spoke and [thus brought] the world into being.




What are we to understand from this? It's a rather strange concept indeed when you get to thinking about it.










share|improve this question














Rambam states in Hilchot Yesodei HaTorah, Chapter 3, Section 9 that each of the planets have a soul, knowledge, and intellect.




כל הכוכבים והגלגלים כולן בעלי נפש ודעה והשכל הם והם חיים ועומדים ומכירין את מי שאמר והיה העולם



All of the stars and spheres possess a soul, knowledge, and intellect. They are alive and stand in recognition of the One who spoke and [thus brought] the world into being.




What are we to understand from this? It's a rather strange concept indeed when you get to thinking about it.







hashkafah-philosophy rambam anthropomorphism






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









ezraezra

11.4k21356




11.4k21356













  • I'm not sure what you find confusing

    – Double AA
    1 hour ago











  • @DoubleAA Sounds like the Rambam is saying planets have conscientiousness.

    – ezra
    26 mins ago



















  • I'm not sure what you find confusing

    – Double AA
    1 hour ago











  • @DoubleAA Sounds like the Rambam is saying planets have conscientiousness.

    – ezra
    26 mins ago

















I'm not sure what you find confusing

– Double AA
1 hour ago





I'm not sure what you find confusing

– Double AA
1 hour ago













@DoubleAA Sounds like the Rambam is saying planets have conscientiousness.

– ezra
26 mins ago





@DoubleAA Sounds like the Rambam is saying planets have conscientiousness.

– ezra
26 mins ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














Rambam discusses this at length in Book II of Guide for the Perplexed. Particularly chapters 4-5 would be informative on this topic. You can read them online in the Friendlander English translation here. Chapter Four in fact opens by noting that you might find it strange at first:




THE enunciation that the heavenly sphere is endowed with a soul will appear reasonable to all who sufficiently reflect on it; but at first thought they may find it unintelligible or even objectionable; because they wrongly assume that when we ascribe a soul to the heavenly spheres we mean something like the soul of man, or that of an ass, or ox. We merely intend to say that the locomotion of the sphere undoubtedly leads us to assume some inherent principle by which it moves; and this principle is certainly a soul.




A little later he states:




The circular motion of the sphere is consequently due to the action of some idea which produces this particular kind of motion; but as ideas are only possible in intellectual beings, the heavenly sphere is an intellectual being.




And a little later:




It follows that the heavenly sphere must have a desire for the ideal which it has comprehended, and that ideal, for which it has a desire, is God, exalted be His name! When we say that God moves the spheres, we mean it in the following sense: the spheres have a desire to become similar to the ideal comprehended by them. This ideal, however, is simple in the strictest sense of the word, and not subject to any change or alteration, but constant in producing everything good, whilst the spheres are corporeal: the latter can therefore not be like this ideal in any other way, except in the production of circular motion: for this is the only action of corporeal beings that can be perpetual; it is the most simple motion of a body; there is no change in the essence of the sphere, nor in the beneficial results of its motion.




These quotes should give you a taste of the general idea, but again you may want to read the chapters at length for the full experience.






share|improve this answer































    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    Rambam discusses this at length in Book II of Guide for the Perplexed. Particularly chapters 4-5 would be informative on this topic. You can read them online in the Friendlander English translation here. Chapter Four in fact opens by noting that you might find it strange at first:




    THE enunciation that the heavenly sphere is endowed with a soul will appear reasonable to all who sufficiently reflect on it; but at first thought they may find it unintelligible or even objectionable; because they wrongly assume that when we ascribe a soul to the heavenly spheres we mean something like the soul of man, or that of an ass, or ox. We merely intend to say that the locomotion of the sphere undoubtedly leads us to assume some inherent principle by which it moves; and this principle is certainly a soul.




    A little later he states:




    The circular motion of the sphere is consequently due to the action of some idea which produces this particular kind of motion; but as ideas are only possible in intellectual beings, the heavenly sphere is an intellectual being.




    And a little later:




    It follows that the heavenly sphere must have a desire for the ideal which it has comprehended, and that ideal, for which it has a desire, is God, exalted be His name! When we say that God moves the spheres, we mean it in the following sense: the spheres have a desire to become similar to the ideal comprehended by them. This ideal, however, is simple in the strictest sense of the word, and not subject to any change or alteration, but constant in producing everything good, whilst the spheres are corporeal: the latter can therefore not be like this ideal in any other way, except in the production of circular motion: for this is the only action of corporeal beings that can be perpetual; it is the most simple motion of a body; there is no change in the essence of the sphere, nor in the beneficial results of its motion.




