What will happen if Parliament votes “no” on each of the Brexit-related votes to be held on the 12th,...
Does the ditching switch allow an A320 to float indefinitely?
Can 5 Aarakocra PCs summon an Air Elemental?
Why do we have to make "peinlich" start with a capital letter and also end with -s in this sentence?
Why does magnet wire need to be insulated?
Should I always close BufferedReader?
After checking in online, how do I know whether I need to go show my passport at airport check-in?
Which RAF squadrons and aircraft types took part in the bombing of Berlin on the 25th of August 1940?
Strange "DuckDuckGo dork" takes me to random website
How to politely refuse in-office gym instructor for steroids and protein
What is the industry term for house wiring diagrams?
Can you tell from a blurry photo if focus was too close or too far?
What language shall they sing in?
Cryptic with some cross words
microtype error with lualatex: "attempt to call field warning a nil value"
Potential client has a problematic employee I can't work with
I have trouble understanding this fallacy: "If A, then B. Therefore if not-B, then not-A."
Is there any risk in sharing info about technologies and products we use with a supplier?
Count repetitions of an array
How do you catch Smeargle in Pokemon Go?
How to access internet and run apt-get through a middle server?
Removing whitespace between consecutive numbers
Plausible reason for gold-digging ant
Why didn't Tom Riddle take the presence of Fawkes and the Sorting Hat as more of a threat?
Cat is tipping over bed-side lamps during the night
What will happen if Parliament votes “no” on each of the Brexit-related votes to be held on the 12th, 13th and 14th of March?
Will the British Parliament prevent “Brexit”?What happens if Parliament rejects the Brexit deal?Is the Brexit implementation period predicated on a deal with the EU?Would European Parliament members from the UK get to vote on the final Brexit deal?What would be the subject of a second Brexit Referendum?What does Nicholas Watt mean that May has “enough tellers for her Brexit vote”?Why is there such a long delay before putting the “Meaningful Vote” to the British ParliamentCould the UK Parliament defy the delay on the meaningful vote and simply vote on it?Would a Government who lose the confidence of the House really delay an election until after the event over which that confidence was lost transpires?How did Theresa May remain PM after her Brexit deal was rejected?
It is being reported that there will be a series of votes on the 12th, 13th and 14th of March:
The prime minister said she will put her withdrawal agreement - including any changes she has agreed with the EU - to a meaningful vote by 12 March.
If that fails, MPs will be offered two separate votes:
One, on the following day, on whether MPs support a no-deal Brexit - so the UK would "only leave without a deal on 29 March if there is explicit consent in the House for that outcome"
If that fails, then MPs will get a vote by 14 March on requesting an extension to the two-year Article 50 negotiation process to delay EU withdrawal beyond 29 March
But what happens if Parliament votes against each of these? That is, what happens if Parliament votes against Theresa May's deal on the 12th, votes that it does not support a No Deal Brexit on the 13th, and then votes against extending the date of departure on the 14th? Firstly, what is the "will of Parliament" deemed to be in this case, and secondly, what are the practical consequences? The default, of course, is that the UK leaves on the 29th of March without a deal; yet Parliament will have said (in its vote on the 13th) that it does not support this eventuality.
united-kingdom brexit parliament
asked 3 hours ago
HammeriteHammerite
1411
New contributor
Hammerite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
|
show 8 more comments
It is being reported that there will be a series of votes on the 12th, 13th and 14th of March:
The prime minister said she will put her withdrawal agreement - including any changes she has agreed with the EU - to a meaningful vote by 12 March.
