Mrthfx

How can I separate the number from the unit in argument?

How to implement Comparable so it is consistent with identity-equality

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

How dangerous is XSS

Calculate the Mean mean of two numbers

Ising model simulation

Do I need to write [sic] when including a quotation with a number less than 10 that isn't written out?

Is it possible to create a QR code using text?

What happens if you break a law in another country outside of that country?

The sum of any ten consecutive numbers from a fibonacci sequence is divisible by 11

Create custom note boxes

Can I cast Thunderwave and be at the center of its bottom face, but not be affected by it?

Airship steam engine room - problems and conflict

What does this strange code stamp on my passport mean?

Another proof that dividing by 0 does not exist -- is it right?

Free fall ellipse or parabola?

Shortening a title without changing its meaning

pgfplots: How to draw a tangent graph below two others?

Is the offspring between a demon and a celestial possible? If so what is it called and is it in a book somewhere?

Why do we say “un seul M” and not “une seule M” even though M is a “consonne”?

MT "will strike" & LXX "will watch carefully" (Gen 3:15)?

Why did early computer designers eschew integers?

My boss doesn't want me to have a side project

A hang glider, sudden unexpected lift to 25,000 feet altitude, what could do this?

Why doesn't Shulchan Aruch include the laws of destroying fruit trees?

3

Despite clear halachos that apply nowadays and codification in Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Rif, Rosh and Semag, and discussion by a host of other commentaries, as far as I (and the Taz, YD 116:6) can tell, the Tur and Shulchan Aruch do not discuss the laws of destroying trees/Bal Tashchis anywhere. Why is this? (Sources, please!)

halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

רבות מחשבות

asked 4 hours ago

רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות

14.6k129122

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  It's not the only thing missing
  
  – Double AA♦
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...
  
  – רבות מחשבות
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

3

Despite clear halachos that apply nowadays and codification in Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Rif, Rosh and Semag, and discussion by a host of other commentaries, as far as I (and the Taz, YD 116:6) can tell, the Tur and Shulchan Aruch do not discuss the laws of destroying trees/Bal Tashchis anywhere. Why is this? (Sources, please!)

halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

רבות מחשבות

asked 4 hours ago

רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות

14.6k129122

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  It's not the only thing missing
  
  – Double AA♦
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  2
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @DoubleAA certainly true, but I would ask questions on other cases that were discussed in earlier codes as well...
  
  – רבות מחשבות
  4 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Despite clear halachos that apply nowadays and codification in Rambam's Mishneh Torah, Rif, Rosh and Semag, and discussion by a host of other commentaries, as far as I (and the Taz, YD 116:6) can tell, the Tur and Shulchan Aruch do not discuss the laws of destroying trees/Bal Tashchis anywhere. Why is this? (Sources, please!)

halacha shulchan-aruch trees tur

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

רבות מחשבות

asked 4 hours ago

רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות

14.6k129122

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

רבות מחשבות

asked 4 hours ago

רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות

14.6k129122

share|improve this question

edited 4 hours ago

רבות מחשבות

asked 4 hours ago

רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות

14.6k129122

asked 4 hours ago

רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות

14.6k129122

asked 4 hours ago

רבות מחשבותרבות מחשבות

14.6k129122

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

2

R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:

Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159

גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור

There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

AlexAlex

22.9k156130

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thanks, nice find, but the answer isn't very compelling. There are a significant enough number of halachos associated with this that would lead us to expect psak.
  
  – רבות מחשבות
  19 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:

Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159

גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור

There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

AlexAlex

22.9k156130

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thanks, nice find, but the answer isn't very compelling. There are a significant enough number of halachos associated with this that would lead us to expect psak.
  
  – רבות מחשבות
  19 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:

Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159

גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור

There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

AlexAlex

22.9k156130

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  Thanks, nice find, but the answer isn't very compelling. There are a significant enough number of halachos associated with this that would lead us to expect psak.
  
  – רבות מחשבות
  19 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

R. Jacob Reischer addresses this in a responsum:

Shu"t Shevut Yaakov 1:159

גם על הטור אין תימא כל כך דאף דלאו בפירוש אתמר מכללא אתמר כיון דאיסור לקצוץ אילנות הוא לאו דוקא אלא ה"ה כל המאבד דרך השחתה עובר בלא תשחית כלשון הרמב"ם ואיסורא דבל תשחית מוזכר כמה פעמים בטור וכמבואר בי"ד הל' אבילות סי' שמ"ט וסי' ש"ן ע"ש והיתרא דמותר לקוץ במקום דמזיק לאחריני מבואר כמה פעמים בטור ח"מ סי' קנ"ה יע"ש כל זה נ"ל ברור

There is also not such a question on the Tur, because even if it is not said explicitly it is said implicitly – since the prohibition of cutting trees is not specific, rather anyone who destroys in a destructive manner violates bal tashchit, as expressed by Rambam. And the prohibition of bal tashchit is mentioned many times in the Tur, as is clarified in Y.D. Hilchot Aveilut 349 and 350 see there. And the exemption that it is permissible to cut in a place where it harms others is clarified many times in the Tur, in C.M. 155 see there. All this seems clear to me.

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

AlexAlex

22.9k156130

share|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

AlexAlex

22.9k156130

answered 3 hours ago

AlexAlex

22.9k156130

answered 3 hours ago

AlexAlex

22.9k156130