Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?Who was in charge of the...

What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?

Japan - Plan around max visa duration

Modeling an IPv4 Address

Have astronauts in space suits ever taken selfies? If so, how?

How to re-create Edward Weson's Pepper No. 30?

Prevent a directory in /tmp from being deleted

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

Smoothness of finite-dimensional functional calculus

How do I create uniquely male characters?

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?

Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

If I cast Expeditious Retreat, can I Dash as a bonus action on the same turn?

Risk of getting Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in the United States?

Do any Labour MPs support no-deal?

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

same font throughout bibliography

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

What do the dots in this tr command do: tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "JVPQBOV" (with 13 dots)

Can a Warlock become Neutral Good?

TGV timetables / schedules?

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

Theorems that impeded progress



Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?


Who was in charge of the Barysaw massacre (20 October 1941)?Did the Torch operation help doom the Germans at Stalingrad?Why were the Germans and Russians so fixated on an unlikely “separate peace” in 1945?Why did the Germans not encircle and besiege Stalingrad?Why couldn't Germans and Finns capture Leningrad?Why did Japan fail to interfere with shipping from America to Vladivostok from 1941-1945?Why was Stalin surprised by the German attack in June 1941?Why did the Germans spare Allied troops trapped at Dunkirk?Why didn't Japanese attack Soviet Union simultaneously as the Germans?Did a German plane really land in Moscow in 1941 May?













6















Photograph made by Max Alpert shows a dead boy holding a pigeon. It seems that the child has been tortured before he was killed.



A teenager tortured and murdered by the Germans in 1941



Source: Federal Archive Agency of Russia, Russian state archive of photographic and movie documents, item nr. 0-259138 (Российский государственный архив кинофотодокументов, aрхивный номер: 0-259138)



According to Russian Wikipedia the name of this boy was Victor Ivanovich Cherevichkin and the Germans killed him because he did not kill his pigeons. After they occupied Rostov-on-Don (the hometown of this boy), the issued an order that made illegal to own pet pigeons.



The boy hid his pigeons at home and was killed for that by the Germans.



Why did the Germans not allow people to own pigeons? What made the possession of pigeons so dangerous that it justified the killing of a child?



Update 1 (2019-04-07 00:09 CET): Here is the Original text from Russian Wikipedia article:




22 ноября 1941 года был издан приказ об уничтожении голубей в районах города Ростова. Вопреки предписанию немецкого командования об уничтожении принадлежащих местному населению домашних голубей, подросток в течение недели скрывал имевшихся у него птиц.



28 ноября 1941 года немцы застали Виктора Черевичкина выпускающим нескольких голубей у здания, в котором размещался штаб, и обнаружили в сарае во дворе его дома голубятню.











share|improve this question




















  • 6





    I do not know the specifics about the German orders, but homing pigeons have been extensively used in warfare to carry messages (I believe there is even a Disney movie about a homing pigeon).

    – SJuan76
    17 hours ago








  • 1





    Thanks for your comment. The Russian Wikipedia article says that there is no definite evidence that this boy actually helped the Red Army in any way.

    – Franz Drollig
    17 hours ago






  • 8





    If there is an order stating that you cannot have pigeons, then the "crime" is just having the pigeons, even if you do not use them to any military activity. And we all know that the Nazi repression at the Eastern Front was specially brutal.

    – SJuan76
    17 hours ago








  • 2





    @vsz Right. I was trying to point out that there's no reason to expect the death to be just. Your point makes that even less likely.

    – jpmc26
    6 hours ago








  • 2





    @vsz Do you have any evidence that it were the Soviets who did that?

    – Franz Drollig
    4 hours ago
















6















Photograph made by Max Alpert shows a dead boy holding a pigeon. It seems that the child has been tortured before he was killed.



A teenager tortured and murdered by the Germans in 1941



Source: Federal Archive Agency of Russia, Russian state archive of photographic and movie documents, item nr. 0-259138 (Российский государственный архив кинофотодокументов, aрхивный номер: 0-259138)



According to Russian Wikipedia the name of this boy was Victor Ivanovich Cherevichkin and the Germans killed him because he did not kill his pigeons. After they occupied Rostov-on-Don (the hometown of this boy), the issued an order that made illegal to own pet pigeons.



The boy hid his pigeons at home and was killed for that by the Germans.



Why did the Germans not allow people to own pigeons? What made the possession of pigeons so dangerous that it justified the killing of a child?



Update 1 (2019-04-07 00:09 CET): Here is the Original text from Russian Wikipedia article:




22 ноября 1941 года был издан приказ об уничтожении голубей в районах города Ростова. Вопреки предписанию немецкого командования об уничтожении принадлежащих местному населению домашних голубей, подросток в течение недели скрывал имевшихся у него птиц.