If that fails, MPs will be offered two separate votes:
One, on the following day, on whether MPs support a no-deal Brexit - so the UK would "only leave without a deal on 29 March if there is explicit consent in the House for that outcome"
If that fails, then MPs will get a vote by 14 March on requesting an extension to the two-year Article 50 negotiation process to delay EU withdrawal beyond 29 March
But what happens if Parliament votes against each of these? That is, what happens if Parliament votes against Theresa May's deal on the 12th, votes that it does not support a No Deal Brexit on the 13th, and then votes against extending the date of departure on the 14th? Firstly, what is the "will of Parliament" deemed to be in this case, and secondly, what are the practical consequences? The default, of course, is that the UK leaves on the 29th of March without a deal; yet Parliament will have said (in its vote on the 13th) that it does not support this eventuality.
united-kingdom brexit parliament
asked 3 hours ago
HammeriteHammerite
1411
New contributor
Hammerite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
The fact is that Parliaments 'support' for leaving with no deal is not truly relevant. If there is no extension, no revocation, and no 'deal', then membership ends on March 29th 2019, 23:00 no matter how Parliament feels on the matter.
– ouflak
3 hours ago
As of now, there's no definitive answer to this question as the government haven't said what would happen (the PM was asked but she avoided answering). In practice, there will need to be another vote (or series of votes) on other alternatives prior to April. I would expect they would include a vote for a 2nd referendum as the opposition parties will be pushing for that by then.
– Alex
3 hours ago
Sure they can keep voting all the way up until 22:59 March 29th, if they like, but if they haven't agreed to anything before then, the idea that they have to have 'explicit consent' to what happens a minute later is sheer silliness. In fact, it's silliness now. It just doesn't matter. So I think that simplifies the OP's question a bit as that can simply be disregarded.
– ouflak
2 hours ago
3
I suspect even Theresa May doesn't know the answer.
– JonathanReez
2 hours ago
1
I would think a revocation would have to be specifcially part in the March 13th amendment then.
– ouflak
1 hour ago
|
show 8 more comments
It is being reported that there will be a series of votes on the 12th, 13th and 14th of March:
The prime minister said she will put her withdrawal agreement - including any changes she has agreed with the EU - to a meaningful vote by 12 March.
If that fails, MPs will be offered two separate votes:
One, on the following day, on whether MPs support a no-deal Brexit - so the UK would "only leave without a deal on 29 March if there is explicit consent in the House for that outcome"
If that fails, then MPs will get a vote by 14 March on requesting an extension to the two-year Article 50 negotiation process to delay EU withdrawal beyond 29 March
But what happens if Parliament votes against each of these? That is, what happens if Parliament votes against Theresa May's deal on the 12th, votes that it does not support a No Deal Brexit on the 13th, and then votes against extending the date of departure on the 14th? Firstly, what is the "will of Parliament" deemed to be in this case, and secondly, what are the practical consequences? The default, of course, is that the UK leaves on the 29th of March without a deal; yet Parliament will have said (in its vote on the 13th) that it does not support this eventuality.
united-kingdom brexit parliament
asked 3 hours ago
HammeriteHammerite
1411
New contributor
Hammerite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
It is being reported that there will be a series of votes on the 12th, 13th and 14th of March:
The prime minister said she will put her withdrawal agreement - including any changes she has agreed with the EU - to a meaningful vote by 12 March.
If that fails, MPs will be offered two separate votes:
One, on the following day, on whether MPs support a no-deal Brexit - so the UK would "only leave without a deal on 29 March if there is explicit consent in the House for that outcome"
If that fails, then MPs will get a vote by 14 March on requesting an extension to the two-year Article 50 negotiation process to delay EU withdrawal beyond 29 March
But what happens if Parliament votes against each of these? That is, what happens if Parliament votes against Theresa May's deal on the 12th, votes that it does not support a No Deal Brexit on the 13th, and then votes against extending the date of departure on the 14th? Firstly, what is the "will of Parliament" deemed to be in this case, and secondly, what are the practical consequences? The default, of course, is that the UK leaves on the 29th of March without a deal; yet Parliament will have said (in its vote on the 13th) that it does not support this eventuality.
united-kingdom brexit parliament
united-kingdom brexit parliament
asked 3 hours ago
HammeriteHammerite
1411
New contributor
Hammerite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
HammeriteHammerite
1411
New contributor
Hammerite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
HammeriteHammerite
1411
New contributor
Hammerite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 3 hours ago
HammeriteHammerite
1411
asked 3 hours ago
HammeriteHammerite
1411
1411
New contributor
Hammerite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Hammerite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Hammerite is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
The fact is that Parliaments 'support' for leaving with no deal is not truly relevant. If there is no extension, no revocation, and no 'deal', then membership ends on March 29th 2019, 23:00 no matter how Parliament feels on the matter.
