Mrthfx

Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive

Derivation tree not rendering

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?

Do warforged have souls?

What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?

Can the DM override racial traits?

Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?

I could not break this equation. Please help me

How do I add random spotting to the same face in cycles?

Install many applications using one command

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

Finding the path in a graph from A to B then back to A with a minimum of shared edges

How does ice melt when immersed in water

system call string length limit

University's motivation for having tenure-track positions

What's the point in a preamp?

Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?

Hopping to infinity along a string of digits

How does this infinite series simplify to an integral?

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

"... to apply for a visa" or "... and applied for a visa"?

ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?

Take groceries in checked luggage

When did F become S in typeography, and why?

4

I'm sure you've all noticed documents in English from the 1700's often have 'F' where, if written now, there would be an 'S'. You can see what I'm talking about a few times in this example, like at the beginning where it says "Prayers faid" or in the date "Tuefday November 26. 1700."

What's going on with this? When did it start? When did it stop?

18th-century language

share|improve this question

edited 26 mins ago

Ian Kemp

1033

asked yesterday

Ryan_LRyan_L

26826

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  it's not f, it's half of German double-s: ß
  
  – Agent_L
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

4

I'm sure you've all noticed documents in English from the 1700's often have 'F' where, if written now, there would be an 'S'. You can see what I'm talking about a few times in this example, like at the beginning where it says "Prayers faid" or in the date "Tuefday November 26. 1700."

What's going on with this? When did it start? When did it stop?

18th-century language

share|improve this question

edited 26 mins ago

Ian Kemp

1033

asked yesterday

Ryan_LRyan_L

26826

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  it's not f, it's half of German double-s: ß
  
  – Agent_L
  5 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I'm sure you've all noticed documents in English from the 1700's often have 'F' where, if written now, there would be an 'S'. You can see what I'm talking about a few times in this example, like at the beginning where it says "Prayers faid" or in the date "Tuefday November 26. 1700."

What's going on with this? When did it start? When did it stop?

18th-century language

share|improve this question

edited 26 mins ago

Ian Kemp

1033

asked yesterday

Ryan_LRyan_L

26826

share|improve this question

edited 26 mins ago

Ian Kemp

1033

asked yesterday

Ryan_LRyan_L

26826

share|improve this question

edited 26 mins ago

Ian Kemp

1033

asked yesterday

Ryan_LRyan_L

26826

edited 26 mins ago

Ian Kemp

1033

edited 26 mins ago

Ian Kemp

1033

asked yesterday

Ryan_LRyan_L

26826

asked yesterday

Ryan_LRyan_L

26826

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

23

There's a typographical distinction between an actual f and the ſ you're referring to in the text. See for instance the difference between 'magiſtrats' and 'behalf' in the second paragraph.

The 'ſ' is a long 's'; the wiki article has a very long section on its history and decline of use.

In general, the long s fell out of use in Roman and italic typefaces in professional printing well before the middle of the 19th century. It rarely appears in good quality London printing after 1800, though it lingers provincially until 1824, and is found in handwriting into the second half of the nineteenth century" being sometimes seen later on in archaic or traditionalist printing such as printed collections of sermons.

See this Old English Alphabet for a more complete list of changes to the alphabet. And this somewhat related Linguistics SE question, with a long answer that explains how 'ſ' was just another way of writing 's' in some circumstances, rather than a letter that corresponded to a different pronunciation.

Other interesting posts courtesy of sumelic:

• https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/37982/use-of-f-instead-of-s-in-historic-printed-english-documents


• https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/321980/how-exactly-was-the-long-s-used-and-why-did-people-stop-using-it

share|improve this answer

edited 11 hours ago

answered yesterday

Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

14.2k24555

• 
  
  
  

  
  5
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This has nothing to do with sounds, and less than nothing to do with Hungarian! It is a typographical issue only.
  
  – TonyK
  13 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I agree, the last paragraph really doesn't have anything to do with the issue at hand.
  
  – sgf
  13 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @TonyK: that's precisely why I asked the separate question in Linguistics. Fixed.
  
  – Denis de Bernardy
  12 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "324"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f52097%2fwhen-did-f-become-s-in-typeography-and-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

23

There's a typographical distinction between an actual f and the ſ you're referring to in the text. See for instance the difference between 'magiſtrats' and 'behalf' in the second paragraph.