28 ноября 1941 года немцы застали Виктора Черевичкина выпускающим нескольких голубей у здания, в котором размещался штаб, и обнаружили в сарае во дворе его дома голубятню.











share|improve this question




















  • 6





    I do not know the specifics about the German orders, but homing pigeons have been extensively used in warfare to carry messages (I believe there is even a Disney movie about a homing pigeon).

    – SJuan76
    17 hours ago








  • 1





    Thanks for your comment. The Russian Wikipedia article says that there is no definite evidence that this boy actually helped the Red Army in any way.

    – Franz Drollig
    17 hours ago






  • 8





    If there is an order stating that you cannot have pigeons, then the "crime" is just having the pigeons, even if you do not use them to any military activity. And we all know that the Nazi repression at the Eastern Front was specially brutal.

    – SJuan76
    17 hours ago








  • 2





    @vsz Right. I was trying to point out that there's no reason to expect the death to be just. Your point makes that even less likely.

    – jpmc26
    6 hours ago








  • 2





    @vsz Do you have any evidence that it were the Soviets who did that?

    – Franz Drollig
    4 hours ago














6












6








6


1






Photograph made by Max Alpert shows a dead boy holding a pigeon. It seems that the child has been tortured before he was killed.



A teenager tortured and murdered by the Germans in 1941



Source: Federal Archive Agency of Russia, Russian state archive of photographic and movie documents, item nr. 0-259138 (Российский государственный архив кинофотодокументов, aрхивный номер: 0-259138)



According to Russian Wikipedia the name of this boy was Victor Ivanovich Cherevichkin and the Germans killed him because he did not kill his pigeons. After they occupied Rostov-on-Don (the hometown of this boy), the issued an order that made illegal to own pet pigeons.



The boy hid his pigeons at home and was killed for that by the Germans.



Why did the Germans not allow people to own pigeons? What made the possession of pigeons so dangerous that it justified the killing of a child?



Update 1 (2019-04-07 00:09 CET): Here is the Original text from Russian Wikipedia article:




22 ноября 1941 года был издан приказ об уничтожении голубей в районах города Ростова. Вопреки предписанию немецкого командования об уничтожении принадлежащих местному населению домашних голубей, подросток в течение недели скрывал имевшихся у него птиц.



28 ноября 1941 года немцы застали Виктора Черевичкина выпускающим нескольких голубей у здания, в котором размещался штаб, и обнаружили в сарае во дворе его дома голубятню.











share|improve this question
















Photograph made by Max Alpert shows a dead boy holding a pigeon. It seems that the child has been tortured before he was killed.



A teenager tortured and murdered by the Germans in 1941



Source: Federal Archive Agency of Russia, Russian state archive of photographic and movie documents, item nr. 0-259138 (Российский государственный архив кинофотодокументов, aрхивный номер: 0-259138)



According to Russian Wikipedia the name of this boy was Victor Ivanovich Cherevichkin and the Germans killed him because he did not kill his pigeons. After they occupied Rostov-on-Don (the hometown of this boy), the issued an order that made illegal to own pet pigeons.



The boy hid his pigeons at home and was killed for that by the Germans.



Why did the Germans not allow people to own pigeons? What made the possession of pigeons so dangerous that it justified the killing of a child?



Update 1 (2019-04-07 00:09 CET): Here is the Original text from Russian Wikipedia article:




22 ноября 1941 года был издан приказ об уничтожении голубей в районах города Ростова. Вопреки предписанию немецкого командования об уничтожении принадлежащих местному населению домашних голубей, подросток в течение недели скрывал имевшихся у него птиц.



28 ноября 1941 года немцы застали Виктора Черевичкина выпускающим нескольких голубей у здания, в котором размещался штаб, и обнаружили в сарае во дворе его дома голубятню.








world-war-two soviet-union russia






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 16 hours ago









sempaiscuba

53.4k6183233




53.4k6183233










asked 17 hours ago









Franz DrolligFranz Drollig

1,4651834




1,4651834








  • 6





    I do not know the specifics about the German orders, but homing pigeons have been extensively used in warfare to carry messages (I believe there is even a Disney movie about a homing pigeon).

    – SJuan76
    17 hours ago








  • 1





    Thanks for your comment. The Russian Wikipedia article says that there is no definite evidence that this boy actually helped the Red Army in any way.

    – Franz Drollig
    17 hours ago






  • 8





    If there is an order stating that you cannot have pigeons, then the "crime" is just having the pigeons, even if you do not use them to any military activity. And we all know that the Nazi repression at the Eastern Front was specially brutal.