– ouflak
3 hours ago
As of now, there's no definitive answer to this question as the government haven't said what would happen (the PM was asked but she avoided answering). In practice, there will need to be another vote (or series of votes) on other alternatives prior to April. I would expect they would include a vote for a 2nd referendum as the opposition parties will be pushing for that by then.
– Alex
3 hours ago
Sure they can keep voting all the way up until 22:59 March 29th, if they like, but if they haven't agreed to anything before then, the idea that they have to have 'explicit consent' to what happens a minute later is sheer silliness. In fact, it's silliness now. It just doesn't matter. So I think that simplifies the OP's question a bit as that can simply be disregarded.
– ouflak
2 hours ago
3
I suspect even Theresa May doesn't know the answer.
– JonathanReez
2 hours ago
1
I would think a revocation would have to be specifcially part in the March 13th amendment then.
– ouflak
1 hour ago
|
show 8 more comments
1
The fact is that Parliaments 'support' for leaving with no deal is not truly relevant. If there is no extension, no revocation, and no 'deal', then membership ends on March 29th 2019, 23:00 no matter how Parliament feels on the matter.
– ouflak
3 hours ago
As of now, there's no definitive answer to this question as the government haven't said what would happen (the PM was asked but she avoided answering). In practice, there will need to be another vote (or series of votes) on other alternatives prior to April. I would expect they would include a vote for a 2nd referendum as the opposition parties will be pushing for that by then.
– Alex
3 hours ago
Sure they can keep voting all the way up until 22:59 March 29th, if they like, but if they haven't agreed to anything before then, the idea that they have to have 'explicit consent' to what happens a minute later is sheer silliness. In fact, it's silliness now. It just doesn't matter. So I think that simplifies the OP's question a bit as that can simply be disregarded.
– ouflak
2 hours ago
3
I suspect even Theresa May doesn't know the answer.
– JonathanReez
2 hours ago
1
I would think a revocation would have to be specifcially part in the March 13th amendment then.
– ouflak
1 hour ago
1
1
The fact is that Parliaments 'support' for leaving with no deal is not truly relevant. If there is no extension, no revocation, and no 'deal', then membership ends on March 29th 2019, 23:00 no matter how Parliament feels on the matter.
– ouflak
3 hours ago
The fact is that Parliaments 'support' for leaving with no deal is not truly relevant. If there is no extension, no revocation, and no 'deal', then membership ends on March 29th 2019, 23:00 no matter how Parliament feels on the matter.
– ouflak
3 hours ago
As of now, there's no definitive answer to this question as the government haven't said what would happen (the PM was asked but she avoided answering). In practice, there will need to be another vote (or series of votes) on other alternatives prior to April. I would expect they would include a vote for a 2nd referendum as the opposition parties will be pushing for that by then.
– Alex
3 hours ago
As of now, there's no definitive answer to this question as the government haven't said what would happen (the PM was asked but she avoided answering). In practice, there will need to be another vote (or series of votes) on other alternatives prior to April. I would expect they would include a vote for a 2nd referendum as the opposition parties will be pushing for that by then.
– Alex
3 hours ago
Sure they can keep voting all the way up until 22:59 March 29th, if they like, but if they haven't agreed to anything before then, the idea that they have to have 'explicit consent' to what happens a minute later is sheer silliness. In fact, it's silliness now. It just doesn't matter. So I think that simplifies the OP's question a bit as that can simply be disregarded.
– ouflak
2 hours ago
Sure they can keep voting all the way up until 22:59 March 29th, if they like, but if they haven't agreed to anything before then, the idea that they have to have 'explicit consent' to what happens a minute later is sheer silliness. In fact, it's silliness now. It just doesn't matter. So I think that simplifies the OP's question a bit as that can simply be disregarded.
– ouflak
2 hours ago
3
3
I suspect even Theresa May doesn't know the answer.
