Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about...
How to feed LSTM with different input array sizes?
Can a German sentence have two subjects?
Do VLANs within a subnet need to have their own subnet for router on a stick?
How to add power-LED to my small amplifier?
Why are weather verbs 曇る and 晴れる treated differently in this sentence?
Japan - Plan around max visa duration
Why linear maps act like matrix multiplication?
Is the month field really deprecated?
The magic money tree problem
Basic combinations logic doubt in probability
How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?
Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?
Is the language {<p,n> | p and n are natural numbers and there's no prime number in [p,p+n]} belongs to NP class?
What do the dots in this tr command do: tr .............A-Z A-ZA-Z <<< "JVPQBOV" (with 13 dots)
How old can references or sources in a thesis be?
Theorems that impeded progress
TGV timetables / schedules?
Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?
Modeling an IPv4 Address
Why has Russell's definition of numbers using equivalence classes been finally abandonned? ( If it has actually been abandonned).
A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?
Is there really no realistic way for a skeleton monster to move around without magic?
Can a Warlock become Neutral Good?
Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)
Prove that NP is closed under karp reduction?
Space(n) not closed under Karp reductions - what about NTime(n)?Class P is closed under rotation?Prove or disprove that $NL$ is closed under polynomial many-one reductions$mathbf{NC_2}$ is closed under log-space reductionOn Karp reductionwhen can I know if a class (complexity) is closed under reduction (cook/karp)Check if class $PSPACE$ is closed under polyonomially space reductionIs NPSPACE also closed under polynomial-time reduction and under log-space reduction?Prove PSPACE is closed under complement?Prove PSPACE is closed under union?
$begingroup$
A complexity class $mathbb{C}$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:
$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbb{C}$ $implies$ $A in mathbb{C}$
How would you go about proving this if $mathbb{C} = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.
Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$
complexity-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A complexity class $mathbb{C}$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:
$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbb{C}$ $implies$ $A in mathbb{C}$
How would you go about proving this if $mathbb{C} = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.
Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$
complexity-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
20 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A complexity class $mathbb{C}$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:
$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbb{C}$ $implies$ $A in mathbb{C}$
How would you go about proving this if $mathbb{C} = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.
Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$
complexity-theory
New contributor
$endgroup$
A complexity class $mathbb{C}$ is said to be closed under a reduction if:
$A$ reduces to $B$ and $B in mathbb{C}$ $implies$ $A in mathbb{C}$
How would you go about proving this if $mathbb{C} = NP$ and the reduction to be the karp reduction? i.e.
Prove that if $A$ karp reduces to $B$ and $B in NP$ $implies$ $A in NP$
complexity-theory
complexity-theory
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 21 hours ago
Ankit BahlAnkit Bahl
663
663
New contributor
New contributor
3
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
20 hours ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
20 hours ago
3
3
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
20 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:
$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.
$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),
Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:
$A (i)$
- Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$
- Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$
This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "419"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106574%2fprove-that-np-is-closed-under-karp-reduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:
$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.
$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),
Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:
$A (i)$
- Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$
- Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$
This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:
$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.
$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),
Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:
$A (i)$
- Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$
- Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$
This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:
$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.
$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),
Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:
$A (i)$
- Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$
- Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$
This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.
New contributor
$endgroup$
I was able to figure it out. In case anyone was wondering:
$B in NP$ means that there exists a non-deterministic polynomial time algorithm for $B$. Let's call that $b(i)$, where i is the input to $B$.
$A$ karp reducing to $B implies$ that there exists a function $m$ such that $m$ can take an input $i$ to $A$ and map it to some input $m(i)$ for $B$, and if an instance of $i$ is true for $A$ then $m(i)$ is true for B (and vice versa),
Therefore, an algorithm for $A$ can be made as follows:
$A (i)$
- Take input $i$ and apply $m$ to yield $m(i)$
- Apply $b$ with input $m(i)$
This yields an output for $A$. Since both $m$ and $b$ are non-deterministic polynomial time, this algorithm is non-deterministic polynomial time. Therefore $A$ must be in NP.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 20 hours ago
Ankit BahlAnkit Bahl
663
663
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ankit Bahl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f106574%2fprove-that-np-is-closed-under-karp-reduction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Try using the definitions.
$endgroup$
– Yuval Filmus
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
@YuvalFilmus thanks for the advice, this helped me figure it out!
$endgroup$
– Ankit Bahl
20 hours ago