    – SJuan76
    17 hours ago








  • 2





    @vsz Right. I was trying to point out that there's no reason to expect the death to be just. Your point makes that even less likely.

    – jpmc26
    6 hours ago








  • 2





    @vsz Do you have any evidence that it were the Soviets who did that?

    – Franz Drollig
    4 hours ago














  • 6





    I do not know the specifics about the German orders, but homing pigeons have been extensively used in warfare to carry messages (I believe there is even a Disney movie about a homing pigeon).

    – SJuan76
    17 hours ago








  • 1





    Thanks for your comment. The Russian Wikipedia article says that there is no definite evidence that this boy actually helped the Red Army in any way.

    – Franz Drollig
    17 hours ago






  • 8





    If there is an order stating that you cannot have pigeons, then the "crime" is just having the pigeons, even if you do not use them to any military activity. And we all know that the Nazi repression at the Eastern Front was specially brutal.

    – SJuan76
    17 hours ago








  • 2





    @vsz Right. I was trying to point out that there's no reason to expect the death to be just. Your point makes that even less likely.

    – jpmc26
    6 hours ago








  • 2





    @vsz Do you have any evidence that it were the Soviets who did that?

    – Franz Drollig
    4 hours ago








6




6





I do not know the specifics about the German orders, but homing pigeons have been extensively used in warfare to carry messages (I believe there is even a Disney movie about a homing pigeon).

– SJuan76
17 hours ago







I do not know the specifics about the German orders, but homing pigeons have been extensively used in warfare to carry messages (I believe there is even a Disney movie about a homing pigeon).

– SJuan76
17 hours ago






1




1





Thanks for your comment. The Russian Wikipedia article says that there is no definite evidence that this boy actually helped the Red Army in any way.

– Franz Drollig
17 hours ago





Thanks for your comment. The Russian Wikipedia article says that there is no definite evidence that this boy actually helped the Red Army in any way.

– Franz Drollig
17 hours ago




8




8





If there is an order stating that you cannot have pigeons, then the "crime" is just having the pigeons, even if you do not use them to any military activity. And we all know that the Nazi repression at the Eastern Front was specially brutal.

– SJuan76
17 hours ago







If there is an order stating that you cannot have pigeons, then the "crime" is just having the pigeons, even if you do not use them to any military activity. And we all know that the Nazi repression at the Eastern Front was specially brutal.

– SJuan76
17 hours ago






2




2





@vsz Right. I was trying to point out that there's no reason to expect the death to be just. Your point makes that even less likely.

– jpmc26
6 hours ago







@vsz Right. I was trying to point out that there's no reason to expect the death to be just. Your point makes that even less likely.

– jpmc26
6 hours ago






2




2





@vsz Do you have any evidence that it were the Soviets who did that?

– Franz Drollig
4 hours ago





@vsz Do you have any evidence that it were the Soviets who did that?

– Franz Drollig
4 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















17














The Germans were concerned that carrier pigeons would be used to communicate with Soviet forces. Carrier pigeons were used extensively during both World Wars.





From the Rostov-on-Don tourism website:




Черевичкин Виктор Иванович (1925–1941) – ростовский пионер-герой.
Когда немцы в 1941 году взяли Ростов-на-Дону, они приказали городским владельцам голубятен уничтожить всех своих птиц. Гитлеровцы опасались, что с помощью почтовых голубей ростовчане будут передавать советским войскам разведывательную информацию.
Но Витя не подчинился приказу и тайно продолжал держать голубей, с их помощью наладив связь с партизанами. Но был «раскрыт» и арестован. Перед тем, как его увели на казнь, Витя успел выпустить всех голубей на волю.
На Нюрнбергском процессе фото убитого мальчика с голубем в руках было представлено в числе документов, обличающих фашизм.
В 1954 году был включен в официальный список пионеров-героев, выпущенного в составе Книги почета Всесоюзной пионерской организации им. В.И. Ленина.




(English translation from the site)




Cherevichkin Viktor Ivanovich (1925-1941) - Rostov pioneer-hero. When the Germans in 1941, took Rostov-on-Don, they ordered the town pigeon owners to destroy all their birds. The Germans feared that using carrier pigeons Rostov will send intelligence information to the Soviet troops. But Victor did not obey the order and secretly continued to keep pigeons, with their help he established the connection with the guerrillas. But he was "discovered" and arrested. Before he was led away to death, Victor managed to release all the pigeons loose. At the Nuremberg trial a photo of a murdered boy with a dove in his hands was represented among all the documents denouncing fascism. In 1954 he was included in the official list of the pioneer heroes, released as part of the Book of Honor All-Union Pioneer Organization of V.I. Lenin.