– JonathanReez
2 hours ago
I suspect even Theresa May doesn't know the answer.
– JonathanReez
2 hours ago
1
1
I would think a revocation would have to be specifcially part in the March 13th amendment then.
– ouflak
1 hour ago
I would think a revocation would have to be specifcially part in the March 13th amendment then.
– ouflak
1 hour ago
|
show 8 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It looks like the BBC have stepped up to answer this very question.
Full Article on the three vote offers.
Per the flow chart below, if MPs vote no at all three votes, the UK will leave the EU without a deal.
However, at the moment it is my understanding that this information is speculative in that the text of the votes and any possible amendments have not yet been released and the details may change this flow diagram.
answered 1 hour ago
JontiaJontia
3,6471928
As discussed in the comments on the Question, it may be this flow is wrong, particularly because it makes vote 2 and 3 mutually contradictory. So if vote 2 is flipped to "pass" an "No no-deal", then failing to pass the extension bill could result in revocation of Article 50.
– Jontia
1 hour ago
1
If this is what the BBC (a presumably knowledgeable source) is currently saying based on their current information, then this is a valid answer, even if the details change later.
– Bobson
1 hour ago
If this is accurate, I didn't realize the Marcth 13th vote was a simple absolute positive/negative. Ofcourse this doesn't cover the political ramifications.
– ouflak
58 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Hammerite is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39050%2fwhat-will-happen-if-parliament-votes-no-on-each-of-the-brexit-related-votes-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It looks like the BBC have stepped up to answer this very question.
Full Article on the three vote offers.
Per the flow chart below, if MPs vote no at all three votes, the UK will leave the EU without a deal.
However, at the moment it is my understanding that this information is speculative in that the text of the votes and any possible amendments have not yet been released and the details may change this flow diagram.
answered 1 hour ago
JontiaJontia
3,6471928
As discussed in the comments on the Question, it may be this flow is wrong, particularly because it makes vote 2 and 3 mutually contradictory. So if vote 2 is flipped to "pass" an "No no-deal", then failing to pass the extension bill could result in revocation of Article 50.
– Jontia
1 hour ago
1
If this is what the BBC (a presumably knowledgeable source) is currently saying based on their current information, then this is a valid answer, even if the details change later.
– Bobson
1 hour ago
If this is accurate, I didn't realize the Marcth 13th vote was a simple absolute positive/negative. Ofcourse this doesn't cover the political ramifications.
– ouflak
58 mins ago
add a comment |
It looks like the BBC have stepped up to answer this very question.
Full Article on the three vote offers.
Per the flow chart below, if MPs vote no at all three votes, the UK will leave the EU without a deal.
However, at the moment it is my understanding that this information is speculative in that the text of the votes and any possible amendments have not yet been released and the details may change this flow diagram.
answered 1 hour ago
JontiaJontia
3,6471928
As discussed in the comments on the Question, it may be this flow is wrong, particularly because it makes vote 2 and 3 mutually contradictory. So if vote 2 is flipped to "pass" an "No no-deal", then failing to pass the extension bill could result in revocation of Article 50.
– Jontia
1 hour ago
1
If this is what the BBC (a presumably knowledgeable source) is currently saying based on their current information, then this is a valid answer, even if the details change later.
– Bobson
1 hour ago
If this is accurate, I didn't realize the Marcth 13th vote was a simple absolute positive/negative. Ofcourse this doesn't cover the political ramifications.
– ouflak
58 mins ago
add a comment |
It looks like the BBC have stepped up to answer this very question.
Full Article on the three vote offers.
Per the flow chart below, if MPs vote no at all three votes, the UK will leave the EU without a deal.
However, at the moment it is my understanding that this information is speculative in that the text of the votes and any possible amendments have not yet been released and the details may change this flow diagram.
answered 1 hour ago
JontiaJontia
3,6471928
It looks like the BBC have stepped up to answer this very question.
Full Article on the three vote offers.
Per the flow chart below, if MPs vote no at all three votes, the UK will leave the EU without a deal.