    These quotes should give you a taste of the general idea, but again you may want to read the chapters at length for the full experience.






    share|improve this answer




























      3














      Rambam discusses this at length in Book II of Guide for the Perplexed. Particularly chapters 4-5 would be informative on this topic. You can read them online in the Friendlander English translation here. Chapter Four in fact opens by noting that you might find it strange at first:




      THE enunciation that the heavenly sphere is endowed with a soul will appear reasonable to all who sufficiently reflect on it; but at first thought they may find it unintelligible or even objectionable; because they wrongly assume that when we ascribe a soul to the heavenly spheres we mean something like the soul of man, or that of an ass, or ox. We merely intend to say that the locomotion of the sphere undoubtedly leads us to assume some inherent principle by which it moves; and this principle is certainly a soul.




      A little later he states:




      The circular motion of the sphere is consequently due to the action of some idea which produces this particular kind of motion; but as ideas are only possible in intellectual beings, the heavenly sphere is an intellectual being.




      And a little later:




      It follows that the heavenly sphere must have a desire for the ideal which it has comprehended, and that ideal, for which it has a desire, is God, exalted be His name! When we say that God moves the spheres, we mean it in the following sense: the spheres have a desire to become similar to the ideal comprehended by them. This ideal, however, is simple in the strictest sense of the word, and not subject to any change or alteration, but constant in producing everything good, whilst the spheres are corporeal: the latter can therefore not be like this ideal in any other way, except in the production of circular motion: for this is the only action of corporeal beings that can be perpetual; it is the most simple motion of a body; there is no change in the essence of the sphere, nor in the beneficial results of its motion.




      These quotes should give you a taste of the general idea, but again you may want to read the chapters at length for the full experience.






      share|improve this answer


























        3












        3








        3







        Rambam discusses this at length in Book II of Guide for the Perplexed. Particularly chapters 4-5 would be informative on this topic. You can read them online in the Friendlander English translation here. Chapter Four in fact opens by noting that you might find it strange at first:




        THE enunciation that the heavenly sphere is endowed with a soul will appear reasonable to all who sufficiently reflect on it; but at first thought they may find it unintelligible or even objectionable; because they wrongly assume that when we ascribe a soul to the heavenly spheres we mean something like the soul of man, or that of an ass, or ox. We merely intend to say that the locomotion of the sphere undoubtedly leads us to assume some inherent principle by which it moves; and this principle is certainly a soul.




        A little later he states:




        The circular motion of the sphere is consequently due to the action of some idea which produces this particular kind of motion; but as ideas are only possible in intellectual beings, the heavenly sphere is an intellectual being.




        And a little later:




        It follows that the heavenly sphere must have a desire for the ideal which it has comprehended, and that ideal, for which it has a desire, is God, exalted be His name! When we say that God moves the spheres, we mean it in the following sense: the spheres have a desire to become similar to the ideal comprehended by them. This ideal, however, is simple in the strictest sense of the word, and not subject to any change or alteration, but constant in producing everything good, whilst the spheres are corporeal: the latter can therefore not be like this ideal in any other way, except in the production of circular motion: for this is the only action of corporeal beings that can be perpetual; it is the most simple motion of a body; there is no change in the essence of the sphere, nor in the beneficial results of its motion.




        These quotes should give you a taste of the general idea, but again you may want to read the chapters at length for the full experience.






        share|improve this answer













        Rambam discusses this at length in Book II of Guide for the Perplexed. Particularly chapters 4-5 would be informative on this topic. You can read them online in the Friendlander English translation here. Chapter Four in fact opens by noting that you might find it strange at first:




        THE enunciation that the heavenly sphere is endowed with a soul will appear reasonable to all who sufficiently reflect on it; but at first thought they may find it unintelligible or even objectionable; because they wrongly assume that when we ascribe a soul to the heavenly spheres we mean something like the soul of man, or that of an ass, or ox. We merely intend to say that the locomotion of the sphere undoubtedly leads us to assume some inherent principle by which it moves; and this principle is certainly a soul.




        A little later he states:




        The circular motion of the sphere is consequently due to the action of some idea which produces this particular kind of motion; but as ideas are only possible in intellectual beings, the heavenly sphere is an intellectual being.




        And a little later:




        It follows that the heavenly sphere must have a desire for the ideal which it has comprehended, and that ideal, for which it has a desire, is God, exalted be His name! When we say that God moves the spheres, we mean it in the following sense: the spheres have a desire to become similar to the ideal comprehended by them. This ideal, however, is simple in the strictest sense of the word, and not subject to any change or alteration, but constant in producing everything good, whilst the spheres are corporeal: the latter can therefore not be like this ideal in any other way, except in the production of circular motion: for this is the only action of corporeal beings that can be perpetual; it is the most simple motion of a body; there is no change in the essence of the sphere, nor in the beneficial results of its motion.




        These quotes should give you a taste of the general idea, but again you may want to read the chapters at length for the full experience.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 1 hour ago









        AlexAlex

        22.7k155130




        22.7k155130















            Popular posts from this blog

            Can't compile dgruyter and caption packagesLaTeX templates/packages for writing a patent specificationLatex...

            Schneeberg (Smreczany) Bibliografia | Menu...

            Hans Bellmer Spis treści Życiorys | Upamiętnienie | Przypisy | Bibliografia | Linki zewnętrzne |...