  • (my emhpasis)




The Vladimir Lenin All-Union Pioneer Organisation was a Soviet youth organisation not dissimilar to the Scouts. As the Wikipedia article observes:




During the Second World War the Pioneers worked hard to contribute to the war effort at all costs. Thousands of them died in battles as military personnel and in the resistance against Nazi Germany in its occupied territories as partisans and Pioneers under secrecy in enemy-occupied towns and cities, even in concentration camps.




So it is entirely possible that the boy in the picture was a member of the Pioneers, and that he had been actively using his pigeons to communicate with Soviet forces. (It is equally possible that he had been shot for simply having pigeons and thus being suspected of communicating with Soviet forces.)





It is worth noting that the case of Vitya Cherevichny was mentioned in the records of the Trial of the major war criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume 7, p455. The record states simply that:




"In Rostov-on-Don a pupil of the commercial school, 15-year old Vitya Cherevichny, was playing in the yard with his pigeons. Some passing German soldiers began to steal the birds. The boy protested. The Germans took him away and shot him, at the corner of 27th Line and 2d Maisky Street for refusing to surrender his pigeons. With the heels of their boots the Hitlerites trampled his face out of all recognition."




Note that this makes no mention of Vitya being a member of the Pioneers or of any suspicion that he was in communication with Soviet forces.





I haven't (yet) found an English translation of the "official list of the pioneer heroes", released as part of the Book of Honor of the Vladimir Lenin All-Union Pioneer Organisation, but I suspect that you'll find more detail there.






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    So according to this he actively was using them for communication rather than keeping as pets?

    – Orangesandlemons
    17 hours ago






  • 2





    @Orangesandlemons That is the claim on that website. However, I haven't (yet) been able to find an English translation of their source

    – sempaiscuba
    16 hours ago






  • 1





    @Orangesandlemons Although, also note the information that I have added from the records of the Nuremberg trials.

    – sempaiscuba
    1 hour ago






  • 1





    Yes, the new info is a big difference. Oh, and +1 for the thoroughly researched answer

    – Orangesandlemons
    1 hour ago





















9














The pigeons could have been homing pigeons, used to carry information from spies in Rostov-on-Don back to Soviet-controlled territory. There's no way for ordinary police or soldiers to tell if pigeons are homers: there's nothing obvious about them. Banning pigeon-keeping in occupied territory was fairly normal for the time; murdering children for disobeying the occupier's decrees was sadly normal for Nazi-occupied territory.



There's a lot of information about homing pigeons in wartime in the book Secret Pigeon Service: Operation Columba, Resistance and the Struggle to Liberate Europe by Gordon Corera, published by Collins in 2018.






share|improve this answer


























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "324"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f51983%2fwhy-did-the-germans-forbid-the-possession-of-pet-pigeons-in-rostov-on-don-in-194%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    17














    The Germans were concerned that carrier pigeons would be used to communicate with Soviet forces. Carrier pigeons were used extensively during both World Wars.





    From the Rostov-on-Don tourism website:




    Черевичкин Виктор Иванович (1925–1941) – ростовский пионер-герой.
    Когда немцы в 1941 году взяли Ростов-на-Дону, они приказали городским владельцам голубятен уничтожить всех своих птиц. Гитлеровцы опасались, что с помощью почтовых голубей ростовчане будут передавать советским войскам разведывательную информацию.
    Но Витя не подчинился приказу и тайно продолжал держать голубей, с их помощью наладив связь с партизанами. Но был «раскрыт» и арестован. Перед тем, как его увели на казнь, Витя успел выпустить всех голубей на волю.
    На Нюрнбергском процессе фото убитого мальчика с голубем в руках было представлено в числе документов, обличающих фашизм.
    В 1954 году был включен в официальный список пионеров-героев, выпущенного в составе Книги почета Всесоюзной пионерской организации им. В.И. Ленина.




    (English translation from the site)




    Cherevichkin Viktor Ivanovich (1925-1941) - Rostov pioneer-hero. When the Germans in 1941, took Rostov-on-Don, they ordered the town pigeon owners to destroy all their birds. The Germans feared that using carrier pigeons Rostov will send intelligence information to the Soviet troops. But Victor did not obey the order and secretly continued to keep pigeons, with their help he established the connection with the guerrillas. But he was "discovered" and arrested. Before he was led away to death, Victor managed to release all the pigeons loose. At the Nuremberg trial a photo of a murdered boy with a dove in his hands was represented among all the documents denouncing fascism. In 1954 he was included in the official list of the pioneer heroes, released as part of the Book of Honor All-Union Pioneer Organization of V.I. Lenin.