However, at the moment it is my understanding that this information is speculative in that the text of the votes and any possible amendments have not yet been released and the details may change this flow diagram.
answered 1 hour ago
JontiaJontia
3,6471928
answered 1 hour ago
JontiaJontia
3,6471928
answered 1 hour ago
JontiaJontia
3,6471928
answered 1 hour ago
JontiaJontia
3,6471928
3,6471928
As discussed in the comments on the Question, it may be this flow is wrong, particularly because it makes vote 2 and 3 mutually contradictory. So if vote 2 is flipped to "pass" an "No no-deal", then failing to pass the extension bill could result in revocation of Article 50.
– Jontia
1 hour ago
1
If this is what the BBC (a presumably knowledgeable source) is currently saying based on their current information, then this is a valid answer, even if the details change later.
– Bobson
1 hour ago
If this is accurate, I didn't realize the Marcth 13th vote was a simple absolute positive/negative. Ofcourse this doesn't cover the political ramifications.
– ouflak
58 mins ago
add a comment |
As discussed in the comments on the Question, it may be this flow is wrong, particularly because it makes vote 2 and 3 mutually contradictory. So if vote 2 is flipped to "pass" an "No no-deal", then failing to pass the extension bill could result in revocation of Article 50.
– Jontia
1 hour ago
1
If this is what the BBC (a presumably knowledgeable source) is currently saying based on their current information, then this is a valid answer, even if the details change later.
– Bobson
1 hour ago
If this is accurate, I didn't realize the Marcth 13th vote was a simple absolute positive/negative. Ofcourse this doesn't cover the political ramifications.
– ouflak
58 mins ago
As discussed in the comments on the Question, it may be this flow is wrong, particularly because it makes vote 2 and 3 mutually contradictory. So if vote 2 is flipped to "pass" an "No no-deal", then failing to pass the extension bill could result in revocation of Article 50.
– Jontia
1 hour ago
As discussed in the comments on the Question, it may be this flow is wrong, particularly because it makes vote 2 and 3 mutually contradictory. So if vote 2 is flipped to "pass" an "No no-deal", then failing to pass the extension bill could result in revocation of Article 50.
– Jontia
1 hour ago
1
1
If this is what the BBC (a presumably knowledgeable source) is currently saying based on their current information, then this is a valid answer, even if the details change later.
– Bobson
1 hour ago
If this is what the BBC (a presumably knowledgeable source) is currently saying based on their current information, then this is a valid answer, even if the details change later.
– Bobson
1 hour ago
If this is accurate, I didn't realize the Marcth 13th vote was a simple absolute positive/negative. Ofcourse this doesn't cover the political ramifications.
– ouflak
58 mins ago
If this is accurate, I didn't realize the Marcth 13th vote was a simple absolute positive/negative. Ofcourse this doesn't cover the political ramifications.
– ouflak
58 mins ago
add a comment |
Hammerite is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Hammerite is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Hammerite is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Hammerite is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39050%2fwhat-will-happen-if-parliament-votes-no-on-each-of-the-brexit-related-votes-to%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
The fact is that Parliaments 'support' for leaving with no deal is not truly relevant. If there is no extension, no revocation, and no 'deal', then membership ends on March 29th 2019, 23:00 no matter how Parliament feels on the matter.
– ouflak
3 hours ago
As of now, there's no definitive answer to this question as the government haven't said what would happen (the PM was asked but she avoided answering). In practice, there will need to be another vote (or series of votes) on other alternatives prior to April. I would expect they would include a vote for a 2nd referendum as the opposition parties will be pushing for that by then.
– Alex
3 hours ago
Sure they can keep voting all the way up until 22:59 March 29th, if they like, but if they haven't agreed to anything before then, the idea that they have to have 'explicit consent' to what happens a minute later is sheer silliness. In fact, it's silliness now. It just doesn't matter. So I think that simplifies the OP's question a bit as that can simply be disregarded.
– ouflak
2 hours ago
3
I suspect even Theresa May doesn't know the answer.
– JonathanReez
2 hours ago
1
I would think a revocation would have to be specifcially part in the March 13th amendment then.
– ouflak
1 hour ago