High Q peak in frequency response means what in time domain? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer...

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

What is special about square numbers here?

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

Derivation tree not rendering

ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?

How does ice melt when immersed in water?

Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?

Match Roman Numerals

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

How to copy the contents of all files with a certain name into a new file?

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

Didn't get enough time to take a Coding Test - what to do now?

Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?

In horse breeding, what is the female equivalent of putting a horse out "to stud"?

Take groceries in checked luggage

Scientific Reports - Significant Figures

Can the prologue be the backstory of your main character?

First use of “packing” as in carrying a gun

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

Cooking pasta in a water boiler

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?



High Q peak in frequency response means what in time domain?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What circuit can use a falling edge to trigger this damped oscillating impulse waveform?Frequency response?How do PID controllers effect time domain and frequency domain responseMaximum Response time meaning?Questions about modelling a typical crystal radio and simulating in LTspiceWhat improved frequency response means?Some questions on a passive network's transfer function and time domain responseMid- and lowband frequency response of CEFrequency domain representationHigh frequency response of capacitors





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1












$begingroup$


Reading Linear Circuit Transfer Functions and one of the graphs got me curious.



I've recreated the circuit (series RLC) and plotted the frequency response for a Q of 7.



enter image description here



We have a peak of ~16.3 dB when Q is 7 @ 10Khz.



Can this value be used (16.3 dB) to accurately predict something in the time domain - such as the value of Q or how long the oscillatory decay would take, the amplitude of the oscillations etc.. ?



Added in case its relevent
enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How did you measure the decay and value vs Q on this example?"
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @SunnyskyguyEE75 I don't fully understand the question. I caculated the values for my R L and C to give me a Q = 0.5 and Q = 7 (green and blue respectively). In this case, I know ahead of time, the Q and f because its what I used to calculate R, L and C
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    because the Zreal=Zreactive for Q=1 the apparent voltage amplitude from phasor current is sqrt (1+1) = sqrt(2) so for Q>>1 it equals gain , try Q=1
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    3 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Did you get an ringing T asymptote of about 300us for 7 ?. So if T=300us = 1/(2πΔf) or Δf= then 530Hz yet Δf=fo/Q = 10k/7=1.43k
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    3 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$


Reading Linear Circuit Transfer Functions and one of the graphs got me curious.



I've recreated the circuit (series RLC) and plotted the frequency response for a Q of 7.



enter image description here



We have a peak of ~16.3 dB when Q is 7 @ 10Khz.



Can this value be used (16.3 dB) to accurately predict something in the time domain - such as the value of Q or how long the oscillatory decay would take, the amplitude of the oscillations etc.. ?



Added in case its relevent
enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How did you measure the decay and value vs Q on this example?"
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @SunnyskyguyEE75 I don't fully understand the question. I caculated the values for my R L and C to give me a Q = 0.5 and Q = 7 (green and blue respectively). In this case, I know ahead of time, the Q and f because its what I used to calculate R, L and C
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    because the Zreal=Zreactive for Q=1 the apparent voltage amplitude from phasor current is sqrt (1+1) = sqrt(2) so for Q>>1 it equals gain , try Q=1
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    3 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Did you get an ringing T asymptote of about 300us for 7 ?. So if T=300us = 1/(2πΔf) or Δf= then 530Hz yet Δf=fo/Q = 10k/7=1.43k
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    3 hours ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


Reading Linear Circuit Transfer Functions and one of the graphs got me curious.



I've recreated the circuit (series RLC) and plotted the frequency response for a Q of 7.



enter image description here



We have a peak of ~16.3 dB when Q is 7 @ 10Khz.



Can this value be used (16.3 dB) to accurately predict something in the time domain - such as the value of Q or how long the oscillatory decay would take, the amplitude of the oscillations etc.. ?



Added in case its relevent
enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Reading Linear Circuit Transfer Functions and one of the graphs got me curious.



I've recreated the circuit (series RLC) and plotted the frequency response for a Q of 7.



enter image description here



We have a peak of ~16.3 dB when Q is 7 @ 10Khz.