    • (my emhpasis)




    The Vladimir Lenin All-Union Pioneer Organisation was a Soviet youth organisation not dissimilar to the Scouts. As the Wikipedia article observes:




    During the Second World War the Pioneers worked hard to contribute to the war effort at all costs. Thousands of them died in battles as military personnel and in the resistance against Nazi Germany in its occupied territories as partisans and Pioneers under secrecy in enemy-occupied towns and cities, even in concentration camps.




    So it is entirely possible that the boy in the picture was a member of the Pioneers, and that he had been actively using his pigeons to communicate with Soviet forces. (It is equally possible that he had been shot for simply having pigeons and thus being suspected of communicating with Soviet forces.)





    It is worth noting that the case of Vitya Cherevichny was mentioned in the records of the Trial of the major war criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume 7, p455. The record states simply that:




    "In Rostov-on-Don a pupil of the commercial school, 15-year old Vitya Cherevichny, was playing in the yard with his pigeons. Some passing German soldiers began to steal the birds. The boy protested. The Germans took him away and shot him, at the corner of 27th Line and 2d Maisky Street for refusing to surrender his pigeons. With the heels of their boots the Hitlerites trampled his face out of all recognition."




    Note that this makes no mention of Vitya being a member of the Pioneers or of any suspicion that he was in communication with Soviet forces.





    I haven't (yet) found an English translation of the "official list of the pioneer heroes", released as part of the Book of Honor of the Vladimir Lenin All-Union Pioneer Organisation, but I suspect that you'll find more detail there.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      So according to this he actively was using them for communication rather than keeping as pets?

      – Orangesandlemons
      17 hours ago






    • 2





      @Orangesandlemons That is the claim on that website. However, I haven't (yet) been able to find an English translation of their source

      – sempaiscuba
      16 hours ago






    • 1





      @Orangesandlemons Although, also note the information that I have added from the records of the Nuremberg trials.

      – sempaiscuba
      1 hour ago






    • 1





      Yes, the new info is a big difference. Oh, and +1 for the thoroughly researched answer

      – Orangesandlemons
      1 hour ago


















    17














    The Germans were concerned that carrier pigeons would be used to communicate with Soviet forces. Carrier pigeons were used extensively during both World Wars.





    From the Rostov-on-Don tourism website:




    Черевичкин Виктор Иванович (1925–1941) – ростовский пионер-герой.
    Когда немцы в 1941 году взяли Ростов-на-Дону, они приказали городским владельцам голубятен уничтожить всех своих птиц. Гитлеровцы опасались, что с помощью почтовых голубей ростовчане будут передавать советским войскам разведывательную информацию.
    Но Витя не подчинился приказу и тайно продолжал держать голубей, с их помощью наладив связь с партизанами. Но был «раскрыт» и арестован. Перед тем, как его увели на казнь, Витя успел выпустить всех голубей на волю.
    На Нюрнбергском процессе фото убитого мальчика с голубем в руках было представлено в числе документов, обличающих фашизм.
    В 1954 году был включен в официальный список пионеров-героев, выпущенного в составе Книги почета Всесоюзной пионерской организации им. В.И. Ленина.




    (English translation from the site)




    Cherevichkin Viktor Ivanovich (1925-1941) - Rostov pioneer-hero. When the Germans in 1941, took Rostov-on-Don, they ordered the town pigeon owners to destroy all their birds. The Germans feared that using carrier pigeons Rostov will send intelligence information to the Soviet troops. But Victor did not obey the order and secretly continued to keep pigeons, with their help he established the connection with the guerrillas. But he was "discovered" and arrested. Before he was led away to death, Victor managed to release all the pigeons loose. At the Nuremberg trial a photo of a murdered boy with a dove in his hands was represented among all the documents denouncing fascism. In 1954 he was included in the official list of the pioneer heroes, released as part of the Book of Honor All-Union Pioneer Organization of V.I. Lenin.





    • (my emhpasis)




    The Vladimir Lenin All-Union Pioneer Organisation was a Soviet youth organisation not dissimilar to the Scouts. As the Wikipedia article observes:




    During the Second World War the Pioneers worked hard to contribute to the war effort at all costs. Thousands of them died in battles as military personnel and in the resistance against Nazi Germany in its occupied territories as partisans and Pioneers under secrecy in enemy-occupied towns and cities, even in concentration camps.