The 'ſ' is a long 's'; the wiki article has a very long section on its history and decline of use.

In general, the long s fell out of use in Roman and italic typefaces in professional printing well before the middle of the 19th century. It rarely appears in good quality London printing after 1800, though it lingers provincially until 1824, and is found in handwriting into the second half of the nineteenth century" being sometimes seen later on in archaic or traditionalist printing such as printed collections of sermons.

See this Old English Alphabet for a more complete list of changes to the alphabet. And this somewhat related Linguistics SE question, with a long answer that explains how 'ſ' was just another way of writing 's' in some circumstances, rather than a letter that corresponded to a different pronunciation.

Other interesting posts courtesy of sumelic:

• https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/37982/use-of-f-instead-of-s-in-historic-printed-english-documents


• https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/321980/how-exactly-was-the-long-s-used-and-why-did-people-stop-using-it

share|improve this answer

edited 11 hours ago

answered yesterday

Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

14.2k24555

• 
  
  
  

  
  5
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This has nothing to do with sounds, and less than nothing to do with Hungarian! It is a typographical issue only.
  
  – TonyK
  13 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I agree, the last paragraph really doesn't have anything to do with the issue at hand.
  
  – sgf
  13 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @TonyK: that's precisely why I asked the separate question in Linguistics. Fixed.
  
  – Denis de Bernardy
  12 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

23

There's a typographical distinction between an actual f and the ſ you're referring to in the text. See for instance the difference between 'magiſtrats' and 'behalf' in the second paragraph.

The 'ſ' is a long 's'; the wiki article has a very long section on its history and decline of use.

In general, the long s fell out of use in Roman and italic typefaces in professional printing well before the middle of the 19th century. It rarely appears in good quality London printing after 1800, though it lingers provincially until 1824, and is found in handwriting into the second half of the nineteenth century" being sometimes seen later on in archaic or traditionalist printing such as printed collections of sermons.

See this Old English Alphabet for a more complete list of changes to the alphabet. And this somewhat related Linguistics SE question, with a long answer that explains how 'ſ' was just another way of writing 's' in some circumstances, rather than a letter that corresponded to a different pronunciation.

Other interesting posts courtesy of sumelic:

• https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/37982/use-of-f-instead-of-s-in-historic-printed-english-documents


• https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/321980/how-exactly-was-the-long-s-used-and-why-did-people-stop-using-it

share|improve this answer

edited 11 hours ago

answered yesterday

Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

14.2k24555

• 
  
  
  

  
  5
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This has nothing to do with sounds, and less than nothing to do with Hungarian! It is a typographical issue only.
  
  – TonyK
  13 hours ago
  
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  I agree, the last paragraph really doesn't have anything to do with the issue at hand.
  
  – sgf
  13 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @TonyK: that's precisely why I asked the separate question in Linguistics. Fixed.
  
  – Denis de Bernardy
  12 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

There's a typographical distinction between an actual f and the ſ you're referring to in the text. See for instance the difference between 'magiſtrats' and 'behalf' in the second paragraph.

The 'ſ' is a long 's'; the wiki article has a very long section on its history and decline of use.

In general, the long s fell out of use in Roman and italic typefaces in professional printing well before the middle of the 19th century. It rarely appears in good quality London printing after 1800, though it lingers provincially until 1824, and is found in handwriting into the second half of the nineteenth century" being sometimes seen later on in archaic or traditionalist printing such as printed collections of sermons.

See this Old English Alphabet for a more complete list of changes to the alphabet. And this somewhat related Linguistics SE question, with a long answer that explains how 'ſ' was just another way of writing 's' in some circumstances, rather than a letter that corresponded to a different pronunciation.

Other interesting posts courtesy of sumelic:

• https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/37982/use-of-f-instead-of-s-in-historic-printed-english-documents


• https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/321980/how-exactly-was-the-long-s-used-and-why-did-people-stop-using-it

share|improve this answer

edited 11 hours ago

answered yesterday

Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

14.2k24555

share|improve this answer

edited 11 hours ago

answered yesterday

Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

14.2k24555

answered yesterday

Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

14.2k24555

answered yesterday

Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

14.2k24555