Can this value be used (16.3 dB) to accurately predict something in the time domain - such as the value of Q or how long the oscillatory decay would take, the amplitude of the oscillations etc.. ?



Added in case its relevent
enter image description here







passive-networks frequency-response






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 4 hours ago







efox29

















asked 5 hours ago









efox29efox29

8,06953481




8,06953481












  • $begingroup$
    How did you measure the decay and value vs Q on this example?"
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @SunnyskyguyEE75 I don't fully understand the question. I caculated the values for my R L and C to give me a Q = 0.5 and Q = 7 (green and blue respectively). In this case, I know ahead of time, the Q and f because its what I used to calculate R, L and C
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    because the Zreal=Zreactive for Q=1 the apparent voltage amplitude from phasor current is sqrt (1+1) = sqrt(2) so for Q>>1 it equals gain , try Q=1
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    3 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Did you get an ringing T asymptote of about 300us for 7 ?. So if T=300us = 1/(2πΔf) or Δf= then 530Hz yet Δf=fo/Q = 10k/7=1.43k
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    3 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    How did you measure the decay and value vs Q on this example?"
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    @SunnyskyguyEE75 I don't fully understand the question. I caculated the values for my R L and C to give me a Q = 0.5 and Q = 7 (green and blue respectively). In this case, I know ahead of time, the Q and f because its what I used to calculate R, L and C
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    because the Zreal=Zreactive for Q=1 the apparent voltage amplitude from phasor current is sqrt (1+1) = sqrt(2) so for Q>>1 it equals gain , try Q=1
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    3 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Did you get an ringing T asymptote of about 300us for 7 ?. So if T=300us = 1/(2πΔf) or Δf= then 530Hz yet Δf=fo/Q = 10k/7=1.43k
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    3 hours ago
















$begingroup$
How did you measure the decay and value vs Q on this example?"
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
4 hours ago






$begingroup$
How did you measure the decay and value vs Q on this example?"
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
4 hours ago














$begingroup$
@SunnyskyguyEE75 I don't fully understand the question. I caculated the values for my R L and C to give me a Q = 0.5 and Q = 7 (green and blue respectively). In this case, I know ahead of time, the Q and f because its what I used to calculate R, L and C
$endgroup$
– efox29
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@SunnyskyguyEE75 I don't fully understand the question. I caculated the values for my R L and C to give me a Q = 0.5 and Q = 7 (green and blue respectively). In this case, I know ahead of time, the Q and f because its what I used to calculate R, L and C
$endgroup$
– efox29
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
because the Zreal=Zreactive for Q=1 the apparent voltage amplitude from phasor current is sqrt (1+1) = sqrt(2) so for Q>>1 it equals gain , try Q=1
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
3 hours ago






$begingroup$
because the Zreal=Zreactive for Q=1 the apparent voltage amplitude from phasor current is sqrt (1+1) = sqrt(2) so for Q>>1 it equals gain , try Q=1
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
3 hours ago














$begingroup$
Did you get an ringing T asymptote of about 300us for 7 ?. So if T=300us = 1/(2πΔf) or Δf= then 530Hz yet Δf=fo/Q = 10k/7=1.43k
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
Did you get an ringing T asymptote of about 300us for 7 ?. So if T=300us = 1/(2πΔf) or Δf= then 530Hz yet Δf=fo/Q = 10k/7=1.43k
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
3 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Q is (among other definitions) the voltage gain at resonance, and a voltage gain of 7 times is $$20 * log(7) = 16.9dB$$ which seems close enough as your cursor is clearly not actually on resonance (phase would be -90 not -93). So dB of resonant gain is trivially converted to or from Q.



Q gives you risetime and whether the circuit is over/under or critically damped in the time domain, as well as how well damped the ringing in an under damped circuit is.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    It's always something simple. This has given me a items to explore deeper into.
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I though Av= √{1+Q²} so when Q=1 Av=1.414 or +3dB and for LPF the f-3dB breakpoints are not symmetrical about peak unlike a simple BPF so your Q=6.6 ( close enuf)
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago














Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f432436%2fhigh-q-peak-in-frequency-response-means-what-in-time-domain%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Q is (among other definitions) the voltage gain at resonance, and a voltage gain of 7 times is $$20 * log(7) = 16.9dB$$ which seems close enough as your cursor is clearly not actually on resonance (phase would be -90 not -93). So dB of resonant gain is trivially converted to or from Q.