    So it is entirely possible that the boy in the picture was a member of the Pioneers, and that he had been actively using his pigeons to communicate with Soviet forces. (It is equally possible that he had been shot for simply having pigeons and thus being suspected of communicating with Soviet forces.)





    It is worth noting that the case of Vitya Cherevichny was mentioned in the records of the Trial of the major war criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume 7, p455. The record states simply that:




    "In Rostov-on-Don a pupil of the commercial school, 15-year old Vitya Cherevichny, was playing in the yard with his pigeons. Some passing German soldiers began to steal the birds. The boy protested. The Germans took him away and shot him, at the corner of 27th Line and 2d Maisky Street for refusing to surrender his pigeons. With the heels of their boots the Hitlerites trampled his face out of all recognition."




    Note that this makes no mention of Vitya being a member of the Pioneers or of any suspicion that he was in communication with Soviet forces.





    I haven't (yet) found an English translation of the "official list of the pioneer heroes", released as part of the Book of Honor of the Vladimir Lenin All-Union Pioneer Organisation, but I suspect that you'll find more detail there.






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      So according to this he actively was using them for communication rather than keeping as pets?

      – Orangesandlemons
      17 hours ago






    • 2





      @Orangesandlemons That is the claim on that website. However, I haven't (yet) been able to find an English translation of their source

      – sempaiscuba
      16 hours ago






    • 1





      @Orangesandlemons Although, also note the information that I have added from the records of the Nuremberg trials.

      – sempaiscuba
      1 hour ago






    • 1





      Yes, the new info is a big difference. Oh, and +1 for the thoroughly researched answer

      – Orangesandlemons
      1 hour ago
















    17












    17








    17







    The Germans were concerned that carrier pigeons would be used to communicate with Soviet forces. Carrier pigeons were used extensively during both World Wars.





    From the Rostov-on-Don tourism website:




    Черевичкин Виктор Иванович (1925–1941) – ростовский пионер-герой.
    Когда немцы в 1941 году взяли Ростов-на-Дону, они приказали городским владельцам голубятен уничтожить всех своих птиц. Гитлеровцы опасались, что с помощью почтовых голубей ростовчане будут передавать советским войскам разведывательную информацию.
    Но Витя не подчинился приказу и тайно продолжал держать голубей, с их помощью наладив связь с партизанами. Но был «раскрыт» и арестован. Перед тем, как его увели на казнь, Витя успел выпустить всех голубей на волю.
    На Нюрнбергском процессе фото убитого мальчика с голубем в руках было представлено в числе документов, обличающих фашизм.
    В 1954 году был включен в официальный список пионеров-героев, выпущенного в составе Книги почета Всесоюзной пионерской организации им. В.И. Ленина.




    (English translation from the site)




    Cherevichkin Viktor Ivanovich (1925-1941) - Rostov pioneer-hero. When the Germans in 1941, took Rostov-on-Don, they ordered the town pigeon owners to destroy all their birds. The Germans feared that using carrier pigeons Rostov will send intelligence information to the Soviet troops. But Victor did not obey the order and secretly continued to keep pigeons, with their help he established the connection with the guerrillas. But he was "discovered" and arrested. Before he was led away to death, Victor managed to release all the pigeons loose. At the Nuremberg trial a photo of a murdered boy with a dove in his hands was represented among all the documents denouncing fascism. In 1954 he was included in the official list of the pioneer heroes, released as part of the Book of Honor All-Union Pioneer Organization of V.I. Lenin.





    • (my emhpasis)




    The Vladimir Lenin All-Union Pioneer Organisation was a Soviet youth organisation not dissimilar to the Scouts. As the Wikipedia article observes:




    During the Second World War the Pioneers worked hard to contribute to the war effort at all costs. Thousands of them died in battles as military personnel and in the resistance against Nazi Germany in its occupied territories as partisans and Pioneers under secrecy in enemy-occupied towns and cities, even in concentration camps.




    So it is entirely possible that the boy in the picture was a member of the Pioneers, and that he had been actively using his pigeons to communicate with Soviet forces. (It is equally possible that he had been shot for simply having pigeons and thus being suspected of communicating with Soviet forces.)





    It is worth noting that the case of Vitya Cherevichny was mentioned in the records of the Trial of the major war criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume 7, p455. The record states simply that:




    "In Rostov-on-Don a pupil of the commercial school, 15-year old Vitya Cherevichny, was playing in the yard with his pigeons. Some passing German soldiers began to steal the birds. The boy protested. The Germans took him away and shot him, at the corner of 27th Line and 2d Maisky Street for refusing to surrender his pigeons. With the heels of their boots the Hitlerites trampled his face out of all recognition."




    Note that this makes no mention of Vitya being a member of the Pioneers or of any suspicion that he was in communication with Soviet forces.





    I haven't (yet) found an English translation of the "official list of the pioneer heroes", released as part of the Book of Honor of the Vladimir Lenin All-Union Pioneer Organisation, but I suspect that you'll find more detail there.






    share|improve this answer















    The Germans were concerned that carrier pigeons would be used to communicate with Soviet forces. Carrier pigeons were used extensively during both World Wars.





    From the Rostov-on-Don tourism website:




    Черевичкин Виктор Иванович (1925–1941) – ростовский пионер-герой.
    Когда немцы в 1941 году взяли Ростов-на-Дону, они приказали городским владельцам голубятен уничтожить всех своих птиц. Гитлеровцы опасались, что с помощью почтовых голубей ростовчане будут передавать советским войскам разведывательную информацию.
    Но Витя не подчинился приказу и тайно продолжал держать голубей, с их помощью наладив связь с партизанами. Но был «раскрыт» и арестован. Перед тем, как его увели на казнь, Витя успел выпустить всех голубей на волю.
    На Нюрнбергском процессе фото убитого мальчика с голубем в руках было представлено в числе документов, обличающих фашизм.
    В 1954 году был включен в официальный список пионеров-героев, выпущенного в составе Книги почета Всесоюзной пионерской организации им. В.И. Ленина.




    (English translation from the site)




    Cherevichkin Viktor Ivanovich (1925-1941) - Rostov pioneer-hero. When the Germans in 1941, took Rostov-on-Don, they ordered the town pigeon owners to destroy all their birds. The Germans feared that using carrier pigeons Rostov will send intelligence information to the Soviet troops. But Victor did not obey the order and secretly continued to keep pigeons, with their help he established the connection with the guerrillas. But he was "discovered" and arrested. Before he was led away to death, Victor managed to release all the pigeons loose. At the Nuremberg trial a photo of a murdered boy with a dove in his hands was represented among all the documents denouncing fascism. In 1954 he was included in the official list of the pioneer heroes, released as part of the Book of Honor All-Union Pioneer Organization of V.I. Lenin.





    • (my emhpasis)




    The Vladimir Lenin All-Union Pioneer Organisation was a Soviet youth organisation not dissimilar to the Scouts. As the Wikipedia article observes:




    During the Second World War the Pioneers worked hard to contribute to the war effort at all costs. Thousands of them died in battles as military personnel and in the resistance against Nazi Germany in its occupied territories as partisans and Pioneers under secrecy in enemy-occupied towns and cities, even in concentration camps.




    So it is entirely possible that the boy in the picture was a member of the Pioneers, and that he had been actively using his pigeons to communicate with Soviet forces. (It is equally possible that he had been shot for simply having pigeons and thus being suspected of communicating with Soviet forces.)





    It is worth noting that the case of Vitya Cherevichny was mentioned in the records of the Trial of the major war criminals before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 14 November 1945-1 October 1946, Volume 7, p455. The record states simply that:




    "In Rostov-on-Don a pupil of the commercial school, 15-year old Vitya Cherevichny, was playing in the yard with his pigeons. Some passing German soldiers began to steal the birds. The boy protested. The Germans took him away and shot him, at the corner of 27th Line and 2d Maisky Street for refusing to surrender his pigeons. With the heels of their boots the Hitlerites trampled his face out of all recognition."




    Note that this makes no mention of Vitya being a member of the Pioneers or of any suspicion that he was in communication with Soviet forces.





    I haven't (yet) found an English translation of the "official list of the pioneer heroes", released as part of the Book of Honor of the Vladimir Lenin All-Union Pioneer Organisation, but I suspect that you'll find more detail there.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 1 hour ago

























    answered 17 hours ago









    sempaiscubasempaiscuba

    53.4k6183233




    53.4k6183233








    • 1





      So according to this he actively was using them for communication rather than keeping as pets?

      – Orangesandlemons
      17 hours ago






    • 2





      @Orangesandlemons That is the claim on that website. However, I haven't (yet) been able to find an English translation of their source

      – sempaiscuba
      16 hours ago






    • 1





      @Orangesandlemons Although, also note the information that I have added from the records of the Nuremberg trials.

      – sempaiscuba
      1 hour ago






    • 1





      Yes, the new info is a big difference. Oh, and +1 for the thoroughly researched answer

      – Orangesandlemons
      1 hour ago
















    • 1





      So according to this he actively was using them for communication rather than keeping as pets?