Q gives you risetime and whether the circuit is over/under or critically damped in the time domain, as well as how well damped the ringing in an under damped circuit is.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    It's always something simple. This has given me a items to explore deeper into.
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I though Av= √{1+Q²} so when Q=1 Av=1.414 or +3dB and for LPF the f-3dB breakpoints are not symmetrical about peak unlike a simple BPF so your Q=6.6 ( close enuf)
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago


















3












$begingroup$

Q is (among other definitions) the voltage gain at resonance, and a voltage gain of 7 times is $$20 * log(7) = 16.9dB$$ which seems close enough as your cursor is clearly not actually on resonance (phase would be -90 not -93). So dB of resonant gain is trivially converted to or from Q.



Q gives you risetime and whether the circuit is over/under or critically damped in the time domain, as well as how well damped the ringing in an under damped circuit is.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    It's always something simple. This has given me a items to explore deeper into.
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I though Av= √{1+Q²} so when Q=1 Av=1.414 or +3dB and for LPF the f-3dB breakpoints are not symmetrical about peak unlike a simple BPF so your Q=6.6 ( close enuf)
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago
















3












3








3





$begingroup$

Q is (among other definitions) the voltage gain at resonance, and a voltage gain of 7 times is $$20 * log(7) = 16.9dB$$ which seems close enough as your cursor is clearly not actually on resonance (phase would be -90 not -93). So dB of resonant gain is trivially converted to or from Q.



Q gives you risetime and whether the circuit is over/under or critically damped in the time domain, as well as how well damped the ringing in an under damped circuit is.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Q is (among other definitions) the voltage gain at resonance, and a voltage gain of 7 times is $$20 * log(7) = 16.9dB$$ which seems close enough as your cursor is clearly not actually on resonance (phase would be -90 not -93). So dB of resonant gain is trivially converted to or from Q.



Q gives you risetime and whether the circuit is over/under or critically damped in the time domain, as well as how well damped the ringing in an under damped circuit is.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 5 hours ago









Dan MillsDan Mills

12.2k11225




12.2k11225












  • $begingroup$
    It's always something simple. This has given me a items to explore deeper into.
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I though Av= √{1+Q²} so when Q=1 Av=1.414 or +3dB and for LPF the f-3dB breakpoints are not symmetrical about peak unlike a simple BPF so your Q=6.6 ( close enuf)
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago




















  • $begingroup$
    It's always something simple. This has given me a items to explore deeper into.
    $endgroup$
    – efox29
    4 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I though Av= √{1+Q²} so when Q=1 Av=1.414 or +3dB and for LPF the f-3dB breakpoints are not symmetrical about peak unlike a simple BPF so your Q=6.6 ( close enuf)
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    4 hours ago


















$begingroup$
It's always something simple. This has given me a items to explore deeper into.
$endgroup$
– efox29
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
It's always something simple. This has given me a items to explore deeper into.
$endgroup$
– efox29
4 hours ago












$begingroup$
I though Av= √{1+Q²} so when Q=1 Av=1.414 or +3dB and for LPF the f-3dB breakpoints are not symmetrical about peak unlike a simple BPF so your Q=6.6 ( close enuf)
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
4 hours ago






$begingroup$
I though Av= √{1+Q²} so when Q=1 Av=1.414 or +3dB and for LPF the f-3dB breakpoints are not symmetrical about peak unlike a simple BPF so your Q=6.6 ( close enuf)
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
4 hours ago




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f432436%2fhigh-q-peak-in-frequency-response-means-what-in-time-domain%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Can't compile dgruyter and caption packagesLaTeX templates/packages for writing a patent specificationLatex...

Schneeberg (Smreczany) Bibliografia | Menu...

Hans Bellmer Spis treści Życiorys | Upamiętnienie | Przypisy | Bibliografia | Linki zewnętrzne |...