      – Orangesandlemons
      17 hours ago






    • 2





      @Orangesandlemons That is the claim on that website. However, I haven't (yet) been able to find an English translation of their source

      – sempaiscuba
      16 hours ago






    • 1





      @Orangesandlemons Although, also note the information that I have added from the records of the Nuremberg trials.

      – sempaiscuba
      1 hour ago






    • 1





      Yes, the new info is a big difference. Oh, and +1 for the thoroughly researched answer

      – Orangesandlemons
      1 hour ago










    1




    1





    So according to this he actively was using them for communication rather than keeping as pets?

    – Orangesandlemons
    17 hours ago





    So according to this he actively was using them for communication rather than keeping as pets?

    – Orangesandlemons
    17 hours ago




    2




    2





    @Orangesandlemons That is the claim on that website. However, I haven't (yet) been able to find an English translation of their source

    – sempaiscuba
    16 hours ago





    @Orangesandlemons That is the claim on that website. However, I haven't (yet) been able to find an English translation of their source

    – sempaiscuba
    16 hours ago




    1




    1





    @Orangesandlemons Although, also note the information that I have added from the records of the Nuremberg trials.

    – sempaiscuba
    1 hour ago





    @Orangesandlemons Although, also note the information that I have added from the records of the Nuremberg trials.

    – sempaiscuba
    1 hour ago




    1




    1





    Yes, the new info is a big difference. Oh, and +1 for the thoroughly researched answer

    – Orangesandlemons
    1 hour ago







    Yes, the new info is a big difference. Oh, and +1 for the thoroughly researched answer

    – Orangesandlemons
    1 hour ago













    9














    The pigeons could have been homing pigeons, used to carry information from spies in Rostov-on-Don back to Soviet-controlled territory. There's no way for ordinary police or soldiers to tell if pigeons are homers: there's nothing obvious about them. Banning pigeon-keeping in occupied territory was fairly normal for the time; murdering children for disobeying the occupier's decrees was sadly normal for Nazi-occupied territory.



    There's a lot of information about homing pigeons in wartime in the book Secret Pigeon Service: Operation Columba, Resistance and the Struggle to Liberate Europe by Gordon Corera, published by Collins in 2018.






    share|improve this answer






























      9














      The pigeons could have been homing pigeons, used to carry information from spies in Rostov-on-Don back to Soviet-controlled territory. There's no way for ordinary police or soldiers to tell if pigeons are homers: there's nothing obvious about them. Banning pigeon-keeping in occupied territory was fairly normal for the time; murdering children for disobeying the occupier's decrees was sadly normal for Nazi-occupied territory.



      There's a lot of information about homing pigeons in wartime in the book Secret Pigeon Service: Operation Columba, Resistance and the Struggle to Liberate Europe by Gordon Corera, published by Collins in 2018.






      share|improve this answer




























        9












        9








        9







        The pigeons could have been homing pigeons, used to carry information from spies in Rostov-on-Don back to Soviet-controlled territory. There's no way for ordinary police or soldiers to tell if pigeons are homers: there's nothing obvious about them. Banning pigeon-keeping in occupied territory was fairly normal for the time; murdering children for disobeying the occupier's decrees was sadly normal for Nazi-occupied territory.



        There's a lot of information about homing pigeons in wartime in the book Secret Pigeon Service: Operation Columba, Resistance and the Struggle to Liberate Europe by Gordon Corera, published by Collins in 2018.






        share|improve this answer















        The pigeons could have been homing pigeons, used to carry information from spies in Rostov-on-Don back to Soviet-controlled territory. There's no way for ordinary police or soldiers to tell if pigeons are homers: there's nothing obvious about them. Banning pigeon-keeping in occupied territory was fairly normal for the time; murdering children for disobeying the occupier's decrees was sadly normal for Nazi-occupied territory.



        There's a lot of information about homing pigeons in wartime in the book Secret Pigeon Service: Operation Columba, Resistance and the Struggle to Liberate Europe by Gordon Corera, published by Collins in 2018.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 6 hours ago

























        answered 17 hours ago









        John DallmanJohn Dallman

        17.6k35784




        17.6k35784






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to History Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fhistory.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f51983%2fwhy-did-the-germans-forbid-the-possession-of-pet-pigeons-in-rostov-on-don-in-194%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            IEEEtran - How to include ORCID in TeX/PDF with PdfLatexIs there a standard way to include ORCID in TeX /...

            Cicindela nigrior Przypisy | Menu nawigacyjneCicindela varians unicolorManual for the Identification of the...

            Glossaries-extra: Adding glossaries package to “Clas­sicTh­e­sis” template by Dr. André Miede v. 4.6 ...